References
- Bradley, M.M., Micolli, L., Escrig, M.A., Lang, P.J. (2008). The pupil as a measure of emotional arousal and autonomic activation. Psychophysiology, 45, pp. 602–607.
- Bradley, M. T., & Janisse, M. P. (1981). Accuracy demonstrations, threat, and the detection of deception: Cardiovascular, electrodermal, and pupillary measures. Psychophysiology, 18, pp. 307–315.
- Cook, A.E., Hacker, D.J., Webb, AK., Osher, D., Kristjansson, S., Woltz, D.J., & Kircher, J.C. (2012). Lyin’ Eyes: Ocular-motor Measures of Reading Reveal Deception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 18(3), pp. 301–313.
- Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16, pp. 297–334.
- Dionisio, D. P., Granholm, E., Hillix, W. A., & Perrine, W. F. (2001). Differentiation of deception using pupillary responses as an index of cognitive processing. Psychophysiology, 38, pp. 205–211.
- Hacker, D.J., Kuhlman, B., & Kircher, J.C., Cook, A.E., & Woltz, D.J. (2014). Detecting deception using ocular metrics during reading. In D.C. Raskin, C.R. Honts, & J.C. Kircher (Eds.), Credibility assessment: Scientific research and applications. Elsevier, pp 159–216.
- Hess, E.H., Polt, J.M. (1960). Pupil size as related to interest value of visual stimuli. Science, 132, pp. 349–350.
- Hess, E.H., Polt, J.M. (1964). Pupil size in relation to mental activity during simple problem solving. Science, 143, –1190–1192.
- Honts, C.R. (2012). Countermeasures and credibility assessment. In In DC Raskin, CR Honts, & JC Kircher (Eds.), Credibility assessment: Scientific research and applications. Elsevier, pp. 131–156.
- Johnson, R., Jr., Barnhardt, J., & Zhu, J. (2005). Differential effects of practice on the executive processes used for truthful and deceptive responses: An event-related brain potential study. Cognitive Brain Research, 24, pp. 386–404.
- Kahneman, D. (1973). Attention and effort. Prentice-Hall: New Jersey.
- Kircher, J. C. (1981). Psychophysiological processes in the detection of deception. Department of Psychology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT. Unpublished manuscript.
- Kircher, J.C., Horowitz, S.W. & Raskin, D.C. (1988). Meta-analysis of mock crime studies of the control question polygraph technique. Law and Human Behavior, 12, pp. 79–90.
- Kircher, J.C., Raskin, D.C., Honts, C.R., & Horowitz, S.W. (1994). Genereralizability of statistical classifiers for the detection of deception. Psychophysiology, 31, S73. (Abstract)
- Loewenfeld, I. E. (1999). The pupil: Anatomy, physiology, and clinical applications (Vol. 1). Boston: Butterworth-Heinemann.
- Middle East (2016a). Ocular-motor detection of deception with Middle Eastern college students, Phase 1. Unpublished research. University of Utah, Department of Educational Psychology.
- Middle East (2016b). Ocular-motor detection of deception with Middle Eastern college students, Phase 2. Unpublished research. University of Utah, Department of Educational Psychology.
- NSA (2012). Ocular-motor detection of deception with employees at the National Security Agency Phase 1. Unpublished research. University of Utah, Department of Educational Psychology.
- NSA (2013). Ocular-motor detection of deception with employees at the National Security Agency Phase 2. Unpublished research. University of Utah, Department of Educational Psychology.
- Office of Technology Assessment (1983). Scientific validity of polygraph testing: A research review and evaluation. OTA-TM-H-15. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
- Osher, D. (2005). Multimethod assessment of deception: Oculomotor movement, pupil size, and response time measures. Unpublished dissertation, University of Utah, Department of Educational Psychology.
- Patnaik, P. (2013). Ocular-motor methods for detecting deception: Direct versus indirect interrogation. Unpublished master’s thesis, University of Utah, Department of Educational Psychology.
- Patnaik, P. (2015). Oculomotor methods for detecting deception: Effects of practice feedback and blocking. Unpublished dissertation, University of Utah, Department of Educational Psychology.
- Patnaik, P., Woltz, D.J., Hacker, D.J., Cook, A.E., Ramm, M.L., Webb, A.K., & Kircher, J.C. (2016). Generalizability of an ocular-motor test for deception to a Mexican population. International Journal of Applied Psychology, 6(1), pp. 1–9.
- Raskin, D.C. & Kircher, J.C. (2014). Validity of polygraph techniques and decision methods. In D.C. Raskin, C.R. Honts, & J.C. Kircher (Eds.), Credibility assessment: Scientific research and applications. Elsevier. pp. 63–129.
- Rayner, K. (1998). Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin, 124, pp. 372–422.
- Rayner, K., Chace, K. H., Slattery, T. J., & Ashby, J. (2006). Eye movements as reflections of comprehension processes in reading. Scientific Studies of Reading, 10, pp. 241–255.
- Steinhauer S. R., Boller F., Zubin J., Pearlman S. (1983). Pupillary dilation to emotional visual stimuli revisited. Psychophysiology, 20, p. 472.
- Steller, M. (1987). Psychophysiologische Aussagebeurteilung [Psychological assessment]. Hogrefe: Gottingen.
- Stern J.A., Walrath L.C., Goldstein, R. (1984). The endogenous eyeblink. Psychophysiology 21, pp. 22–33.
- USTAR (2010). Oculomotor deception detection. Unpublished research funded by the Utah Science Technology and Research Initiative.
- Vrij, A., Fisher, R., Mann, S., & Leal, S. (2006). Detecting deception by manipulating cognitive load. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10, pp. 141–142.
- Webb, A.K. (2008). Effects of Motivation, and Item Difficulty on Oculomotor and Behavioral Measures of Deception. Unpublished dissertation, University of Utah, Department of Educational Psychology.
- Webb, A. K, Honts, C. R., Kircher, J. C., Bernhardt, P.C., & Cook, A. E. (2009). Effectiveness of pupil diameter in a probable-lie comparison question test for deception. Legal and Criminal Psychology, 14(2), pp. 279–292.