Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Environmentally Friendly Fuel Usage: Economic Margin of Feasibility Cover

Environmentally Friendly Fuel Usage: Economic Margin of Feasibility

Ecological Chemistry and Engineering S
Volume 26 (2019): Issue 2 (June 2019)
By: Antonina Kalinichenko and  Valerii Havrysh  
Open Access
|Jul 2019

References

  1. [1] Williams JL. WTRG Economics. London; 2017. http://wtrg.com/.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  2. [2] Report from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. Renewable Energy Progress Report. Brussels, 01.02.2017 COM(2017) 57 final. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52017DC0057&from=EN.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  3. [3] Bates J. Biomethane for Transport from Landfill and Anaerobic Digestion. Final report. Report for the Department for Transport (PPRO 04/91/63). Ricardo-AEA. 06/03/2015. https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/416002/biomethane-for-transport.pdf.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  4. [4] Bereczky A. Alternative fuels and technologies for compression ignition internal combustion engines. J KONES. 2012:19(4):1-9. http://yadda.icm.edu.pl/yadda/element/bwmeta1.element.baztech-article-BUJ8-0020-0005/c/httpwww_bg_utp_edu_plartkones42012j20o20kones20201220no20420vol_201920bereczky.pdf.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  5. [5] Hall CAS, Lambert JG, Balogh SB. EROI of different fuels and the implications for society. Energy Policy. 2014;64:141-152. DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2013.05.049.10.1016/j.enpol.2013.05.049
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  6. [6] Kalghatgi G. Is it really the end of internal combustion engines and petroleum in transport? Appl Energy. 2018;225:965-974. DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.05.076.10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.05.076
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  7. [7] Use of gaseous fuels in transport. REA Renewable Transport Group. 2016. https://www.r-e-a.net/upload/rea_use_of_gaseous_fuels_in_transport_report-_april_2016-_final.pdf.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  8. [8] Jaffe AM, Dominguez-Faus R, Lee A, Medlock K, Parker N. Scheitrum D, et al. Exploring the role of natural gas in U.S. trucking. UC Davis Institute of Transportation Studies. 2015: 63. UCD-ITS-RR-15-05. https://www.ge.com/sites/default/files/2015%2002%20Exploring%20the%20Role%20of%20Natural%20Gas%20in%20US%20Trucking.pdf.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  9. [9] Study of Opportunities for Natural Gas in the Transportation Sector. Marbek. 2010; project ID: 29064: 78. http://www.xebecinc.com/pdf/Marbek-NGV-Final-Report-April-2010.pdf.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  10. [10] Mikolajková-Alifov M, Pettersson F, Björklund-Sänkiaho M, Saxén HA. Model of optimal gas supply to a set of distributed consumers. Energies. 2019;12(3):351. DOI: 10.3390/en12030351.10.3390/en12030351
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  11. [11] Kalinichenko A, Havrysh V, Perebyynis V. Evaluation of biogas production and usage potential. Ecol Chem Eng S. 2016;23(3): 387-400. DOI: 10.1515/eces-2016-0027.10.1515/eces-2016-0027
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  12. [12] Gahleitner G, Lindorfer J. Alternative fuels for mobility and transport: Harnessing excess electricity from renewable power sources with power-to-gas. ECEEE Summer Study Proc. 2013;4-133-13:1007-1018. http://proceedings.eceee.org/papers/proceedings2013/4-133-13_Gahleitner.pdf.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  13. [13] Gabbar HA, Ayoub N. Integrated modeling for optimized regional transportation with compressed natural gas fuel. Alexandria Eng J. 2016;55(1):533:545. DOI: 10.1016/j.aej.2015.10.007.10.1016/j.aej.2015.10.007
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  14. [14] Topal O, Nakir I. Total cost of ownership based economic analysis of diesel, CNG and electric bus concepts for the public transport in Istanbul City. Energies. 2018;11(9):2369. DOI: 10.3390/en11092369.10.3390/en11092369
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  15. [15] Hall CAS, Cleveland CJ. EROI: definition, history and future implications. ASPO-US Conf, Denver. 2005. www.esf.edu/efb/hall/talks/EROI6a.ppt.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  16. [16] Fernández-Dacosta C, Shen L, Schakel W, Ramirez A, Kramer GJ. Potential and challenges of low-carbon energy options: Comparative assessment of alternative fuels for the transport sector. Appl Energy. 2019;236:590-606. DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.11.055.10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.11.055
