Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Flower development and senescence in Narcissus tazetta ‘Kashmir Local’ Cover

Flower development and senescence in Narcissus tazetta ‘Kashmir Local’

Open Access
|Dec 2015

References

  1. AF.M., BR., KR.E., MD.D., SJ.C., SK., 1989. Current Protocols in Molecular Biology. John Wiley and Sons, New York, USA.
  2. BS., WB., CL.J., KM.T., FD.M., SA.D., JM.L., 2010. Proteomic analysis of pollination-induced corolla senescence in. J. Exp. Bot. 61: 1089-1109.
  3. BA., BH., 2001. Daffodils for North American Gardens. Bright Sky Press, Albany, USA.
  4. CF.G., VDW.G., 1995. Solute leakage, lipid peroxidation and protein degradation during senescence oftepals. Physiol. Plantarum 94: 515-521.
  5. CA.M., 1971. Flowers and Their Histories. McGraw Hill, London, UK.
  6. CS.E., RC.C., SA.D., 1994. Changes in protein ubiquitination and the expression of ubiquitin-encoding transcripts in daylily petal during floral development and senescence. Physiol. Plantarum 9: 196-204.
  7. ER.Y., RM.S., 1988. Changes in carbohydrates and osmotic potential during the rhythmic expansion of rose petals. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 113: 884-888.
  8. GS., TI., AI., FS., SS.M., 2005. Effect of cytokinins on the senescence and longevity of isolated flowers of daylily () cv. Royal crown sprayed with cycloheximide. Acta Hortic. 669: 395-403.
  9. HJ.H., CA.R., MG.A., 2011. End of day harvest delays postharvest senescence of broccoli florets. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 59: 64-70.
  10. IS.T., TI., SW., BM.A., 2011. Effect of cycloheximide on senescence and postharvest performance in. cv. Royal Crown. J. Plant Sci. 6: 14-25.
  11. JM.L., CG.S., EJ.R., CD.G., 2005. Ethylene sensitivity regulates Proteolytic activity and cysteine protease gene expression in petunia corollas. J. Exp. Bot. 56: 2733-2744.
  12. L-YM., SA.D., RM.S., 1992. Flower senescence in daylily (). Physiol. Plantarum 86: 308-314.
  13. LO.H., RN.J., FA.L., RR.J., 1951. Protein measurement with folin phenol reagent. J. Biol. Chem. 193: 265-275.
  14. MR.L., IM., SM., 1987. Protein assay by coomassie brilliant blue G-250 binding method is unsuitable for plant tissues rich in phenolics and phenolases. Ann. Biochem. 163: 376-384.
  15. NN., 1944. Photometric adaptation of Somogy’s method for the determination of glucose. J. Biol. Chem. 153: 375-380.
  16. PC., VDW.G., 2005. Delay offlower senescence by protease inhibitors. New Phytol. 165: 473-480.
  17. RH., 1957. A modified ninhydrin colorimetric method for amino acids. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 67: 10-15.
  18. SV., VR., OG., SF., 2009. Changes in the phenolic concentration during flower development of rose ‘KORcrisett’. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 134: 491-496.
  19. SW., TI., 2010. Effect of cycloheximide on senescence and post-harvest performance ofL. flowers. Pakistan J. Bot. 42: 3577-3585.
  20. SW., TI., 2011a. Flower senescence: strategies and some associated events. Bot. Rev. 77: 152-184.
  21. SW., TI., 2011b. Physiological and biochemical changes associated with flower development and senescence inNieuwl cv. Violet blue. Frontiers Agric. China 5: 201-208.
  22. SW., TI., 2011c. Flower development and senescence inL. J. Fruit Orn. Plant Res. 19: 123-131.
  23. SW., TI., 2014. Flower senescence: some molecular aspects. Planta 239: 277-297.
  24. SW., TI., IS.T., BM.A., 2011. Physiological and biochemical changes associated with flower development and senescence in so far unexploredLam. cv. Olympicus. Physiol. Mol. Biol. Plants 17: 33-39.
  25. ST., HW.E., 1959. The phenolic constituents ofL. The quantitative analysis of phenolic constituents. J. Fd. Sci. Agric. 10: 63-68.
  26. TH., 1976. Staff of the LH Bailey Hortorium. Macmillan Publishing Company, Cornell University, New York, USA.
  27. TA., VP., FA., SG., 2007. Physiological characterization of flower senescence in long life and ephemeral hibiscus (L.). Acta Hortic. 755: 457-464.
  28. VDW.G., 2001. Categories of petal senescence and abscission: a re-evaluation. Ann. Bot. 87: 447-456.
  29. VDW.G., WE.J., 2008. Physiology and molecular biology of petal senescence. J. Exp. Bot. 59: 453-480.
  30. WM.H., NT.A., BJ.E., 1995. Investigation of proteins in petals of potted chrysanthemum as a potential indicator of longevity. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 5: 95-100.
  31. WE.J., VDW.G., 2009. Petal senescence: New concepts for ageing cells. Acta Hortic. 847: 161-169.
  32. WW.R., HA.K., 1987. Changes in protein patterns and invivo protein synthesis during presenescence and senescence ofpetals. J. Plant Physiol. 128: 67-75.
  33. YK., IM., OT., NM., MM., YS., 2007. Analysis of sucrose metabolism during petal growth of cut roses. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 43: 174-177.
  34. YT., IK., VDW.G., 2006b. DNA degradation and nuclear fragmentation during programmed cell death in petals of,and. J. Exp. Bot. 57: 3543-3552.
  35. YT., TY., MT., KM., IK., VDW.G., 2006a. Nuclear fragmentation and DNA degradation during programmed cell death in petals of morning glory (). Planta 224: 1279-1290.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/fhort-2015-0021 | Journal eISSN: 2083-5965 | Journal ISSN: 0867-1761
Language: English
Page range: 115 - 121
Submitted on: Jun 7, 2015
Accepted on: Aug 30, 2015
Published on: Dec 30, 2015
Published by: Polish Society for Horticultural Sciences (PSHS)
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year
Related subjects:

© 2015 Fahima Gul, Inayatullah Tahir, Waseem Shahri, published by Polish Society for Horticultural Sciences (PSHS)
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.