Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Architecture Enabling Adaptation of Data Integration Processes for a Research Information System Cover

Architecture Enabling Adaptation of Data Integration Processes for a Research Information System

Foundations of Computing and Decision Sciences
Volume 43 (2018): Issue 2 (June 2018)
By: Darja Solodovnikova,  Laila Niedrite and  Aivars Niedritis  
Open Access
|Jun 2018

References

  1. [1] Aagaard K., Bloch C., Schneider J.W., Impacts of performance-based research funding systems: the case of the Norwegian Publication Indicator. Research Evaluation 24, 2, 2015, 106-117.10.1093/reseval/rvv003
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  2. [2] Cabinet Regulation No. 1316 Regulations regarding calculation and assignment of grantbased funding for research institutions, https://likumi.lv/doc.php?id=262508
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  3. [3] Chen Z., Wu D., Lu J., Chen Y., Metadata-based information resource integration for research management, Procedia Computer Science, 17, 2013, 54-61.10.1016/j.procs.2013.05.009
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  4. [4] Di Tria F., Lefons E., Tangorra F., Academic data warehouse design using a hybrid methodology, Computer Science and Information Systems, 12, 1, 2015, 135-160.10.2298/CSIS140325087D
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  5. [5] DSpace-CRIS Home. https://wiki.duraspace.org/display/DSPACECRIS/DSpace-CRIS+Home
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  6. [6] Galimberti P., Mornati S., The Italian model of distributed research information management systems: a case study, Procedia Computer Science, 106, 2017, 183-195.10.1016/j.procs.2017.03.015
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  7. [7] Golfarelli M., Lechtenbörger J., Rizzi S., Vossen G., Schema versioning in data warehouses: Enabling cross-version querying via schema augmentation, Data & Knowledge Engineering, 59, 2, 2006, 435-459.10.1016/j.datak.2005.09.004
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  8. [8] Gonzalez-Pereira B., Guerrero-Bote V.P., Moya-Anegon F., A new approach to the metric of journals’ scientific prestige: The SJR indicator, Journal of Informetrics, 4, 3, 2010, 379-391.10.1016/j.joi.2010.03.002
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  9. [9] Hardcastle J., New journal citation metric - Impact per Publication, 2014, http://editorresources.taylorandfrancisgroup.com/new-journal-citation-metric-impactper-publication/
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  10. [10]Hicks D., Wouters P., Waltman L., De Rijcke S., Rafols I., The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics, Nature, 520, 7548, 2015, 429-431.10.1038/520429a25903611
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  11. [11] Inmon W.H., Building the Data Warehouse, 3rd edition, Wiley Computer Publishing, 2002.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  12. [12]The International Organisation for Research Information, http://eurocris.org/cerif/mainfeatures-cerif
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  13. [13] Jörg B., CERIF: The common European research information format model, Data Science Journal, 9, 2010, CRIS24-CRIS31.10.2481/dsj.CRIS4
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  14. [14]Kosten J., A classification of the use of research indicators, Scientometrics, 108, 1, 2016, 457-464.10.1007/s11192-016-1904-7490978727390388
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  15. [15] Kulczycki E., Korzeń M., Korytkowski P., Toward an excellence-based research funding system: Evidence from Poland, Journal of Informetrics, 11, 1, 2017, 282-298.10.1016/j.joi.2017.01.001
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  16. [16]Moed H.F., Measuring contextual citation impact of scientific journals, Journal of Informetrics, 4, 3, 2010, 265-277.10.1016/j.joi.2010.01.002
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  17. [17]Nadal S., Romero O., Abelló A., Vassiliadis P., Vansummeren S., An integrationoriented ontology to govern evolution in big data ecosystems, in: Proceedings of the Workshops of the EDBT/ICDT 2017 Joint Conference (EDBT/ICDT 2017), Venice, Italy, 2017.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  18. [18]Niedrite L., Solodovnikova D., University IS Architecture for the Research Evaluation Support, in: Proceedings of 11th International Scientific and Practical Conference "Environment. Technology. Resources", Rezekne Academy of Technologies, Rezekne, 2017, 112-117.10.17770/etr2017vol2.2528
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  19. [19]Niedrite L., Solodovnikova D., Niedritis A., Publication Data Integration as a Tool for Excellence-Based Research Analysis at the University of Latvia, in: M. Kirikova, K. Nørvåg, G. Papadopoulos, J. Gamper, R. Wrembel, J. Darmont, S. Rizzi (eds.), New Trends in Databases and Information Systems. ADBIS 2017. Communications in Computer and Information Science, 767, Springer, Berlin, 2017, 125-136.10.1007/978-3-319-67162-8_14
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  20. [20] Nikolić S ., P enca V ., I vanović D ., S urla D ., K onjović Z., Storing of Bibliometric Indicators in CERIF Data Model, in: International Conference on Internet Society Technology, 2015.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  21. [21]Parmenter D., Key Performance Indicators: Developing, Implementing, and Using Winning KPIs, Second Edition, Jon Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2010.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  22. [22]Quix C., Matthias J., Information integration in research information systems, Procedia Computer Science, 33, 2014, 18-24.10.1016/j.procs.2014.06.004
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  23. [23]Sivertsen G., Data integration in Scandinavia, Scientometrics, 106, 2, 2016, 849-855.10.1007/s11192-015-1817-x
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  24. [24]Solodovnikova, D., Data Warehouse Evolution Framework, in: Proceedings of Spring Young Researcher's Colloquium on Database and Information Systems, Moscow, Russia, 2007, 4.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  25. [25]Teixeira da Silva J.A., Memon A.R., CiteScore: A cite for sore eyes, or a valuable, transparent metric?, Scientometrics, 111, 1, 2017, 553-556.10.1007/s11192-017-2250-0
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  26. [26]Winkler W., The state of record linkage and current research problems, Technical report, Statistics of Income Division, US Census Bureau, 1999.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  27. [27]Winter R., Strauch B., A method for demand-driven information requirements analysis in data warehousing projects, in: Proceedings of the 36th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, IEEE Computer Society Washington, DC, 2003, 231.1.10.1109/HICSS.2003.1174602
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/fcds-2018-0008 | Journal eISSN: 2300-3405 | Journal ISSN: 0867-6356
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 129 - 149
Submitted on: Jan 11, 2018
Accepted on: Mar 21, 2018
Published on: Jun 22, 2018
Published by: Poznan University of Technology
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year
Keywords:
integration architecture,
adaptation,
research evaluation,
research metrics,
data quality,
data model
Related subjects:
Computer sciences,
Artificial intelligence,
Software development

© 2018 Darja Solodovnikova, Laila Niedrite, Aivars Niedritis, published by Poznan University of Technology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 43 (2018): Issue 2 (June 2018)