Have a personal or library account? Click to login
State and Analysis of Scientific Journals in the Field of “Economic Sciences” for the Period 1995-2014 Cover

State and Analysis of Scientific Journals in the Field of “Economic Sciences” for the Period 1995-2014

Economic Themes
Volume 53 (2015): Issue 4 (December 2015)
By: Predrag Dašić  
Open Access
|Apr 2016

References

  1. Abbas, A.M. (2012) “Bounds and inequalities relating h-index, g-index, e-index and generalized impact factor: An improvement over existing models”, PLoS (Public Library of Science) One, 7 (4): 1-7.10.1371/journal.pone.0033699
    Search in Google Scholar
  2. Abrizah, A., A.N. Zainab, K. Kiran and R.G. Raj (2013) “LIS journals scientific impact and subject categorization: A comparison between Web of Science and Scopus”, Scientometrics, 94 (2): 721-740.10.1007/s11192-012-0813-7
    Search in Google Scholar
  3. Adriaanse, L.S. and C. Rensleigh (2013) “Web of Science, Scopus and Google Scholar: A content comprehensiveness comparison”, The Electronic Library, 31 (6): 727-744.10.1108/EL-12-2011-0174
    Search in Google Scholar
  4. Alonso, S., F.J. Cabrerizo, E. Herrera-Viedma and F. Herrera (2009) “h-index: A review focused in its variants, computation and standardization for different scientific fields”, Journal of Informetrics, 3 (4): 273-289.10.1016/j.joi.2009.04.001
    Search in Google Scholar
  5. Althouse, B.M., J.D. West, C.T. Bergstrom and T. Bergstrom (2009) “Differences in impact factor across fields and over time”, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology (JASIST), 60 (1): 27-34.10.1002/asi.20936
    Search in Google Scholar
  6. Andreis, M. and M. Jokić (2008) “An impact of Croatian journals measured by citation analysis from SCI-expanded database in time span 1975-2001”, Scientometrics, 75 (2): 263-288.10.1007/s11192-007-1858-x
    Search in Google Scholar
  7. Archambault, É., D. Campbell, Y. Gingras and V. Larivière (2009) “Comparing bibliometric statistics obtained from the Web of Science and Scopus”, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60 (7): 1320-1326.10.1002/asi.21062
    Search in Google Scholar
  8. Arendt, J. (2010) “Are article influence scores comparable across scientific fields?” Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship, 60.10.29173/istl2511
    Search in Google Scholar
  9. Asai, I (1981) “Adjusted age distribution and its application to impact factor and immediacy index”, Journal of the American Society for Information Science (JASIS), 32 (3): 172-174.10.1002/asi.4630320303
    Search in Google Scholar
  10. Bakkalbasi, N., K. Bauer, J. Glover and L. Wang (2006) “Three options for citation tracking: Google Scholar, Scopus and Web of Science”, Biomedical Digital Libraries, 3 (1): Article 7: pp. 1-8.10.1186/1742-5581-3-7
    Search in Google Scholar
  11. Banks, M.G. (2006) “An extension of the Hirsch index: Indexing scientific topics and compounds”, Scientometrics, 69 (1): 161-168.10.1007/s11192-006-0146-5
    Search in Google Scholar
  12. Barczyński, B.J. and M. Rek (2011) “Evaluation in science - Index Copernicus case study of multi-parametric evaluation system”, Archives of Budo, 7 (2): 93-103.
    Search in Google Scholar
  13. Bar-Ilan, J. (2008a) “The h-index of h-index and of other informetric topics”, Scientometrics, 75 (3): 591-605.10.1007/s11192-007-1880-z
    Search in Google Scholar
  14. Bar-Ilan, J. (2008b) “Which h-index? - A comparison of WoS, Scopus and Google Scholar”, Scientometrics, 74 (2): 257-271.10.1007/s11192-008-0216-y
    Search in Google Scholar
  15. Bar-Ilan, J. (2010) “Rankings of information and library science journals by JIF and by htype indices”, Journal of Informetrics, 4 (2): 141-147.10.1016/j.joi.2009.11.006
    Search in Google Scholar
  16. Bartol, T., G. Budimir, D. Dekleva-Smrekar, M. Pusnik and P. Juznic (2014) “Assessment of research fields in Scopus and Web of Science in the view of national research evaluation in Slovenia”, Scientometrics, 98 (2): 1491-1504.10.1007/s11192-013-1148-8
    Search in Google Scholar
  17. Berezkina, N.Yu. and O.N. Sikorskaya (2008) “Assessment of the research activities of Russian and Belarussian scientists (according to Scopus data)”, Scientific and Technical Information Processing, 35 (6): 256-259.10.3103/S014768820806004X
    Search in Google Scholar
  18. Bergman, E.M.L. (2012) “Finding citations to social work literature: The relative benefits of using Web of Science, Scopus, or Google Scholar”, The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 38 (6): 370-379.10.1016/j.acalib.2012.08.002
    Search in Google Scholar
  19. Bergstrom C.T. (2007) “Eigenfactor: Measuring the value and prestige of scholarly journals ”, College & Research Libraries News, 68 (5): 314-316.10.5860/crln.68.5.7804
    Search in Google Scholar
  20. Bergstrom, C.T. West, J.D. and M.A. Wiseman (2008) “The Eigenfactor metrics”, The Journal of Neuroscience, 28 (45): 11433-11434.10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0003-08.2008
    Search in Google Scholar
  21. Betancourt, K.G., M.R. de Zayas Pérez and M.V. González Guitián (2013) “Análisis bibliométrico de las publicaciones relacionadas con proyectos de innovación y su gestión en Scopus, en el período 2001-2011”, Revista Cubana de Información en Ciencias de la Salud, 24 (3): 281-294.
