Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Quality of Rivers: Comparison of Hydro-Morphological, Physical-Chemical and Biological Methods Cover

Quality of Rivers: Comparison of Hydro-Morphological, Physical-Chemical and Biological Methods

Ecological Chemistry and Engineering S
Volume 25 (2018): Issue 1 (March 2018)
By: Małgorzata Gorzel,  Ryszard Kornijów and  Edyta Buczyńska  
Open Access
|Apr 2018

References

  1. [1] Du Plessis A, Global Water Scarcity and Possible Conflicts Freshwater Challenges of South Africa and Its Upper Vaal River: Current State and Outlook. Springer Water. 2017; 45-62. http://www.springer.com/gp/book/9783319495019.10.1007/978-3-319-49502-6_3
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  2. [2] McDonald RIP, Green D, Balk BM, Fekete C, Revenga M, Montgomery TM. Urban growth, climate change, and freshwater availability. P Natl Acad Sci USA. 2011;108(15):6312-6317. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1011615108.10.1073/pnas.1011615108307688021444797
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  3. [3] Srebotnjak T, Carr G, de Sherbinin A, Rickwood C. A global Water Quality Index and hot-deck imputation of missing data. Ecol Indic. 2012; 17:108-119. DOI:10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.04.023.10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.04.023
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  4. [4] Turley MD, Bilotta GS, Extence CA, Brazier RE. Evaluation of a fine sediment biomonitoring tool across a wide range of temperate rivers and streams. Freshwater Biol. 2014;59(11):2268-2277 DOI: 10.1111/fwb.12429.10.1111/fwb.12429
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  5. [5] Nichols SJ, Barmuta LA, Chessman BC, Davies PE, Dyer FJ, Harrison ET, et al. The imperative need for nationally coordinated bioassessment of rivers and streams. Mar Freshwater Res. 2017;68(4):599-613. DOI: 10.1071/mf15329.10.1071/MF15329
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  6. [6] Beavan L, Sadler J, Pinder L. The invertebrate fauna of a physically modified urban river. Hydrobiologia. 2001;445:97-108. DOI: 10.1023/a:1017584105641.10.1023/a:1017584105641
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  7. [7] Tavzes B, Urbanic G, Toman MJ. Biological and hydromorphological integrity of the small urban stream. Phys Chem Earth. 2006;31:1062-1074. DOI:10.1016/j.pce.2006.07.009.10.1016/j.pce.2006.07.009
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  8. [8] Sandin L. The relationship between land-use, hydromorphology and river biota at different spatial and temporal scales: a synthesis of seven case studies. Fund Appl Limnol. 2009;174:1-5. DOI: 10.1127/1863-9135/2009/0174-0001.10.1127/1863-9135/2009/0174-0001
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  9. [9] Fan JT, Semenzin E, Meng W, Giubilato E, Zhang Y, Critto. et al. Ecological status classification of the Taizi River Basin, China: a comparison of integrated risk assessment approaches. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2015;22(19):14738-14754. DOI: 10.1007/s11356-015-4629-x.10.1007/s11356-015-4629-x25989855
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  10. [10] Miserendino M, Kutschker A, Brand C, La Manna L, Di Prinzio C, Papazian G, et al. Ecological status of a Patagonian mountain river: Usefulness of environmental and biotic metrics for rehabilitation assessment. Environ Manage. 2016;57(6):1166-1187. DOI: 10.1007/s00267-016-0688-0.10.1007/s00267-016-0688-026961305
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  11. [11] Directive 2000/60/EC of The European Parliament and of The Council of 23 Oct. 2000 establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy (WFD). Official J Europ Communities L 327/1, 2000. http://ec.europa.eu/environment/water/water-framework/index_en.html.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  12. [12] Duffy BT, George SD, Baldigo BP, Smith AJ. Assessing condition of macroinvertebrate communities and bed sediment toxicity in the Rochester Embayment Area of Concern, New York, USA. J Great Lakes Res. 2017; 43(5):890-898. DOI:10.1016/j.jglr.2017.02.002.10.1016/j.jglr.2017.02.002
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  13. [13] Hoekstra AY, Chapagain AK, van Oel PR. Advancing Water Footprint Assessment research: Challenges in monitoring progress towards Sustainable Development Goal 6. Water-Sui. 2017;9(6). DOI: 10.3390/w9060438.10.3390/w9060438
