Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The growth and flowering of Rhodohypoxis baurii (Baker) Nel cultivars depending on rhizome weight Cover

The growth and flowering of Rhodohypoxis baurii (Baker) Nel cultivars depending on rhizome weight

Folia Horticulturae
Volume 27 (2015): Issue 2 (December 2015)
By: ,  ,   and    
Open Access
|Dec 2015
References

References

  1. AI.K., SP., 2011. Influence of bulb sizes at planting on growth and development of the common hyacinth and the lily. Agric. Biol. J. N. Am. 2: 298-314.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  2. BT., KN., 2014. Planting density and corm size effects on flower yield and quality of cut-freesia () in Ethiopia. J. Appl. Hortic.16: 76-79.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  3. CG.E., BG.K., ME.R., TC.M., 2013. Production ofcorms for forcing as a flowering pot plant. Acta Hortic. 1002: 59-66.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  4. DM.H., SB.M., WA.R., MGJ.A., 2014. Saffron (L.): The effect of mother corm size on progeny multiplication, flower and stigma production. Sci. Hortic. 166: 50-58.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  5. DG.D., 2003.: carpets of Alpine jewels. Veld Flora. 89: 140-144.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  6. DG.D., 2013. Geophyte research and production in South Africa. In: Ornamental Geophytes: From Basic Science to Sustainable Production. R. Kamenetsky, H. Okubo (eds), Taylor and Francis Group LLC, Boca Raton: 485-503.
    Search in Google Scholar
  7. HA.H., 1990. Recent advances in control of flowering and growth habit of geophytes. Acta Hortic. 266: 35-42.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  8. HS.S., HA.H., SR.M., RM.S., 1991. Flowering and corm yield ofin response to temperature, photoperiod, corm size, and planting depth. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 116: 19-22.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  9. HS.S., 2001. Flowering of three species ofin relation to bulb size and source. Sci. Hortic. 91: 349-355.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  10. KA., 2008. Effect of corm size on the yield ofKer-Gawl. grown in the field. Zesz. Probl. Post. Nauk Roln. 525: 197-202.
    Search in Google Scholar
  11. KA., 2014. Effect of bulb size on growth, flowering and bulb formation in lachenalia cultivars. Hortic. Sci. 41: 89-94.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  12. KA., KM.A., S-U-RI.A., 2013. Different corm sizes affect performance ofcvs. Red Majesty and Early Yellow. Adv. Zool. Bot. 1: 86-91.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  13. MP., SF., PP., YP., 2009. Effect of bulb weight on the growth and flowering ofsubsp.(Iridaceae) Cienc. Investig. Agrar. 36: 259-266.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  14. MG., SY., 1990. Effect of temperature on flowering ofvar.Nel. J. Jpn. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 58: 993-998.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  15. NI., 1998. Hypoxidaceae. In: The Families and Genera of Vascular Plants. Flowering Plants. Monocotyledons. K. Kubitzki (ed.), Volume 3, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg GmbH, New York: 286-295.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  16. N-U-AKA.M., AI., AN., AA., AM., AI., 2013. Corm and cormel size of gladiolus greatly influenced growth and development of subsequent corm production. Pak. J. Bot. 45: 1407-1409.
    Search in Google Scholar
  17. PE., 1998. A Field Guide to Wild Flowers Kwazulu-Natal and the Eastern Region. Natal Flora Publications Trust, Durban.
    Search in Google Scholar
  18. PJ.G., GN., GJ.E., 2014. Flower removal increases rhizome mass in natural populations of(Alstroemeriaceae). Flora 209: 332-339.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  19. SP., 2014. Effect of size of on the inflorescences and bulb yield ofBak. grown in an unheated plastic tunnel. Folia Pomeranae Univ. Technol. Stetinensis, Agric. Piscaria Zootech. 312: 153-158.
    Search in Google Scholar
  20. SK., MN., 2005. The effect of corm weight and low temperature treatment on the flowering ofPagoda. Acta Hortic. 673: 495-499.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  21. SY., 2000. Rhodohypoxis, beauty in abundance. Herbertia. 55: 74-80, 86.
    Search in Google Scholar
  22. TM.F., 1976. Studies in the Hypoxidaceae. I. Vegetative morphology and anatomy. Bothalia. 12: 111-117.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  23. TD.I., MN.P., AG.D., EJ.E., VSJ., 2011. Flowering control in: Effects of corm size, temperature, photoperiod and irradiance. Sci. Hortic. 129: 493-502.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  24. US.J., VSJ., ET.J., 1992. In vitro propagation of. HortScience. 27: 1230.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  25. WA.A., LG., BA., 1999. Aconitum: Effects of environmental conditions and tuber size on growth, flowering and tuber production. Sci. Hortic. 81: 135-147.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  26. WM.J.A., HH., 2006. Tuber size variation and organ preformation constrain growth responses of a spring geophyte. Oecologia. 147: 396-405.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/fhort-2015-0027 | Journal eISSN: 2083-5965 | Journal ISSN: 0867-1761
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 169 - 173
Submitted on: Aug 12, 2015
Accepted on: Nov 16, 2015
Published on: Dec 30, 2015
Published by: Polish Society for Horticultural Sciences (PSHS)
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year
Keywords:
ornamentals geophytes,
pot plant,
storage organ size
Related subjects:
Life sciences,
Plant science

© 2015 Piotr Salachna, Agnieszka Zawadzińska, Rafał Piechocki, Andżelika Wośkowiak, published by Polish Society for Horticultural Sciences (PSHS)
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Volume 27 (2015): Issue 2 (December 2015)
Previous article
Next article