Have a personal or library account? Click to login

An empirical examination of the Environmental Kuznets Curve hypothesis for carbon dioxide emissions in Ghana: an ARDL approach

Open Access
|Dec 2016

References

  1. Abimbola O.M., Bello A.K. 2010. Does the level of economic growth influence environmental quality in Nigeria: A test of Environmental Kuznets Curve hypothesis. Pakistan J. Soc. Sci., 7, 4: 325-329.
  2. Andreoni J., Levinson A. 2001. The simple analytics of the Environmental Kuznets curve. J. Public Economics, 80: 269-286.
  3. Antle, J. M., Heidebrink, G. 1999. Environment and Development: Theory and International evidence. Environ. Econ. Dev., 43: 603-625.
  4. Beckerman W. 1992. Economic growth and the environment: Whose growth? Whose environment? World Dev., 20, 4: 481-496.
  5. DeBruyn S.M., Heintz R.J. 2002. The Environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis. [In:] Bergh J.C.J.M.V.D. (ed.). Handbook of Environmental and Resource Economics. Edward Elgar Publ., Oxford: 656-677.
  6. DeBruyn S.M., Opschoor S. 1998. Developments in the throughput-income relationship: theoretical and empirical observations. Ecol. Econ., 20, 3: 255-268.
  7. De Groot H.L.F. 1999. Structural Change, Economic Growth and the Environmental Kuznets Curve. OCFEB Research Memorandum 9911, Environmental Policy, Economic Reform and Endogenous Technology, Working Paper Series 1: 7-39.
  8. Environmental Protection Agency. 2011. Ghana’s Second National Communication to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, EPA, Accra, Ghana. http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/natc/ghanc2.pdf [Accessed 10th May, 2015].
  9. Environmental Protection Agency. 2015. Ghana’s Third National Communication to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, EPA, Accra, Ghana.
  10. Friedl B., Getzner M. 2003. Determinants of CO2 emissions in a small open economy. Ecol. Econ., 45, 1: 133-148.
  11. Galeotri M., Lanza A. 1999. Richer and cleaner? A study on carbon dioxide emissions in developing countries. Energy Policy, 27, 10: 565-573.
  12. Grossman G.M., Krueger A.B. 1991. Environmental impacts of a North American Free Trade Agreement. Natl. Bureau Econ. Res. Working Paper No. 3914. http://www.nber.org/papers/w3914.pdf10.3386/w3914
  13. Grossman G.M., Krueger A.B. 1995. Economic growth and the Environment. Quarterly J. Econ., 110, 2: 353-377.
  14. Gujarati, N. D. 2004. Basic Econometrics. Fourth Edition. The McGraw-Hill Companies.
  15. Halicioglu, F. 2009. An econometric study of CO2 emissions, energy consumption, income and foreign trade in Turkey. Energy Policy, 37, 3: 1156-1164.
  16. Holtz-Eakin D., Selden T. 1995. Stoking the fires? CO2 emissions and economic growth. J. Publ. Econ., 57: 85-101.
  17. Hossain S. 2012. An econometric analysis for CO2 emissions, energy consumption, economic growth, foreign trade and urbanization of Japan. Low Carbon Econ., 3: 92-105.
  18. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. 2007. The physical science basis. Contribution of Working group 1 to the fourth assessment report of the IPCC, Cambridge Univ. Press. http://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/assessment-report/ar4/wg1/ar4_wg1_full_report.pdf [accessed 25th June, 2015].
  19. Kriström B., Rivera P. 1995. Is the income elasticity of environmental improvement less than one?, Environ. Res. Econ,. 7: 45-55.
  20. Lieb Ch.M. 2002. The Environmental Kuznets Curve - A survey of the Empirical Evidence and of Possible Causes. Discussion Paper Ser., No. 391, Interdisci. Inst. of Environ. Econ., Univ. of Heidelberg. http://www.uni-heidelberg.de/md/awi/forschung/dp391.pdf.
  21. Lopez R. 1994. The environment as a factor of production: The effects of economic growth and trade liberalization. J. Environ. Econ. Manage., 27: 163-184.
  22. Managi S., Hibiki A., Tetsuya T. 2008. Does trade liberalization reduce pollution emissions? Discussion Papers, 08013. Res. Inst. Econ. Trade Industry (REITI). http://www.rieti.go.jp/jp/publications/dp/08e013.pdf