    Search in Google Scholar
  22. Bollen, J., M.A. Rodriquez and H. Van de Sompel, (2006) “Journal status”, Scientometrics, 69 (3): 669-687.10.1007/s11192-006-0176-z
    Search in Google Scholar
  23. Borisova, L.F. and O.V. Syuntyurenko (2007) “VINITI RAN abstract database: Prospects of information postprocessing using methods of data analysis”, Scientific and Technical Information Processing, 34 (6): 278-283.10.3103/S0147688207060020
    Search in Google Scholar
  24. Bornmann, L. (2008) “The h-index and its variants: Which works best?”, Research Trends, (5): 5-6.
    Search in Google Scholar
  25. Bornmann, L., L. Leydesdorff, C. Walch-Solimena and C. Ettl (2011) “Mapping excellence in the geography of science: An approach based on Scopus data”, Journal of Informetrics, 5 (4): 537-546.10.1016/j.joi.2011.05.005
    Search in Google Scholar
  26. Buchanan, R.A. (2007) “Science Citation Index Expanded: The effect of journal editorial policies”, The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 33 (5): 532-539.10.1016/j.acalib.2007.05.001
    Search in Google Scholar
  27. Builova, N.M. Osipov, A.I. and E.M. Epshtein (2008) “On the rubrication of the journal The Physics of Nanoobjects and Nanotechnology from the AJ Physics of the VINITI RAS”, Automatic Documentation and Mathematical Linguistics, 42 (6): 269-271.10.3103/S0005105508060034
    Search in Google Scholar
  28. Burnham, J.F. (2006) “Scopus database: A review”, Biomedical Digital Libraries, 3: Article 1: pp. 1-8.10.1186/1742-5581-3-1
    Search in Google Scholar
  29. Burrell, Q.L. (2007) “Hirsch's h-index: A stochastic model”, Journal of Informetrics, 1(1): 16-25.10.1016/j.joi.2006.07.001
    Search in Google Scholar
  30. Caplin A. and A. Schotter (2008) “The foundations of positive and normative economics”, Oxford University Press, pp. 416.
    Search in Google Scholar
  31. Chang, C.-L. McAleer, M. and L. Oxley (2011) “How are journal impact, prestige and article influence related? An application to neuroscience”, Journal of Applied Statistics, 38 (11): 2563-2573.10.1080/02664763.2011.559212
    Search in Google Scholar
  32. Chang, C.-L., M. McAleer and L. Oxley (2013) “Corecive journal self citations, impact factor, Journal Influence and Article Influence”, Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, 93: 190-197.10.1016/j.matcom.2013.04.006
    Search in Google Scholar
  33. Chen, Y. and E.A. Fox (2014) “Using ACM DL paper metadata as an auxiliary source for building educational collections”, In: Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries, London: IEEE, pp. 137-140.10.1109/JCDL.2014.6970159
    Search in Google Scholar
  34. Chou, P.-N. (2012) “Database comparison between Web of Science and Scopus: A case of educational technology journals ”, International Journal of Information and Education Technology (IJIET), 2 (6): 584-586.10.7763/IJIET.2012.V2.209
    Search in Google Scholar
  35. Costas, R. and M. Bordons (2007) “The h-index: Advantages, limitations and its relation with other bibliometric indicators at the micro level”, Journal of Informetrics, 1 (3): 193-203.10.1016/j.joi.2007.02.001
    Search in Google Scholar
  36. Courtault, J.-M. Hayek, N. Rimbaux, E. and T. Zhu (2010) “Research in economics and management in France: A bibliometric study using the h-index”, The Journal of Socio-Economics, 39 (2): 329-337.10.1016/j.socec.2009.12.006
    Search in Google Scholar
  37. Dašić, P. (2011) “Analysis of the journal impact factor in field of economics and management”, In: Proceedings of the 1st International Conference Economics and Management-Based on New Technologies (EMoNT-2011), Vrnjačka Banja: SaTCIP Publisher Ltd., pp. 33-42.
    Search in Google Scholar
  38. Dašić, P. (2012) “Application of polynomial regression models for approximation of time series”, Journal of Economic and Management Based on New Technologies, 1 (2) 81-160.
