Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Hydrological properties of bark of selected forest tree species. Part 2: Interspecific variability of bark water storage capacity Cover

Hydrological properties of bark of selected forest tree species. Part 2: Interspecific variability of bark water storage capacity

Open Access
|Jul 2017

References

  1. Aboal J.R., Morales D., Hernández M., Jiménez M.S. 1999. The measurement and modelling of the variation of stemflow in a laurel forest in Tenerife, Canary Islands. Journal of Hydrology, 221 (3), 161-175.
  2. Barlow J., Lagan B.O., Reres C.A. 2003. Morphological correlates of fire-induced tree mortality in a central Amazonian forest. Journal of Tropical Ecology, 19, 291-299.
  3. Bauer G., Speck T., Blömer J., Bertling J., Speck O. 2010. Insulation capability of the bark of trees with different fire adaptation. Journal of Materials Science, 45 (21), 5950-5959.
  4. Biggs A.R. 1992. Anatomical and physiological responses of bark tissues to mechanical injury. In: Defense mechanisms of woody plants against fungi (eds.: R. Blanchette, A. Biggs). Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, 13-40.
  5. Blake G.J. 1975. The interception process. In: Predictionin Catchment Hydrology (eds.: T.G. Chapmann, R.X. Dunin). Australian Academy of Science, Netley, 59-81.
  6. Calder I.R. 1999. Dependence of rainfall interception on drop size - a replay to the comment by Uijlenhoet and Sticker. Journal of Hydrology, 217, 164-165.
  7. Chattaway M.M. 1953. The anatomy of bark. I. The genus Eucalyptus. Australian Journal of Botany, 1 (3), 402-433.
  8. Crockford R.H., Richardson D.P. 2000. Partitioning of rainfall into throughfall, stemflow and interception: Effect of forest type, ground cover and climate. Hydrological Processes, 14, 2903-2920.
  9. Franceschi V.R., Krokene P., Christiansen E., Krekling T. 2005. Anatomical and chemical defenses of conifer bark against bark beetles and other pests. New Phytologist, 167 (2), 353-376.
  10. Harmon M.E. 1984. Survival of trees after low-intensity surface fires in Great Smoky Mountains National Park. Ecology, 65, 796-802.
  11. Hengst G.E., Dawson J.O. 1994. Bark properties and fire resistance of selected tree species from the central hardwood region of North America. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 24 (4), 688-696.
  12. Herwitz S.R. 1985. Interception storage capacities of tropical rainforest canopy trees. Journal of Hydrology, 77, 237-252.
  13. Hoffmann W.A., Orthen B., do Nascimento P.K.V. 2003. Comparative fire ecology of tropical savanna and forest trees. Funcional Ecology, 17, 720-726.
  14. Howard E.T. 1977. Bark structure of southern upland oaks. Wood and Fiber Science, 9 (3), 172-183.
  15. Ilek A., Kucza J. 2014. Hydrological properties of bark of selected forest tree species. Part I: the coefficient of development of the interception surface of bark. Trees, 28, 831-839.
  16. Keim R.F., Skaugset A.E., Weiler M. 2006. Storage of water on vegetation under simulated rainfall of varying intensity. Advances in Water Resources, 29, 974-986.
  17. Lendzian K.J. 2006. Survival strategies of plants during secondary growth: barrier properties of phellems and lenticels towards water, oxygen, and carbon dioxide. Journal of Experimental Botany, 57, 2535-2546.
  18. Levia D.F., Herwitz S.R. 2005. Interspecific variation of bark water storage capacity of three deciduous tree species in relation to stemflow yield solute flux to forest soils. Catena, 64, 117-137.
  19. Levia D.F., Van Stan J.T., Mage S.M., Kelley- Hauske P.W. 2010. Temporal variability of stemflow volume in a beech-yellow poplar forest in relation to tree species and size. Journal of Hydrology, 380 (1), 112-120.
