References
- Bakker M.R., Turpault M.P., Huet S., Nys C. 2008. Root distribution of Fagus sylvatica in a chronosequence in western France. Journal of Forest Research, 13 (3), 176-184.
- Böhm W. 1985. Metody badań systemów korzeniowych. PWRiL, Warszawa.
- Bolte A., Villanueva I. 2006. Interspecific competition impacts on the morphology and distribution of fine roots in European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) and Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst.). European Journal of Forest Research, 125, 15-26.
- Bulletin of the Institute of Meteorology and Water Management. 2000-2006. IMGW, Poland.
- Claus A., George E. 2005. Effect of stand age on fine- -root biomass and biomass distribution in three three European forest chronosequences. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 36, 1617-1625.
- Curt T., Prevosto B. 2003.Root biomass and rooting profile of naturally regenerated beech in mid-elevation Scots pine woodlands. Plant Ecology, 167, 269-282.
- Dobrowolska D. 2015. Vitality of European Beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) at the limit of its natural range in Poland. Polish Journal of Ecology, 63 (1), 173-185.
- Farfał D. 2011.The effect of habitat on European ash root growth in the topsoil layers. Forest Research Papers, 72 (2), 109-114.
- Finér L., Helmisaari H.S., Lõhmus K., Majdi H., Brunner I., Borja I., Eldhuset T., Godbold D., Grebenc T., Konôpka B., Kraigher H., Möttönen M.R., Ohashi M., Oleksyn J., Ostonen I., Uri V., Vanguelova E. 2007. Variation in fine root biomass of three European tree species: beech (Fagus sylvatica L.), Norway spruce (Picea abies L. Karst.), and Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.). Plant Biosystems, 141 (3), 394-405.
- Finér L., Ohashi M., Noguchi K., HiranoY. 2011. Fine root production and turnover in forest ecosystems in relation to stand and environmental characteristics. Forest Ecology and Management, 262, 2008-2023.
- Gill R.A., Jackson R.B. 2000.Global patterns of root turnover for terrestrial ecosystems. New Phytologist, 147, 13-31.
- Godbold D.L., Brunner I. 2007. The platform for European root science, COST action E38: An introduction and overview. Plant Biosystems, 141, 390-393.
- Hertel D., Leuschner Ch. 2002. A comparison of four different fine root production estimates with ecosystem carbon balance data in a Fagus-Quercus mixed forest. Plant and Soil, 239, 237-251.
- Idol T.W., Pope P.E., Ponder F. Jr. 2000. Fine root dynamics a chronosequence of upland temperate deciduous forests. Forest Ecology and Management, 127, 153-167.
- Jackson R.B., Canadell J., Ehleringer J.R., Mooney H.A., Sala O.E., Schulze E.D. 1996. A global analysis of root distributions for terrestrial biomes. Oecologia, 108, 389-411.
- Jagodzinski A.M., Ziółkowski J., Warnkowska A., Prais H. 2016. Tree age effects on fine root biomass and morphology over chronosequences of Fagus sylvatica, Quercus robur and Alnus glutinosa stands. PLoS ONE 11 (2): e0148668.
- Jaworski A. 1995.Charakterystyka hodowlana drzew leśnych. Gutenberg, Kraków. Kundzewicz Z.W., Juda-Rezler K. 2010. Climate change related risk. Nauka, 4, 69-76.
- Leuschner Ch., Backes K., Hertel D., Schipka F., Schmitt U., Terborg O., Runge M. 2001. Drought responses at leaf, stem and fine root levels of competitive Fagus sylvatica L. and Quercus petraea (Matt.) Liebl. trees in dry and wet years. Forest Ecology and Management, 149, 33-46.
- Leuschner Ch., Hertel D. 2002. Fine root biomass of temperate forests in relation to soil acidity and fertility, climate, age and species. Progress in Botany, 64, 405-438.
- Leuschner Ch., Hertel D., Schmid I., Koch O., Muhs A., Hölscher D. 2004. Stand fine root and fine root morphology in old-growth beech forests as function of precipitation and soil fertility. Plant and Soil, 258 (1/2), 43-56.
- Le Goff N., Ottorini J. 2001. Root biomass and biomass increment in a beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) stand in North-East France. Annals of Forest Science, 58, 1-13.
- Meinen C., Hertel D., Leuschner Ch. 2009. Biomass and morphology of fine roots in temperate broad-leaved forests differing in tree species diversity: is there evidence of below-ground overyielding? Oecologia, 161 (1), 99-111.
- Norby R.J., Jackson R.B. 2000. Root dynamics and global change: seeking an ecosystem perspective. New Phytologist, 147, 3-12.
- Olesinski J., Lavigne M.B., Krasowski M.J. 2011. Effects of soil moisture manipulations on fine root dynamics in a mature balsam fir (Abies balsamea L. Mill.) forest. Tree Physiology, 31 (3), 339-348.
- Olesinski J., Krasowski M.J., Lavigne M.B., Kershaw J.A. Jr., Bernier P.Y. 2012. Fine root production varies with climate in balsam fir (Abies balsamea). Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 42 (2), 364-374.
- Olszowska G. 2011. Biochemical variability of forest soils at the range edge of European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) in Poland. Forest Research Papers, 72 (4), 321-328.
- Santantonio D., Grace J.C. 1987. Estimating fine-root production and turnover from biomass and decomposition data: a compartment-flow model. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 17, 900-908.
- Stykes M.T., Prentice I.C. 1995. Boreal forest futures: modeling the controls on tree species range limits and transient responses to climate change. Water, Air and Soil Pollution, 82, 415-428.
- Vogt K.A., Moore E.E., Vogt D.J., Redlin M.J., Edmonds R.L. 1983. Conifer fine root and mycorrhizal root biomass within the forest floors of Douglas- fir stands of different ages and site productivities. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 13, 429-437.
- Vogt K.A., Grier C.C., Vogt D.J. 1986. Production, turnover, and nutrient dynamics of above- and belowground detritus of world forests. Advances in Ecological Research, 15, 303-378.
- Vogt K.A., Vogt D.J., Palmiotto P.A., Boon P., O’Hara J., Asbjornsen H. 1996. Review of root dynamics in forest ecosystems grouped by climate, climatic forest type and species. Plant and Soil, 187, 159-219.
- Yuan Z.Y., Chen Y.H. 2010. Fine root biomass, production, turnover rates, and nutrient contents in boreal forest ecosystems in relation to species, climate, fertility, and stand age: literature review and meta- analyses. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences, 29 (4), 204-221.