    Search in Google Scholar
  39. Dašić, P. (2013a) “State of the art of reference journals indexed by SCI and SCI-E for 2008-2012”, Journal of Research and Development in Mechanical Industry, 5 (3): pp. 181-260.
    Search in Google Scholar
  40. Dašić, P. (2013b) “State of the art of reference journals indexed by SSCI for 2008-2012”, Journal of Economic and Management Based on New Technologies, 2 (3): 121-200.
    Search in Google Scholar
  41. Dašić, P. (2015a) “A comprehensive analysis of bibliometric indicators for category “Management” within SSCI based on JCR and Scopus data”, Journal of Economic and Management Based on New Technologies, 4 (3).
    Search in Google Scholar
  42. Dašić, P. (2015b) “A comprehensive analysis of bibliometric indicators for category “Mechanical Engineering” within SCI-E based on JCR and Scopus data”, Journal of Research and Development in Mechanical Industry, 7 (3).
    Search in Google Scholar
  43. Dašić, P. (2015c). “State and analysis of scientific journals in the field of "Mechanical sciences" within SCI-E for the period 1985-2014”, Journal of Research and Development in Mechanical Industry, 7 (2): 35-50.
    Search in Google Scholar
  44. Dašić, P. and M. Karić (2015a) “A comprehensive bibliometric analysis for category “Thermodynamics” within SCI-E. Part 1: Trend analysis of number of journals , articles and total citations”; Journal of Research and Development in Mechanical Industry, 7 (2).
    Search in Google Scholar
  45. Dašić, P. and M. Karić (2015b) “A comprehensive bibliometric analysis for category “Thermodynamics” within SCI-E. Part 2: Analysis of scientific journals by countries and continents”, Journal of Research and Development in Mechanical Industry, 7 (2).
    Search in Google Scholar
  46. Dašić, P. and M. Karić (2016a) “A comprehensive bibliometric analysis for category “Thermodynamics” within SCI-E. Part 5: Analysis of II, CHL and CngHL”, Applied Mechanics and Materials, 830: 249-257.10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.806.249
    Search in Google Scholar
  47. Dašić, P. and M. Karić (2016b) “A comprehensive bibliometric analysis for category “Thermodynamics” within SCI-E. Part 6: Analysis of EF and AI”, Applied Mechanics and Materials, 830: 258-270.10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.806.258
    Search in Google Scholar
  48. Dašić, P. Moldovan, L. and L. Grama (2015) “Status and analysis of scientific journals indexed in SCI, SCI-E and SSCI citation databases from Romania and Serbia”, Procedia Technology, 19: 1075-1082.10.1016/j.protcy.2015.02.153
    Search in Google Scholar
  49. Davis, P. M. (2008) “Eigenfactor: Does the principle of repeated improvement result in better estimates than raw citation counts?”, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology (JASIST), 59 (13) 2186-2188.10.1002/asi.20943
    Search in Google Scholar
  50. De Groote, S. L. and R. Raszewski (2012) “Coverage of Google Scholar, Scopus and Web of Science: A case study of the h-index in nursing”, Nursing Outlook, 60 (6): 391-400.10.1016/j.outlook.2012.04.007
    Search in Google Scholar
  51. Della, S.S. and J. R. Crawford (2007) “A double dissociation between impact factor and cited half life”, Cortex, 43 (2) 174-175.10.1016/S0010-9452(08)70473-8
    Search in Google Scholar
  52. Dewitt, T. W., R. S. Nicholson, and M. K. Wilson (1980) “Science Citation Index and Chemistry”, Scientometrics, 2(4): 265-75.10.1007/BF02016348
    Search in Google Scholar
  53. Dodson, M.V. (2009) “Citation analysis: Maintenance of h-index and use of e-index”, Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, 387 (4): 625-626.10.1016/j.bbrc.2009.07.091
    Search in Google Scholar
  54. Egghe, L. (1988) “Mathematical relations between impact factors and average number of citations”, Information Processing & Management, 24 (5) 567-576.10.1016/0306-4573(88)90026-X
    Search in Google Scholar
  55. Egghe, L. (2007) “Dynamic h-index: The Hirsch index in function of time”, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology (JASIST), 58 (3): 452-454.10.1002/asi.20473
    Search in Google Scholar
  56. Egghe, L. (2008) “Examples of simple transformations of the h-index: Qualitative and quantitative conclusions and consequences for other indices”, Journal of Informetrics, 2 (2): 136-148.10.1016/j.joi.2007.12.003
    Search in Google Scholar
  57. Egghe, L. Liang, L. and R. Rousseau (2009) “A relation between h-index and impact factor in the power-law model”, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology (JASIST), 60 (11): 2362-2365.10.1002/asi.21144
    Search in Google Scholar
  58. Esposito, M. (2010) “H-index: An index to quantifiy the impact of scientific research”, European Journal of Oral Implantology, 3 (1): 3-4.