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  17. [17] Mofijur M, Rasul MG, Hyde J, Bhuyia MMK. Role of biofuels on IC engines emission reduction. Energy Proc. 2015;75:886-892. DOI: 10.1016/j.egypro.2015.07.211.10.1016/j.egypro.2015.07.211
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  18. [18] Chris LF. The prospects for natural gas as a transport fuel in Europe. OIES Paper. 2014;84:1-109. https://www.oxfordenergy.org/wpcms/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/NG-84.pdf.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  19. [19] Chikishev E, Ivanov A, Anisimov I., Chainikov D. Prospects of and problems in using natural gas for motor transport in Russia. VII Int Sci Pract Conf “Innovative Technologies in Engineering”. IOP Conf. Series: Mater Sci Eng. 2016;142(012110):1-8. DOI: 10.1088/1757-899X/142/1/012110.10.1088/1757-899X/142/1/012110
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  20. [20] Llera E, Romeo LM, Bailera M, Osorio JL, Ebro CR, de Luna M. Exploring the integration of the power to gas technologies and the sustainable transport. Intern J Energ Prod Manage. 2018:3(1):8. DOI: 10.2495/EQ-V3-N1-1-9.10.2495/EQ-V3-N1-1-9
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  21. [21] Patel AB, Patel KA, Umrigar PB, Joshi A, Patel VC. Effect of ignition energy on performance and emission of dedicated 4-stroke single cylinder S.I engine fuelled with biogas - An experimental investigation. Int J Sci Technol Eng. 2015;1(11):391-399. http://www.ijste.org/articles/IJSTEV1I11096.pdf.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  22. [22] Ayade M, Latey AA. Performance and emission characteristics of biogas - petrol dual fuel in SI engine. Int J Mechanic Eng Technol (IJMET). 2016;7(2):45-54. http://www.iaeme.com/MasterAdmin/uploadfolder/IJMET_07_02_006/IJMET_07_02_006.pdf.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  23. [23] Liu J, Yang F, Wang H, Ouyang M, Hao S. Effects of pilot fuel quantity on the emissions characteristics of a CNG/diesel dual fuel engine with optimized pilot injection timing. Appl Energy. 2013;110:201-206. DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.03.024.10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.03.024
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  24. [24] Kapilan N, Ashok Babu TP, Reddy RP. Improvement of performance of dual fuel engine operated at part load. Int J Automot Mech Eng (IJAME). 2010;2:200-210. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/35361474.pdf.10.15282/ijame.2.2010.8.0016
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  25. [25] Senthilkumar K, Vivekanandan S. Investigating the biogas as secondary fuel for Ci engine. Int J Appl Environ Sci (IJAES). 2016;11(1):155-163. https://www.ripublication.com/ijaes16/ijaesv11n1_12.pdf.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  26. [26] Subramanian KA, Singal SK, Saxena M, Singhal S. Utilization of liquid biofuels in automotive diesel engines: An Indian perspective. J Biomass Bioenergy. 2005:29:65-72. DOI: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2005.02.001.10.1016/j.biombioe.2005.02.001
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  27. [27] Yuen P, Villaire W, Beckett J. Automotive materials engineering challenges and solutions for the use of ethanol and methanol blended fuels. SAE Technical Paper. 2010-01-0729. DOI: 10.4271/2010-01-0729.10.4271/2010-01-0729
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  28. [28] Rose K, Hamje H, Jansen L, Fittavolini C, Clark R, Dolores M et al. Impact of FAME content on the regeneration frequency of diesel particulate filters (DPFs). SAE Int. J. Fuels Lubr. 2014;7(2):563-570. DOI: 10.4271/2014-01-1605.10.4271/2014-01-1605
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  29. [29] Kuglarz M, Grübel K. Integrated production of biofuels and succinic acid from biomass after thermochemical pretreatments. Ecol Chem Eng S. 2018;25(4):521-536. DOI: 10.1515/eces-2018-0034.10.1515/eces-2018-0034
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  30. [30] Kalinichenko A, Pasichnyk L, Osypenko S, Patyka V, Usmanova H, Bacterial diseases of bioenergy plants. Ecol Chem Eng A. 2017:24(2):169-191. DOI: 10.2428/ecea.2017.24(2)16.10.2428/ecea.2017.24(2)16
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  31. [31] Huliaieva H, Tokovenko I, Maksin V, Kaplunenko V, Kalinichenko A. Effect of nanoaquacitrates on physiological parameters of Fodder Galega infected with phytoplasma. Ecol Chem Eng S. 2018:25(1):153-158. DOI: 10.1515/eces-2018-0011.10.1515/eces-2018-0011
