Have a personal or library account? Click to login

Spatial Constraints of Slovenian Farms: What Does Urbanization Have to Do with It?

European Countryside
Volume 9 (2017): Issue 2 (June 2017)
By:
Open Access
|Jul 2017

References

  1. [1] Almstedt, Å., Brouder, P., Karlsson, S. & Lundmark L. (2014). Beyond post-productivism: from rural policy discourse to rural diversity. European Countryside 6(4), 297-306. Doi: 10.2478/euco-2014-0016.10.2478/euco-2014-0016
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  2. [2] Bergmann, E. & Dosch, F. (2004). Von Siedlungsexpansion zum Flächenkreislauf. Trendwende zum haushälterischen Umgang. PlanerIn 1, 5-8.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  3. [3] Berry, D. & Plaut, T. (1978). Retaining agricultural activities under urban pressures: a review of land use conflicts and policies. Policy Sciences 9(2), 153-178.10.1007/BF00143740
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  4. [4] Blanc, M. & Perrier-Cornet, P. (1993). Farm Transfer and Family Entry in the European community. Sociologia Ruralis, 33(3/4), 319-335. Doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9523.1993.tb00967.x.10.1111/j.1467-9523.1993.tb00967.x
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  5. [5] Bole, D., Petek, F., Ravbar, M., Repolusk, P. & Topole, M. (2007). Changes in built-up areas in Slovene rural settlements (Georitem 5). Ljubljana: Založba ZRC SAZU.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  6. [6] Bryant, C. (1992). Farming at the urban fringe. In Bowler, I., ed., The geography of agriculture in developed market economies (pp. 275-304). Harlow: Longman.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  7. [7] Bryant, C. & Johnston, T. R. (1992). Agriculture in the city’s countryside. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  8. [8] Cigale, D. (2005). Posodobitev Ravbarjeve tipizacije naselij z vidika stopnje urbaniziranosti na podlagi RPE 2002. Ljubljana: Univerza v Ljubljani.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  9. [9] Daniels, T. (1999). When city and country collide: Managing growth in the metropolitan fringe. Washington D. C.: Island Press.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  10. [10] Errington, A. (1994). The peri-urban fringe: Europe’s forgotten rural areas. Journal of Rural Studies 10(4), 367-375. Doi: 10.1016/0743-0167(94)90046-9.10.1016/0743-0167(94)90046-9
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  11. [11] Grazuleviciute-Vileniske, I., Zaleskiene, E., Baltrusaityte, G. & Rubikaite, L. (2015). Urbanization Influence on the Relicts of Soviet Rural Landscape: Case of Lithuania. SAGE Open 1-18. Doi: 10.1177/2158244015601718.10.1177/2158244015601718
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  12. [12] Hauser, L. T., Van Der Sluis, T. & Giezen, M. (2016).The Role of Farm Management Characteristics in Understanding the Spatial Distribution of Landscape Elements: A Case Study in the Netherlands. Rural Landscapes: Society, Environment, History 3(1), 1-15. Doi: 10.16993/rl.14.10.16993/rl.14
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  13. [13] Henderson, S. R. (2005). Managing land-use conflict around urban centres: Australian poultry farmer attitudes towards relocation. Applied Geography 25, 97-119. Doi: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2005.03.001.10.1016/j.apgeog.2005.03.001
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  14. [14] Hersperger, A. M., Franscini, M. P. G., & Kuebler, D. (2014). Actors, decisions and policy changes in local urbanization. European Planning Studies 22(6), 1301-1319. Doi: 10.1080/09654313.2013.783557.10.1080/09654313.2013.783557
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  15. [15] Ilbery, B. & Bowler, I. (1998). From agricultural productivism to post-productivism. In Ilbery, B., ed., The Geography of Rural Change (pp. 57-84). Harlow: Longman.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  16. [16] Kerbler, B. K. (2008). The influence of factors of the socio-geographical structure of mountain farms in Slovenia upon farm succession statuses and decisions. Acta Geographica Slovenica 48(2), 277-303. Doi: 10.3986.AGS48203.10.3986/AGS48203
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  17. [17] Kladnik, D. (2003). The significance and prospects of farms within Ljubljana's ring road. Geografski vestnik 75(2), 35-52.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  18. [18] Kladnik, D. & Petek, F. (2007). Agriculture and changing land use on Ljubljansko polje. Geografski vestnik 79(2), 25-40.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  19. [19] Knific, K. & Bojnec, Š. (2015). Structural changes in land use of agricultural holdings in hilly rural areas. Acta Geographica Slovenica 55(1), 59-77. Doi: 10.3986/AGS.736.10.3986/AGS.736
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  20. [20] Lampič, B. (2008). Kmetijstvo v Mestni občini Ljubljana: relikt ali razvojni potencial (GeograFF 2). Ljubljana: Znanstvena založba Filozofske fakultete.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  21. [21] Lawrence, H. W. (1988). Changes in agricultural production in metropolitan areas. Professional Geographer 40(2), 159-175. Doi: 10.1111/j.0033-0124.1988.00159.x.10.1111/j.0033-0124.1988.00159.x
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  22. [22] Lewis, G. (1998). Rural migration and demographic change. In Ilbery, B., ed., The Geography of Rural Change (pp. 131-160). Harlow: Longman.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  23. [23] Lisansky, J., Andrews, M. S. & Lopez, R. A. (1988). The determinants of right-to-farm conflicts. Rural Sociology 53(2), 246-255.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  24. [24] Markuszewska, I. (2013). Land consolidation as an instrument of shaping the agrarian structure in Poland. Quaestiones Geographicae 32(3), 53-67. Doi: 10.2478/quageo-2013-0027.10.2478/quageo-2013-0027
