Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The Amount of Information Remembered by the Perpetrator in the Context of the Application of the Guilty Knowledge Technique in Criminal Investigation ‒ a Pilot Study Cover

The Amount of Information Remembered by the Perpetrator in the Context of the Application of the Guilty Knowledge Technique in Criminal Investigation ‒ a Pilot Study

European Polygraph
Volume 10 (2016): Issue 2 (June 2016)
By:  and    
Open Access
|Jul 2016
References

References

  1. Ben-Shakhar G., Elaad E., Th e Guilty Knowledge Test (GKT) as an Application of Psychophysiology: Future Prospects and Obstacles, [in:] M. Kleiner (ed.), Handbook of Polygraph Testing, Academic Press 2002, 87-102.
    Search in Google Scholar
  2. Bradley M.T., Warfi eld J.F., Innocence, Information and the Guilty Knowledge Test in the Detection of Deception, Polygraph 1986, 15, 3, 183-194.
    Search in Google Scholar
  3. Christianson S.A., Freij I., Von Vogelsang E., Searching for Off enders’ Memories of Violent Crimes [in:] Christianson S.A. (ed.), Off enders’ Memories of Violent Crimes, John Wiley and Sons Ltd. 2007.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  4. Elaad E., Detection of Guilty Knowledge in Real-Life Criminal Investigations, Journal of Applied Psychology 1990, 75, 5, 521-529.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  5. Ellad E., Th e Challenge of the Concealed Knowledge Polygraph Test, Expert Evidence 1998, 6, 3, 161-187.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  6. Elaad E., Ginton A., Jungman N., Detection Measures in Real-Life Criminal Guilty Knowledge Tests, Journal of Applied Psychology 1992, 77, 5, 757-767.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  7. Gaines K.H., Utility and Numerical Evaluation of the Guilty Knowledge Test, Polygraph 2013, 43, 2, 173-190.
    Search in Google Scholar
  8. Gołaszewski M., Validated Techniques and Scoring Models for PDD Test Data Analysis - Conclusions from the 2011 APA Report, European Polygraph 2012, 6, 4, 227-240.
    Search in Google Scholar
  9. Krapohl D.J., McCloughan J.B., Senter S.M., How to Use the Concealed Information Test, Polygraph 2009, 38, 1, 34-49.
    Search in Google Scholar
  10. Lykken D.T., Th e GSR in the Detection of Guilt, Journal of Applied Psychology 1959, 43, 6, 385-388.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  11. Lykken D.T., Psychology and the Lie-Detector Industry, American Psychologist 1974, 29, 10, 25-739.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  12. Lykken D.T., Th e Validity of the Guilty Knowledge Technique: Th e Eff ects of Faking, Journal of Applied Psychology 1960, 44, 4, 258-262.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  13. Konieczny J., Fraś M., Widacki J., Pochodzenie ukrytej informacji a niektóre cechy osobowości w badaniu poligrafi cznym, Archiwum Medycyny Sądowej i Kryminalistyki 1984, XXXIV, 1, 25-30.
    Search in Google Scholar
  14. MacLaren, V.V., A Quantitative Review of the Guilty Knowledge Test, Journal of Applied Psychology 2001, 86, 4, 674-683.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  15. Meta-Analytic Survey of Criterion Accuracy of Validated Polygraph Techniques. Report Prepared for the American Polygraph Association Board of Directors, Polygraph Special Edition 2011, 40, 4.
    Search in Google Scholar
  16. Podlesny J.A., Is the Guilty Knowledge Polygraph Technique Applicable in Criminal Investigations? A Review of FBI Case Records, Polygraph 1994, 23, 1, 85-94.
    Search in Google Scholar
  17. Podlesny J.A., A Paucity of Operable Case Facts Restricts Applicability of the Guilty Knowledge Technique in FBI Criminal Polygraph Examinations, Forensic Sciences Communication 2003, 5, 3.
    Search in Google Scholar
  18. Pollock Ph. H., When the Killer Suff ers: Post-Traumatic Stress Reactions Following Homicide, Legal and Criminological Psychology 1999, 4, 2, 185-202.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  19. Widacki J.(ed.), Badania poligrafi czne w Polsce, Ofi cyna Wydawnicza AFM 2014.
    Search in Google Scholar
  20. Widacki J., Logical Identity of Conclusions from Polygraph Testing Performed in Control Questions test (CQT) and Guilty Knowledge Test (GKT) Techniques, European Polygraph 2011, 5, 1, 5-10.
    Search in Google Scholar
  21. Widacki J., Wprowadzenie do problematyki badań poligrafi cznych, Wydawnictwo MSW, Warszawa 1981.
    Search in Google Scholar
  22. Widacki J., W sprawie wyboru techniki badania poligrafi cznego. Czy technika oparta na testach GKT (CIT) jest lepsza od techniki opartej na testach CQ?, Problemy Kryminalistyki 2011, 273, 5-10.
    Search in Google Scholar
  23. Wójcikiewicz J., CIT czy CQT?, Problemy Kryminalistyki 2012, 275, 15-18.
    Search in Google Scholar
  24. Wójcikiewicz J., Kulicki M., Ekspertyza wariografi czna, [in:] Wójcikiewicz J. (ed.), Ekspertyza sądowa. Zagadnienia wybrane, 2nd ed, Ofi cyna Wolters Kluwer Business, Warszawa 2007.
    Search in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ep-2016-0008 | Journal eISSN: 2380-0550 (formerly 1898-5238) | Journal ISSN: 1898-5238
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 63 - 76
Published on: Jul 26, 2016
Published by: Andrzej Frycz Modrzewski Krakow University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Keywords:
Guilty Knowledge Technique,
GKT or CQT
Related subjects:
Medicine,
Clinical medicine,
Psychiatry, psychotherapy

© 2016 Marcin Tarabuła, Michał Widacki, published by Andrzej Frycz Modrzewski Krakow University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.

Volume 10 (2016): Issue 2 (June 2016)
Previous article
Next article