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  14. [14] Szoszkiewicz KS, Jusik, I, Lewin I. Czerniawska-Kusza J, Kupiec M, Szostak M. Macrophyte and macroinvertebrate patterns in unimpacted mountain rivers of two European ecoregions. Hydrobiologia. 2018;808(1):327-342. DOI: 10.1007/s10750-017-3435-5.10.1007/s10750-017-3435-5
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  15. [15] Heatherly TII, Whiles MR, Royer TV, David MB. Relationships between water quality, habitat quality, and macroinvertebrate assemblages in Illinois streams. J Environ Qual. 2007;36:1653-1660. DOI: 10.2134/jeq2006.0521.10.2134/jeq2006.052117940265
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  16. [16] Verdonschot PFM. Impact of hydromorphology and spatial scale on macroinvertebrate assemblage composition in streams. Integr Environ Assess Manage. 2009;5:97-109. DOI: 10.1897/IEAM_2008-028.1.10.1897/IEAM_2008-028.119431295
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  17. [17] Timm H, Kairo K, Mols T, Virro T. An index to assess hydromorphological quality of Estonian surface waters based on macroinvertebrate taxonomic composition. Limnologica. 2011;41:398-410. DOI: 10.1016/j.limno.2011.09.006.10.1016/j.limno.2011.09.006
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  18. [18] Cortelezzi A, Sierra MV, Gomez N, Marinelli C, Capitulo AR. Macrophytes, epipelic biofilm, and invertebrates as biotic indicators of physical habitat degradation of lowland streams (Argentina). Environ Monit Assess. 2013;185:5801-5815. DOI: 10.1007/s10661-012-2985-2.10.1007/s10661-012-2985-223149840
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  19. [19] Urbanic G. Hydromorphological degradation impact on benthic invertebrates in large rivers in Slovenia. Hydrobiologia. 2014;729:191-207. DOI: 10.1007/s10750-012-1430-4.10.1007/s10750-012-1430-4
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  20. [20] Błachuta J, Szoszkiewicz K, Gebler D, Schneider SC. How do environmental parameters relate to macroinvertebrate metrics? Prospects for river water quality assessment. Pol J Ecol. 2014;62:111-122. DOI: 10.3161/104.062.0111.10.3161/104.062.0111
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  21. [21] Rajfur M, Kłos A. Use of algae in active biomonitoring of surface waters. Ecol Chem Eng S. 2014;21(4):561-576. DOI: 10.1515/eces-2014-0040.10.1515/eces-2014-0040
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  22. [22] Bis B, Zdanowicz A, Zalewski M. Effects of catchment properties on hydrochemistry, habitat complexity and invertebrate community structure in a lowland river. Hydrobiologia. 2000;422/423:369-387. DOI: 10.1023/A:1017002923173.10.1023/A:1017002923173
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  23. [23] Pistocchi A, Udias A, Grizzetti B, Gelati E, Koundouri P, Ludwig R, et al. An integrated assessment framework for the analysis of multiple pressures in aquatic ecosystems and the appraisal of management options. Sci Total Environ. 2017;575:1477-1488. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.10.020.10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.10.020
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  24. [24] Valero E, Alvarez X, Picos J. An assessment of river habitat quality as an indicator of conservation status. A case study in the Northwest of Spain. Ecol Indic. 2015;57:131-138. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.04.032.10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.04.032
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  25. [25] Raport o stanie środowiska województwa lubelskiego w 2003 roku. [Report on the state of the environment of Lublin Voivodship in 2003]. Lublin: Biblioteka Monitoringu Środowiska; 2004. http://www.wios.lublin.pl/srodowisko/raporty-o-stanie-srodowiska/.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  26. [26] Hooper FF, Kohler SL. Measurement of stream velocity and discharge. Chapter 19. In: Schneider JC, editor. Manual of Fisheries Survey Methods II: With Periodic Updates. Michigan Department of Natural Resources, Fisheries Special Report 25, Ann Arbor; 2000; 1-5. http://www.michigan.gov/documents/dnr/SMII_Assembled_Doc_2017_final_552610_7.pdf.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  27. [27] Oglęcki P, Pawłat H. The index method of small lowland river environmental evaluation. Annals of Warsaw Agriculture University. SGGW, Land Reclamation, 2000;30:37-43.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  28. [28] Ilnicki P, Lewandowski P. Ekomorfologiczna waloryzacja dróg wodnych Wielkopolski. [Ecomorphological evaluation of waterways in Wielkopolska]. Akademia Rolnicza w Poznaniu; 1997; 128. ISBN: 8390860503, 9788390860503.