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  25. [25] Neumeier, S. & Pollermann, K. (2014). Rural tourism as promoter of rural development - prospects and limitations: case study findings from a pilot project promoting village tourism. European Countryside 6(4), 270-296. Doi: 10.2478/euco-2014-0015.10.2478/euco-2014-0015
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  26. [26] Perpar, A. & Kovačič, M. (2006). Spatial aspects of farm development. Dela 25, 61-71. Doi: 10.4312/dela.25.5.61-71.10.4312/dela.25.5.61-71
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  27. [27] Podhrázská, J., Vaishar, A., Toman, F., Knotek, J., Ševelová, M., Stonawská, K., Vasylchenko, A. & Karásek, P. (2015). Evaluation of land consolidation process by rural stakeholders. European Countryside 7(3), 144-155. Doi: 10.1515/euco-2015-0010.10.1515/euco-2015-0010
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  28. [28] Pospěch, P., Spěšná, D. & Staveník. A. (2015). Images of a good village: a visual analysis of the rural idyll in the “village of the year” competition in the Czech Republic. European Countryside 7(2), 68-86. Doi: 10.1515/euco-2015-0005.10.1515/euco-2015-0005
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  29. [29] Potter, C. & Tilzey, M. (2005). Agricultural Policy Discourses in the European Post-Fordist Transition. Progress in Human Geography 29(5), 581-600. Doi: 10.1191/0309132505ph569oa.10.1191/0309132505ph569oa
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  30. [30] Price, R. Kienast, F., Seidl, I., Ginzler, C., Verburg P. H. & Bolliger, J. (2015). Future landscapes of Switzerland: Risk areas for urbanisation and land abandonment. Applied Geography 57, 32-41. Doi: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2014.12.009.10.1016/j.apgeog.2014.12.009
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  31. [31] Ravbar, M. (1997). Slovene cities and suburbs in transformation. Geografski zbornik, 37, 65-109.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  32. [32] Ravbar, M. (2002). Sodobne težnje v razvoju prebivalstva in delovnih mest - pot k sonaravnemu in decentraliziranemu usmerjanju poselitve v Sloveniji? IB revija 36(1), 21-41.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  33. [33] Ravbar, M. (2004). Razpotja naselbinskega omrežja v Sloveniji: težnje, razvojne dilemein možni scenariji. IB revija 38(4), 41-51.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  34. [34] Ravbar, M. (2005). »Urban Sprawl« - a distorted image of (sub)urbanization in Slovenia? Geografski vestnik 77(1), 27-36.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  35. [35] Razpotnik Visković, N. (2015). Evaluating the development potential of farms on urban outskirts: methodology. Acta Geographica Slovenica 55(1), 79-98. Doi: 10.3986/AGS.704.10.3986/AGS.704
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  36. [36] Razpotnik Visković, N. (2011). Spatial limitations on farms in urban outskirts. Acta Geographica Slovenica 51(1), 109-127. Doi: 10.3986/AGS51105.10.3986/AGS51105
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  37. [37] Serra, P., Vera, A., Tulla, A. F., & Salvati, L. (2014). Beyond urban-rural dichotomy: exploring socioeconomic and land-use processes of change in Spain (1991-2011). Applied Geography 55, 71-81. Doi: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2014.09.005.10.1016/j.apgeog.2014.09.005
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  38. [38] van Dijk, T. (2007). Complications for traditional land consolidation in Central Europe. Geoforum 38, 505-511. Doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2006.11.010.10.1016/j.geoforum.2006.11.010
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  39. [39] Vitikainen, A. (2004). An Overview of land Consolidation in Europe. Nordic Journal of Surveying and Real Estate Research 1, 25-44.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  40. [40] Zasada, I., Fertner, C., Piorr, A. & Sick Nielsen, T. (2011). Peri-urbanisation and multifunctional adaptation of agriculture around Copenhagen. Danish Journal of Geography 111(1), 59-72. Doi: 10.1080/00167223.2011.10669522.10.1080/00167223.2011.10669522
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  41. [41] SPRS - Spatial Development Strategy of Slovenia (2004). (http://www.mop.gov.si/fileadmin/mop.gov.si/pageuploads/podrocja/prostorski_razvoj/SPRS_angleska_verzija.pdf (6. 6. 2016)).
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  42. [42] SURS - Statistical Office of the Republic of Slovenia (2012). 2010 Agricultural Census - Every farm counts! (http://www.stat.si/doc/pub/15-RP141-1202.pdf (6. 6. 2016)).
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  43. [43] SURS - Statistical Office of the Republic of Slovenia (2014). Supply balance sheets. (http://pxweb.stat.si/pxweb/Database/Environment/Environment.asp (6. 6. 2016)).
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/euco-2017-0017 | Journal eISSN: 1803-8417
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 274 - 286
Published on: Jul 13, 2017
Published by: Mendel University in Brno
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year
Keywords:
spatial constraints of farms,
urbanization,
development potential of farms,
spatial planning,
geography,
Slovenia
Related subjects:
Life sciences,
Ecology,
Life sciences, other

© 2017 Nika Razpotnik Visković, published by Mendel University in Brno
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 9 (2017): Issue 2 (June 2017)Next article