Have a personal or library account? Click to login

Composite Indexes Economic and Social Performance: Do they Provide Valuable Information?

Foundations of Management
Volume 8 (2016): Issue 1 (January 2016)
By:
Open Access
|Aug 2016

References

  1. [1] Adam, F., 2014. Measuring National Innovation Performance – the Innovation Union Scoreboard Revisited. Slovenia, Ljubliana: Springer.10.1007/978-3-642-39464-5
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  2. [2] Archibugi, D., Coco, A., 2005. Measuring Technological Capabilities at the Country Level: A Survey and a Menu for Choices. Research Policy, Vol 34, pp.175-194.10.1016/j.respol.2004.12.002
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  3. [3] Archibugi, D., Filippetti A., 2009. The Technological Capabilities of Nations: the State of the Art of Synthetic Indicators. Technology Forecasting and Social Change, Vol. 76 (7), pp.917-931.10.1016/j.techfore.2009.01.002
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  4. [4] Balzat, M., Hanusch, H., 2004. Recent trends in the research on national innovation systems. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Vol. 14, pp.197-210.10.1007/s00191-004-0187-y
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  5. [5] Chapple, W., Lockett, A., Siegel, D., Wright., M., 2005. Assessing the Relative Performance of U.K. University Transfer Offices: Parametric and non-parametric evidence. Research Policy, Vol. 34, Iss. 3, pp.369-384.10.1016/j.respol.2005.01.007
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  6. [6] Fagerberg, J., 2006. Introduction: a guide to literature: In: J. Fagerberg, D.C. Mowery, R.R. Nelson, eds. The Oxford Handbook of Innovation, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp.1-26.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199286805.001.0001
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  7. [7] Freeman, C., Soete, L., 2007. The Economics of Industrial Innovation, 3rd ed., London: Routledge.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  8. [8] Freudenberg, M., 2003. Composite Indicators of Country Performance: A critical assessment. STI Working paper 2003/16, Industry Issues, OECD JT00153477.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  9. [9] GCR, The Global Competitiveness Report 2015-16. K. Schwab, ed. World Economic Forum, Geneva [online] Available at: https://www.globalinnovationindex.org/userfiles/file/reportpdf/GII-2014-v5.pdf.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  10. [10] GII, Global Innovation Index 2014. Eds.: Soumitra, D., Bruno, L., Wunsch-Vincent, S. [online] Available at: https://www.globalinnovationindex.org/userfiles/file/reportpdf/GII-2014-v5.pdf.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  11. [11] GII, The Global Innovation Index 2015. Effective Innovation Policies for Development. D. Soumitra, L. Bruno, S. Wunsch-Vincent, eds. [online] Available at: http://www.wipo.int/edocs/pubdocs/en/wipo_gii_2015.pdf,
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  12. [12] Handbook on Constructing Composite Indicators, 2008. Paris: OECD.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  13. [13] HDI, Human Development Index, 2014. Table 1. United Nations Development Programme. New York: Published for the United Nations Development Program.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  14. [14] Hollanders, H., Cruysen, V.A, 2008. Rethinking the European Innovation Scoreboard: Recommendations for further improvements. Input paper for the workshop on Improving the European Innovation Scoreboard methodology, Maastricht,
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  15. [15] IUS, Innovation Union Scoreboard, 2013, 2014, 2015. European Commission.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  16. [16] KAM, Knowledge Assessment Methodology Knowledge Economy Index 2012. The World Bank Institute. [online] Available at: www.worldbank.org/kam.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  17. [17] Katz, S., 2006. Indicators for complex innovation systems. Research Policy, Vol. 35, Issue 7, pp.893-909.10.1016/j.respol.2006.03.007
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  18. [18] McArthur, J.W, Sachs, J.D, 2003. The Growth Competitiveness Index: Measuring Technological Advancement and the Stages of Development. The Global Competitiveness Report 2001–2002. New York: Oxford University Press for the World Economic Forum.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  19. [19] Mirchandani, D., 1999. Economic and social indicators of global competitiveness: An analysis of country rankings, 8th International Eastern Academy of Management Conference, (CD Rom version), Prague.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  20. [20] Morss, E.R., 2009. The Global Economics of Gambling [online] Available at: www.morssglob-alfinance.com/the-global-economics-of-gambling.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  21. [21] Nasierowski, W. Arcelus, F., 2003. On the efficiency of National Innovation Systems. Socio Economic Planning Sciences, 37, pp.215-234.10.1016/S0038-0121(02)00046-0
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  22. [22] Nasierowski, W., Arcelus, F., 1999. Interrelationships among the elements of National Innovation Systems: A statistical evaluation, European Journal of Operations Research, No 119, pp.235-253.10.1016/S0377-2217(99)00128-9
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/fman-2016-0013 | Journal eISSN: 2300-5661 | Journal ISSN: 2080-7279
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 167 - 174
Published on: Aug 2, 2016
Published by: Warsaw University of Technology
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year
Keywords:
macroeconomic analyses,
economic activity evaluation,
classification,
economic development
Related subjects:
Computer sciences,
Business computing,
Business and economics,
Business management,
Management accounting, financial controlling, cost calculation, investment

© 2016 Wojciech Nasierowski, published by Warsaw University of Technology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 8 (2016): Issue 1 (January 2016)Next article