Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Integrated AHP-TOPSIS Method for the Assessment of Health Management Information Systems Efficiency Cover

Integrated AHP-TOPSIS Method for the Assessment of Health Management Information Systems Efficiency

Open Access
|Apr 2017

References

  1. Ahmadi, H., Rad, M. S., Nazari, M., Nilashi, M., & Ibrahim, O. (2014). Evaluating the factors affecting the implementation of hospital information system (HIS) using AHP method. Life Science Journal, 11(3), 202-207.
  2. Arnesen, T., & Trommald, M. (2004). Roughly right or precisely wrong? Systematic review of quality-of-life weights elicited with the time trade-off method. Journal of health services research & policy, 9(1), 43-50.10.1258/135581904322716111
  3. Barron, F. H., & Barrett, B. E. (1996). The efficacy of SMARTER-Simple multi-attribute rating technique extended to ranking. Acta Psychologica, 93(1), 23-36.10.1016/0001-6918(96)00010-8
  4. Bottomley, P. A., & Doyle, J. R. (2001). A comparison of three weight elicitation methods: good, better, and best. Omega, 29(6), 553-560.10.1016/S0305-0483(01)00044-5
  5. Bottomley, P. A., Doyle, J. R., & Green, R. H. (2000). Testing the reliability of weight elicitation methods: direct rating versus point allocation. Journal of Marketing Research, 37(4), 508-513.10.1509/jmkr.37.4.508.18794
  6. Chin, K. S., Fu, C., & Wang, Y. (2015). A method of determining attribute weights in evidential reasoning approach based on incompatibility among attributes. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 87, 150-162.10.1016/j.cie.2015.04.016
  7. Colombo, E., & Francalanci, C. (2004). Selecting CRM packages based on architectural, functional, and cost requirements: Empirical validation of a hierarchical ranking model. Requirements Engineering, 9(3), 186-203.10.1007/s00766-003-0184-y
  8. Curtis, I. A. (2004). Valuing ecosystem goods and services: a new approach using a surrogate market and the combination of a multiple criteria analysis and a Delphi panel to assign weights to the attributes. Ecological Economics, 50(3), 163-194.10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.02.003
  9. Danaher, P. J. (1997). Using conjoint analysis to determine the relative importance of service attributes measured in customer satisfaction surveys. Journal of Retailing, 73(2), 235-260.10.1016/S0022-4359(97)90005-1
  10. Dehghan-Manshadi, B., Mahmudi, H., Abedian, A., & Mahmudi, R. (2007). A novel method for materials selection in mechanical design: combination of non-linear normalization and a modified digital logic method. Materials & Design, 28(1), 8-15.10.1016/j.matdes.2005.06.023
  11. Deng, H., Yeh, C. H., & Willis, R. J. (2000). Inter-company comparison using modified TOPSIS with objective weights. Computers & Operations Research, 27(10), 963-973.10.1016/S0305-0548(99)00069-6
  12. Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., & Papayannakis, L. (1995). Determining objective weights in multiple criteria problems: the CRITIC method. Computers & Operations Research, 22(7), 763-770.10.1016/0305-0548(94)00059-H
  13. e Costa, C. A. B., & Vansnick, J. C. (1997). A theoretical framework for measuring attractiveness by a categorical based evaluation technique (MACBETH). In Multicriteria Analysis (pp. 15-24). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.10.1007/978-3-642-60667-0_3
  14. Edwards, W., & Barron, F. H. (1994). SMARTS and SMARTER: Improved simple methods for multiattribute utility measurement. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 60(3), 306-325.10.1006/obhd.1994.1087
  15. Edwards, W., & Barron, F. H. (1994). SMARTS and SMARTER: Improved simple methods for multiattribute utility measurement. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 60(3), 306-325.10.1006/obhd.1994.1087
  16. Huang, J. (2008). Combining entropy weight and TOPSIS method for information system selection. In 2008 IEEE Conference on Cybernetics and Intelligent Systems, 1281-128410.1109/ICCIS.2008.4670971
  17. Hwang, C. L., & Yoon, K. (1981). Multiple attribute decision making making: methods and applications. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.10.1007/978-3-642-48318-9
  18. Jadhav, A. S., & Sonar, R. M. (2009). Evaluating and selecting software packages: A review. Information and software technology, 51(3), 555-563.10.1016/j.infsof.2008.09.003
  19. Janković-Milić, V., & Stanković J. (2010). Bayesian approach to multi-criteria analysis in business decision making (in Serbian). Vrnjačka Spa
  20. Jayant, A., Gupta, P., Garg, S. K., & Khan, M. (2014). TOPSIS-AHP based approach for selection of reverse logistics service provider: a case study of mobile phone industry. Procedia Engineering, 97, 2147-2156.10.1016/j.proeng.2014.12.458
  21. Karande, P., & Chakraborty, S. (2014). A facility layout selection model using MACBETH method. In Proceedings of the 2014 International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management, January (pp. 7-9).
