Have a personal or library account? Click to login
An empirical study on evaluation indexes of scientific research achievements in nursing Cover

An empirical study on evaluation indexes of scientific research achievements in nursing

By: Jin-Lian Cheng and  Xi Tan  
Open Access
|Mar 2018

Figures & Tables

Comparison of the evaluation scores of the clinical nursing studies with different innovation statuses

InnovationABCTotal
Original innovation31.18±3.254.74±1.773.21±1.1339.13±4.90
Partial innovation29.57±3.854.92±1.993.20±1.1337.69±5.49
t2.263–0.4610.0011.399
P0.0250.6460.9990.164

Comparison of the evaluation scores of clinical nursing studies by authors from different types of institutes

Author’s institute typeABCTotal
Hospital29.96±3.805.04±1.923.16±1.1238.16±5.38
College or university30.74±3.353.89±1.633.47±1.1738.11±5.16
t–0.8312.439-1.1320.037
P0.4080.0160.2600.970

Comparison of the evaluation scores of clinical nursing studies by authors with and without related training

Received related trainingABCTotal
Yes30.76±3.254.94±1.973.49±1.1639.19±4.98
No29.36±4.094.78±1.882.90±1.0137.03±5.50
t2.1080.4503.0012.272
P0.0370.6530.0030.025

Comparison of the evaluation scores of applied and unapplied clinical nursing studies

Application statusABCTotal
Being applied31.07±2.995.29±1.763.44±1.1039.79±3.93
Not being applied25.33±3.342.81±1.212.10±0.3030.24±3.90
T7.8456.1565.52810.150
P0.0000.0000.0000.000

Scores of the various dimensions in the evaluation of the clinical nursing studies

DimensionNumber of entriesM±SD
A. Level of the study930.08±3.73
B. Value of the result24.86±1.92
C. Effectiveness of the result23.20±1.13
Total score1338.15±5.33

Comparison of the evaluation scores of the clinical nursing studies at different levels

Level of the studyABCTotal
National32.40 ± 1.34

Comparison of the evaluation scores for studies at the national and municipal levels, P < 0.05;

,

Comparison of the evaluation scores for studies at the national and hospital levels, P < 0.05;

5.40 ± 2.073.80 ± 1.1041.60 ± 3.13
Provincial31.43 ± 3.12

Comparison of the evaluation scores for studies at the provincial and hospital levels, P < 0.05.

5.17 ± 2.013.48 ± 1.2240.09 ± 4.66

Comparison of the evaluation scores for studies at the provincial and hospital levels, P < 0.05.

Municipal29.53 ± 4.384.76 ± 1.973.06 ± 0.9837.35 ± 6.13
Hospital or university28.59 ± 3.354.49 ± 1.712.91 ± 1.0636.00 ± 4.58
F5.3881.0412.4325.549
P0.0020.3770.0690.001

Factors affecting the application of the results of clinical nursing studies

Obstacle factorNumber of casesComposition ratio (%)
Results of the study7517.48
Funding9522.14
Market6314.69
Management8620.05
Policy6715.62
Subjective factor4310.02
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/fon-2018-0006 | Journal eISSN: 2544-8994 | Journal ISSN: 2097-5368
Language: English
Page range: 35 - 41
Submitted on: Aug 11, 2017
|
Accepted on: Oct 8, 2017
|
Published on: Mar 26, 2018
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2018 Jin-Lian Cheng, Xi Tan, published by Shanxi Medical Periodical Press
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.