Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The influence of NANO-GRO® organic stimulator on the yielding and fruit quality of field tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) Cover

The influence of NANO-GRO® organic stimulator on the yielding and fruit quality of field tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.)

Folia Horticulturae
Volume 28 (2016): Issue 1 (June 2016)
By:  and    
Open Access
|Jun 2016
References

References

  1. AF., GP., ZP., ZG., 1998. The effect of commercial humic acid on tomato plant growth and mineral nutrition. J. Plant Nutr. 21(3): 561-575.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  2. AM., FM.R., 2007. Roles of glycine betaine and proline improving plant abiotic stress resistance. Environ. Exp. Bot. 59: 206-216.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  3. BI., PE., 2008. Evaluation of the usefulness the plant stimulator Nano-Groin the field cultivation of vegetables (tomato, cucumber). Research Report No. 1 PW/2008. Institute of Vegetable Crops, Skierniewice.
    Search in Google Scholar
  4. BA., 2008. Biostimulators, definitions, classification and legislation. In: Biostimulators in Modern Agriculture. General Aspects. H. Gawrońska (ed.), Editorial House Wieś Jutra, Warsaw, Poland: 7-17.
    Search in Google Scholar
  5. DR., GK., 2008. Influence of Bio-algeen S-90 on the yield and quality of small-sized tomato In: Biostimulators in Modern Agriculture. Vegetable Crops. Z.T. Dąbrowski (ed.), Editorial House Wieś Jutra, Warsaw, Poland: 150.
    Search in Google Scholar
  6. FJ.F., SJ., 1985. Effect of seaweed concentrate and applied hormones oncultured tomato roots. J. Plant Physiol. 120(3): 215-222.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  7. G-WJ., ŁM., ZT., 2010. The influence of grafting and biostimulators on the yield and fruit quality of greenhouse tomato cv. (Mill.) grown in the field. Veg. Crops Res. Bull. 72: 63-70.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  8. G-WJ., RJ., ŁM., 2009. The influence of grafting and biostimulators on physical and sensorial traits of greenhouse tomato fruit (Mill.) in field production. Acta Sci. Pol., Hortorum Cultus 8(3): 37-43.
    Search in Google Scholar
  9. GA., KM., 2011. Initial research on the effect of the NanoGro plant growth stimulator on(W.G. Smith) Sacc. Ecol. Chem. Eng. A 18(12): 1625-1631.
    Search in Google Scholar
  10. H-HR.M., S-RF., R-LM.A., NJ., H-CG., 2014. Effect of liquid seaweed extracts on growth of tomato seedlings (L.). J. Appl. Phycol. 26: 619-628.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  11. JR., 2012. The influence of biological compounds with different mechanism of action on the metabolism of plants and seed quality of garden rocket. Biul. IHAR 262: 197-206.
    Search in Google Scholar
  12. JK., DJ., TI., JJ., 2013. Impact on Nano-Gro stimulator on the seeds germination and growth kinetics of seedlings of selected grass and legumes species. ENVIRON 24,1(55): 23-26.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  13. JE., SB., KJ., AA.M., 2012. The influence of weather conditions during vegetation period on yielding of twelve determinate tomato cultivars. Not. Bot. Horti. Agrobo. 40(2): 203-209.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  14. KE.B., YI.A., KD.V., 2009. New nanobioregulator of plant growth NANO-Stim: physiological activity and field application. Proc. 2Nanotechnology International Forum, Rusnanotech Moscow, Russia: 470-471.
    Search in Google Scholar
  15. KA., KR., KS., 2013. Effects assessment of Klepak SL on the bean yield (L.). J. Cent. Eur. Agr. 14(2): 545-554.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  16. KA., KS., ZU., KR., ŚM., 2015. Effect of Nano-Gro preparation applications on yield components and antioxidant properties of common bean (L.). Fresen. Environ. Bull. 24-11b: 4034-4041.
    Search in Google Scholar
