References
- [1] Bäckstrand, K. (2008). Accountability of Networked Climate Governance: The Rise of Transnational Climate Partnerships. Global Environmental Politics, 8(3), 74-102. DOI: 10.1162/glep.2008.8.3.74.10.1162/glep.2008.8.3.74
- [2] Beck, U. (2006). Reflexive governance: politics in the global risk society. In Voss, J.-P., Bauknecht, D. & Kemp, R. (Eds.), Reflexive governance for sustainable development (pp. 31-56). Cheltenham, UK; Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
- [3] Bulkeley, H., & Newell, P. (2010). Governing climate change. London ; New York: Routledge.
- [4] Dax, T., Strahl, W., Kirwan, J., & Maye, D. (2016). The Leader programme 2007-2013: Enabling or disabling social innovation and neo-endogenous development? Insights from Austria and Ireland. European Urban and Regional Studies, 23(1), 56-68. DOI: 10.1177/0969776413490425.10.1177/0969776413490425
- [5] Deephouse, D. L. & Suchman, M. (2008). Legitimacy in organizational institutionalism (pp. 49-77). The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism, 49.
- [6] Delin, M. (2012). The role of farmers in Local Action Groups: The case of the national network of the Local Action Groups in the Czech Republic. Agricultural Economics (Zemědělská ekonomika), 58(9), 433-442.
- [7] Dingwerth, K. (2007). The New Transnationalism: Private Transnational Governance and its Democratic Legitimacy. Basingstoke, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
- [8] Dostál, J. (2012). Cooperation between non-governmental organizations and the State in the matter of flood risk management in the Czech Republic. In Proverbs, D. G. ed., Flood recovery, innovation and response III (pp. 15-26). Southampton: WIT Press. DOI: 10.2495/FRIAR120021.10.2495/FRIAR120021
- [9] Dwyer, J. & Findeis, J. (2008). Human and Social Capital in Rural Development – EU and US Perspectives Human- und Sozialkapital in der Entwicklung des ländlichen Raums – Perspektiven aus der EU und den USA Le capital social et humain dans le développement rural: Perspectives aux États-Unis et dans l’Union européenne. EuroChoices, 7(1), 38-45. DOI: 10.1111/j.1746-692X.2008.00084.x.10.1111/j.1746-692X.2008.00084.x
- [10] ECONADPT. (2015). The Costs and Benefits of Adaptation: Results from the ECONADAPT Project. The ECONADAPT consortium. Retrieved from http://econadapt.eu/docs/Econadapt-policy-report-on-costs-and-benefits-of-adaptaiton-july-draft-2015.pdf.
- [11] Ensor, J. & Berger, R. (2009). Community Based Adaptation and Culture in Theory and Practice. In Adger, W. N., Lorenzoni, I. & O’Brien, K. L. (Eds.), Adapting to climate change: thresholds, values, governance (pp. 227-239). Cambridge ; New York: Cambridge University Press.
- [12] European Commission. (2006). The Leader approach: a basic guide. Luxembourg: EUR-OP. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/publi/fact/leader/2006_en.pdf.
- [13] European Commission. (2010). Eurobarometer. 1. Life in the European Union (Standard Eurobarometer No. 70) (p. 209). European Commission. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/eb/eb70/eb70_part1_en.pdf.
- [14] European Commission. (2013). An EU Strategy on adaptation to climate change. (Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions No. COM (2013) 216 final). Brussels: European Commission. Retrieved from http://eurlex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52013DC0216&from=EN.
- [15] European Court of Auditors. (2010). Implementation of the Leader approach for rural development: (pursuant to Article 287(4), second subparagraph, TFEU). Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
- [16] Forsberg, E.-M. (2012a). Applying instruments for regional innovation – generating projects or legitimacy? International Journal of Innovation and Regional Development, 4(5), 430-445. DOI: 10.1504/IJIRD.2012.048995.10.1504/IJIRD.2012.048995
- [17] Forsberg, E.-M. (2012b). Standardisation in the Field of Nanotechnology: Some Issues of Legitimacy. Science and Engineering Ethics, 18(4), 719-739. DOI: 10.1007/s11948-011-9268-0.10.1007/s11948-011-9268-0
- [18] Glaas, E., Jonsson, A., Hjerpe, M. & Andersson-Sköld, Y. (2010). Managing climate change vulnerabilities: formal institutions and knowledge use as determinants of adaptive capacity at the local level in Sweden. Local Environment, 15(6), 525-539. DOI: 10.1080/13549839.2010.487525.10.1080/13549839.2010.487525
- [19] Hudečková, H. & Lošťák, M. (2008). LEADER in the Czech Republic and farming sector. Agricultural Economics (Zemědělská ekonomika), 54(12), 555-565.