    Search in Google Scholar
  59. Etxebarria, G. and M. Gomez-Uranga (2010) “Use of Scopus and Google Scholar to measure social sciences production in four major Spanish universities”, Scientometrics, 82 (2): 333-349.10.1007/s11192-009-0043-9
    Search in Google Scholar
  60. Falagas, M.E., E.I. Pitsouni, G.A. Malietzis and G. Pappas (2008) “Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science and Google Scholar: Strengths and weaknesses”, FASEB Journal, 22 (2): 338-342.10.1096/fj.07-9492LSF
    Search in Google Scholar
  61. Falagas, M.E., V.D. Kouranos, R. Arencibia-Jorge and D.E. Karageorgopoulos (2008) “Comparison of SCImago journal rank indicator with journal impact factor”, The FASEB Journal, 22 (8): 2623-2628.10.1096/fj.08-107938
    Search in Google Scholar
  62. Fersht, A. (2009) “The most influential journals : Impact Factor and Eigenfactor”, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America (PNAS), 106 (17): 6883-6884.10.1073/pnas.0903307106
    Search in Google Scholar
  63. Fu, H.-Z. and Y.-S. Ho (2013) “Independent research of China in Science Citation Index Expanded during 1980-2011”, Journal of Informetrics, 7 (1): 210-222.10.1016/j.joi.2012.11.005
    Search in Google Scholar
  64. Fu, H.-Z. and Y.-S. Ho (2015) “Top cited articles in thermodynamic research”, Journal of Engineering Thermophysics, 24 (1): 68-85.10.1134/S1810232815010075
    Search in Google Scholar
  65. Gągolewski, M. and R. Mesiar (2012) “Aggregating different paper quality measures with a generalized h-index”, Journal of Informetrics, 6 (4) 566-579.10.1016/j.joi.2012.05.001
    Search in Google Scholar
  66. Garfield, E. (1955) “Citation indexes to science: A new dimension in documentation through association of ideas”, Science, 122 (3159): 108-111.10.1126/science.122.3159.108
    Search in Google Scholar
  67. Garfield, E. (1970) “Citation indexing for studying science”, Nature, 227(5259): 669-671.10.1038/227669a0
    Search in Google Scholar
  68. Garfield, E. (1972) “Citation analysis as a tool in journal evaluation: Journals can be ranked by frequency and impact of citations for science policy studies”, Science, 178 (4060): 471-479.10.1126/science.178.4060.471
    Search in Google Scholar
  69. Garfield, E. (1985) “History of Citation Indexes for Chemistry: A brief review”, Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences, 25 (3): 170-174.10.1021/ci00047a007
    Search in Google Scholar
  70. Garfield, E. (2006) “The history and meaning of the journal impact factor”, Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA), 295(1): 90-93.10.1001/jama.295.1.90
    Search in Google Scholar
  71. Garfield, E. and A. Welljams-Dorof (1992) “Of Nobel class: A citation perspective on high impact research authors”, Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics, 13 (2): 117-135.10.1007/BF02163625
    Search in Google Scholar
  72. Garfield, E. and I.H. Sher (1963) “New factors in evaluation of scientific literature through citation indexing”, American Documentation, 14 (3): 195-201.10.1002/asi.5090140304
    Search in Google Scholar
  73. Gavel, Y. and L. Iselid (2008) “Web of Science and Scopus: A journal title overlap study”, Online Information Review, 32 (1): 8-21.10.1108/14684520810865958
    Search in Google Scholar
  74. Glänzel, W. (2006) “On the h-index - A mathematical approach to a new measure of publication activity and citation impact”, Scientometrics, 67 (2): 315-321.10.1007/s11192-006-0102-4
    Search in Google Scholar
  75. Guan, J.C. and X. Gao (2009) “Exploring the h-index at patent level”, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology (JASIST), 60 (1): 35-40.10.1002/asi.20954
    Search in Google Scholar
  76. Guns, R. and R. Rousseau (2009) “Real and rational variants of the h-index and the gindex”, Journal of Informetrics, 3(1): 64-71.10.1016/j.joi.2008.11.004
    Search in Google Scholar
  77. Gupta, B.M. and S.M. Dhawan (2009) “Status of India in science and technology as reflected in its publication output in the Scopus international database, 1996-2006”, Scientometrics, 80 (2): 473-490.10.1007/s11192-008-2083-y
    Search in Google Scholar
  78. Guz, A.N. and J.J. Rushchitsky (2009a) “On the level of coverage and citation of publications by mechanicians of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine in the Scopus database”, International Applied Mechanics, 45 (11): 1153-1161.10.1007/s10778-010-0256-x
    Search in Google Scholar
  79. Guz, A.N. and J.J. Rushchitsky (2009b) “Scopus: A system for the evaluation of scientific journals ”, International Applied Mechanics, 45 (4): 351-362.10.1007/s10778-009-0189-4
    Search in Google Scholar
  80. Harzing, A.-W. K. and R. Van der Wal (2009) “A Google Scholar h-index for journals : An alternative metric to measure journal impact in economics and business”, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology (JASIST), 60 (1): 41-46.10.1002/asi.20953
    Search in Google Scholar
  81. Herubel, J.-P. V. M. and A. L. Buchanan (1993) “Using SSCI to map scholarly influence in the social sciences: Braudel and annales historiography”, Behavioral & Social Sciences Librarian, 12 (1): 45-51.10.1300/J103v12n01_04
    Search in Google Scholar
  82. Hirsch, J. E. (2007) “Does the h index have predictive power?”, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America (PNAS), 104 (49): 19193-19198.10.1073/pnas.0707962104
    Search in Google Scholar
  83. Ho, Y.-S. (2012) “Top-cited articles in chemical engineering in science citation index expanded: A bibliometric analysis”, Chinese Journal of Chemical Engineering, 20 (3): 478-488.10.1016/S1004-9541(11)60209-7
    Search in Google Scholar
  84. Ho, Y.-S. (2013) “The top-cited research works in the Science Citation Index Expanded”, Scientometrics, 94 (3): 1297-1312.10.1007/s11192-012-0837-z
    Search in Google Scholar
  85. Ho, Y.S. (2014) “A bibliometric analysis of highly cited articles in materials science”, Current Science, 107 (9): 1565-1572.
