References
- Aghion, P. & Blanchard, J. O. (1998). On privatization methods in Eastern Europe and their implications. Economics of Transition, 6(1), 87-99.
- Caves, R. (1974). Multinational firms, competition and productivity in the host country. Economica, 41, 176-193.
- Caves, R. (1996). Multinational enterprise and economic analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Frydman, R., Cheryl, W., Gray, M. H. & Rapaczynski, A. (1999). When does privatization work? The impact of private ownership on corporate performance in transition economies. Quarterly Journal of Economics, November, 1153-1192.
- Grosfeld, I. & Tressel, T. (2002). Competition and ownership structure: Substitutes or complements? Evidence from the Warsaw stock exchange. The Economics of Transition, 10(3), 525-551.
- Hunya, G. (2000). International competitiveness impacts of FDI in CEECs (Research Reports 268), Vienna: Institute for International Economic Studies.
- Hunya, G. (2002). Recent impacts of foreign direct investment on growth and restructuring in Central European transition countries (Research Reports 284), Vienna: Institute for International Economic Studies.
- Kalotay, K. (2010). Patterns of inward FDI in economies in transition. Eastern Journal of European Studies, 1, 55-76.
- Kaplan, R. S. & Norton, D. P. (1992). The balanced scorecard: Measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review, 70, 71-79.
- Kaplan, R. S. & Norton, D. P. (1993). Putting the balanced scorecard to work. Harvard Business Review, Volume 71(5), 134-142.
- Kaplan, R. S. & Norton, D. P. (1996). The balanced scorecard: Translating strategy into action. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
- Kennerly, M. & Neely, A. (2003). Measuring performance in a changing business environment. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 23, 213-229.
- Kocenda, E. & Svejnar, J. (2002). Ownership and firm performance after large-scale privatization (Working paper No. 471a), Michigan: The William Davidson Institute.
- Lizal, L. & Svejnar, J. (2001). Investment, credit rationing, and the soft budget constraint: Evidence from Czech panel data. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 84, 353-370.
- Lizal, L., & Svejnar, J. (2002). Privatization revisited: The effects of foreign and domestic owners on corporate performance (Third draft, June 2002), Michigan: The William Davidson Institute.
- National bank of Serbia (NBS). (2016). Retreived from http://www.nbs.rs/ on 05/02/2016.
- Paranjape, B., Rossiter, M. & Pantano, V. (2006). Performance measurement systems: Successes, failures and future- A review. Measuring Business Excellence, 10(3), 4-14.
- Privatization Agency (2013). Analysis of the privatization effects in Serbia. Retreived from http://www.priv.rs/cms/view.php?id=9319 on 05/02/2016.
- Rappaport, J. (2000). How does openness to capital flows affect growth? (Research Working Paper 00-11), Kansas City: Federal Reserve Bank.
- Serbian Business Register Agency (SBRA). (2016). Retreived from www.apr.gov.rs on 01/10/2016.
- Smith, S. C., Beon-Cheol, C. & Vodopivec, M. (1997). Privatization incidence, ownership forms, and firm performance: Evidence from Slovenia. Journal of Comparative Economics, 25, 158-179.
- Tangen, S. (2005). Analysing the requirements of performance measurement systems. Measuring Business Excellence, 9(4), 46-54.
- Taticchi, P., Tonelli, F., & Cagnazzo, L. (2010). Performance measurement and management: A literature review and research agenda. Measuring Business Excellence, 14(1), 4-18.
- UNCTAD FDI database.