Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The influence of NANO-GRO® organic stimulator on the yielding and fruit quality of field tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) Cover

The influence of NANO-GRO® organic stimulator on the yielding and fruit quality of field tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.)

Open Access
|Jun 2016

References

  1. Adani F., Genevini P., Zaccheo P., Zocchi G., 1998. The effect of commercial humic acid on tomato plant growth and mineral nutrition. J. Plant Nutr. 21(3): 561-575.10.1080/01904169809365424
  2. Ashraf M., Foolad M.R., 2007. Roles of glycine betaine and proline improving plant abiotic stress resistance. Environ. Exp. Bot. 59: 206-216.10.1016/j.envexpbot.2005.12.006
  3. Babik I., Panasiuk E., 2008. Evaluation of the usefulness the plant stimulator Nano-Gro® in the field cultivation of vegetables (tomato, cucumber). Research Report No. 1 PW/2008. Institute of Vegetable Crops, Skierniewice.
  4. Basak A., 2008. Biostimulators, definitions, classification and legislation. In: Biostimulators in Modern Agriculture. General Aspects. H. Gawrońska (ed.), Editorial House Wieś Jutra, Warsaw, Poland: 7-17.
  5. Dobromilska R., Gubarewicz K., 2008. Influence of Bio-algeen S-90 on the yield and quality of small-sized tomato In: Biostimulators in Modern Agriculture. Vegetable Crops. Z.T. Dąbrowski (ed.), Editorial House Wieś Jutra, Warsaw, Poland: 150.
  6. Finnie J.F., Staden J., 1985. Effect of seaweed concentrate and applied hormones on in vitro cultured tomato roots. J. Plant Physiol. 120(3): 215-222.10.1016/S0176-1617(85)80108-5
  7. Gajc-Wolska J., Łyszkowska M., Zielony T., 2010. The influence of grafting and biostimulators on the yield and fruit quality of greenhouse tomato cv. (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) grown in the field. Veg. Crops Res. Bull. 72: 63-70.10.2478/v10032-010-0006-y
  8. Gajc-Wolska J., Radzanowska J., Łyszkowska M., 2009. The influence of grafting and biostimulators on physical and sensorial traits of greenhouse tomato fruit (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) in field production. Acta Sci. Pol., Hortorum Cultus 8(3): 37-43.
  9. Gorczyca A., Kasprowicz M., 2011. Initial research on the effect of the NanoGro plant growth stimulator on Fusarium culmorum (W.G. Smith) Sacc. Ecol. Chem. Eng. A 18(12): 1625-1631.
  10. Hernández-Herrera R.M., Santacruz-Ruvalcaba F., Ruiz-López M.A., Norrie J., Hernández-Carmona G., 2014. Effect of liquid seaweed extracts on growth of tomato seedlings (Solanum lycopersicum L.). J. Appl. Phycol. 26: 619-628.10.1007/s10811-013-0078-4
  11. Janas R., 2012. The influence of biological compounds with different mechanism of action on the metabolism of plants and seed quality of garden rocket. Biul. IHAR 262: 197-206.
  12. Jankowski K., Deska J., Truba I., Jankowska J., 2013. Impact on Nano-Gro stimulator on the seeds germination and growth kinetics of seedlings of selected grass and legumes species. ENVIRON 24,1(55): 23-26.10.2478/oszn-2013-0004
  13. Jędrszczyk E., Skowera B., Kopcińska J., Ambroszczyk A.M., 2012. The influence of weather conditions during vegetation period on yielding of twelve determinate tomato cultivars. Not. Bot. Horti. Agrobo. 40(2): 203-209.10.15835/nbha4028252
  14. Kirichenko E.B., Yamskov I.A., Kurilov D.V., 2009. New nanobioregulator of plant growth NANO-Stim: physiological activity and field application. Proc. 2nd Nanotechnology International Forum, Rusnanotech Moscow, Russia: 470-471.
  15. Kocira A., Kornas R., Kocira S., 2013. Effects assessment of Klepak SL on the bean yield (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). J. Cent. Eur. Agr. 14(2): 545-554.10.5513/JCEA01/14.2.1234
  16. Kocira A., Kocira S., Złotek U., Kornas R., Świeca M., 2015. Effect of Nano-Gro preparation applications on yield components and antioxidant properties of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Fresen. Environ. Bull. 24-11b: 4034-4041.
