Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Application of Multi-Criteria Analysis in the Public Procurement Process Optimization Cover

Application of Multi-Criteria Analysis in the Public Procurement Process Optimization

By: Predrag Mimović and  Ana Krstić  
Open Access
|Jun 2016

References

  1. Alarcon, L.F. & Mourgues, C. (2002). Performance modelling for contractor selection. Journal of Management in Engineering, 18 (2), 52–60.
  2. Al-Harbi, K. M. & A.-S. (2001). Application of the AHP in project management. International Journal of Project Management, 19 (1), 19 –27.10.1016/S0263-7863(99)00038-1
  3. Andruškevičius, A. (2005). Evaluation of contractors by using COPRAS – the multiple criteria method. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 11(3), 158–169.10.3846/13928619.2005.9637694
  4. Azis, I.J. (2010). Predicting a Recovery Date from the Economic Crisis of 2008. Socio economic planning sciences, 44, 122-129.10.1016/j.seps.2010.03.003
  5. Banaitis, A. & Banaitien, N. (2006). Analysis of criteria for contractors’ qualification evaluation, Technological and Economic. Development of Economy, 12(4), 276–282.
  6. Blair, A.R., Mnadelker, G.N., Saaty, T.L. & Whitaker, R. (2010). Forecasting the resurgence of the U.S. economy in 2010: An expert judgment approach. Socio - Economic Planning Sciences, 44(3) 114-121.
  7. Carr, P. G. (2012). Investigation of Bid Price Competition Measured through Prebid Project Estimates, Actual Bid Prices, and Number of Bidders. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 131(11), 1165–1172.10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2005)131:11(1165)
  8. Dobi, K., Gugić, J., Kancijan, D. (2010). AHP As a Decision Support Tool in the Multicriteria Evaluation of Bids in Public Procurement Proceedings of the ITI 2010 32nd Int. Conf. on Information Technology Interfaces, June 21-24, Cavtat, Croatia.
  9. Fong, P. S. W.& Choi, S. K.-Y. (2000). Final contractor selection using the analytical hierarchy process. Construction Management & Economics, 18(5), 547–557.10.1080/014461900407356
  10. Ginevicius, R. & Podvezko, V. (2008). Multicriteria graphical analytical evaluation of the financial state of construction enterprises. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 14(4), 452–461.10.3846/1392-8619.2008.14.452-461
  11. Hatush, Z. & Skitmore, M. (1998). Contractor selection using multicriteria utility theory: An additive model. Building and Environment, 33(2-3), 105–115.10.1016/S0360-1323(97)00016-4
  12. Holt, G.D. (1997). Classifying construction contractors: a case study using cluster analysis. Building Research and Information, 25(6), 374–82.10.1080/096132197370200
  13. Holt, G.D. (1998). Which contractor selection methodology? International Journal of Project Management, 16(3), 153–164.10.1016/S0263-7863(97)00035-5
  14. Holt, G. D. & Edwards, D. J. (2005). Domestic builder selection in the UK housing repair and maintenance sector: a critique. Journal of Construction Research, 6(1), 123–137.10.1142/S1609945105000298
  15. Hughes, M. (2005). Evaluation of the Local Government Procurement Agenda – Baseline Survey Report. The Office of the Deputy Prime Minister, London. [On-line]. Available at www.odpm.gov.uk. [Last retrieved April 20, 2006].
  16. Ishizaka, A. & Labib, A. (2011). Review of the main developments in the analytic hierarchy process. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(11): 14336–14345.
  17. Izveštaj o javnim nabavkama u Republici Srbiji za period 01.01.2014-30.06.2014.godine, Republika Srbija, Uprava za javne nabavke, Beograd, 2014.
  18. Jayant, A., Paul, V. & Kumar, U. (2015). Aplication of Analytic Network Process (ANP) in Business Environment: A Comprehensive Literature Review, IJRMET, 5(1), 29-37.
  19. Kandanala, R., Al-Hussein, M. & Vanderstar, A. (2005). Automation of pre-bidding process for construction projects. Cost Engineering, 147(6), 30–34.
  20. Lam, K.C., Hu, T., Ng, S.T., Skitmore, M. & Cheung, S.O. (2001). A fuzzy neural network approach for contractor prequalification. Construction Management & Economics, 19(2), 175–188.10.1080/01446190150505108
  21. Laver, J. & Larsberger, O. (2011). The Art of identifying „The Most Economically Advantageous Tender” – the Use of Relative Evaluation Models in Public and Utilities Procurement, Hannes Snellman Attorneys Ltd., www.whoswholegal.com.
  22. Mahdi, I.M., Riley, M.J., Fereig, S.M. & Alex, A.P. (2002). A multi-criteria approach to contractor selection. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 9(1), 29–37.
  23. Minchin, Jr. R.E. & Smith, G.R. (2005). Quality-based contractor rating model for qualification and bidding purposes. Journal of Management in Engineering, 21(1), 38–43.10.1061/(ASCE)0742-597X(2005)21:1(38)
  24. Mitkus, S. & Trinkuniene, E. (2008). Reasoned decisions in construction contracts evaluation. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 14(3), 402–416.10.3846/1392-8619.2008.14.402-416
  25. Molenaar, K. R. & Johnson, D. E. (2003). Engineering the procurement phase to achieve the best value. Leadership & Management in Engineering, 3(3), 137–141.10.1061/(ASCE)1532-6748(2003)3:3(137)
