Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Approaching Multifunctionality by a ‘Normative View’: Finnish Farmers’ Visions on Contemporary Agriculture Cover

Approaching Multifunctionality by a ‘Normative View’: Finnish Farmers’ Visions on Contemporary Agriculture

European Countryside
Volume 8 (2016): Issue 1 (March 2016)
By:   
Open Access
|Apr 2016
References

References

  1. [1] Almås, R. & Campbell, H. (2012). Introduction: emerging challenges, new policy frameworks and the resilience of agriculture (pp. 1-22). In Almås, R. & Campbell, H., eds.,Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
    Search in Google Scholar
  2. [2] Alsos, G. A. & Carter, S. (2006). Multiple business ownership in the Norwegian farm sector: resource transfer and performance consequences., 22(3), 313-322. DOI: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2005.09.003.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  3. [3] Atterton, J. & Ward, N. (2007). Diversification and Innovation in Traditional Land-Based Industries (pp. 12-23). In: Mahroum, S., Atterton, J., Ward, N., Williams, A., Naylor, R., Hindle, R. & Rowe, F. (eds.). London: National Endowment for Science Technology and the Arts.
    Search in Google Scholar
  4. [4] Baldock, D., Dwyer, J., Lowe, P., Petersen, J-E. and Ward, N. (2001).London: Institute for European Environmental Policy.
    Search in Google Scholar
  5. [5] Boonstra, W. J., Ahnström, J. & Hallgren, L. (2011). Swedish farmers talking about nature – a study of the interrelations between farmers’ values and the sociocultural notion of., 51(4), 420-435. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9523.2011.00547.x.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  6. [6] Burton, R., Kuczera, C. and Schwarz, G. (2008). Exploring farmers’ resistance to voluntary agri-environmental schemes. Sociologia Ruralis, 48(1), 16-37.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  7. [7] Burton, R. & Wilson, G. (2012). The rejuvenation of productivist agriculture: the case for cooperative neo-productivism., 18, 51-72.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  8. [8] Burton, R. & Wilson, G. (2006). Injecting social psychology theory into conceptualisations of agricultural agency: towards a post-productivist farmer self-identity?, 22(1), 95-115. DOI: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2005.07.004.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  9. [9] Carnegie Trust UK, 2010.Dunfermline: Carnegie Trust UK.
    Search in Google Scholar
  10. [10] Darnhofer, I. (2009). Organic farming and rural development: some evidence from Austria., 45(4), 308-323. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9523.2005.00307.x.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  11. [11] Evans, N. (2009). Adjustment strategies revisited: agricultural change in the Welsh Marches., 25(2), 217-230. DOI: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2008.10.002.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  12. [12] Evans, N., Morris, C. & Winter, M. (2002). Conceptualizing agriculture: a critique of postproductivism as the new orthodoxy.26(3), 313-332. DOI: 10.1191/0309132502ph372ra.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  13. [13] Fairclough, N. (2004).. London: Taylor & Francis.
    Search in Google Scholar
  14. [14] Feola, G. & Binder, C. R. (2010). Towards an improved understanding of farmers’ behaviour: the integrated agent-centered (IAC) framework., 69 (12), 2323-2333. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.07.023.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  15. [15] Finnish Rural Policy Committee (2009). Countryside for vigorous Finland. Government report to parliament on rural policy.[Accessed on 10 November 2015].
    Search in Google Scholar
  16. [16] Gorton, M., Davidova, S. & Douarin, E. (2008). Attitudes to agricultural policy and farming futures in the context of the 2003 CAP reform: a comparison of farmers in selected established and New Member States., 24(3), 322-336. DOI: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2007.10.001.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  17. [17] Groenfeldt, D. (2009). Multifunctional Agricultural Policies and Practices in Europe and Relevance for Monsoon Asia. Santa Fe, Mexico: Water and Culture Institute.. [Accessed on 10 November 2015].
    Search in Google Scholar
  18. [18] Gundelach, P. (2005). Visions in agriculture., 45(3), 245-262. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9523.2005.00303.x.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  19. [19] Halfacree, K, (2010). Reading rural consumption practices for difference: bolt-holes, castles and life-rafts., 2, 241-263. DOI: 10.3384/cu.2000.1525.1022.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  20. [20] Huylenbroeck, V. & Durand, G. (2003). Multifunctionality and rural development: a general framework (pp. 1-18). In: Huylenbroeck, V. & Durand, G., eds.,. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing Limited.