- [20] IPCC. (2014). Climate change 2014: impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability: Working Group II contribution to the fifth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
- [21] Katona-Kovács, J., High, C. & Nemes, G. (2011). Importance of Animation Actions in the Operation of Hungarian Local Action Groups. European Countryside, 3(4), 227-240. DOI: 10.2478/v10091-012-0006-7.10.2478/v10091-012-0006-7
- [22] Kumar, R. & Das, T. K. (2007). Interpartner Legitimacy in the Alliance Development Process*. Journal of Management Studies, 44(8), 1425-1453. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2007.00709.x.10.1111/j.1467-6486.2007.00709.x
- [23] Lederer, M. (2011). From CDM to REDD+ – What do we know for setting up effective and legitimate carbon governance? Ecological Economics, 70(11), 1900-1907. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.02.003.10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.02.003
- [24] Lošťák, M. & Hudečková, H. (2010). Preliminary impacts of the LEADER+ approach in the Czech Republic. Agricultural Economics (Zemědělská ekonomika), 56, 249-265.
- [25] Low, B. & Johnston, W. J. (2010). Organizational network legitimacy and its impact on knowledge networks: the case of China’s TD-SCDMA mobility technology. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 25(6), 468-477. DOI: 10.1108/08858621011066053.10.1108/08858621011066053
- [26] Majule, A. E., Stathers, T., Lamboll, R., Liwenga, E. T., Ngongondo, C., Kalanda-Joshua, M., Swai, E. & Chipungu, F. (2013). Enhancing capacities of individuals, institutions and organizations to adapt to climate change in agricultural sector using innovation system approaches in Tanzania and Malawi. World Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 1(6), 220-231.
- [27] Maurel, M.-C. (2008). Local Development Stakeholders and the European Model: Learning the LEADER Approach in the New Member States. Czech Sociological Review, 44(3), 511-530.
- [28] Moser, S. C. & Ekstrom, J. A. (2010). A framework to diagnose barriers to climate change adaptation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107(51), 22026-22031. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1007887107.10.1073/pnas.1007887107
- [29] National Network of Local Action Groups in the Czech Republic. (2011, May). NATIONAL STRATEGIC PLAN. LEADER 2014+. Retrieved from http://nsmascr.cz/content/uploads/2012/07/NATIONAL-STRATEGIC-PLAN-LEADER-2014+-SUMMARY.pdf.
- [30] OECD. (2014). Society at a Glance 2014. OECD Publishing. Retrieved from http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/social-issues-migration-health/society-at-a-glance-2014_soc_glance-2014-en.
- [31] OECD. (2015). Climate Change Risks and Adaptation. OECD Publishing. Retrieved from http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/environment/climate-change-risks-and-adaptation_9789264234611-en.
- [32] Parsons, T. (1960). Structure and process in modern societies. Glencoe, Ill.: Free Press.