  22. Kim, J., & Moon, J. Y. (1997). An AHP & survey for selecting workflow management systems. Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management, 6(2), 141-161.10.1002/(SICI)1099-1174(199706)6:2<;141::AID-ISAF122>3.0.CO;2-2
  23. Kim, K. Y., & Na, K. S. (2014). Business information system recovery priority decision using TOPSIS on interval data. Journal of Systems and Information Technology, 16(2), 103-112.10.1108/JSIT-12-2013-0068
  24. Krstic, B., Petrovic, J., & Stanisic, T. (2015). Analysis of key indicators of economic dimensions of spas'sustainable development in Serbia as tourism destinations 4. Ekonomika, 61(3), 61.10.5937/ekonomika1503061K
  25. Kundakcı, N. (2016). Combined Multi-Criteria Decision Making Approach Based On Macbeth And Multi-MOORA Methods. Alphanumeric Journal, 4(1).10.17093/aj.2016.4.1.5000178402
  26. Kundakcı, N., & Işık, A. (2016). Integration of MACBETH and COPRAS methods to select air compressor for a textile company. Decision Science Letters, 5(3), 381-394.10.5267/j.dsl.2016.2.003
  27. Lee, J. W., & Kim, S. H. (2000). Using analytic network process and goal programming for interdependent information system project selection. Computers & Operations Research, 27(4), 367-382.10.1016/S0305-0548(99)00057-X
  28. Ma, J., Fan, Z. P., & Huang, L. H. (1999). A subjective and objective integrated approach to determine attribute weights. European Journal of Operations Research, 112 (2), 397-404.10.1016/S0377-2217(98)00141-6
  29. Milićević, M.R. & Župac, G.Ž. (2012). Objektivni pristup određivanju težina kriterijuma. Vojnotehnički glasnik, 60(1), 39-56.10.5937/vojtehg1201039M
  30. Mitchell, J. (2000). Increasing the cost-effectiveness of telemedicine by embracing ehealth. Journal of telemedicine and telecare, 6(suppl 1), 16-19.10.1258/1357633001934500
  31. Ngai, E. W., & Chan, E. W. C. (2005). Evaluation of knowledge management tools using AHP. Expert systems with applications, 29(4), 889-899.10.1016/j.eswa.2005.06.025
  32. Pan American Health Organization (1998) Information Systems and Information Technology in Health: Challenges and Solutions for Latin America and the Caribbean, Health Services Information Systems Program, PAHO/WHO, Washington, DC; ISBN 9275 12246 6.