  26. Ng, S. T. & Skitmore, R. M. (1999). Client and consultant perspectives of prequalification criteria. Building and Environment, 34(5), 607–621.10.1016/S0360-1323(98)00050-X
  27. Nikolovová, P., Palguta, J. & Pertold, F. (2012). Public Contracts in the Czech Republic. What the Data Say on Behaviour of Contracting Authorities? Veřejné zakázky v ČR: Co říkají data o chování zadavatelů?. Cerge EI. [Online] 6. [Citace: 10. May 2013.] http://idea.cerge-ei.cz/docu.
  28. Paul, A. & Gutierrez, G. (2005). Simple probability models for project contracting. European Journal of Operational Research, 165(2), 329–33810.1016/j.ejor.2004.04.005
  29. Plenkiewicz, E. (2009). Contractor prequalification model using fuzzy sets. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 15(4), 377–385
  30. Russell, J.S. & Skibniewski M. (1987). A structured approach to the contractor prequalification process in the USA. CIB-SBI Fourth Int.Sym. on Building Economics, Session D:240-51. Danish Building Research Copenhagen, Denmark.
  31. Russel, J.S. (1991). Contractor failure: analysis. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, ASCE, 5(3), 163-180.10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3828(1991)5:3(163)
  32. Russell, J. S., Hancher, D. E. & Skibniewski, M. J. (1992). Contractor prequalification data for construction owners. Construction Management & Economics, 10(2), 117–135.10.1080/01446199200000012
  33. Saaty, T. L., (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process, New York, McGraw-Hill.10.21236/ADA214804
  34. Saaty, T. L. & Kearns P. K. (1985). Analytical planning, The Organization of Systems, The Analytic Hierarchy Process Series, Vol. IV, RWS Publications, Pittsburgh.
  35. Saaty, T. L., (2005). Theory and Applications of the Analytic Network Process, Decision Making with Benefits, Opportunities, Costs and Risks, RWS Publications, Pittsburgh.
  36. Saaty, T. (2010). Economic forecasting with tangible and intagible criteria: the analytic hierarchy process of measurement and its validation, Economic Horizons, 1, 5-45.
  37. Saaty T.L. & Peniwati K. (2008). Group decision making: drawing out and reconciling differences. RWS Publications, Pittsburgh.
  38. Shen, L. Y., Lu, W., Shen, Q. & Li, H. (2003). A computer-aided decision support system for assessing a contractor’s competitiveness. Automation in Construction, 12(5), 577–587.10.1016/S0926-5805(03)00020-7
  39. Sipahi, S. Timor, M. (2010). The analytic hierarchy process and analytic network process: an overview of applications. Management Decision, 48(5), 775 – 80810.1108/00251741011043920
  40. Skibniewski, M., & Chao, L. (1992). Evaluation of advanced construction technology with AHP method. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, ASCE, 118, 255–261.10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1992)118:3(577)
  41. Strand, I., Ramada, P. & Canton, E. (2011). Public procurement in Europe, Cost and effectiveness, A study on procurement regulation. Prepared for the European Commission, March 2011, London Economics, ECORYS.
  42. Topcu, Y. I. (2004). A decision model proposal for construction contractor selection in Turkey. Building and Environment, 39(4), 469–481.10.1016/j.buildenv.2003.09.009
  43. Turskis, Z. (2008). Multi-attribute contractors ranking method by applying ordering of feasible alternatives of solutions in terms of preferability technique. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 14(2), 224–239.10.3846/1392-8619.2008.14.224-239
  44. Vaidya, O.S & Kumar, S. (2006). Analytic hierarchy process: An overview of applications, European Journal Of Operational Research, Publisher: Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 169(1), 1-29.10.1016/j.ejor.2004.04.028
  45. Wong, C. H., Holt, G. D. & Harris, P. (2001). Multi-criteria selection or lowest price? Investigation of UK construction clients’ tender evaluation preferences. Engineering Construction & Architectural Management, 8(4), 257–271.
  46. Wong, C. H., Holt, G. D. & Cooper, P. A. (2000). Lowest price or value? Investigation of UK construction clients’ tender selection process. Construction Management & Economics, 18(7), 767–774.10.1080/014461900433050
  47. Voulgaridou, D., Kirytopoulos K.E. & Leopoulos, V. (2009). An Analytic Network Process Approach for sales forecasting, Operations Research International Journal 9, 35-53.10.1007/s12351-008-0026-2
  48. Zavadskas, E. K., Kaklauskas, A. & Banaitiene, N. (2001). Multi-criteria analysis of a building life cycle. Vilnius: Technika, 380 p. (in Lithuanian).
  49. http://curia.europa.eu/juris/liste.jsf?language=en&num=C-532/06
  50. http://www.loc.gov/law/help/govt-procurement-law/eu.php
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ethemes-2016-0006 | Journal eISSN: 2217-3668 | Journal ISSN: 0353-8648
Language: English
Page range: 103 - 128
Submitted on: Dec 22, 2015
Accepted on: Mar 23, 2016
Published on: Jun 8, 2016
Published by: University of Niš, Faculty of Economics
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2016 Predrag Mimović, Ana Krstić, published by University of Niš, Faculty of Economics
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.