    Search in Google Scholar
  86. Hodge, D. R. and J. R. Lacasse (2011) “Ranking disciplinary journals with the Google Scholar h-index: A new tool for constructing cases for tenure, promotion, and other professional decisions”, Journal of Social Work Education, 47 (3): 579-596.10.5175/JSWE.2011.201000024
    Search in Google Scholar
  87. Huang, A.H.-M. (2009) “Science as ideology: SSCI, TSSCI and the evaluation system of social sciences in Taiwan”, Inter-Asia Cultural Studies, 10 (2): 282-291.10.1080/14649370902823413
    Search in Google Scholar
  88. Huang, M.-H. and W.-Y.C. Lin (2012) “The influence of journal self-citations on journal impact factor and immediacy index”, Online Information Review, 36 (5): 639-654.10.1108/14684521211275957
    Search in Google Scholar
  89. Ingwersen, P., J.W. Schneider, M. Scharff and B. Larsen (2007) “A national research profile-based immediacy index and citation ratio indicator for research evaluation”, In: Proceedings of 11th International Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics (ISSI-2007), Madrid: Spanish National Research Council, pp. 864-865.
    Search in Google Scholar
  90. Jacsó, P. (2009) “Five-year impact factor data in the Journal Citation Reports”, Online Information Review, 33 (3): 603-614.10.1108/14684520910969989
    Search in Google Scholar
  91. Jacsó, P. (2010a) “Eigenfactor and article influence scores in the Journal Citation Reports”, Online Information Review, 34 (2) 339-348.10.1108/14684521011037034
    Search in Google Scholar
  92. Jacsò, P. (2010b) “Pragmatic issues in calculating and comparing the quantity and quality of research through rating and ranking of researchers based on peer reviews and bibliometric indicators from Web of Science, Scopus and Google Scholar”, Online Information Review, 34 (6): 972-982.10.1108/14684521011099432
    Search in Google Scholar
  93. Jacsó, P. (2012a) “Google Scholar author citation tracker: Is it too little, too late?”, Online Information Review, 36 (1): 126-141.10.1108/14684521211209581
    Search in Google Scholar
  94. Jacsó, P. (2012b) “The problems with the subject categories schema in the EigenFactor database from the perspective of ranking journals by their prestige and impact”, Online Information Review, 36 (5): 758-766.10.1108/14684521211276064
    Search in Google Scholar
  95. Jacsó, P. (2012c) “Using Google Scholar for journal impact factors and the h-index in nationwide publishing assessments in academia-siren songs and air-raid sirens”, Online Information Review, 36 (3): 462-478.10.1108/14684521211241503
    Search in Google Scholar
  96. Kellner, A. W. and L. C. Ponciano (2008) “H-index in the Brazilian Academy of Sciences: Comments and concerns”, Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências, 80 (4): 771-781.10.1590/S0001-37652008000400016
    Search in Google Scholar
  97. Kelly, C. D. and M. D. Jennions (2007) “H-index: Age and sex make it unreliable”, Nature, 449 (7161): 403.10.1038/449403c
    Search in Google Scholar
  98. Kulkarni, A.V., B. Aziz, I. Shams and J.W. Busse (2009) “Comparisons of citations in Web of Science, Scopus and Google Scholar for articles published in general medical journals ”, The Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA), 302 (10): 1092-1096.10.1001/jama.2009.1307
    Search in Google Scholar
  99. Lacasse, J. R. Hodge, D. R. and K. F. Bean (2011) “Evaluating the productivity of social work scholars using the h-index”, Research on Social Work Practice, 21 (5): 599-607.10.1177/1049731511405069
    Search in Google Scholar
  100. Lazaridis, T. (2010) “Ranking university departments using the mean h-index”. Scientometrics, 82 (2): 211-216.10.1007/s11192-009-0048-4
    Search in Google Scholar
  101. Levine-Clark, M. and J. Kraus (2007) “Finding chemistry information using Google Scholar: A comparison with Chemical Abstracts Service”, Science & Technology Libraries, 27 (4): 3-17.10.1300/J122v27n04_02
