Have a personal or library account? Click to login

Postharvest properties of sweet cherry fruit depending on rootstock and storage conditions

Open Access
|Dec 2017

References

  1. Blažková J., Hlušičková I., Blažek J., 2002. Fruit weight, firmness and soluble solids content during ripening of Karešova.cv. sweet cherry. Hort. Sci. (Prague) 29(3): 92-98.10.17221/4470-HORTSCI
  2. Cavalheiro J.T., Santos A.A., Marques R.I., Pirra A., Silvestre A., 2005. Rootstock and storage regime influence ‘Summit’ cherry quality. Acta Hort. 682: 1179-1183.10.17660/ActaHortic.2005.682.156
  3. Crisosto C.H., Garner D., Doyle J., Day K.R., 1993. Relationship between fruit respiration, bruising susceptibility, and temperature in sweet cherries. HortSci. 28(2): 132-135.10.21273/HORTSCI.28.2.132
  4. Drake S.R., Elfving D.C., 2002. Indicators of maturity and storage quality of ‘Lapins’ sweet cherry. HortTechnology 12(4): 687-690.10.21273/HORTTECH.12.4.687
  5. Giacalone G., Chiabrando V., 2 013. M odified atmosphere packaging of sweet cherries with biodegradable films. Inter. Food Res. J. 20(3): 1263-1268.
  6. Goliáš J., Lacný Z., Němcová A., Čaněk A., 2006. Release of anaerobic metabolites from intact sweet cherries in low oxygen atmospheres. Mitteilungen Klosternneuburg 56: 157-165.
  7. Goliáš J., Němcová A., Čaněk A., Kolenčíková D., 2007. Storage of sweet cherries in low oxygen and high carbon dioxide atmospheres. Hort. Sci. (Prague) 34(1): 26-34.10.17221/1843-HORTSCI
  8. Jiang A.L., Tian S.P., Xu Y., 2002. Effect of controlled atmospheres with high-O2 and high CO2 concentrations on postharvest physiology and storability of ‘Napoleon’ sweet cherry. Acta Bot. Sin. 44(8): 925-930.
  9. Kader A.A., 1999. Fruit maturity, ripening and quality relationships. Acta Hort. 485: 203-208.10.17660/ActaHortic.1999.485.27
  10. Kankaya A., Askin M.A., Akinci-Yildrim F., Balci B., Alkan T., 2008. Evaluation of some sweet cherry cultivars on GiSelA 5 and GiSelA 6 rootstocks in Baryamic, Turkey. Acta Hort. 795: 221-225. 10.17660/ActaHortic.2008.795.30
  11. Kappel F., Fisher-Fleming B., Hogue E., 1996. Fruit characteristics and sensory attributes of an ideal sweet cherry. HortSci. 31(3): 443-446.10.21273/HORTSCI.31.3.443
  12. Kappel F., Toivonen P., McKenzie D.L., Stan S., 2002. Storage characteristics of new sweet cherry cultivars. HortSci. 37(1): 139-143.10.21273/HORTSCI.37.1.139
  13. Krupa T., Tomala K., 2000. Wpływ atmosfery na jakość przechowalniczą czereśni ‘Regina’ [Effect of atmosphere on quality of ‘Regina’ sweet cherry fruit]. Abstract Book XXXIX Polish Scientific Fruit Growing Conference, Skierniewice, Poland: 221-222.
  14. Lugli S., Sansavini S., 2008. Preliminary results of a cherry rootstock trial in Vignona, Italy. Acta Hort. 795: 321-326.10.17660/ActaHortic.2008.795.46
  15. Meheriuk M., Girar B., Moyls A.L., Beveridge H.J.T., McKenzie D.L., Harrison J., Weintrub S., Hocking R., 1995. Modified atmosphere packaging of ‘Lapins’ cherry. Food Res. Int. 28: 238-244.10.1016/0963-9969(95)00003-5
  16. Meheriuk M., McKenzie D.L., Girard B., Moyls A.L., Weintraub S., Hocking R., Kopp T., 1997. Storage of ‘Sweetheart’ cherries in sealed plastic film. J. Food Quality 20: 189-198.10.1111/j.1745-4557.1997.tb00463.x
  17. Padilla-Zakour O.I., Tandon K.S., Wargo J., 2004. Quality of modified atmosphere packaging ‘Hedelfinden’ and ‘Lapins’ sweet cherry. HortTechnology 14(3): 331-337.10.21273/HORTTECH.14.3.0331
  18. Remón S., Ferrer A., Marquina P., Burgos J., Oria R., 2000. Use of modified atmospheres to prolong the postharvest life of Burlat cherries at two different degrees of ripeness. J. Sci. Food Agric. 80: 1545-1552.10.1002/1097-0010(200008)80:10<;1545::AID-JSFA680>3.0.CO;2-X
  19. Remón S., Venturini M.E., Lopez-Bues P., Oria R., 2003. Burlat cherry quality after long range transport: Optimisation of packaging conditions. Innov. Food Sci. Emerq. Technol. 4: 425-434.10.1016/S1466-8564(03)00058-4
