Have a personal or library account? Click to login
When Urban Planning Doctrine Meets Low Density Countryside Cover

When Urban Planning Doctrine Meets Low Density Countryside

European Countryside
Volume 8 (2016): Issue 3 (September 2016)
By: Maarit Sireni  
Open Access
|Oct 2016

References

  1. [1] Alexander, D. (2006). Rural policy, rural communities and the planning system, Town & Country Planning, 75(12), 351-355.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  2. [2] Babbie, E. (2010). The practice of social research, 12th edition, Wadsworth: Cengage Learning.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  3. [3] Böhme, K. (2002). Nordic Echoes of European Spatial Planning: Discursive Integration in Practice, Nordregio Report 2002:8, Stockholm: Nordregio.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  4. [4] Curry, N. & Owen, S. (2009). Rural planning in England. Town Planning Review 80(6), 575-595. DOI:10.3828/tpr.2009.13.10.3828/tpr.2009.13
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  5. [5] Damsgaard, O., Dubois, A., Gløersen, E., Hedin, S., Rauhut, D., Roto, J., Schmitt, P. & Steinecke, J. M. (2008). Nordic inputs to the EU Green Paper on Territorial Cohesion, Nordregio Working Paper 2008:4, Stockholm: Nordregio.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  6. [6] EEA (European Environmental Agency) (2006). Urban sprawl in Europe. The ignored challenge, EEA Report 10/2006, Copenhagen: European Commission, European Environmental Agency. [http://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/eea_report_2006_10/eea_report_10_2006.pdf].
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  7. [7] Gkartzios, M. & Scott, M. (2010). Residential mobilities and house building in rural Ireland: evidence from three case studies. Sociologia Ruralis 50(1), 64-84. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9523.2009.00502.x10.1111/j.1467-9523.2009.00502.x
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  8. [8] Gløersen, E., Dubois, A., Copus, A. & Schürmann, C. (2005). Continuity of Transformation? Perspectives on Rural Development in the Nordic Countries. Northern Peripheral, Sparsely Populated Regions in the European Union, Nordregio Report 2005: 4, Stockholm: Nordregio.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  9. [9] Harvold, K. & Nordahl, B. (2012). Planning in Rurbania: rural policy and the planning system in Norway, Town Planning Review 83(2), 213-232. DOI: 10.3828/tpr.2012.12.10.3828/tpr.2012.12
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  10. [10] Helminen, V. & Ristimäki, M. (2007). Kaupunkiseutujen haja-asutusalueen väestömuutokset Suomessa 1980-2005. Suomen ympäristö 9/2007. Helsinki: Ympäristöministeriö.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  11. [11] Hiltunen, M. J. & Rehunen, A. (2014). Second home mobility in Finland: Patterns, practices and relations of leisure oriented mobile lifestyle. Fennia – International Journal of Geography, 192(1), 1-22. DOI: 10.11143/8384.10.11143/8384
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  12. [12] Juntto, A. (2007). Suomalaisten asumistoiveet ja mahdollisuudet, Helsinki: Tilastokeskus, Ympäristöministeriö.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  13. [13] Katajamäki, H. (1991). Suomen maaseudun suuri kertomus. Terra 103(3), 173-183.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  14. [14] Kettunen, P. (2001). The Nordic welfare state in Finland. Scandinavian Journal of History 26(3), 225-247.10.1080/03468750175030386417844642
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  15. [15] Kortteinen, M. Tuominen, M. & Vaattovaara, M. (2005). Asumistoiveet, sosiaalinen epäjärjestys ja kaupunkisuunnittelu pääkaupunkiseudulla. Yhteiskuntapolitiikka 70(2), 121-131.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  16. [16] Lapintie, K. (2010). Intohimon hämärä kohde. Mitä asukas haluaa? Yhdyskuntasuunnittelu 48(2), 41-57.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  17. [17] Lapping, M. B. (2006). Rural policy and planning (pp. 104-122). In Cloke, P., Marsden, T. & Mooney, P. H., eds., Handbook of Rural Studies, London: SAGE.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  18. [18] Ministry of the Environment (2006). Competitiveness, well-being and eco-efficiency. Perspectives for spatial structure and land-use in Finland, The Finnish Environment 31en/2006, Helsinki: Ympäristöministeriö.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  19. [19] Ministry of the Environment (2009). The future of land-use is being decided now. The Revised National Land Use Guidelines of Finland, Helsinki: Ympäristöministeriö.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  20. [20] Ministry of the Environment (2012). Kyläyleiskaavoitus. Opas kaavoittajille, kunnille ja kylille, Suomen ympäristö 3/2012, Helsinki: Ympäristöministeriö.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  21. [21] Ministry of the Finance (2012). Elinvoimainen kunta- ja palvelurakenne. Kunnallishallinnon rakennetyöryhmän selvitys, Osa I, Valtiovarainministeriön julkaisuja, Kunnat 5a/2012, Helsinki: Valtiovarainministeriö. [http://www.vm.fi/vm/fi/04_julkaisut_ja_asiakirjat/01_julkaisut/03_kunnat/20120206Elinvo/001_Kuntauudistusraportti_suomi_osa1_finalNETTI.pdf].
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  22. [22] Mäntysalo, R., Saglie, I. & Cars, G. (2011). Between Input Legitimacy and Output Efficiency: Defensive Routines and Agonistic Reflectivity in Nordic Land-Use Planning. European Planning Studies 19(12), 2109-2126. DOI: 10.1080/09654313.2011.632906.10.1080/09654313.2011.632906