    Search in Google Scholar
  102. Leydesdorff, L. (2004) “Top-down decomposition of the Journal Citation Report of the Social Science Citation Index: Graph-and factor-analytical approaches”. Scientometrics, 60 (2): 159-180.10.1023/B:SCIE.0000027678.31097.e0
    Search in Google Scholar
  103. Leydesdorff, L. and T. Opthof (2010) “Scopus's Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) versus a Journal Impact Factor based on fractional counting of citations” Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology (JASIST), 61 (11): 2365-2369.10.1002/asi.21371
    Search in Google Scholar
  104. Liu, J. S. and Y. Y. L. Lu, “An integrated approach for main path analysis: Development of the Hirsch index as an example” Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology (JASIST), 63 (3): 528-542.10.1002/asi.21692
    Search in Google Scholar
  105. Lopez-Illescas, C., F. Moya-Anegon and H.F. Moed (2008) “Coverage and citation impact of oncological journals in the Web of Science and Scopus”, Journal of Informetrics, 2 (4): 304-316.10.1016/j.joi.2008.08.001
    Search in Google Scholar
  106. Losev, K.S. Efremovich, V.M. Kryuchkova, E.A. and V.K. Lyuboshchinskaya (2009) “Geography in the VINITI of the RAS: From reference journal to database. A history of development. Statistical characteristics during 1954-2008”, Scientific and Technical Information Processing, 36 (4): 262-266.10.3103/S0147688209040042
    Search in Google Scholar
  107. Luciano, M. (2012) “The new impact factor and immediacy index of World Psychiatry”, World Psychiatry, 11 (3): 207-208.10.1002/j.2051-5545.2012.tb00137.x
    Search in Google Scholar
  108. Lynn B.G. (2010) “IEEE Xplore”, Online (Wilton, Connecticut), 34 (3): 26-28.
    Search in Google Scholar
  109. Ma, H. Ho, Y.-S. and H.-Z. Fu, (2011) “Solid waste related research in Science Citation Index Expanded” Archives of Environmental Science, 5: 89-100.
    Search in Google Scholar
  110. Magri, M.-H. and A. Solari (1996) “The SCI Journal Citation Reports: A potential tool for studying journals ? I. Description of the JCR journal population based on the number of citations received, number of source items, impact factor, immediacy index and cited half-life”, Scientometrics, 35 (1): 93-117.10.1007/BF02018235
    Search in Google Scholar
  111. Maravić, B. (2005) “Directory of Open Access Journals ”, Kemija u industriji / Journal of Chemists and Chemical Engineers, 54 (11): 482-483.
    Search in Google Scholar
  112. Markusova, V.A. (2008) “Publishing activity of Russian scientists according to SCI and Scopus databases”, Scientific and Technical Information Processing, 35 (3): 120-127.10.3103/S0147688208030039
    Search in Google Scholar
  113. Mayr, P. and .-K. Walter (2007) “An exploratory study of Google Scholar”, Online Information Review, 31 (6): 814-830.10.1108/14684520710841784
    Search in Google Scholar
  114. Meho, L.I. and K. Yang (2007) “A new era in citation and bibliometric analyses: Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar”, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology (JASIST), 58 (13): 2015-2125.
    Search in Google Scholar
  115. Mikki, S. (2010) “Comparing Google Scholar and ISI Web of Science for Earth Sciences”, Scientometrics, 82 (2): 321-331.10.1007/s11192-009-0038-6
    Search in Google Scholar
  116. Mingers, J. and E.A.E.C.G. Lipitakis (2010) “Counting the citations: A comparison of Web of Science and Google Scholar in the field of business and management”, Scientometrics, 85 (2): 613-625.10.1007/s11192-010-0270-0
    Search in Google Scholar
  117. Moed, H. F. (2010) “A new journal citation impact measure that compensates for disparities in citation potential among research areas”, Annals of Library and Information Studies (ALIS), 57 (3): 271-277.