    Search in Google Scholar
  21. [21] Ilbery, B. (1992). State-assisted farm diversification in the United Kingdom (pp. 100-116). In: Bowler, I., Bryant, C., & Nellis, M., eds.,. Wallingford: CAB.
    Search in Google Scholar
  22. [22] Ilbery, B. & Bowler, I. (1998). From agricultural productivism to postproductivism (pp. 57-84). In Ilbery, B., ed.,. Harlow: Longman.
    Search in Google Scholar
  23. [23] Jokinen, P., Järvelä, M., & Puupponen, A. (2009). Local food systems and rural sustainability initiatives by small scale rural entrepreneurs in Finland., 2, 5-20.
    Search in Google Scholar
  24. [24] Kahila, P. (2010).. [Case study report]. Stockholm: Nordregio.
    Search in Google Scholar
  25. [25] Kietäväinen, A. (2014). Narrated Agency and Identity of Settlement Farmers in the Changing Circumstance of Modern Society., 54(1), 57-70. DOI: 10.1111/soru.12028.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  26. [26] Lowe, P., Buller, H., and Ward, N. (2002). Setting the next agenda? British and French approaches to the second pillar of the Common Agricultural Policy., 18(1), 1-17. DOI: 10.1016/S0743-0167(01)00025-0.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  27. [27] Macias, T. (2008). Working toward a just, equitable, and local food system: the social impact of community-based agriculture., 89(5), 1086-1101. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6237.2008.00566.x.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  28. [28] Magnaghi, A. (2010).. Torino: Bollati Boringhieri.
    Search in Google Scholar
  29. [29] Marsden, T. (1998). Agriculture beyond the treadmill? Issues for policy, theory and research practice., 22(2), 265-275. DOI: 10.1191/030913298669229669.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  30. [30] Mather, A. S., Hill, G., & Nijnik, M. (2006). Post-productivism and rural land use: cul de sac or challenge for theorization?, 22(4), 441-455. DOI: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2006.01.004.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  31. [31] McElwee, G., & Bosworth, G. (2010). Exploring the strategic skills of farmers across a typology of farm diversification approaches., 13(12), 819-838.
    Search in Google Scholar
  32. [32] Morgan, S. L., Marsden, T., Miele, M. & Morley, A. (2010). Agricultural multifunctionality and farmers’ entrepreneurial skills: a study of Tuscan and Welsh farmers., 26(2), 116-129. DOI: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2009.09.002.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  33. [33] Morris, C. & Evans, N. (2004). Agricultural turns, geographical turns: retrospect and prospect., 20(1), 95-111. DOI: 10.1016/S0743-0167(03)00041-X.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  34. [34] Muilu, T., & Rosenqvist, O. (2006). Maaseutu – tuotannon tilasta kulutuksen kohteeksi., 118 (3-4), 141-142.
    Search in Google Scholar
  35. [35] Natural Resources Institute Finland (2014). Other entrepreneurship in agriculture and horticulture.[Accessed on 15 January 2016].
    Search in Google Scholar
  36. [36] Niemi, J. & Kola, J. (2005). Renationalization of the Common Agricultural Policy: mission impossible?, 8(4), 23-41.
    Search in Google Scholar
  37. [37] Page, B. (1996). Across the great divide: agriculture and industrial geography., 72(4), 376-397.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  38. [38] Pohjois-Karjalan TE-keskus (2007). Joensuu: Pohjois-Karjalan alueellinen maaseutuohjelma 2007-2013.
    Search in Google Scholar
  39. [39] Pohjois-Savon ELY Keskus (2013). Kuopio: ELY Keskus.[Accessed 10 September 2015].
    Search in Google Scholar
  40. [40] Pro Agria (2014). About Pro Agria.[Accessed 10 September 2015].
    Search in Google Scholar
  41. [41] Pro Agria Pohjois Karjala (2013). Maatilaselvitys Liperin Kirkonkylä. Vuorovaikutteiset toimintatavat kaavoituksen tukena-LEADER hanke (Farm report on the village of Liperi. LEADER Project: interactive approach to support land use and planning).[Accessed on 20 November 2014].
    Search in Google Scholar
  42. [42] Rickard, S. (2004). CAP reform, competitiveness and sustainability., 84(8), 745-756. DOI: 10.1002/jsfa.1696.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  43. [43] Riley, M., & Harvey, D. (2007). Oral histories, farm practice and uncovering meaning in the countryside., 8(3), 391-415. DOI: 10.1080/14649360701488823.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  44. [44] Rizzo, F., (2012).. Joensuu: Publications of the University of Eastern Finland Dissertations in Social Sciences and Business Studies No 38.