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  23. [23] Moisio, S. (2008). Towards attractive and cost-efficient state space: Political geography of the production of state transformation in Finland. World Political Science Review 4(3), 1-34.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  24. [24] Moisio, S. & Leppänen, L. (2007). Towards a Nordic competition state? Politicoeconomic transformation of statehood in Finland 1965-2005. Fennia 185(2), 63-87.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  25. [25] OECD (Organisation for economic co-operation and development) (2005). Finland: OECD Territorial Reviews, Paris: OECD.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  26. [26] Othengrafen, F. (2010). Spatial planning as expression of culturised planning practices. Town Planning Review 81(1), 83-110. DOI: 10.3828/tpr.2009.25.10.3828/tpr.2009.25
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  27. [27] Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods, 3rd Edition, Thousand Oaks (CA): SAGE.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  28. [28] Remahl, T. (2008). Aluepolitiikan yhteiskunnalliset merkitykset ja muutos. Hyvinvointivaltiosta kilpailuvaltioon, Nordia Geographical Publications Vol 37: 5, Publications of the Geographical Society of Northern Finland and the Department of Geography, Oulu: University of Oulu.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  29. [29] Rosenqvist, O. (2003). Kilpailukykyisen maaseudun tuottaminen keskittyvän aluekehityksen ja hegemonisen kaupunkidiskurssin oloissa. Terra 115(1), 3-18.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  30. [30] Sireni, M. (2010). Sparsity as Luxury? An analysis of rural politicians’ views on building rights in low density areas in Finland (pp. 310-321). In Ache, P. & Ilmonen, M., ed., Space is luxury. Helsinki: Aalto University.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  31. [31] Sturzaker, J. (2010). The exercise of power to limit the development of new housing in the English countryside. Environment and Planning A 42(4), 1001-1016. DOI: 10.1068/a42297.10.1068/a42297
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  32. [32] Statistics http://www.kunnat.net/fi/tietopankit/tilastot/yleistilastoja_kunnittain/Sivut/default.aspx.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  33. [33] Sturzaker, J. & Shucksmith, M. (2011). Planning for housing in rural England. Discursive power and spatial exclusion. Town Planning Review 82(2), 169-192. DOI: 10.3828/tpr.2011.11.10.3828/tpr.2011.11
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  34. [34] The Centre Party (2008). Äänestä kotiasi. Keskustan kunta- ja maakuntaohjelma 2008. www.keskusta.fi.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  35. [35] The Christian Democrats (2008). Kotikunta kuuluu kaikille. Kristillisdemokraattien kuntavaaliohjelma 2008. www.kd.fi.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  36. [36] The Greens (2008). Oikeudenmukaisuus, valinnanvapaus, ilmastovastuu. Vihreän liiton kunnallisvaaliohjelma 2008. www.vihreat.fi.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  37. [37] The Finnish Social Democratic Party (2008). Unelmista todeksi – sanoista teoiksi. Sosialidemokraattinen kuntavaaliohjelma 2008. www.sdp.fi.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  38. [38] The Left Alliance (2008). Vasemmistoliiton kunnallisvaaliohjelma 2008. www.vasemmistoliitto.fi.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  39. [39] The National Coalition Party (2008). Kaikkien kuntien tekevät ihmiset liittykää yhteen. Kokoomuksen kunnallisvaaliohjelma. www.kokoomus.fi.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  40. [40] True Finns (2008). Perussuomalaisten kunnallisvaaliohjelma 2008 – Äänestäjän asialla. www.perussuomalaiset.fi.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  41. [41] Vaattovaara, M., Schulman, H. & Kortteinen, M. (2011). A Nordic Welfare model at a turning point? Social housing and segregation in Finland (pp. 49-70). In Driant, J.-C. & Houard, N., ed., Social housing across the Europe. Paris: La documentation Francaise.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  42. [42] Vasanen, A. (2012). Beyond stated and revealed preferences: the relationship between residential preferences and housing choises in the urban region of Turku, Finland. Journal of Housing and Built Environment 27(3), 301-315. DOI: 10.1007/s10901-012-9267-8.10.1007/s10901-012-9267-8
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  43. [43] Vepsäläinen, M. & Pitkänen, K. (2010). Second home countryside. Representations of the rural in Finnish popular discourses. Journal of Rural Studies. 26(2), 194-204. DOI: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2009.07.002.10.1016/j.jrurstud.2009.07.002
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/euco-2016-0005 | Journal eISSN: 1803-8417
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 189 - 206
Submitted on: Jan 15, 2016
|
Accepted on: Jun 3, 2016
|
Published on: Oct 18, 2016
Published by: Mendel University in Brno
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year
Keywords:
land use planning,
climate change,
rural areas,
Finland
Related subjects:
Life sciences,
Ecology,
Life sciences, other

© 2016 Maarit Sireni, published by Mendel University in Brno
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Volume 8 (2016): Issue 3 (September 2016)Next article