    Search in Google Scholar
  118. Moed, H. F. (2011) “The source normalized impact per paper is a valid and sophisticated indicator of journal citation impact”, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology (JASIST), 62 (1): 211-213.10.1002/asi.21424
    Search in Google Scholar
  119. Moh, F.-Y. Lu, H.-P. and B.-H. Lin (2012) “Contributions to financial crisis research: An assessment of the literature in Social Science Citation Index journals from 1990 to 2008”, Applied Economics, 44 (36): 4689-4700.10.1080/00036846.2010.528370
    Search in Google Scholar
  120. Morozova, O.P. (2008) “Internet coverage of the VINITI RAS”, Scientific and Technical Information Processing, 35 (3): 153-154.10.3103/S0147688208030076
    Search in Google Scholar
  121. Moskovkin, V.M. (2009) “The potential of using the Google Scholar search engine for estimating the publication activities of universities”, Scientific and Technical Information Processing, 36 (4): 198-202.10.3103/S0147688209040029
    Search in Google Scholar
  122. Moussa, S. and M. Touzani (2010) “Ranking marketing journals using the Google Scholar-based hg-index”, Journal of Informetrics, 4 (1): 107-117.10.1016/j.joi.2009.10.001
    Search in Google Scholar
  123. Murphy, J. and R. Law (2008) “Google Scholar visibility and tourism journals ”, Annals of Tourism Research, 35 (4): 1078-1082.10.1016/j.annals.2008.03.008
    Search in Google Scholar
  124. Nagaraja, A. and M. Vasanthakumar (2011) “Comparison of Web of Science and Scopus Impact Factors of Indian journals ”, Library Philosophy & Practice, 14: Article no. 596: pp. 1-6.
    Search in Google Scholar
  125. Nair, G. M. and B. A. Turlach (2012) “Stochastic h-index”, Journal of Informetrics, 6 (1): 80-87.10.1016/j.joi.2011.09.006
    Search in Google Scholar
  126. Norris, M. and C. Oppenheim (2010) “The h-index: A broad review of a new bibliometric indicator”, Journal of Documentation, 66 (5): 681-705.10.1108/00220411011066790
    Search in Google Scholar
  127. Noruzi, A. (2005) “Google Scholar: The new generation of citation indexes”, Libri, 55 (4): 170-180.10.1515/LIBR.2005.170
    Search in Google Scholar
  128. Ortner, H.M. (2010) “The impact factor and other performance measures - much used with little knowledge about”, International Journal of Refractory Metals and Hard Materials, 28 (5): 559-566.10.1016/j.ijrmhm.2010.05.004
    Search in Google Scholar
  129. Pislyakov, V.V. (2009) “Comparing two “thermometers”: Impact factors of 20 leading economic journals according to Journal Citation Reports and Scopus”, Scientometrics, 79 (3): 541-550.
    Search in Google Scholar
  130. Quesada, A. (2009) “Monotonicity and the Hirsch index”, Journal of Informetrics, 3 (2): 158-160.10.1016/j.joi.2009.01.002
    Search in Google Scholar
  131. Ristović, I., P. Dašić and J. Dašić (2014) “Analysis of the SCI, SCI-E and SSCI journals in the fields of mining transport, haulage and hoisting”, Applied Mechanics and Materials, 683: 78-85.10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.683.78
    Search in Google Scholar
  132. Rizkallah, J. and D.D. Sin (2010) “Integrative approach to quality assessment of medical journals using impact factor, Eigenfactor and Article influence scores”, PLoS (Public Library of Science) One, 5 (4), Article no. e10204: pp. 1-10.
    Search in Google Scholar
  133. Rogers, M. (2007) “ProQuest CSA free marketing kit”, Library Journal, 132 (6): 23-24.
    Search in Google Scholar
  134. Rousseau, R. (2007) “The influence of missing publications on the Hirsch index”, Journal of Informetrics, 1 (1): 2-7.10.1016/j.joi.2006.05.001
    Search in Google Scholar
  135. Schreiber, M. (2010) “A new family of old Hirsch index variants”, Journal of Informetrics, 4 (4): 647/651.10.1016/j.joi.2010.05.002
    Search in Google Scholar
  136. Shamaev, V.G. Zharov, A.V. and A.B. Gorshkov (2007) “Development of technology for the creation of retrospective reference databases of the VINITI RAN for physics and mathematics”, Scientific and Technical Information Processing, 34 (1): 10-16.10.3103/S0147688207010029
    Search in Google Scholar
  137. Sidiropoulos, A. Katsaros, D. and Y. Manolopoulos (2006) “Generalized h-index for disclosing latent facts in citation networks”, Scientometrics, 72 (2): 253-280.10.1007/s11192-007-1722-z
    Search in Google Scholar
  138. Sillet, A. Katsahian, S. Rangé, H. Czernichow, S. and P. Bouchard (2012) “The Eigenfactor™ score in highly specific medical fields: The dental model”, Journal of Dental Research (JDR), 91 (4): 329-333.10.1177/0022034512437374
    Search in Google Scholar
  139. Sl. glasnik RS, br. 38/2008: Pravilnik o postupku i načinu vrednovanja i kvantitativnom iskazivanju naučno-istraživačkih rezultata istraživača.
    Search in Google Scholar
  140. Šipka, P. (2005) “The Serbian citation index: context and content”, In: Proceedings of ISSI 2005, Stockholm: Karolinska University Press, pp. 710-711.