  23. Mensah J.T. 2014. Carbon emissions, Energy consumption and Output: A Threshold Analysis of the Causal dynamics in Emerging African Economies. Energy Policy, 70: 172-182.
  24. McConnell, K.E. 1997. Income and the demand for environmental quality. Environ. Dev. Econ., 2, 4: 383-400.
  25. Muhammad S., Faridul I., Muhammad S. 2011. Financial Development, Energy Consumption and CO2 emissions: evidence from ARDL approach for Pakistan. MPRA paper No. 30138. https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/30138/1/MPRA_paper_30138.pdf
  26. Nguyen T.A. 1999. Evidences of Environmental Kuznets Curve from CO2 emissions in six-country analysis. Working Paper. Inst. d’Econ. de Polique de l’Energie (IEPE) BP 47, 38040 Grenoble Cedex 09.
  27. Omisakin A.O. 2009. Economic growth and environmental quality in Nigeria: Does environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis hold? Environ. Res. J., 3, 1: 14-18.
  28. Omojolaibi A.Y. 2010. Environmental Quality and Economic Growth in some selected West African countries: A panel data assessment of the EKC. J. Sustain. Dev. Africa, 12, 8: 35-48.
  29. Onafowora O.A. and Owoye, O. 2014. Bounds Testing Approach to analysis of the environment Kuznets curve hypothesis. Energy Econ., 44: 47-62.
  30. Panayotou T. 1993. Empirical tests and policy analysis of environmental degradation at different stages of economic development. Working paper WP238, Tech. Employment Programme, Geneva: Int. Labour Office. http://www.ilo.org/public/libdoc/ilo/1993/93B09_31_engl.pdf
  31. Panayotou T. 2000. Economic Growth and the Environment. Working Paper, 56, Environ. Dev. Paper, 4. Center Int. Dev., Harvard Univ.
  32. Panayotou T., Sachs J., Peterson A. 1999. Developing countries and the control of climate change: A theoretical perspective and policy implications. CAER II Discussion paper, 45.
  33. Pesaran M.H., Shin Y. 1999. An Autoregressive Distributed-Lag Modelling Approach to Cointegration Analysis. Econometrics and Economic Theory in the 20th century. [In:] Strom S. (ed.) The Ragnar Frisch Centennial Symp. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge: 371-413.
  34. Saboori B., Soleymani A. 2011. CO2 emissions, economic growth and energy consumption in Iran: A cointegration approach. Int. J. Environ. Sci., 2, 1: 44-53.
  35. Schmalensee R., Stoker T.M., Judson R.A. 1998. World carbon dioxide emissions: 1950-2050. http://globalchange.mit.edu/files/document/MITJPSPGC_Rpt5.pdf10.1162/003465398557294
  36. Selden T.M., Song D. 1995. Neoclassical growth, the J curve for abatement and the inverted U curve for pollution. J. Environ. Econ. Manage., 29, 2: 162-168.
  37. Shafik N., Bandyopadhyay S. 1992. Economic Growth and Environmental Quality: Time Series and Cross Country Evidence. World Bank Policy Res. Working Paper, WPS 904.
  38. Smulders S., Bretschger L. 2000. Explaining Environmental Kuznets Curves: How Pollution induces policy and new technologies. Center Econ. Res., Tilburg, Discussion Paper, 2000-95.
  39. Stern D.I., Common M.S., Barbier E.B. 1996. Economic Growth and environmental degradation: The Environmental Kuznets Curve and sustainable development. World Dev., 24, 7: 1151-1160.
  40. Tamazian A., Chousaa J.P., Vadlamannatia K.C. 2009. Does higher economic and financial development lead to environmental degradation? Evidence from BRIC countries. Energy Policy, 37, 1: 246-253.
  41. Twerefou D.K., Appiah-Konadu P. 2015. The Impact of Trade Liberalization on the Environment: Evidence from Ghana. Ghana Soc. Sci. J., 12, 1.
  42. Word Bank. 2012. World Development Indicators Online Database. The World Bank Group. Available On-Line: http://devdata.worldbank.org/dataonline.
Language: English
Page range: 1 - 12
Submitted on: Jun 24, 2016
Accepted on: Dec 2, 2016
Published on: Dec 28, 2016
Published by: University of Silesia in Katowice, Institute of Mathematics
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 times per year

© 2016 Daniel Kwabena Twerefou, Frank Adusah-Poku, William Bekoe, published by University of Silesia in Katowice, Institute of Mathematics
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.