The Role of Small Towns in a Potential Ecoregion through the Example of Fertő/Neusiedlersee Cultural Landscape

Ágnes Sallay; Zsuzsanna Mikházi; Klaudia Mátá; Edina Dancsokné Fóris; Krisztina Filepné Kovács; István Valánszki; László Kollányi

doi:10.1515/euco-2016-0020

.blurhash-client-img { display: none !important; }

The Role of Small Towns in a Potential Ecoregion through the Example of Fertő/Neusiedlersee Cultural Landscape

European Countryside

Volume 8 (2016): Issue 3 (September 2016)

By: Ágnes Sallay, Zsuzsanna Mikházi, Klaudia Mátá, Edina Dancsokné Fóris, Krisztina Filepné Kovács, István Valánszki and László Kollányi

Open Access

|Oct 2016

Abstract

Fertő/Neusiedlersee Cultural Landscape, as a transboundary World Heritage Site of Hungary and Austria, possesses unique cultural and natural values. The examined areas can be characterised as meeting places of different cultures. We examined the role of small towns in Fertő/Neusiedlersee Cultural Landscape, which play an important role in regional development. In the last 25 years, different levels of cooperation started among the Hungarian and Austrian settlements aiming at nature and cultural heritage protection and tourism development. We formulated suggestions to maintain and strengthen the existing co-operation and relations.

References

[1] 321/2012. (XI. 16.) Korm. rendelet a területszervezési eljárásról.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[2] 1971 Országos Területfejlesztési Koncepció (1971 National Spatial Development Concept).
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[3] Beluszky, P. & Tímár, L. (2003). Magyarország történeti földrajza. Budapest-Pécs: Dialóg Campus Kiadó.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[4] Bundes-Verfassungsgesetz: http://www.ris.bka.gv.at/GeltendeFassung.wxe?Abfrage=Bundesnormen&Gesetzesnummer=10000138 (Retrieved: 1 April 2016).
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[5] Busch, J. (2008). Gains from configuration: The transboundary protected area as a conservation tool. Ecological Economics 67(3), 394-404. Doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.12.012.10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.12.012
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[6] Czerny, M., van Lindert, P. & Verkoren, O. (1997). Small and intermediate towns in Latin American rural and regional Development (pp. 1-14). In Lindert, van P. & Verkoren, O., eds., Small Towns and Beyond: Rural Transformation and Small Urban Centres in Latin America, Amsterdam: Thela Publishers.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[7] Eriksson, G. A. (1979). Tourism at the Finnish–Swedish–Norwegian borders (pp. 151-162). In Gruber, G., Lamping, H., Lutz, W., Matznetter, J. & Vorlaufer, K., eds., Tourism and Borders: Proceedings of the Meeting of the IGU Working Group – Geography of Tourism and Recreation Institut für Wirtschafts- und Sozialgeographie der Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universität, Frankfurt am Main.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[8] Európa Tanács/European council (2000): Európai Táj Egyezmény. (2007. évi CXI. törvény a Firenzében, 2000. október 20-án kelt, az Európai Táj Egyezmény kihirdetéséről).
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[9] Fertő-táj Kultúrtáj világörökségi kezelési terve, Stadtland–AVL-Bécs, VÁTI KHT–Budapest, 2003.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[10] Gehl, J. (2010). Cities for people. Washington-Covelo-London: ISLANDPRESS.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[11] Gemeindestatus: http://www.burgenland.at/land-politik-verwaltung/land/bezirke-gemeinden/ (Retrieved: 1 April 2016).
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[12] Hamza, C., Frangenheim, A., Charles, D. & Miller, P. (2014). The role of cities in cohesion policy 2014-2020. Brussel: European Parliament. Doi: 10.2861/6801.10.2861/6801
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[13] Közép- és Kelet-Európa. Rejtett potenciál a kis- és középvárosokban. European Union, az ESPON 2013 Program keretében futó ESPON on the road projekt, magyar kiadás. http://esponontheroad.eu.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[14] McCallum, W., J., Vasilijevic, M. & Cuthill, I. (2015). Assessing the benefits of Transboundary Protected Areas: A questionnaire survey in the Americas and the Caribbean. Journal of Environmental Management 149, 245-252. Doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.10.013.10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.10.01325463587
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[15] McMahon, G., Gregonis S. M., Waltman, S. W., Omernik, J. M., Thorson, T. D., Freeouf, J. A., Rorick, A. H. & Keys, J. E. (2001). Developing a Spatial Framework of Common Ecological Regions for the Conterminous United States. Environmental Management 28(3), 293-316. DOI: 10.1007/s002670010225.10.1007/s002670010225
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[16] Milenković, M. (2012). Ecoregionalism - Factor Cross-Border Cooperation and Tourism Development. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 44, 236-240. Doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.05.025.10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.05.025
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[17] Omernik, J. M. (2004). Perspectives on the Nature and Definition of Ecological Regions. Environmental Management 34(Suppl. 1), S27-S38. DOI: 10.1007/s00267-003-5197-2.10.1007/s00267-003-5197-216044553
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[18] Opermanis, O., MacSharry, B., Evans, D. & Sipkova, Z. (2013). Is the connectivity of the Natura 2000 network better across internal or external administrative borders? Biological Conservation 166, 170-174. Doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2013.06.019.10.1016/j.biocon.2013.06.019
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[19] Owusu, G. (2005). The role of district capitals in regional development: linking small towns, rural-urban linkages and decentralisation in Ghana. [PhD theses]. Trondheim: Norwegian University of Science and Technology.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[20] Pedersen, A. (2002). Managing Tourism at World Heritage Sites: a Practical Manual for World Heritage Site Managers. Paris, UNESCO World Heritage Centre.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[21] Strategie Raumstruktur Landesentwicklungsplan Burgenland (2011). [Endbericht]. Mecca consulting and Regional Consulting ZT GmbH.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[22] Territorial Agenda of the European Union. Towards a more competitive and sustainable Europe of diverse regions. Agreed on the occasion of the Informal Ministerial Meeting on Urban Development and Territorial Cohesion. Leipzig 24/25 May 2007.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[23] Territorial Agenda of the European Union 2020 (2011). Towards an Inclusive, Smart and Sustainable Europe of Diverse Regions. Agreed at the Informal Ministerial Meeting of Ministers responsible for Spatial Planning and Territorial Development on 19 May 2011. Gödöllő, Hungary.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
[24] Trillo-Santamaría, J. M. & Paül, V. (2016). Transboundary protected areas as ideal tools? Analyzing the Gerês-Xurés transboundary biosphere reserve. Land Use Policy 52, 454-463. Doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.12.019.10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.12.019
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article

Articles in this issue

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/euco-2016-0020 | Journal eISSN: 1803-8417

Journal RSS Feed

Language: English

Page range: 278 - 295

Submitted on: Apr 15, 2016

Accepted on: Aug 31, 2016

Published on: Oct 18, 2016

Published by: Mendel University in Brno

In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

Keywords:

small towns,

ecoregion,

Fertő/Neusiedlersee Cultural Landscape,

cultural landscape,

cross-border tourism,

world heritage

Related subjects:

Life sciences,

Ecology,

Life sciences, other

© 2016 Ágnes Sallay, Zsuzsanna Mikházi, Klaudia Mátá, Edina Dancsokné Fóris, Krisztina Filepné Kovács, István Valánszki, László Kollányi, published by Mendel University in Brno
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Volume 8 (2016): Issue 3 (September 2016)