Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Similar foliage area but contrasting foliage biomass between young beech and spruce stands / Porovnateľná plocha avšak kontrastná biomasa asimilačných orgánov medzi mladými porastmi buka a smreka Cover

Similar foliage area but contrasting foliage biomass between young beech and spruce stands / Porovnateľná plocha avšak kontrastná biomasa asimilačných orgánov medzi mladými porastmi buka a smreka

Open Access
|Mar 2015

References

  1. Albrektson, A., 1980: Relations between tree biomass fractions and conventional silvicultural measurements. Ecological Bulletins, 32:315-327.
  2. Barna, M., 2004: Adaptation of European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) to different ecological conditions: leaf area size variation.
  3. Polish Journal of Ecology, 52:35-45.
  4. Bréda, N., 2003: Ground-based measurements of leaf area index: A review of methods, instruments and current controversies.
  5. Journal of Experimental Botany, 54:2403-2417.
  6. Bussoti, F., Borghini, F., Celesti, C., Leonzio, C., Bruschi, P., 2000: Leaf morphology and macronutrients in broadleaved trees in central Italy. Trees, 14:361-368.
  7. Closa I., Irigoyen, J. J., Goicoechea, N., 2012: Microclimatic conditions determined by stem density influence leaf anatomy and leaf physiology of beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) growing within stands that naturally regenerate from clear-cutting. Trees, 24:1029-1043.
  8. Eriksson, H. M., Eklundh, L., Kuusk, A., Nilson, T., 2006: Impact of understory vegetation on forest canopy reflectance and remotely sensed LAI estimates. Remote Sensing of Environment, 103:408-418.
  9. Ford, E. D., 1982: High productivity in a polestage Sitka spruce stand and its relation to canopy structure. Forestry, 55:1-17.
  10. Freeland, R. O., 1952: Effect of age of leaves on rate of photosynthesis in some conifers. Plant Physiology, 27:685-690.
  11. Gebauer, R. R., Volařík, D., Urban, J., Borja, I., Nagy N. E., Eldhuset, T. D. et al., 2011: Effect of thinning on anatomical adaptations of Norway spruce needles. Tree Physiology, 31:1103-1113.
  12. Gebauer, R., Volařík, D., Urban, J., Borja, I., Nagy, N. E., Eldhuset, T. D. et al., 2012: Effects of different light conditions on xylem structure of Norway spruce needles. Trees, 26:1079-1089.
  13. Gilmore, D. W., Seymour, R. S., Halteman, W. A., Greenwood, M.
  14. S., 1995: Canopy dynamics and the morphological development of Abies balsamea: effect of foliage age on specific leaf area and secondary vascular development. Tree Physiology, 15:47-55.
  15. Gower, S. T., Vogt, K. A., Grier, C. C., 1992: Carbon dynamics of Rocky Mountain Douglas-fir: influence of water and nutrient availability. Ecological Monographs, 62:43-65.
  16. Härkönen, S., Pulkkinen, M., Duursma, R., Mäkelä, A., 2010: Estimating annual GPP, NPP and stem growth in Finland using summary models. Forest Ecology and Management, 259:524-533.
  17. Hager, H., Sterba, H., 1985: Specific leaf area and needle weight of Norway spruce (Picea abies) in stands of different densities.
  18. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 15:389-392.
  19. Herbert, D. A., Fownes, J. H., 1997: Effects of leaf aggregation in a broad-leaf canopy on estimates of leaf area index by the gapfraction method. Forest Ecology and Management, 97:277-282.
  20. Jack, B. S., Sheffield, M. C. P., McConville, D. J., 2002: Comparison of growth efficiency for mature longleaf and slash pine trees.
  21. General Technical Reports.
  22. Kantor, P., Šach, F., Černohous, V., 2009: Development of foliage biomass of young spruce and beech stands in the mountain water balance research area. Journal of Forest Science, 55:51-62.
