Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Polygraph Examinations Contaminating Factors Cover

Polygraph Examinations Contaminating Factors

By: Tuvya T. Amsel  
Open Access
|Feb 2017

References

  1. [1] Trovillo Paul Y. (1939), A history of lie detection. Journal of Criminal Law, Criminology and Police Science, 29, pp. 848–881, Reprinted in Polygraph 1972, 1 (2), pp. 46–74, and 1(3), pp. 151–160.10.2307/1136489
  2. [2] Matte J.A., Forensic Psychophysiology Using The Polygraph, J.A.M Publications, Williamsville NY, 1996, pp. 41–42, 199, 203–205, 278, 281, 292, 325, 328–342.
  3. [3] Krapohl D., Sturm S., (2002), “Superdampening Concept”, Terminology Reference for The Science of Psychophysiological Detection of Deception, Polygraph 31 (3), p. 221.
  4. [4] Honts C.R., Amato S.L., Gordon A. (2004), Validity of outside-issue questions in the control question test, The Journal of General Psychology 131 (1), pp. 53–76.
  5. [5] Reid J.E., Inbau F.E., Truth and Deception, William & Wilkins, Baltimore 1977, p. 224.
  6. [6] Ibidem, pp. 41–42.
  7. [7] Backster C., A Response to Kraphol & Ryan’s “Belated Look at Symptomatic Questions”, Polygraph, 30 (3), pp. 213–215.
  8. [8] Capps M.H, Knill B.L., Evans R.K. (1993), Effectiveness of the symptomatic questions, Polygraph, 22 (4), pp. 285–298.
  9. [9] Ibidem, p. 294.
  10. [10] Ibidem, p. 53.
  11. [11] Krapohl D.J., Ryan A.H. (2001), A belated look at symptomatic questions, Polygraph 30 (3), p. 206.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ep-2016-0020 | Journal eISSN: 2380-0550 | Journal ISSN: 1898-5238
Language: English
Page range: 151 - 157
Published on: Feb 23, 2017
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2017 Tuvya T. Amsel, published by Andrzej Frycz Modrzewski Krakow University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.