Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The Role of Mineral Phases in the Biogas Production Technology Cover

The Role of Mineral Phases in the Biogas Production Technology

Ecological Chemistry and Engineering S
Volume 25 (2018): Issue 1 (March 2018)
By: Milan Geršl,  Tjaša Kanduč,  Dalibor Matýsek,  Martin Šotnar and  Jan Mareček  
Open Access
|Apr 2018

References

  1. [1] Holm-Nielsen JB, Al Seadi T, Oleskowicz-Popiel P. The future of anaerobic digestion and biogas utilization. Bioresource Technol. 2009;100:5478-5484. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2008.12.046.10.1016/j.biortech.2008.12.04619217772
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  2. [2] Lantz M, Börjesson P. Greenhouse gas and energyassessment of the biogas from co-digestion injected into the natural gas grid: A Swedish case-study including effects on soil properties. Renew Energy. 2014;7:387-395. DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2014.05.048.10.1016/j.renene.2014.05.048
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  3. [3] Mauky E, Fabian Jacobi H, Liebetrau J, Nelles M. Flexible biogas production for demand-driven energy supply-Feeding strategies and types of substrates. Bioresource Technol. 2014;178:262-269. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2014.08.12310.1016/j.biortech.2014.08.12325280601
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  4. [4] Wu XF, Wu XD, Li JS, Xia XH, Mi T, Yang Q, et al. Ecological accounting for an integrated “pig-biogas-fish” system based on emergetic indicators. Ecol Indicators. 2014;47:189-197. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.04.033.10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.04.033
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  5. [5] Poeschl M, Ward S, Owende P. Environmental impacts of biogas deployment - Part II: life cycle assessment of multiple production and utilization pathways. J Cleaner Production. 2012;24,184-201. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.10.030.10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.10.030
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  6. [6] Persson M, Jönsson O, Wellinger A. Biogas upgrading to vehicle fuel standards and grid injection. IEA Bioenergy, Task 37; 2006. http://task37.ieabioenergy.com/files/daten-redaktion/download/publi-task37/upgrading_report_final.pdf
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  7. [7] Ryckebosch E, Drouillon H, Vervaeren H. Techniques for transformation of biogas to biomethane. Biomass Bioenergy. 2011;35:1633-1645. DOI: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2011.02.03310.1016/j.biombioe.2011.02.033
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  8. [8] Marcato CE, Pinelli E, Pouech P, Winterton P, Guiresse M. Particle size and metal distribution in anaerobically digested pig slurry. Bioresource Technol. 2008;99(7):2340-2348. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2007.05.013.10.1016/j.biortech.2007.05.01317600701
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  9. [9] Menardo S, Gioelli F, Balsari P. The methane yield of digestate: Effect of organic loading rate, hydraulic retention time and plant feeding. Bioresource Technol. 2011;102(3):2348-2351. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2010.10.094.10.1016/j.biortech.2010.10.09421071217
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  10. [10] Govasmark E, Stäb J, Holen B, Hoornstra D, Nesbakk T, Salkinoja-Salonen M. Chemical and microbiological hazards associated with recycling of anaerobic digested residue intended for agricultural use. Waste Manage. 2011;31(12):2577-2583. DOI: 10.1016/j.wasman.2011.07.025.10.1016/j.wasman.2011.07.02521865025
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  11. [11] Rassi S, Läntelä J, Rintala J. Trace compounds affecting biogas energy utilisation - A review. Energy Convers Manage. 2011;52(12):3369-3375. DOI: 10.1016/j.enconman.2011.07.005.10.1016/j.enconman.2011.07.005
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  12. [12] Plawsky JL, Wang G, William N. Kinetic model for the pyrolysis of polysiloxane polymers to ceramic composites. AIChE J. 2002;48(10):2315-2323. DOI: 10.1002/aic.690481021.10.1002/aic.690481021
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  13. [13] Sevimoğlu O, Tansel B. Effect of persistent trace compounds in landfill gas on engine performance during energy recovery: a case study. Waste Manage. 2013;33(1):74-80. DOI: 10.1016/j.wasman.2012.08.016.10.1016/j.wasman.2012.08.016
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  14. [14] Sevimoğlu O, Tansel B. Composition and source identification of deposits forming in landfill gas (LFG) engines and effect of activated carbon treatment on deposit composition. J Environ Manage. 2013;128:300-305. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.05.029.10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.05.029