    Search in Google Scholar
  141. Su, X.-N., Han, X.-M. and X.-N. Han (2001) “Developing the Chinese Social Science Citation Index”, Online Information Review, 25 (6): 365-369.10.1108/EUM0000000006535
    Search in Google Scholar
  142. Tol, R. S. J. (2009) “The h-index and its alternatives: An application to the 100 most prolific economists”, Scientometrics, 80 (2): 317-324.10.1007/s11192-008-2079-7
    Search in Google Scholar
  143. Tomer, C.A (1986) “Statistical assessment of two measures of citation: The impact factor and the immediacy index”, Information Processing and Management, 22 (3): 251-258.10.1016/0306-4573(86)90057-9
    Search in Google Scholar
  144. Torres-Salinas, D., E.D. Lopez-Cózar and E. Jiménez-Contreras (2009) “Ranking of departments and researchers within a university using two different databases: Web of Science versus Scopus”, Scientometrics, 80 (3): 761-774.10.1007/s11192-008-2113-9
    Search in Google Scholar
  145. Toth, T. (1998) “Chemical Abstracts Service source of chemical information”, Kemija u industriji / Journal of Chemists and Chemical Engineers, 47 (7/8): 265-274.
    Search in Google Scholar
  146. Van Raan, A. F. J. (2006) “Comparison of the Hirsch-index with standard bibliometric indicators and with peer judgement for 147 chemistry research groups”, Scientometrics, 67 (3): 491-502.10.1556/Scient.67.2006.3.10
    Search in Google Scholar
  147. Vanclay, J. K. (2008) “Ranking forestry journals using the h-index”, Journal of Informetrics, 2 (4): 326-334.10.1016/j.joi.2008.07.002
    Search in Google Scholar
  148. Vieira, E.S. and J.A.N.F. Gomes (2009) “A comparison of Scopus and Web of Science for a typical university”, Scientometrics, 81 (2): 587-600.10.1007/s11192-009-2178-0
    Search in Google Scholar
  149. Vine, R. (2006) “Google Scholar”, Journal of the Medical Library Association (JMLA), 94 (1): 97-99.
    Search in Google Scholar
  150. Walters, W.H. (2014) “Do Article Influence scores overestimate the citation impact of social science journals in subfields that are related to higher-impact natural science disciplines?” Journal of Informetrics, 8 (2): 421-430.10.1016/j.joi.2014.02.001
    Search in Google Scholar
  151. Ward, J. (2014) “Prestige versus citation volume as journal indices in cognitive neuroscience”, Cognitive neuroscience, 5 (3-4): 135-37.10.1080/17588928.2014.976381
    Search in Google Scholar
  152. West, J. D. (2008) “Eigenfactor: Pulling the stories out of the data”; Research Trends, (8): 8. West, J. D. (2010) “Eigenfactor: Ranking and mapping scientific knowledge” Ph.D. Dissertation. Seattle (Washington - USA): University of Washington, 2010. pp. 139.
    Search in Google Scholar
  153. Wu, J. Lozano, S. and D. Helbing (2011) “Empirical study of the growth dynamics in real career h-index sequences”, Journal of Informetrics, 5 (4): 489-497.10.1016/j.joi.2011.02.003
    Search in Google Scholar
  154. Yin, C.-Y. (2011) “Do impact factor, h-index and Eigenfactor of chemical engineering journals correlate well with each other and indicate the journals ' influence and prestige?“ Current Science, 100 (5): 648-653.
    Search in Google Scholar
  155. Yue, W. Wilson, C. S. and R. Rousseau (2004) “The immediacy index and the journal impact factor: Two highly correlated derived measures”, The Canadian Journal of Information and Library Science, 28 (1): 33-48.
    Search in Google Scholar
  156. Zhang, C.-T. (2010) “Relationship of the h-index, g-index and e-index”, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology (JASIST), 61 (3): 625-628.
    Search in Google Scholar
  157. Zhiren, Z. (2002) “On the characteristic Chinese database: Chinese Social Science Citation Index”, Journal of Information, Communication and Library Science, 9 (1): 57-61.
    Search in Google Scholar
  158. Zibareva, I.V. and N.S. Soloshenko (2011) “Russian scientific publications 2005-2009 in the Science Citation Index, Scopus and Chemical Abstracts databases”, Scientific and Technical Information Processing, 38 (3): 212-223.10.3103/S0147688211030178
    Search in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ethemes-2015-0032 | Journal eISSN: 2217-3668 | Journal ISSN: 0353-8648
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 547 - 581
Submitted on: Nov 12, 2015
Accepted on: Dec 17, 2015
Published on: Apr 15, 2016
Published by: University of Niš, Faculty of Economics
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year
Keywords:
Bibliometric analysis,
citation database (CDB),
Social Science Citation Index (SSCI),
Journal Impact Factor (JIF),
“Economic Sciences”
Related subjects:
Business and economics,
Political economics,
Political economics, other,
Business management,
Business management, other

© 2016 Predrag Dašić, published by University of Niš, Faculty of Economics
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 53 (2015): Issue 4 (December 2015)