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  29. [29] Hermanowicz W, Dożańska W, Dojlido J, Koziorowski B. Fizyczno-chemiczne badanie wody i ścieków. [Physical-chemical investigations of water and sewage]. Warszawa: Arkady Press; 1999; 848. ISBN: 9788321340678.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  30. [30] Rozporządzenie Ministra Środowiska z dnia 9 listopada 2011 r. w sprawie sposobu klasyfikacji stanu jednolitych części wód powierzchniowych oraz środowiskowych norm jakości dla substancji priorytetowych. [Regulation of the Polish Ministry of the Environment of 9 November 2011. on the methods of classification of surface waters and environmental quality standards for priority substances]. Dziennik Ustaw Nr 257, poz. 1545. isap.sejm.gov.pl/Download?id=WDU20112571545&type=2.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  31. [31] Montusiewicz M, Chomczyńska J, Malicki J, Łagód G. Biofilm sampling for bioindication of municipal wastewater treatment. In: Pawłowski L, Dudzińska MR, Pawłowski A. editor. Environmental Engineering III. London: CRC Press; 2010; 491-496. ISBN: 9780415548823.10.1201/b10566-78
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  32. [32] Quigley M. Invertebrates of Stream and Rivers. Edward Arnold, London, 1977. ISBN-13: 978-0713100914.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  33. [33] Cranston PS. A key to the larvae of the British Orthocladiinae (Chironomidae). Freshwater Biological Association Scientific Publication; 1982; 152. DOI: 10.1002/iroh.19830680229.10.1002/iroh.19830680229
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  34. [34] Wiederholm T. Chironomidae of the Holarctic region. Keys and diagnoses. Part 1, Larvae. Entomol Scand. Supplement 19;1983.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  35. [35] Extence CA, Bates AJ, Forbes WJ, Barham PJ. Biologically based water quality management. Environ Pollut. 1987;45:221-236. DOI: 10.1016/0269-7491(87)90059-5.10.1016/0269-7491(87)90059-5
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  36. [36] Kownacki A, Soszka H, Fleituch T, Kudelska D. The ecological assessment of river quality in Poland on the basis of communities of benthic invertebrates, In: Kownacki A, Soszka H, Fleituch T, Kudelska D, editors. River Biomonitoring and Benthic Invertebrate Communities. Warszawa-Kraków: Institute of Environmental Protection; 2002; 71-88. ISBN: 8385444904.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  37. [37] King D, Ball RC. A quantitative biological measure of stream pollution. J Water Pollut Control Fed. 1964;36:650-653. http://www.jstor.org/stable/25035074.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  38. [38] Goodnight C. Use of aquatic macroinvertebrates as indicators of stream pollution. T Am Microsc Soc. 1973;92:1-13. DOI: 10.2307/3225166.10.2307/3225166
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  39. [39] Wiederholm T. Use of benthos in lake monitoring. J Wat Poll Control. 1980;52:537-547. http://www.jstor.org/stable/25040750.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  40. [40] Ter Braak CJF, Smilauer P. CANOCO reference manual and CanoDraw for Windows User’s Guide: Software for Canonical Community Ordination (version 4.5.). Microcomputer Power, Ithaca, NY, 2002. www. http://edepot.wur.nl/405659.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  41. [41] Ter Braak CJF. Canonical community ordination. Part I: Basic theory and linear methods. Ecoscience. 1994;1(2):127-140. DOI: 10.1080/11956860.1994.11682237.10.1080/11956860.1994.11682237
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  42. [42] Hammer Ř, Harper DAT, Ryan PD. PAST: Paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. Palaeontol Electron. 2001;4(1):9pp. http://palaeo-electronica.org/2001_1/past/issue1_01.htm; 2001.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  43. [43] Łagód G, Chomczyńska M, Montusiewicz A, Malicki J, Bieganowski A. Proposal of measurement and visualization methods for dominance structures in the saprobe communities. Ecol Chem Eng S. 2009;16(3):369-377. http://tchie.uni.opole.pl/freeECE/S_16_3/LagodChomczynska_16(3).pdf.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  44. [44] Łagód G, Chomczyńska M, Montusiewicz A, Malicki J, Stransky D. Methods applied for measurement and visualization of changes in biodiversity. Ecol Chem Eng S. 2014;21(4):593-604. DOI: 10.1515/eces-2014-0042.10.1515/eces-2014-0042