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  15. [15] Huguen P, Le Saux G. Perspectives for a European standard on biomethane: a Biogasmax proposal. Biogasmax; 2010. http://www.transport-research.info/sites/default/files/project/documents/20120601_135059_69928_d3_8_new_lmcu_bgx_eu_standard_14dec10_vf__077238500_0948_26012011.pdf.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  16. [16] Dewil R, Appels L, Baeyens J. Energy use of biogas hampered by the presence of siloxanes. Energy Convers Manage. 2005;47:1711-1722. DOI: 10.1016/j.enconman.2005.10.016.10.1016/j.enconman.2005.10.016
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  17. [17] Rossol D, Schmelz KG. Siloxane im Faulgas. GWF, Wasser/Abwasser. 2005;146(1):55-61.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  18. [18] Callander IJ, Barford JP. Recent advances in anaerobic digestion technology. Process Biochem. 1983;18:24-30.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  19. [19] Stams AJM, Oude-Elferink SJWH, Westerman P. Metabolic interactions between methanogenic consortia and anaerobic respiring bacteria. In: Ahring BK, editor. Biomethanation I: Adv Biochem Eng/Biotechnol. 2003;81:31-56. DOI: 10.1007/3-540-45839-5_2.10.1007/3-540-45839-5_2
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  20. [20] Tambone F, Genevini P, D’Imporzano G, Adani F. Assessing amendment properties of digestate by studying the organic matter composition and the degree of biological stability during the anaerobic digestion of the organic fraction of MSW. Bioresource Technol. 2009;100(12):3140-3142. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2009.02.012.10.1016/j.biortech.2009.02.012
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  21. [21] Gómez X, Cuetos MJ, García AI, Morán A. An evaluation of stability by thermogravimetric analysis of digestate obtained from different biowastes. J Hazard Mater. 2007;49:(1)97-105. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.03.049.10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.03.049
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  22. [22] Mandile AJ, Hutton AC. Quantitative X-ray diffraction analysis of mineral and organic phases in organic-rich rocks. Int J Coal Geol. 1995;28:51-69. DOI: 10.1016/0166-5162(95)00004-W.10.1016/0166-5162(95)00004-
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  23. [23] Bish DL, Post JE. Quantitative mineralogical analysis using the Rietveld full pattern fitting method. Amer Mineralogist. 1993;78:932-940. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/298d/5765bc8d4001f388526632b2104206416634.pdf.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  24. [24] Bish DL, Post JE, Editors. Modern Powder Diffraction: Reviews in Mineralogy. Washington, D.C.: Mineralogical Society of America; 1989. ISBN-13: 978-0-939950-24-9.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  25. [25] Bish DL, Chipera SJ. Problems and solutions in quantitative analysis of complex mixtures by X-ray powder diffraction. In: Barrett C, Charles S, editors. Advances in X-ray Analysis, 1988;31:295-308. Indiana, USA: Plenum Pub Co. ISBN-13: 978-0306422874.10.1154/S0376030800022102
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  26. [26] Bish DL, Howard SA. Quantitative phase analysis using the Rietveld method. J Appl Crystallog. 1988;21:86-91. https://journals.iucr.org/j/issues/1988/02/00/mo0014/mo0014.pdf.10.1107/S0021889887009415
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  27. [27] Álvarez-Flórez J, Egusquiza E. Analysis of damage caused by siloxanes in stationary reciprocating internal combustion engines operating with landfill gas. Eng Failure Analysis. 2015;20:29-30. DOI: 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2015.01.010.10.1016/j.engfailanal.2015.01.010
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/eces-2018-0003 | Journal eISSN: 2084-4549 | Journal ISSN: 1898-6196
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 51 - 59
Published on: Apr 24, 2018
Published by: Society of Ecological Chemistry and Engineering
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year
Keywords:
biogas production,
digestate,
X-ray diffraction analysis,
Rietvield method,
opal-CT
Related subjects:
Chemistry,
Sustainable and green chemistry,
Engineering,
Electrical engineering,
Energy engineering,
Life sciences,
Ecology

© 2018 Milan Geršl, Tjaša Kanduč, Dalibor Matýsek, Martin Šotnar, Jan Mareček, published by Society of Ecological Chemistry and Engineering
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 25 (2018): Issue 1 (March 2018)Next article