Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Examiner Approach and its Impact on Polygraph Results Cover

Examiner Approach and its Impact on Polygraph Results

By: Tuvya T. Amsel  
Open Access
|Apr 2016

References

  1. Barland G.H. (1975), Detection of Deception in Criminal Suspects: A Field Validation Study, unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Utah.
  2. Ben-Shakhar G., Bar-Hillel M., Lieblich I. (1986), Trial by Polygraph: Scientific and Juridical Issues in Lie Detection, Behavioral Science and the Law, 4, 459–479.10.1002/bsl.2370040408
  3. Ben-Shakhar G., Furedy J.J. (1990), Theories and Applications in the Detection of Deception: A Psycho-physiological and International Perspective, Springer-Verlag, New York.10.1007/978-1-4612-3282-7
  4. Deskovic v. City of Peekskill et al, U.S District Court, Southern District of N.Y, 07-cv-8150, 34, 35.
  5. Elaad E., Ginton A., Ben-Shakhar G. (1994), The Effects of Prior Expectations and Outcome Knowledge on Polygraph Examiners’ Decisions, Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 7, 279–292.10.1002/bdm.3960070405
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ep-2016-0002 | Journal eISSN: 2380-0550 | Journal ISSN: 1898-5238
Language: English
Page range: 7 - 10
Published on: Apr 30, 2016
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2016 Tuvya T. Amsel, published by Andrzej Frycz Modrzewski Krakow University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.