  17. MP., JK., KM., P-SP., PE., SS., 1998. Foliar application of glycinebetaine – a novel product from sugar beet – as an approach to increase tomato yield. Ind. Crops Prod. 7: 139-148.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  18. MP., KJ., SS., 2000. Effect of glycinebetaine on chloroplast ultrastructure, chlorophyll and protein content, and RuBPCO activities in tomato grown under drought or salinity. Biol. Plantarum 43(3): 471-475.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  19. MK., AK., 2009. Plant growth regulators application – studies in Poland and in the world Prog. Plant Prot. 49(4): 1810-1816.
    Search in Google Scholar
  20. MK., KS., KR., 2011. Influence of sea weed extracts and mixture of humic and fulvic acids on germination and growth ofL. Acta Sci. Pol., Agricultura 10(1): 33-45.
    Search in Google Scholar
  21. MT., 2010. Development and yielding of grain maize treated with Biochikol 020 PC, in comparison with crops dressed with Vitavax 200 WS and a control without any dressing. J. Res. App. Agr. Eng. 55(4): 33-35.
    Search in Google Scholar
  22. MA., DR., 2013. Effect of bioproducts based on sea algae on biometric features of sweet pepper (L.) plants in seedling stage. Episteme 18(2): 303-310.
    Search in Google Scholar
  23. NM., YI., 1992. Simple method for simultaneous determination of chlorophyll and carotenoids in tomato fruit. J. Jpn. Soc. Food Sci. Technol. 39(10): 925-928.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  24. NS., PD., SM., EA., 2016. Plant biostimulants: physiological responses induced by protein hydrolyzed-based products and humic substances in plant metabolism. Sci. Agric. 73(1): 18-23.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  25. N-PA., KE., 2013. The influence of physioactivators on broad bean (var.yield and its quality. Proc. Conf. Sustainable production of vegetable and medicinal plants, 20-21 June, Warsaw, Poland: 67.
    Search in Google Scholar
  26. SB., JE., KJ., AA.M., KA., 2014. The effects of hydrothermal conditions during vegetation period on fruit quality of processing tomatoes. Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 23 (1): 195-202.
    Search in Google Scholar
  27. SE., 2011. Comparison of chlorophyll fluorescence parameters ofandleaves exposed to short-term UV-B radiation. Acta Biol. Cracov. Ser. Bot. 53(1): 16-19.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  28. SE., 2008. Does the Nano-Gro® biostimulator increase tolerance on Tytus Fcucumber plants in early growth phase to ultraviolet-B radiation? In: Biostimulators in Modern Agriculture. Vegetable Crops. Z.T. Dąbrowski (ed.), Editorial House Wieś Jutra, Warsaw, Poland: 44-51.
    Search in Google Scholar
  29. SI.M., EO.L., OA.N., OL.S., KE.B., 2009. Physiological activity of nanoregulator of plant growth Nano-Gro: Wheat caryophysis formation and germination activity, ryzogenesis of cutting of ornamental plants. Proc. 2Nanotechnology International Forum, Rusnanotech Moscow, Russia: 834.
    Search in Google Scholar
  30. YE.W., WA.J., 1954 The estimation of carbohydrates in plant extracts by anthrone. Biochem. J. 57(3): 508–514.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/fhort-2016-0010 | Journal eISSN: 2083-5965 | Journal ISSN: 0867-1761
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 87 - 94
Submitted on: Jan 25, 2016
Accepted on: Apr 8, 2016
Published on: Jun 29, 2016
Published by: Polish Society for Horticultural Sciences (PSHS)
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year
Keywords:
chemical composition,
plant height,
plant spraying,
soaking seeds,
stem thickness
Related subjects:
Life sciences,
Plant science

© 2016 Elżbieta Jędrszczyk, Anna M. Ambroszczyk, published by Polish Society for Horticultural Sciences (PSHS)
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Volume 28 (2016): Issue 1 (June 2016)
Previous article
Next article