Have a personal or library account? Click to login

A robust method for haploid sugar beet in vitro proliferation and hyperhydricity reduction

Open Access
|Dec 2017

References

  1. Aflaki F., Pazuki A., Gürel S., Stevanato S., Bıancardı E., G ürel E ., 2017. Doubled haploid sugar beet: an integrated view of factors influencing the processes of gynogenesis and chromosome doubling. Int. Sugar. J. 119: 884-895.
  2. Arve L.E., Carvalho D.R., Olsen J.E., Torre S., 2014. ABA induces H2O2 production in guard cells, but does not close the stomata on Vicia faba leaves developed at high air humidity. Plant Signal Behav. 9: e29192.10.4161/psb.29192420356625763494
  3. Arve L.E., Kruse O.M.O., Tanino K.K., Olsen J.E., Futsæther C., Torre S., 2015. Growth in continuous high air humidity increases the expression of CYP707A-genes and inhibits stomatal closure. Environ. Exp. Bot. 115: 11-19.10.1016/j.envexpbot.2015.02.004
  4. Bailey-Serres J., Fukao T., Gibbs D.J., Holdsworth M.J., Lee S.C., Licausi F., Perata P., Voesenek L.A., van Dongen J.T., 2012. Making sense of low oxygen sensing. Trends Plant Sci. 17: 129-138.10.1016/j.tplants.2011.12.00422280796
  5. Biancardi E., 2005. Objectives of sugar beet breeding. In: Genetics and Breeding of Sugar Beet. E. Biancard, L.G. Campbell, G.N. Skaracis and M. de Biaggi (Eds), Science Publishers, Inc., Enfield, NH, USA: 53-167.10.1201/9781482280296
  6. Bosemark N.O., 2006. Genetics and breeding. In: Sugar Beet. A.P. Draycott (Ed.), Blackwell Publishing, Harayana, India: 50-88.10.1002/9780470751114.ch4
  7. Carins Murphy M.R., Jordan G.J., Brodribb T.J., 2014. Acclimation to humidity modifies the link between leaf size and the density of veins and stomata. Plant Cell Environ. 37: 124-131.10.1111/pce.1213623682831
  8. Cohen J., 1988. “Small”, “medium” and “large” d values. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Hillsdale, NJ, USA: 24-27.
  9. Croux C., Catherine D., 2010. Influence functions of the Spearman and Kendall correlation measures. Stat. Methods Appl. 9: 497-515.10.1007/s10260-010-0142-z
  10. Debergh I.C., Harbaoui Y., Lemeur R., 1981. Mass propagation of globe artichoke (Cynara scolymus): Evaluation of different hypotheses to overcome vitrification with special reference to water potential. Physiol. Plant. 53: 181-187.10.1111/j.1399-3054.1981.tb04130.x
  11. Doležel J., Bartoš J.A.N., 2005. Plant DNA flow cytometry and estimation of nuclear genome size. Ann. Bot. 95: 99-110.10.1093/aob/mci005424671015596459
  12. Dwivedi S.L., Britt A.B., Tripathi L., Sharma S., Upadhyaya H.D., Ortiz R., 2015. Haploids: Constraints and opportunities in plant breeding. Biotechnol. Adv. 33: 812-829.10.1016/j.biotechadv.2015.07.00126165969
  13. Field A., 2013. Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics. Sage, London, UK.
  14. Gao H., Xia X., An L., Xin X., Liang Y., 2017. Reversion of hyperhydricity in pink (Dianthus chinensis L.) plantlets by AgNO3 and its associated mechanism during in vitro culture. Plant Sci. 254: 1-11.10.1016/j.plantsci.2016.10.00827964780
  15. Gürel E., Gürel S., Lemaux P.G., 2008. Biotechnology applications for sugar beet. Crit. Rev. Plant. Sci. 27: 108-140. doi: 10.1080/07352680802202000
  16. Gürel S., Baloglu M.C., Gürel E., Oktem H.A., Yucel M., 2011. A two-stage pretreatment of seedlings improves adventitious shoot regeneration in sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.). Plant Cell Tiss. Organ Cult. 106: 261. doi: 10.1007/s11240-011-9916-8
  17. Gürel S., Gürel E., 2013. In vitro regeneration of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.). In: Bulbous Plants: Biotechnology. K.G. Ramawat and J.M. Merillon (Eds), CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, USA: 113-151. doi: 10.1134/S1022795406020086
  18. Gürel S., Gürel E., Kaya Z., 2002. Protoplast fusion in sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.). Turk. J. Biol. 26: 163--170. Howell D.C., 2012. Statistical Methods for Psychology. Thomson Wadsworth, Belmont, CA, USA.
  19. Ivanova M., van Staden J., 2010. Natural ventilation effectively reduces hyperhydricity in shoot cultures of Aloe polyphylla Schӧnland ex Pillans. Plant Growth Regul. 60: 143-150.10.1007/s10725-009-9430-8
  20. Ivanova M., van Staden J., 2011. Influence of gelling agent and cytokinins on the control of hyperhydricity in Aloe polyphylla. Plant Cell Tiss. Organ Cult. 104: 13-21.10.1007/s11240-010-9794-5
  21. Ivic-Haymes S.D., Smigocki A.C., 2005. Identification of highly regenerative plants within sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) breeding lines for molecular breeding. In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. - Plant 41: 483-488.10.1079/IVP2005666
  22. Kazan K., 2015. Diverse roles of jasmonates and ethylene in abiotic stress tolerance. Trends Plant Sci. 20: 219-229.10.1016/j.tplants.2015.02.00125731753