    Search in Google Scholar
  45. [45] Rural Policy Committee (2009)..[Accessed 15 September 2015].
    Search in Google Scholar
  46. [46] Seufert, V., Ramankutty, N. & Foley, J. A. (2012). Comparing the yields of organic and conventional agriculture., 485, 229-234. DOI: 10.1038/nature11069.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  47. [47] Seuneke, P., Lans, T., & Wiskerke, J. S. C. (2013). Moving beyond entrepreneurial skills: key factors driving entrepreneurial learning in multifunctional agriculture., 32(2), 208-219. DOI: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2013.06.001.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  48. [48] Shortall, S. (2008). Are rural development programmes socially inclusive? Social inclusion, civic engagement, participation, and social capital: Exploring the differences., 24(4), 450-457. DOI: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2008.01.001.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  49. [49] Spencer, J. & Stewart, N. (1973). The nature of agricultural systems.63(4), 529-544. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8306.1973.tb00946.x.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  50. [50] Spilková, J., Fendrychová, L. & Syrovátková, M. (2013). Farmers’ markets in Prague: a new challenge within the urban shoppingscape., 30(2), 179-191. DOI: 10.1007/s10460-012-9395-5.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  51. [51] Statistical Yearbook of Finland (2014). Tilastokeskus, Helsinki.[Accessed on 15 January 2016].
    Search in Google Scholar
  52. [52] Uudenmaan TE-keskus (2012). Uudenmaan maaseutuyritysstrategia vuoteen 2012. Uudenmaan TE-keskus.
    Search in Google Scholar
  53. [53] Vesala, H. T. & Vesala, M. (2010). Entrepreneurs and producers: identities of Finnish farmers in 2001 and 2006., 26, 21-30. DOI: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2009.06.001.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  54. [54] Vihinen, H. (2006). Impact of agricultural policy on rural development in the northern periphery of the EU: the case of Finland (pp. 217-230). In: Diakosavvas, D., ed.,. Paris, OECD.
    Search in Google Scholar
  55. [55] Voutilainen, O., (2012).. [Doctoral Dissertation] Oulu: University of Oulu.
    Search in Google Scholar
  56. [56] Wilson, G. A. (2009). The spatiality of multifunctional agriculture: a human geography perspective., 40, 269-280. DOI: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2008.12.007.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  57. [57] Wilson, G. A. (2007).. Oxfordshire: CAB International.
    Search in Google Scholar
  58. [58] Wilson, G. A. (2001). From productivism to post-productivism… and back again? Exploring the (un)changed natural and mental landscapes of European agriculture., 26(1), 77-102. DOI: 10.1111/1475-5661.00007.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  59. [59] Wilson, G. A. & Burton, R. J. F. (2015). ‘Neo-productivist’ agriculture: spatio-temporal versus structuralist perspectives., 38, 52-64. DOI: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2015.02.003.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  60. [60] Winter, M. (2003). Geographies of food: agro-food geographies – making reconnections., 27(4), 505-513. DOI: 10.1191/0309132503ph446pr.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  61. [61] Winter, M. (2005). Geographies of food: agro-food geographies – food, nature, farmers and agency. Progress in Human Geography, 29(5), 609-617.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  62. [62] Woods, M. (2009). Rural geography: blurring boundaries and making connections., 33 (6), 849-858. DOI: 10.1177/0309132508105001.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  63. [63] Woods, M. (2005).. London: SAGE Publications.
    Search in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/euco-2016-0002 | Journal eISSN: 1803-8417
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 16 - 32
Submitted on: Sep 2, 2015
Accepted on: Mar 18, 2016
Published on: Apr 9, 2016
Published by: Mendel University in Brno
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Keywords:
multifunctionality,
normative view,
vision,
territorial expression,
productivism,
non-productivism,
resistance identity
Related subjects:
Life sciences,
Life sciences, other

© 2016 Fulvio Rizzo, published by Mendel University in Brno
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Volume 8 (2016): Issue 1 (March 2016)
Previous article
Next article