Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Changes Of A Rural Landscape In Czech Areas Of Different Types Cover

Changes Of A Rural Landscape In Czech Areas Of Different Types

European Countryside
Volume 7 (2015): Issue 2 (June 2015)
By: ,  ,  ,  ,  ,   and    
Open Access
|Sep 2015
References

References

  1. [1] Antrop, M. (1997). The concept of traditional landscapes as a base for landscape evaluation and planning. The example of Flanders region.38(1-2), 105-117. DOI: 10.1016/S0169-2046(97)00027-3.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  2. [2] Antrop, M. (2005). Why landscapes of the past are important for the future., 70(1), 21-34. DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2003.10.002.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  3. [3] Bastian, O., Krönert, R. & Lipský, Z. (2006). Landscape diagnosis on different space and time scales a challenge for landscape planning.21(3), 359-374. DOI: 10.1007/s10980-005-5224-1.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  4. [4] Bičík, I., Jeleček, L., Kabrda, J., Kupková, L., Lipský, Z., Mareš, P., Šefrna, L., Štych, P. & Winklerová, J. (2013).. Praha: Česká geografická společnost.
    Search in Google Scholar
  5. [5] Blacksell, M. (2010). Agriculture and landscape in the 21century Europe: the post-communist transition.2(1), 13-24. DOI: 10.2478/v10091-010-0002-8.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  6. [6] Brady, M., Kellermann, K., Sahrbacher, Ch. & Jelínek, L. (2009). Impacts of decoupled agricultural support on farm structure, biodiversity and landscape mosaic. Some EU results.60(3), 563-585. DOI: 10.1111/j.1477-9552.2009.00216.x.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  7. [7] Brouwer, F. & Lowe, P. (2000)::. Wallingford: CAB Publishing.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  8. [8] Brůna, V. & Křováková, K. (2005). Analýza změn krajinné struktury s využitím map Stabilního katastru (pp. 27-34). In. Bratislava: Kartografická spoločnosť Slovenskej republiky.
    Search in Google Scholar
  9. [9] Brůna, V., Křováková, K. & Nedbal, V. (2005). Stabilní katastr jako zdroj informací o krajině.33, 397-409.
    Search in Google Scholar
  10. [10] Buhyoff, G. J., Miller, P. A., Hull, R. B. & Schlagel, D. H. (1995). Another look at expert visual assessment: validity and reliability., 9(1), 112-120.
    Search in Google Scholar
  11. [11] Bukáček, R, Bukáčková, P., Culek, M., Matějka, P., Chroust, J., & Rusňák, J. (2008).. Jihlava: Krajský úřad kraje Vysočina.
    Search in Google Scholar
  12. [12] Bürgi, M., Hersperger, A. N. & Schneeberger, M. (2004). Driving forces of landscape change – current and new directions.19(8), 857-868. DOI: 10.1007/s10980-004-0245-8.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  13. [13] Cloke, P. (2013):. London: Unwin Hyman.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  14. [14] Crofts, R. S. & Cooke, R. U. (1974):. Occasional Papers, no 25, Department of Geography, University College London.
    Search in Google Scholar
  15. [15] Daniel, T. C. & Vining, J. (1983). Methodological Issues in the Assessment of Landscape Quality (pp. 39-83). In Altman, I. & Wohwill, J., eds.,(eds.), Dordrecht: Plenum Press.
    Search in Google Scholar
  16. [16] Demek, J., Havlíček, M., Mackovčin, P. & Stránská, T. (2007).0(0), 32-53.
    Search in Google Scholar
  17. [17] van Dijk, T. (2007). Complications for traditional land consolidation in Central Europe.38(3), 505-511. DOI: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2006.11.010.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  18. [18] Forman, R. T. T. & Godron, M. (1993):, Praha: Academia.
    Search in Google Scholar
  19. [19] Havlíček, M. & Dostál, I. (2010). Projevy suburbanizace ve využití krajiny v Jihomoravském kraji a v zázemí města Brna.94, 65-76.
    Search in Google Scholar
  20. [20] Gulinck, H., Múgica, M., de Lucio, J. V. & Atauri, J. A. (2001). A framework for comparative landscape analysis and evaluation based on land cover data with an application in Madrid region (Spain).55(4), 257-270. DOI: 10.1016/S0169-2046(01)00159-1.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  21. [21] Jeleček, L. (2007). Environmentalizace vědy, geografie a historické geografie: environmentální dějiny a výzkum změn land use Česka v 19. a 20. století., 4, 20-28.
    Search in Google Scholar
  22. [22] Jones, M. (2003). The concept of cultural landscape: Discourse and narratives (pp. 21-51). In: Palang, H. & Fry, G., eds.,. Berlin: Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-94-017-0189-1_3.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  23. [23] Klusáček, P., Krejčí, T., Martinát, S., Kunc, J., Oman, R. & Frantál, B. (2013). Regeneration of agricultural brownfields in the Czech Republic – case study of the South-Moravian region.61(2), 549-561. DOI: 10.11118/actaun201361020549.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  24. [24] Lausch, A., Blaschke, T., Haasec, D., Herzog, F., Syrbee, R., Tischendorff, L. & Walz, U. (2015). Understanding and quantifying landscape structure – A review on relevant process characteristics, data models and landscape metrics.295, 31-41. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2014.08.018.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  25. [25] Lindenmayer, D. B., & Fischer, J. (2013):. Washington (D.C.): Island Press.