  23. Kevers C., Gaspar T.H., 1985. Vitrification of carnation in vitro: changes in ethylene production, ACC level and capacity to convert ACC to ethylene. Plant Cell Tiss. Organ Cult. 4: 215-223.10.1007/BF00040195
  24. Kevers C., Franck R., Strasser R.J., Dommes J., Gaspar T., 2004. Hyperhydricity of micropropagated shoots: A typically stress-induced change of physiological state. Plant Cell Tiss. Organ Cult. 77: 181-191.10.1023/B:TICU.0000016825.18930.e4
  25. Kikindonov G., Kikindonov T., Enchev S., 2016. Economical qualities of crosses between doubled haploid sugar beet lines. Agric. Sci. Technol. 8: 107-110.
  26. Klimek-Chodacka M., Baranski R., 2013. Comparison of haploid and doubled haploid sugar beet clones in their ability to micropropagate and regenerate. Electron. J. Biotechnol. 16: 1-10.10.2225/vol16-issue2-fulltext-3
  27. Liu M., Jiang F., Kong X., Tian J., Wu Z., Wu Z., 2017. Effects of multiple factors on hyperhydricity of Allium sativum L. Sci. Hortic. 217: 285-296. Mezei S., Kovacev L., Nagl N., 2006. Sugar beet micropropagation. Biotechnol. Biotechnol. Equip. 20: 9-14.10.1016/j.scienta.2017.02.010
  28. Mishutkina Y.V., Gaponenko A.K., 2006. Sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) morphogenesis in vitro: Effects of phytohormone type and concentration in the culture medium, type of explants, and plant genotype on shoot regeneration frequency. Russ. J. Genet. 42: 150.10.1134/S1022795406020086
  29. Murashige T., Skoog F., 1962. A revised medium for rapid growth and bio assays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol. Plant. 15: 473-497.10.1111/j.1399-3054.1962.tb08052.x
  30. Pazuki A., Aflaki F., Gürel E., Ergül A., Gürel S., 2017a. Gynogenesis induction in sugar beet (Beta vulgaris) improved by 6-benzylaminopurine (BAP) and synergized with cold pretreatment. Sugar Tech. doi: 10.1007/s12355-017-0522-x.
  31. Pazuki A., Aflaki F., Gürel S., Ergül A., Gürel E., 2017b. Production of doubled haploids in sugar beet (Beta vulgaris): an efficient method by a multivariate experiment. Plant Cell Tiss. Organ Cult. doi: 10.1007/s11240-017-1313-5.
  32. Pospíšilová J., Synková H., Rulcová J., 2000. Cytokinins and water stress. Biol. Plant. 43: 321-328.10.1023/A:1026754404857
  33. Řezbová H., Mansoor M., Ondřej Š., Luboš S., 2016. The economic aspects of sugar beet production. Ver. Sem. Agr. XXV: 327-335.
  34. Rojas-Martínez L., Visser R.G., de Klerk G.J., 2010. The hyperhydricity syndrome: waterlogging of plant tissues as a major cause. Propag. Ornam. Plants 10: 169-175.
  35. Tian J., Cheng Y., Kong X., Liu M., Jiang F., Wu Z., 2017. Induction of reactive oxygen species and the potential role of NADPH oxidase in hyperhydricity of garlic plantlets in vitro. Protoplasma 254: 379-388.10.1007/s00709-016-0957-z26945990
  36. Tomaszewska-Sowa M., 2012. Effect of growth regulators and other components of culture medium on morphogenesis of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) in unfertilised ovule in vitro cultures. Acta Agrobot. 65: 91-100.10.5586/aa.2012.025
  37. Tomita K.I., Hiura S., Tamagake H., 2013. Evaluation of the potential for somatic embryogenesis in sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) breeding lines and improvement of regeneration efficiency. Plant Biotechnol. 30: 479-87.10.5511/plantbiotechnology.13.0816a
  38. van den Dries N., Giannì S., Czerednik A., Krens F.A., de Klerk G.J.M., 2013. Flooding of the apoplast is a key factor in the development of hyperhydricity. J. Exp. Bot. 64: 5221-5230.10.1093/jxb/ert315383049624123249
  39. Weber J., Georgiev V., Haas C., Bley T., Pavlov A., 2010. Ploidy levels in Beta vulgaris (red beet) plant organs and in vitro systems. Eng. Life Sci. 10: 139-147.10.1002/elsc.200900021
  40. Wojtania A., Węgrzynowicz-Lesiak E., Dziurka M., Waligórski P., 2015. Sucrose and cytokinin interactions in relation to ethylene and abscisic acid production in the regulation of morphogenesis in Pelargonium × hortorum LH Bailey in vitro. Acta Biol. Cracov. Bot. 57: 62-69.10.1515/abcsb-2015-0005
  41. Xu W., Hou Y., Hung Y.S., Zou Y., 2013. A comparative analysis of Spearman's rho and Kendall's tau in normal and contaminated normal models. Signal Process. 93: 261-276.10.1016/j.sigpro.2012.08.005
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/fhort-2017-0022 | Journal eISSN: 2083-5965 | Journal ISSN: 0867-1761
Language: English
Page range: 241 - 250
Submitted on: Jul 19, 2017
Accepted on: Nov 11, 2017
Published on: Dec 29, 2017
Published by: Polish Society for Horticultural Sciences (PSHS)
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2017 Arman Pazuki, Fatemeh Aflaki, Ekrem Gürel, Ali Ergül, Songül Gürel, published by Polish Society for Horticultural Sciences (PSHS)
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.