  20. Rozpara E., 2008. Growth and yield of eleven sweet cherry cultivars in central Poland. Acta Hort. 795: 571-576. 10.17660/ActaHortic.2008.795.90
  21. Rutkowski K., Szymczak J., Grzyb Z.S., Rozpara E., 2000. Wpływ warunków przechowywania na ocenę sensoryczną czereśni odmiany ‘Kordia’ [Effect of storage conditions on sensory evaluation of ‘Kordia’ sweet cherry fruit]. Abstract Book XXXIX Polish Scientific Fruit Growing Conference, Skierniewice, Poland: 102-103.
  22. Sen F., Oksar R. F., Golkarian M., Yaldiz S., 2014. Quality changes of different sweet cherry cultivars at various stages of the supply chain. Not. Bot. Horti. Agrobot. 42(2): 501-506.10.15835/nbha4229596
  23. Serrano M., Martínez-Romero D., Castillo S., Guillén F., Valero D., 2005. The use of antifungal compounds improves the beneficial effect of MAP in sweet cherry storage. Innov. Food Sci. Emerq. Technol. 6: 115-123.10.1016/j.ifset.2004.09.001
  24. Serrano M., Diaz-Mula H.M., Zapata P.J., Castillo S., Guillén F., Martinez-Domingo R., Valverde J.M., Valero D., 2009. Maturity stage at harvest determines the fruit quality and antioxidant potential after storage of sweet cherry cultivars. J. Agric. Food Chem. 57: 3240-3246.10.1021/jf803949k
  25. Sitarek M., Grzyb Z.S., Koziński B., 2008. The influence of different rootstocks on the growth and yield of sweet cherry trees during the first four years after planting in the double row system. Acta Hort. 795: 531-536.10.17660/ActaHortic.2008.795.82
  26. Sitarek M., Grzyb Z.S., 2010. Growth, productivity and fruiting of Kordia sweet cherry trees on eight clonal rootstocks. J. Fruit Ornam. Plant Res. 18(2): 169-176.
  27. Szymczak J.A., Rutkowski K.P., Miszczak A., Rozpara E., 2003. Sensory evaluation of ‘Kordia’ sweet cherry after storage. Pol. J. Food Nutr. Sci. 12/53(3): 45-49.
  28. Tian S.P., Jiang A.L., Xu Y., Wang Y.S., 2004. Responses of physiology and quality of sweet cherry fruit to different atmospheres in storage. Food Chem. 87: 43-49.10.1016/j.foodchem.2003.10.014
  29. Tomala K., Krupa T., Karbowiak A., 2003. Wpływ składu atmosfery na jakość przechowalniczą czereśni [Effect of atmosphere content on sweet cherry fruit quality after cool storage]. Folia Hort. Suppl. 2003/2: 206-208.
  30. Wang L., Verstheim S., 2002. Controlled atmosphere storage of sweet cherries (Prunus avium L.). Acta Agric. Scand., Sect. B, Soil Plant Sci. 52: 136-142.10.1080/090647103100004825
  31. Wang Y., Long L.E., 2014. Respiration and quality responses of sweet cherry to different atmospheres during cold storage and shipping. Postharv. Biol. Technol. 92: 62-69.10.1016/j.postharvbio.2014.01.003
  32. Wani A.A., Singh P., Gul K., Wani M.H., Langowski H.C., 2 014. S weet c herry (Prunus avium): Critical factors affecting the composition and shelf life. Food Packaging and Shelf Life 1: 86-99.10.1016/j.fpsl.2014.01.005
  33. Wociór S., 2008a. The effect of rootstock on the growth and yielding of Regina cherry trees. Folia Hort. 20(1): 15-22.10.2478/fhort-2013-0102
  34. Wociór S., 2008b. The effect of rootstock on the growth and yielding of cultivar Kordia sweet cherry trees. Acta Sci. Pol., Hortorum Cultus 7(1): 21-26.10.2478/fhort-2013-0102
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/fhort-2017-0011 | Journal eISSN: 2083-5965 | Journal ISSN: 0867-1761
Language: English
Page range: 113 - 121
Submitted on: Jan 31, 2017
Accepted on: May 24, 2017
Published on: Dec 29, 2017
Published by: Polish Society for Horticultural Sciences (PSHS)
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2017 Ewa Dziedzic, Jan Błaszczyk, Elżbieta Kaczmarczyk, published by Polish Society for Horticultural Sciences (PSHS)
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.