  33. Podvezko, V., & Sivilevičius, H. (2013). The use of AHP and rank correlation methods for determining the significance of the interaction between the elements of a transport system having a strong influence on traffic safety. Transport, 28(4), 389-403.10.3846/16484142.2013.866980
  34. Pöyhönen, M., & Hämäläinen, R. P. (2001). On the convergence of multiattribute weighting methods. European Journal of Operational Research, 129(3), 569-585.10.1016/S0377-2217(99)00467-1
  35. Pulipati, S. B., & Mattingly, S. P. (2013). Establishing criteria and their weights for evaluating transportation funding alternatives using a Delphi survey.Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 104, 922-931.10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.11.187
  36. Rao, R. V. (2008). A decision making methodology for material selection using an improved compromise ranking method. Materials & Design, 29(10), 1949-1954.10.1016/j.matdes.2008.04.019
  37. Rao, R. V., & Davim, J. P. (2008). A decision-making framework model for material selection using a combined multiple attribute decision-making method. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 35(7-8), 751-760.10.1007/s00170-006-0752-7
  38. Roberts, R., & Goodwin, P. (2002). Weight approximations in multi‐attribute decision models. Journal of Multi‐Criteria Decision Analysis, 11(6), 291-303.10.1002/mcda.320
  39. Rodrigues, R. J. (2000, April). Telemedicine and the transformation of healthcare practice in the information age. In Speakers' book of the International Telecommunication Union (ITU) Telecom Americas. Rio de Janeiro: Telecom Development Symposium, Session TDS (Vol. 2, pp. 91-105).
  40. Rodrigues, R. J. (2003). Opportunities and challenges in the deployment of global e-health. International journal of healthcare technology and management, 5(3-5), 335-358.10.1504/IJHTM.2003.004173
  41. Saaty, T. L. (1977). A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures. Journal of mathematical psychology, 15(3), 234-281.10.1016/0022-2496(77)90033-5
  42. Saaty, T. L. (1990). How to make a decision: the analytic hierarchy process. European Journal of Operational Research, 48 (1), 9-26.10.1016/0377-2217(90)90057-I
  43. Saaty, T.L. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process, New York: McGraw Hill.10.21236/ADA214804
  44. Srđević, B. (2005). Nepristrasna ocena značaja krtierijuma u višekriterijumskoj optimizaciji. Vodoprivreda, 37 (1-3), 53-58.
  45. Tan, J., & Payton, F. C. (2010). Adaptive health management information systems: Concepts, cases, & practical applications. Jones & Bartlett Learning.
  46. Teltumbde, A. (2000). A framework for evaluating ERP projects. International journal of production research, 38(17), 4507-4520.10.1080/00207540050205262
  47. Todorović, O., & Stanković, J. (2011). TOPSIS metoda kao sredstvo optimizacije odlučivanja u uslovima krize. Nauka i svetska ekonomska kriza, Niš: Ekonomski fakultet
  48. Von Winterfeldt, D., & Edwards, W. (1986). Decision analysis and behavioral research: Vol. 604. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  49. Wei, C. C., Chien, C. F., & Wang, M. J. J. (2005). An AHP-based approach to ERP system selection. International journal of production economics, 96(1), 47-62.10.1016/j.ijpe.2004.03.004
  50. Wu, J., Sun, J., Liang, L., & Zha, Y. (2011). Determination of weights for ultimate cross efficiency using Shannon entropy. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(5), 5162-5165.10.1016/j.eswa.2010.10.046
  51. Xu, X. (2004). A note on the subjective and objective integrated approach to determine attribute weights. European Journal of Operational Research, 156(2), 530-532.10.1016/S0377-2217(03)00146-2
  52. Yoon, K., Hwang, C. (1995). Multiple attribute decision-making: an introduction. Sage Publisher10.4135/9781412985161
  53. Zaidan, A. A., Zaidan, B. B., Al-Haiqi, A., Kiah, M. L. M., Hussain, M., & Abdulnabi, M. (2015). Evaluation and selection of open-source EMR software packages based on integrated AHP and TOPSIS. Journal of biomedical informatics, 53, 390-404.10.1016/j.jbi.2014.11.012
  54. Zavadskas, E. K., & Podvezko, V. (2016). Integrated Determination of Objective Criteria Weights in MCDM. International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making, 15(02), 267-283.10.1142/S0219622016500036
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ethemes-2017-0008 | Journal eISSN: 2217-3668 | Journal ISSN: 0353-8648
Language: English
Page range: 121 - 142
Submitted on: Oct 18, 2016
Accepted on: Mar 16, 2017
Published on: Apr 26, 2017
Published by: University of Niš, Faculty of Economics
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2017 Žarko Rađenović, Ivana Veselinović, published by University of Niš, Faculty of Economics
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.