- [33] Pechrová, M. & Boukalová, K. (2015). Differences Among Czech Local Action Groups In Using Selected Principles Of Leader*. Scientia Agriculturae Bohemica, 46(1), 41-48. DOI: 10.1515/sab-2015-0015.10.1515/sab-2015-0015
- [34] Persson, S. G., Lundberg, H. & Andresen, E. (2011). Interpartner legitimacy in regional strategic networks. Industrial Marketing Management, 40(6), 1024-1031. DOI: 10.1016/j.indmarman.2011.06.027.10.1016/j.indmarman.2011.06.027
- [35] Ray, C. (1999). Endogenous Development in the Era of Reflexive Modernity. Journal of Rural Studies, 15(3), 257-267. DOI: 10.1016/S0743-0167(98)00072-2.10.1016/S0743-0167(98)00072-2
- [36] Ray, C. (2000). Editorial. The EU leader Programme: Rural Development Laboratory. Sociologia Ruralis, 40(2), 163-171. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9523.00138.10.1111/1467-9523.00138
- [37] Scott, M. (2013). Resilience: a Conceptual Lens for Rural Studies? Geography Compass, 7(9), 597-610. DOI: 10.1111/gec3.12066.10.1111/gec3.12066
- [38] Sørensen, E. (2002). Democratic Theory and Network Governance. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 24(4), 693-720. DOI: 10.1080/10841806.2002.11029383.10.1080/10841806.2002.11029383
- [39] Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571-610. DOI: 10.5465/AMR.1995.9508080331.10.5465/AMR.1995.9508080331
- [40] Thuesen, A. A. (2010). Partnership Organising of Rural and Coastal Development in Denmark (Ph.d.). Syddansk Universitet. Det Samfundsvidenskabelige Fakulter. Retrieved from http://static.sdu.dk/mediafiles/A/F/A/%7BAFA43E21-7DCF-4BFC-A1C6-8DA4E1FDD6B8%7DSamlet%20LAG%20afhandling.pdf.
- [41] Thuesen, A. A. (2011). Partnerships as Associations: Input and Output Legitimacy of LEADER Partnerships in Denmark, Finland and Sweden. European Planning Studies, 19(4), 575-594. DOI: 10.1080/09654313.2011.548469.10.1080/09654313.2011.548469
- [42] Thuesen, A. A. (2016). The Democratic Capabilities of and Rhetoric on LEADER LAGs in the EU – The Danish Case. In Granberg, L., Andersson, K. & Kovách, I., eds., Evaluating the European Approach to Rural Development: Grass-roots Experiences of the LEADER Programme (pp. 79-93). Routledge.
- [43] Thuessen, A. A. & Nielsen, N. C. (2014). A Territorial Perspective On EU’s Leader Approach In Denmark: The Added Value Of Community-Led Local Development Of Rural And Coastal Areas In A Multi-Level Governance Settings. European Countryside, 6(4). DOI: 10.2478/euco-2014-0017.10.2478/euco-2014-0017
- [44] Urwin, K. & Jordan, A. (2008). Does public policy support or undermine climate change adaptation? Exploring policy interplay across different scales of governance. Global Environmental Change, 18(1), 180-191. DOI: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2007.08.002.10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2007.08.002
- [45] Van Aalst, M. K., Cannon, T. & Burton, I. (2008). Community level adaptation to climate change: The potential role of participatory community risk assessment. Global Environmental Change, 18(1), 165-179. DOI: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2007.06.002.10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2007.06.002
- [46] Varga, E. (2009). Non-profit organizations in Hungarian rural development – a leader+ example in the southern Transdanubian region. European Countryside, 1(2), 93-103. DOI: 10.2478/v10091/009-0008-2.10.2478/v10091/009-0008-2
- [47] Ward, P. N., Atterton, D. J., Kim, T., Lowe, P. P., Phillipson, J. & Thompson, D. N. (2005). Universities, the Knowledge Economy and “Neo-Endogenous Rural Development”. Retrieved from http://eprint.ncl.ac.uk/pub_details2.aspx?pub_id=148470.
- [48] Weber, M. (1947). The theory of social and economic organization (1. pbk. ed., reprint). New York, NY: Free Press.
- [49] Weichselgartner, J. & Pigeon, P. (2015). The Role of Knowledge in Disaster Risk Reduction. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 6(2), 107-116. DOI: 10.1007/s13753-015-0052-7.10.1007/s13753-015-0052-7
- [50] Winsvold, M., Stokke, K. B., Klausen, J. E. & Saglie, I. L. (2009). Organizational learning and governance in adaptation in urban development (pp. 476-490). In Adger, N., Lorenzoni, I. & O’Brien, K., eds., Adapting to climate change. Thresholds, values, governance.
- [51] Wynne, B. (1996). May the Sheep Safely Graze? A Reflexive View of the Expert–Lay Knowledge Divide. In Lash, S., Szerszynski, B. & Wynne, B. (Eds.), Risk, environment and modernity: towards a new ecology (pp. 44-84). London ; Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage Publications.