  23. Konôpka, B., Pajtík, J., Moravčík, M., Lukac, M., 2010: Biomass partitioning and growth efficiency in four naturally regenerated forest tree species. Basic and Applied Ecology, 11:234-243.
  24. Konôpka, B., Pajtík, J., 2013: Foliage and fine roots in terms of growth efficiency - a comparison between European beech and Norway spruce at early growth stages. Journal of Forest Science, 11:436-446.
  25. Konôpka, B., Pajtík, J., Šebeň, V., Bošeľa, M., Máliš, F., Priwitzer, T. et al., 2013: The Research Site Vrchslatina - an experimental design and the main aims. Lesnícky časopis - Forestry Journal, 59:203-213.
  26. Kozlowski, T. T., Pallardy, G., 1997: Physiology of Woody Plants.
  27. San Diego, Academic Press, 411 p.
  28. Leuschner, Ch., Voss, S., Foetzki, A., Clases, Y., 2006: Variation in leaf area index and stand leaf mass of European beech across gradients of soil acidity and precipitation. Plant Ecology, 182:247-258.
  29. Milla, R., Reich, P.B., Niinemets, U., Castro-Díez, P., 2008: Environmental and developmental controls on specific leaf area are little modified by leaf allometry. Functional Ecology, 22:565-576.
  30. Nock, C. A., Caspersen, J. P., Thomas, S. C., 2008: Large ontogenetic declines in intra-crown leaf area index in two temperate deciduous tree species. Ecology, 89:744-753.
  31. Pajtík, J., Konôpka, B., Lukac, M., 2008: Biomass functions and expansion factors in young Norway spruce (Picea abies [L.] Karst) trees. Forest Ecology and Management, 256:1096-1103.
  32. Pajtík, J., Konôpka, B., Lukac, M., 2011: Individual biomass factors for beech, oak and pine in Slovakia: a comparative study in young naturally regenerated stands. Trees, 25:277-288.
  33. Pickup, M., Westoby, M., Basden, A., 2005: Dry mass costs of deploying leaf area in relation to leaf size. Functional Ecology, 19:88-97.
  34. Reich, P. B., Walters, M. B., Ellsworth, D. S., Vose, J. M., Volin, J.
  35. C., Gresham, Ch. et al., 1998: Relationships of leaf dark respiration to leaf nitrogen, specific leaf area and life -span: a test across biomes and functional groups. Oecologia, 114:471-482.
  36. Shipley, B., 2006: Net assimilation rate, specific leaf area and leaf mass ratio: which is most closely correlated with relative growth rate? A meta-analysis. Functional Ecology, 20:565-574.
  37. Van Dijk, A. I. J. M, Bruijnzeel, L. A., 2001: Modelling rainfall interception by vegetation of variable density using an adapted analytical model. Part 1. Model description. Journal of Hydrology, 247:230-238.
  38. Vogt, K., 1991: Carbon budget of temperate forest ecosystems. Tree Physiology, 9: 69-86.
  39. Waring, R., Schlesinger, W. H., 1985: Forest ecosystems: concepts and management. Orlando, Academic Press, 340 p.
  40. West, P. W., 2009: Tree and forest measurement. Dordrecht, Springer, 191 p.
  41. Xiao, C. W., Ceulemans, R., 2004: Allometric relationships for below- and aboveground biomass of young Scots pines. Forest Ecology and Management, 203:177-186.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/forj-2015-0002 | Journal eISSN: 2454-0358 | Journal ISSN: 2454-034X
Language: English
Page range: 205 - 213
Published on: Mar 4, 2015
Published by: National Forest Centre and Czech University of Life Sciences in Prague, Faculty of Forestry and Wood Sciences
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2015 Bohdan Konôpka, Jozef Pajtík, published by National Forest Centre and Czech University of Life Sciences in Prague, Faculty of Forestry and Wood Sciences
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.