  17. Mäkelä P., Jokinen K., Kontturi M., Peltonen-Sainio P., Pehu E., Somersalo S., 1998. Foliar application of glycinebetaine – a novel product from sugar beet – as an approach to increase tomato yield. Ind. Crops Prod. 7: 139-148.10.1016/S0926-6690(97)00042-3
  18. Mäkelä P., Kärkkäinen J., Somersalo S., 2000. Effect of glycinebetaine on chloroplast ultrastructure, chlorophyll and protein content, and RuBPCO activities in tomato grown under drought or salinity. Biol. Plantarum 43(3): 471-475.10.1023/A:1026712426180
  19. Matysiak K., Adamczewski K., 2009. Plant growth regulators application – studies in Poland and in the world Prog. Plant Prot. 49(4): 1810-1816.
  20. Matysiak K., Kaczmarek S., Krawczyk R., 2011. Influence of sea weed extracts and mixture of humic and fulvic acids on germination and growth of Zea mays L. Acta Sci. Pol., Agricultura 10(1): 33-45.
  21. Michalski T., 2010. Development and yielding of grain maize treated with Biochikol 020 PC, in comparison with crops dressed with Vitavax 200 WS and a control without any dressing. J. Res. App. Agr. Eng. 55(4): 33-35.
  22. Mila A., Dobromilska R., 2013. Effect of bioproducts based on sea algae on biometric features of sweet pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) plants in seedling stage. Episteme 18(2): 303-310.
  23. Nagata M., Yamashita I., 1992. Simple method for simultaneous determination of chlorophyll and carotenoids in tomato fruit. J. Jpn. Soc. Food Sci. Technol. 39(10): 925-928.10.3136/nskkk1962.39.925
  24. Nardi S., Pizzeghello D., Schiavon M., Ertani A., 2016. Plant biostimulants: physiological responses induced by protein hydrolyzed-based products and humic substances in plant metabolism. Sci. Agric. 73(1): 18-23.10.1590/0103-9016-2015-0006
  25. Nowicka-Połeć A., Kunicki E., 2013. The influence of physioactivators on broad bean (Vicia faba var. major yield and its quality. Proc. Conf. Sustainable production of vegetable and medicinal plants, 20-21 June, Warsaw, Poland: 67.
  26. Skowera B., Jędrszczyk E., Kopcińska J., Ambroszczyk A.M., Kołton A., 2014. The effects of hydrothermal conditions during vegetation period on fruit quality of processing tomatoes. Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 23 (1): 195-202.
  27. Skórska E., 2011. Comparison of chlorophyll fluorescence parameters of Cucumis sativus and Mentha piperita leaves exposed to short-term UV-B radiation. Acta Biol. Cracov. Ser. Bot. 53(1): 16-19.10.2478/v10182-011-0002-7
  28. Skórska E., 2008. Does the Nano-Gro® biostimulator increase tolerance on Tytus F1 cucumber plants in early growth phase to ultraviolet-B radiation? In: Biostimulators in Modern Agriculture. Vegetable Crops. Z.T. Dąbrowski (ed.), Editorial House Wieś Jutra, Warsaw, Poland: 44-51.
  29. Smirnova I.M., Enina O.L., Orekhova A.N., Olekhnovich L.S., Kirichenko E.B., 2009. Physiological activity of nanoregulator of plant growth Nano-Gro: Wheat caryophysis formation and germination activity, ryzogenesis of cutting of ornamental plants. Proc. 2nd Nanotechnology International Forum, Rusnanotech Moscow, Russia: 834.
  30. Yemm E.W., Wills A.J., 1954 The estimation of carbohydrates in plant extracts by anthrone. Biochem. J. 57(3): 508–514.10.1042/bj0570508126978913181867
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/fhort-2016-0010 | Journal eISSN: 2083-5965 | Journal ISSN: 0867-1761
Language: English
Page range: 87 - 94
Submitted on: Jan 25, 2016
Accepted on: Apr 8, 2016
Published on: Jun 29, 2016
Published by: Polish Society for Horticultural Sciences (PSHS)
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2016 Elżbieta Jędrszczyk, Anna M. Ambroszczyk, published by Polish Society for Horticultural Sciences (PSHS)
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.