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  45. [45] Grzybowski M, Endler Z. Hydro-morphological evaluation of the Łyna River along the Kotowo-Ardapy section. Quaest Geograph. 2012;31(1):51-65. DOI: 10.2478/v10117-012-0008-6.10.2478/v10117-012-0008-6
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  46. [46] Buffagni A, Erba S, Cazzola M, Kemp JL. The AQEM multimetric system for the southern Italian Apennines: assessing the impact of water quality and habitat degradation on pool macroinvertebrates in Mediterranean rivers. Hydrobiologia. 2004;516:313-329. DOI: 10.1023/B:HYDR.0000025273.15958.6a.10.1023/B:HYDR.0000025273.15958.6a
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  47. [47] Hering D, Moog O, Sandin L, Verdonschot PFM. Overview and application of the AQEM assessment system. Hydrobiologia. 2004;516:1-20. DOI: 10.1023/B:HYDR.0000025255.70009.a5.10.1023/B:HYDR.0000025255.70009.a5
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  48. [48] Lorenz A, Hering D, Feld CK, Rolauffs P. A new method for assessing the impact of morphological degradation on the benthic invertebrate fauna for streams in Germany. Hydrobiologia. 2004;516:107-127. DOI: 10.1023/B:HYDR.0000025261.79761.b3.10.1023/B:HYDR.0000025261.79761.b3
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  49. [49] Gorzel M, Kornijów R. The response of zoobenthos to “natural channelization” of a small river. Ecohydrol Hydrobiol. 2007;7:261-272. www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1642359307701891.10.1016/S1642-3593(07)70189-1
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  50. [50] Koperski P. Reduced diversity and stability of chironomid assemblages (Chironomidae, Diptera) as the effect of moderate stream degradation. Pol J Ecol. 2009;57:125-138. aeu.miiz.waw.pl/pliki/article/ar57_1_10.pdf.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  51. [51] Wyżga B, Oglęcki P, Radecki-Pawlik A, Skalski T, Zawiejska J. Hydromorphological complexity as a driver of the diversity of benthic invertebrate communities communities in the Czarny Dunajec River, Polish Carpathians. Hydrobiologia. 2012;696:29-46. DOI: 10.1007/s10750-012-1180-3.10.1007/s10750-012-1180-3
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  52. [52] Ji ZG. Hydrodynamics and Water Quality: Modeling Rivers, Lakes, and Estuaries. 2nd edition. New Jersey: John Wiley Sons; 2017. ISBN: 978-1-118-87715-9.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  53. [53] De Pauw N, Ghetti PE, Manzani P, Spaggiari R. Biological assessment methods for running water. In: Newman P, Piavaux NA, Sweeting RA, editors. River Water Quality. Ecological Assessment and Control. Brussels: Commission of the European Communities; 1992:217-248.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  54. [54] Rosenberg DM, Resh VH. Freshwater Biomonitoring and Benthic Macroinvertebrates. New York: Chapman and Hall, 1993. ISBN 0412022516. DOI: 10.2307/1467358.10.2307/1467358
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  55. [55] Fleituch T, Soszka H, Kudelska D, Kownacki A. Macroinvertebrates as indicators of water quality in rivers: a scientific basis for Polish standard method. Large Rivers. 2002;13:225-239. DOI: 10.1127/lr/13/2002/225.10.1127/lr/13/2002/225
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  56. [56] Raczyńska M, Żurawska J, Chojnacki JC. The problem of quality assessment of surface lotic waters as exemplified by rivers Tywa and Rurzyca. EJPAU. 2000;3:1-17. http://www.ejpau.media.pl/volume3/issue1/fisheries/art-03.html.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  57. [57] Hynes HBN. The Biology of Polluted Waters. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press;1960; 202. DOI: 10.1002/iroh.19610460321.10.1002/iroh.19610460321
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/eces-2018-0007 | Journal eISSN: 2084-4549 | Journal ISSN: 1898-6196
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 101 - 122
Published on: Apr 24, 2018
Published by: Society of Ecological Chemistry and Engineering
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year
Keywords:
river classification,
ecological status,
hydro-morphology,
water chemistry,
zoobenthos
Related subjects:
Chemistry,
Sustainable and green chemistry,
Engineering,
Electrical engineering,
Energy engineering,
Life sciences,
Ecology

© 2018 Małgorzata Gorzel, Ryszard Kornijów, Edyta Buczyńska, published by Society of Ecological Chemistry and Engineering
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 25 (2018): Issue 1 (March 2018)Next article