Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Plant ecological groups and soil properties of common hazel (Corylus avellana L.) stand in Safagashteh forest, north of Iran Cover

Plant ecological groups and soil properties of common hazel (Corylus avellana L.) stand in Safagashteh forest, north of Iran

Open Access
|Mar 2016

References

  1. Adel M.N., Pourbabaei H., Dey D.C. 2014. Ecological species group–Environmental factors relationships in unharvested beech forests in the north of Iran., 69, 1–7.
  2. Augusto L., Dupouey J.L., Ranger J. 2003. Effects of tree species on understory vegetation and environmental conditions in temperate forests., 60, 823–831.
  3. Boulanger V., Baltzinger C., Saïd S., Ballon P., Picard J.F., Dupouey J.L. 2015. Decreasing deer browsing pressure influenced understory vegetation dynamics over 30 years., 72, 367–378.
  4. Chang-Bae Lee C.B., Chun J.H. 2015. Patterns and determinants of plant richness by elevation in a mountain ecosystem in South Korea: area, middomain effect, climate and productivity., 26 (4), 905-917. DOI 10.1007/11676-015-0115-z.
  5. Chávez V., Macdonald S.E. 2012. Partitioning vascular understory diversity in mixedwood boreal forests: The importance of mixed canopies for diversity conservation., 271, 19–26.
  6. Clement Ch. 2001. The ecological importance of understory herbaceous plants. The Effects of Land-Use change on the biodiversity of the Highlands Plateau: a Carolina Environmental Program Report, 32–42.
  7. Coroi M., Skeffington M.S., Giller P., Smith C., Gormally M., O’Donovan G. 2004. Vegetation diversity and stand structure in streamside forests in the south of Ireland., 202, 39–57.
  8. Eshaghi Rad J., Banj Shafiei A. 2010. The distribution of ecological species groups in Fagetum communities of Caspian forests: determination of effective environmental factors., 205 (11), 721–727.
  9. Gilliam F.S. 2007. The ecological significance of the herbaceous layer in temperate forest ecosystems., 57 (10), 845–858.
  10. Giorgini D., Giordani P., Casazza G., Amici V., Mariotti M.G., Chiarucci A. 2015. Woody species diversity as predictor of vascular plant species diversity in forest ecosystems., 345, 50–55.
  11. Hardtle W., von Oheimb G., Westphal C. 2005. Relationships between the vegetation and soil conditions in beech and beech-oak forests of northern Germany., 177, 113–124.
  12. Hermy M., Honnay O., Firbank L., Grashof-Bokdam C., Lawesson J.E. 1999. An ecological comparison between ancient and other forest plant species of Europe, and the implications for forest conservation., 91, 9–22.
  13. Hosein Ava S., Pir Khezri M. 2011. Evaluation of Quantitative and Quality Characteristics in Some Hazelnut (Corylus avellana L.) Varieties in Karaj Climatic Conditions., 26 (2), 329–342.
  14. Jancke O., Dorren L.K.A., Berger F., Fuhr M., Kohl M. 2009. Implications of coppice stand characteristics on the rockfall protection function., 259, 124–131.
  15. Jolls C.L. 2003. Populations of and threats to rare plants of the herb layer: more challenges and opportunities for conservation biologists. In: The Herbaceous Layer in Forests of Eastern North America (eds.: F.S Gilliam, M.R. Roberts). Oxford University Press, New York.
  16. Khuroo A.A., Weber E., Malik A.H., Reshi Z.A., Dar G.H. 2011. Altitudinal distribution patterns of the native and alien woody flora in Kashmir Himalaya, India., 111, 967–977.
  17. Koorem K., Moora M. 2010. Positive association between understory species richness and a dominant shrub species () in a boreonemoral spruce forest., 260, 1407–1413.
  18. Lencinasa M.V., Pastur G.M., Gallo E., Cellini J.M. 2011. Alternative silvicultural practices with variable retention to improve understory plant diversity conservation in southern Patagonian forests., 262, 1236–1250.
  19. McEwan R.W., Muller R.N. 2011. Dynamics, diversity, and resource gradient relationships in the herbaceous layer of an old-growth Appalachian forest., 212, 1179–1191.
  20. Mölder A., Streit M., Schmidt W. 2014. When beech strikes back: How strict nature conservation reduces herb-layer diversity and productivity in Central European deciduous forests., 319, 51–61.
  21. Moraghebi F., Matinizade M., Khanjani Shiraz B. 2010. Mycorrhizal symbiosis hazelnut (L.) and acid phosphatase activity in two regions suction and Fandoglo., 6 (24), 13–23.
  22. Onaindia M., Mitxelena A. 2009. Potential use of pine plantations to restore native forests in a highly fragmented river basin., 66 (305), 1–8.
  23. Pena L., Amezaga I., Onaindia M. 2011. At which spatial scale are plant species composition and diversity affected in beech forests?, 68, 1351–1362.
  24. Reyers B., Van Jaarsveld A.S., Krüger M. 2000. Complementarity as a biodiversity indicator strategy., 267, 505–513.
  25. Scheller R.M., Mladenoff D.J. 2002. Understory species patterns and diversity in old-growth and managed northern hardwood forests., 12, 1329–1343.
  26. Wulf M., Naaf T. 2009. Herb layer response to broad-leaf tree species with different leaf litter quality and canopy structure in temperate forests., 20, 517–526.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ffp-2015-0026 | Journal eISSN: 2199-5907 | Journal ISSN: 0071-6677
Language: English
Page range: 245 - 250
Submitted on: Oct 1, 2015
Accepted on: Nov 16, 2015
Published on: Mar 7, 2016
Published by: Forest Research Institute
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Related subjects:

© 2016 Hassan Pourbabaei, Mohammad Naghi Adel, published by Forest Research Institute
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.