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  32. [32] Havrysh V. Features of determination of discount rate for energy producing investment projects. Ukrainian Black Sea Region Agrarian Sci. 2014;3(79-1):23-35. http://visnyk.mnau.edu.ua/en/n79v3r2014t1havrysh/.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  33. [33] Ekman M. Biomethane in Sweden: Governmental Incentives and Market Trends. Glob Biomethane Congr. 2012. http://european-biogas.eu/wp-content/uploads/files/2013/11/5-Michelle_Ekman_Governmental-Incentives-and-Market-Trends_Developments-in-the-Swedish.pdf.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  34. [34] Rydberg T, Belhaj M, Bolin L, Lindblad M, Sjödin Å, Wolf C. Market conditions for biogas vehicles. Swedish Environmental Research Institute Ltd.; 2010. http://www.ivl.se/download/18.343dc99d14e8bb0f58b75d6/1446478742726/B1947.pdf.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  35. [35] IEA Bioenergy Task 37 - Country Reports Summary 2015. IEA Bioenergy. 2016. http://task37.ieabioenergy.com/country-reports.html?file=files/daten-redaktion/download/publications/country-reports/Summary/IEABioerg+T37CRS+2015+Final.pdf.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  36. [36] Wrońska I, Cybulska K. Quantity and quality of biogas produced from the poultry sludge optimized by filamentous fungi. Ecol Chem Eng S. 2018;25(3): 395-404. DOI: 10.1515/eces-2018-0027.10.1515/eces-2018-0027
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  37. [37] Geršl M, Kanduč T, Matýsek D, Šotnar M, Mareček J. The role of mineral phases in the biogas production technology. Ecol Chem Eng S. 2018;25(1):51-59. DOI: 10.1515/eces-2018-0003.10.1515/eces-2018-0003
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  38. [38] Biomethane in Transport. European Biogas Association. Brussels. 2016. http://european-biogas.eu/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/BiomethInTransport.pdf.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  39. [39] Biofuel barometer. EurObserv’ER. July 2016. https://www.eurobserv-er.org/pdf/biofuels-barometer-2016-en/.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  40. [40] Current Super and Diesel Prices. All Petrol Stations in Germany. https://gasoline-germany.com/preise-deutschland.phtml/statistics.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  41. [41] Global Petrol Prices. Access mode: http://www.globalpetrolprices.com/lpg_prices/. April 2017.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  42. [42] АZS.UA. http://azs.uapetrol.com/. April 2015.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  43. [43] Petroleum & Other Liquids. Independent Statistics & Analysis. U.S. Energy Information Administration. 2017. https://www.eia.gov/petroleum/gasdiesel/.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  44. [44] Energy and Environmental Affairs. 2017. http://www.mass.gov/eea/energy-utilities-clean-tech/home-auto-fuel-price-info/gasoline-and-diesel-fuel-prices.html.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  45. [45] Fuel prices in Sweden: petrol/gasoline and diesel. Sweden tips. 2017. http://www.swedentips.se/travel-info/fuel-prices/.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  46. [46] CNG Europe. 2017. http://cngeurope.com/.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  47. [47] Petrol, diesel fuel, gas prices. 2017.http://www.benzin-price.ru/price.php?region_id=77.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  48. [48] Current Fuel Prices in Europe. 2017. www.fuel-prices-europe.info.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  49. [49] CNG Europe. 2017. http://cngeurope.com/countries/france/.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  50. [50] Berg H, Burger A, Thiele K. Environmentally harmful subsidies in Germany. Federal Environment Agency. 2010. https://www.umweltbundesamt.de/sites/default/files/medien/publikation/long/3896.pdf.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/eces-2019-0030 | Journal eISSN: 2084-4549 | Journal ISSN: 1898-6196
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 241 - 254
Published on: Jul 18, 2019
Published by: Society of Ecological Chemistry and Engineering
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year
Keywords:
alternative fuel,
profitability index,
mathematical model for feasibility of the alternative fuel utilization,
fuel energy cost,
vehicle
Related subjects:
Chemistry,
Sustainable and green chemistry,
Engineering,
Electrical engineering,
Energy engineering,
Life sciences,
Ecology

© 2019 Antonina Kalinichenko, Valerii Havrysh, published by Society of Ecological Chemistry and Engineering
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 26 (2019): Issue 2 (June 2019)Next article