Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Selection and Assortment of The Variables Describing The Relationship between The Economy and The General Government Sector Size by Application of The LEM2 Algorithm Cover

Selection and Assortment of The Variables Describing The Relationship between The Economy and The General Government Sector Size by Application of The LEM2 Algorithm

Open Access
|Feb 2017

References

  1. Alesina, A., Ardagna, S. (2009). Large Changes in Fiscal Policy: Taxes Versus Spending. NBER Working Paper, No. 15438, 1-37.10.3386/w15438
  2. Alesina, A., Perrotti, R. (1995). The Political Economy of Budget Deficits. IMF Staff Papers, 24, 1-32.
  3. Alesina, A., Wacziarg, R. (1998). Openness, Country Size and Government. Journal of Public Economics, No 69, 305-321.10.1016/S0047-2727(98)00010-3
  4. Anwar, S. (2005). Specialisation-based External Economies, Supply of Primary Factors and Government Size. Journal of Economics and Business, 57(3), 259-271.10.1016/j.jeconbus.2004.11.002
  5. Baumol, W.J. (1965). Welfare Economics and the Theory of the State. London: G. Bell & Sons.
  6. Baumol, W.J., (1967). Macroeconomics of Unbalanced Growth: the Anatomy of Urban Crisis. American Economic Review, Vol. 57(3), 415-426.
  7. Berry, W.D., Lowery, D. (1984). The Growing Cost of Government: A Test of Two Explanations. Social Science Quarterly, Vol. 65, 734-749.
  8. Berry, W.D., Lowery, D. (1987). Explaining the Size of the Public Sector: Responsive and Excessive Government Interpretations. The Journal of Politics, 49(2), 400-420.10.2307/2131307
  9. Boix, C. (2001). Democracy, development, and the public sector. American Journal of Political Science, Vol. 45, No. 1, 1-17.
  10. Borcherding, T.E., Ferris, J.S., Garzoni, A. (2003). Growth in the Real Size of Government since 1970. In R.E. Wagner, J.G. Backhaus (Eds.), The Kluwer Handbook of Public Finance. Hingham: Kluwer Academic Press.
  11. Brennan, G., Buchanan, J.M. (1980). The Power to Tax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  12. Buchanan, J.M. (1980). Rent Seeking and Profit Seeking. In J.M. Buchanan, R.D. Tollison, G. Tullock (Eds.), Toward a Theory of the Rent-Seeking Society (pp. 3-15). Texas: Texas A&M University Press, College Station.
  13. Chang, T. (2002). An Econometric Test of Wager’s Law for Six Countries Based on Cointegration and Error-Correction Modelling Techniques. Applied Economics, Vol. 34, 1157-1169.10.1080/00036840110074132
  14. Chletsos, M., Kollias, C. (1997). Testing Wagner’s Law Using Disaggregated Public Expenditure Data in the Case of Greece: 1958-93. Applied Economics, Vol. 29, 371-377.10.1080/000368497327155
  15. Chobanov, D., Mladenova, A. (2009). What Is the Optimum Size of Government. Institute for Market Economics, Bulgaria, 1-47.
  16. Cios, K.J., Pedrycz, W., Świnarski, R.W. (1999). Data Mining Methods for Knowledge Discovery. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
  17. Downs, A. (1967). Inside Bureaucracy. Boston: Little Brown.10.7249/CB156
  18. Fayyad, U.M., Piatetsky-Shapiro, G., Smyth, P. (1996). From Data Mining to Knowledge Discovery in Databases. AI Magazine, Volume 17, Number 3, 1-54.
  19. Epifani, P., Gancia, G. (2009). Openness, Government Size and the Terms of Trade. Review of Economics Studies, Vol. 76(2), 629-668.10.1111/j.1467-937X.2009.00546.x
  20. Ferris, J.S., West, E.G. (1996). The Cost Disease and Government Growth: Qualifications to Baumol. Public Choice, Vol. 89, 35-52.10.1007/BF00114277
  21. Fryc, B., Pancerz, K., Suraj, Z. (2004). Approximate Petri Nets for Rule-Based Decision Making. In Proceedings of Rough Sets and Current Trends in Computing: 4th International Conference, RSCTC 2004, Uppsala, Sweden, June 1-5, 2004, pp. 733-742. Volume 3066 of Lecture Notes in Computer.10.1007/978-3-540-25929-9_93
  22. Garen, J., Trask, K. (2005). Do More Open Countries Have Bigger Governments? Another Look. Journal of Development Economics, 77, 533-551.10.1016/j.jdeveco.2004.04.002
  23. Garrett, G. (2001). Globalization and Government Spending around the World. Studies in Comparative International Development, No 35, 3-29.10.1007/BF02732706
  24. Gemmell, N. (1993). The Wagner’s Law and Musgrave’s Hypotheses. In: N. Gemmell (Ed.), The Growth of the Public Sector - Theories and International Evidences (pp. 103-120). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar,.
  25. Gramc, B. (2007). Factors of the Size of Government in Developed Countries. Prague Economic Papers, No 2, 130-142.10.18267/j.pep.302
  26. Grzymala-Busse, J.W. (1992). LERS-A System for Learning from Examples Based on Rough Sets. [In:] R. Slowinski (Ed.), Intelligent Decision Support. Handbook of Applications and Advances of the Rough Set Theory (pp. 3-18). Dordrecht, Boston, London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  27. Henrekson, M. (1993). Wagner’s Law - A Spurious Relationship? Public Finance, Vol. 48 (3), 406- 415.