    Search in Google Scholar
  26. [26] Lipský, Z. (1995). The changing face of the Czech rural landscape.31(1-3), 39-45. DOI: 10.1016/0169-2046(94)01034-6.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  27. [27] Lipský, Z. (1994). Změna struktury české venkovské krajiny., 99(4), 248-260.
    Search in Google Scholar
  28. [28] Lipský, Z. (2014). Historical development of the Czech rural landscape: Implications for present landscape planning.36, 150-161.
    Search in Google Scholar
  29. [29] Meyer, B. C. (1997):. Leipzig: Helmholtz-Umweltforschungszentrum.
    Search in Google Scholar
  30. [30] Míchal, I. (1982). Principy krajinářského hodnocení území.16, 65-87.
    Search in Google Scholar
  31. [31] Míchal, I. et al. (1999). Hodnocení krajinného rázu a jeho uplatňování ve veřejné správě, metodické doporučení AOPK (pp. 111-116). In Vorel, I., Sklenička, P., eds.,. Praha: ČVUT.
    Search in Google Scholar
  32. [32] Nassauer, J. I. (1995). Culture and changing landscape structure.10(4), 229-237. DOI: 10.1007/BF00129257.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  33. [33] Podhrázská, J., Vaishar, A., Toman, F., Knotek, J., Ševelová, M., Stonawská, K. & Vasylchenko, A. (2015). Land consolidation in the Czech Republic. Perception versus reality.(in print).
    Search in Google Scholar
  34. [34] Punch, K. F. (2008):). Praha: Portál.
    Search in Google Scholar
  35. [35] Olwig, K. R. (2007). The practice of landscape „Conventions“ and the just landscape: The case of European Landscape Convention.32(5), 579-594. DOI: 10.1080/01426390701552738.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  36. [36] Semotanová, E. (2002). Studium krajiny a srovnávací kartografické prameny (pp. 63-70). In Němec, J., ed.,. Praha: Ministry of Environment.
    Search in Google Scholar
  37. [37] Skaloš, J., Weber, M., Lipský, Z., Trpáková, I., Šantrůčková, M., Uhlířová, L. & Kukla, P. (2011). Using old military survey maps and ortograph maps to analyze long-term land cover changes – case study (Czech Republic).31(2), 426-438. DOI: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2010.10.004.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  38. [38] Skaloš, J. & Engstová, B. (2010). Methodology for mapping non-forest wood elements using historic cadastral maps and aerial photographs as a basis for management., 91(4), 831-843. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.10.013.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  39. [39] Sklenička, P (2003):. Praha: Naděžda Skleničková.
    Search in Google Scholar
  40. [40] Sklenička, P. (2006). Applying evaluation criteria for the land consolidation effect to three contrasting study areas in the Czech Republic.23(4), 502-510. DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2005.03.001.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  41. [41] Skokanová, H. & Eremiášová, R. (2012). Changes in the secondary landscape structure and their connection with ecological stability: the cases of two model areas in the Czech Republic.31(1), 33-45. DOI: 10.4149/ekol_2012_01_33.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  42. [42] Swanwick, C. et al. (2013):. 3Edition. London: Routledge.
    Search in Google Scholar
  43. [43] Taylor, K. & Lennon, J. (2012):. London: Routledge.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  44. [44] Těšitel, J., Kolbmüller, B. & Stöglehner, G. (2014):. České Budějovice: NEBE.
    Search in Google Scholar
  45. [45] Vaishar, A., Jakešová, L. & Náplavová, M. (2011). Current problems in the South-Moravian rural landscape.3(4), 265-281. DOI: 10.2478/v10091-012-0008-5.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  46. [46] Vos, W. & Meekes, H. (1999). Trends in European cultural landscape development: perspectives for a sustainable future.46(1-3), 3-14. DOI: 10.1016/S0169-2046(99)00043-2.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  47. [47] Vorel, I., Bukáček, R., Matějka, P., Culek, M. & Sklenička, P. (2004):. Praha: Czech University of Technology.
    Search in Google Scholar
  48. [48] Walz, U. (2001):. Dresden: Institut für ökologische Raumentwicklung e.V.
    Search in Google Scholar
  49. [49] Zonneveld, I. S. (1995):. Amsterdam: SPB Academic Publishing.
    Search in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/euco-2015-0008 | Journal eISSN: 1803-8417
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English, Czech, Polish
Page range: 111 - 133
Submitted on: Apr 21, 2015
Accepted on: Jun 30, 2015
Published on: Sep 19, 2015
Published by: Mendel University in Brno
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Keywords:
landscape changes,
macrostructure,
microstructure,
the Czech Republic
Related subjects:
Life sciences,
Life sciences, other

© 2015 Milada Šťastná, Antonín Vaishar, Hana Vavrouchová, Miloslava Ševelová, Silvie Kozlovská, Veronika Doskočilová, Helena Lincová, published by Mendel University in Brno
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Volume 7 (2015): Issue 2 (June 2015)
Previous article