  20. Levia D.F., Wubbena N.P. 2006. Vertical variation of bark water storage capacity of Pinus strobus L. (eastern white pine) in Southern Illionois. Northeastern Naturalist, 13 (1), 131-137.
  21. Liu S. 1998. Estimation of rainfall storage capacity in the canopies of cypress wetlands and slash pine uplands in North-Central Florida. Journal of Hydrology, 207, 32-41.10.1016/S0022-1694(98)00115-2
  22. Llorens P., Gallart F. 2000. A simplified method for forest water storage capacity measurement. Journal of Hydrology, 240, 131-144.
  23. Návar J. 1993. The causes of stemflow variation in three semi-arid growing species of northeastern Mexico. Journal of Hydrology, 145 (1), 175-190.
  24. Paine C.E.T., Stahl C., Courtois E.A., Patiño S., Sarmiento C., Baraloto C. 2010. Functional explanations for variation in bark thickness in tropical rain forest trees. Functional Ecology, 24, 1202-1210.
  25. Pallardy S.G. 2010. Physiology of woody plants. Academic Press.
  26. Pinard M.A., Huffman J. 1997. Fire resistance and bark properties of trees in a seasonally dry forest in eastern Bolivia. Journal of Tropical Ecology, 13 (5), 727-740.
  27. Pypker T.G., Levia D.F., Staelens J., Van Stan J.T. 2011. Canopy structure in relation hydrological and biogeochemical fluxes. Forest Hydrology and Biogeochemistry, Ecological Studies, 216 (4), 371-388.
  28. Quilhó T., Pereira H., Richter H.G. 2000. Within-tree variation in phloem cell dimensions and proportions in Eucalyptus globulus. IAWA Journal, 21 (1), 31-40.
  29. StatSoft, Inc. 2011. STATISTICA (data analysis software system), version 10. www.statsoft.com
  30. Teskey R., Saveyn A., Steppe K., Mcguire M. 2007. Origin, fate and significance of CO2 in tree stems. New Phytologist, 177, 17-32.
  31. Tsiko C.T., Makurira H., Gerrits A.M.J., Savenije H.H.G. 2012. Measuring forest floor and canopy interception in a savannah ecosystem. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Parts A/B/C, 47, 122-127.
  32. Valovà M., Bieleszovà S. 2008. Interspecific variations of bark’s water storage capacity of chosen types of trees and the dependence on occurrence of epiphytic mosses. GeoScience Engineering, 54 (4), 45-51.
  33. Van Stan J.T., Hildebrandt A., Rebmann C., Friesen J. 2016. Impact of interacting bark structure and rainfall conditions on stemflow variability in a temperate beech-oak forest, central Germany. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 61 (11), 2071-2083.
  34. Van Stan J.T., Levia D.F. 2010. Inter- and intraspecific variation of stemflow production from Fagus grandifolia Ehrh. (American beech) and Liriodendron tulipifera L. (yellow poplar) in relation to bark microrelief in the eastern United States. Ecohydrology, 3 (1), 11-19.
  35. Webb E.K. 1975. The interception process. In: Prediction in Catchment Hydrology (eds.: T.G. Chapmann, R.X. Dunin). Australian Academy of Science, Netley, 203-236.
  36. Whitmore T.C. 1962. Studies in systematic bark morphology. New Phytologist, 61 (2), 191-207.
  37. Yáñez-Espinosa L., Terrazas T., López-Mata L. 2001. Effects of flooding on wood and bark anatomy of four species in a mangrove forest community. Trees, 15, 91-97.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ffp-2017-0011 | Journal eISSN: 2199-5907 | Journal ISSN: 0071-6677
Language: English
Page range: 110 - 122
Submitted on: Sep 9, 2016
Accepted on: Feb 24, 2017
Published on: Jul 18, 2017
Published by: Forest Research Institute
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2017 Anna Ilek, Jarosław Kucza, Karolina Morkisz, published by Forest Research Institute
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.