  28. Holsey, C., Borcherding, T. (1997). Why does Government’s Share of National Income Grow. In: D. Muller (Ed.), Perspectives on public choice (pp. 569-590). New York: CUP.
  29. Hosley, Ch.M., Borcherding, T.E. (1997). Why does Government’s Share of National Income Grow? An Assessment of the Recent Literature on the US. Perspectives on public choice: A handbook, pp. 562-589.
  30. Islam, A. (2001). Wagner’s Law Revisited: Cointegration and Exogeneity. Test for the USA. Applied Economics Letters, Vol. 8, 509-515.10.1080/13504850010018743
  31. Islam M.Q., (2004), “The Long Run Relationship between Openness and Government Size: Evidence from Bounds Test”, Applied Economics, No 36, pp. 995-1000.10.1080/0003684042000233221
  32. Iyare, S., Lorde, T., (2004). Co-integration, Causality and Wagner’s Law: Test for Selected Caribbean Countries. Applied Economics Letters, Vol. 11, 815-825.10.1080/1350485042000254881
  33. Kau, J.B., Rubin, P.H. (2002). The Growth of Government: Sources and Limits. Public Choice, 113(3-4), 389-402.10.1023/A:1020884121375
  34. Kraan, D.J. (1996). Budgetary Decisions. A Public Choice Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511628320
  35. Kustepeli, Y. (2005). The Relationship Between Government Size and Economic Growth: Evidence From a Panel Data Analysis. DokuzEylül University-Faculty of Business-Department of Economics Discussion Paper Series, No. 05/06, November-December, pp. 1-10.
  36. McNutt, P.A. (1996). The Economics of Public Choice. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, Brookfield.
  37. Michalski, R.S. (1997). Machine Learning, Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery. Principles and Applications. In: Tutorials of Intelligent Information Systems IIS’97. Zakopane: IPI PAN Press.
  38. Mueller, D.C. (1997). Perspectives on Public Choice: A Handbook. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  39. Mueller, D.C. (2003). Public Choice III. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511813771
  40. Niskanen, W.A. (1971). Bureaucracy and Representative Government. Chicago: Aldine-Atherton, Chicago.
  41. Oxley, L. (1994). Cointegration, Causality and Wagner’s Law: a Test for Britain 1870-1913. Scottish Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 41(3), 286-298.10.1111/j.1467-9485.1994.tb01127.x
  42. Pawlak, Z. (1982). Rough Sets. Intern J Comp Inf Sci 11, 341-356.10.1007/BF01001956
  43. Payne, J.L. (1991). Elections and Government Spending. Public Choice, 70(1-2), 71-82.10.1007/BF00239345
  44. Peacock, A.T., Wiseman, J. (1961). The Growth of Public Expenditures in the United Kingdom. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  45. Persson, T., Tabellini, G., (1999). Political Economics and Public Finance. Bocconi University, IGIER Working Paper, No 149, 1-131.10.3386/w7097
  46. Pevcin, P. (2004a). Does Optimal Size of Government Spending Exist? University of Ljubljana, No 10, 101-135.
  47. Pevcin, P. (2004b). Cross-country Diff erences in Government Sector Activities. Zbornik Radova Ekonomskog fakulteta u Rijeci, časopis za ekonomsku teoriju i praksu-Proceedings of Rijeka Faculty of Economics. Journal of Economics and Business, 22(2), 41-59.
  48. Quinlan, J.R. (1993). C4.5: Programs for Machine Learning. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann.
  49. Quinn, D. (1997). The Correlates of Change in International Financial Regulation. American Political Science Review, Vol. 91(3), 531-551.10.2307/2952073
  50. Rodrik, D. (1998). Why Do More Open Economies Have Bigger Governments? Journal of Political Economy, No 106, 997-1032.10.1086/250038
  51. Rodrik, D. (2000). Institutions for high quality growth: What they are and how to acquire them. Studies in Comparative International Development, No 35(3), 3-31.10.1007/BF02699764
  52. Rowley, C.K., Tollison, R.D. (1994). Peacock and Wiseman on the Growth of Public Expenditure. Public Choice 78(2), 125-128.10.1007/BF01050389
  53. Słowiński, K., Stefanowski, J., Siwiński, D. (2002). Application of Rule Induction and Rough Sets to Verification of Magnetic Resonance Diagnosis. Fundamenta Informaticae, Volume 53, 345-363.
  54. Szczuka, M., Mikołajczyk, M., Bazan, J. (2005). RSES 2.2 User’s Guide. Retrieved from: http://logic.mimuw.edu.pl/rses.
  55. Thornton, R. (1999). Cointegration, Causality and Wagner’s Law in 19th Century Europe. Applied Economics Letters, Vol. 6, 413-416.10.1080/135048599352916
  56. Tullock, G. (1980). Efficient Rent Seeking. In: J.M. Buchanan, R.D. Tollison, G. Tullock, (Eds.), Towards a Theory of Rent Seeking Society (pp. 14-34). Texas: Texas A&M University Press, College Station.
Language: English
Page range: 69 - 84
Submitted on: Aug 20, 2015
|
Accepted on: Dec 16, 2016
|
Published on: Feb 9, 2017
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2017 Tomasz Skica, Jacek Rodzinka, Barbara Fryc, published by University of Information Technology and Management in Rzeszow
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.