Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Impact of Use of Chemical Transformation Modules in Calpuff on the Results of Air Dispersion Modelling Cover

Impact of Use of Chemical Transformation Modules in Calpuff on the Results of Air Dispersion Modelling

Ecological Chemistry and Engineering S
Volume 23 (2016): Issue 4 (December 2016)
By: Robert Oleniacz,  Mateusz Rzeszutek and  Marek Bogacki  
Open Access
|Dec 2016

References

  1. [1] Hanna SR, Schulman LL, Paine RJ, Pleim JE, Baer M. Development and evaluation of the offshore and coastal dispersion model. J Air Pollut Control Assoc. 1985;35(10):1039-1047. DOI: 10.1080/00022470.1985.10466003.10.1080/00022470.1985.10466003
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  2. [2] Steven PG. CTDMPLUS: A Dispersion model for sources near complex topography. Part I: Technical formulations. J Appl Meteorol. 1992;31(7):633-645. DOI: 10.1175/1520-04501992031<;0633:CADMFS>2.0.CO;2.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  3. [3] Paumier JO, Burns DJ, Perry SG. CTDMPLUS: A dispersion model for sources near complex topography. Part II: Performance characteristics. J Appl Meteorol. 1992;31(7):646-660. DOI: 10.1175/1520-04501992031<;0646:CADMFS>2.0.CO;2.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  4. [4] US EPA. User’s guide for the Industrial Source Complex (ISC3) Dispersion Models: Volume II - Description of Model Algorithms. Tech. Rep. EPA-454/B-95-003b. Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards Emissions, Monitoring and Analysis Division, Research Triangle Park, NC; 1995. https://www.epa.gov/scram001/userg/regmod/isc3v2.pdf.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  5. [5] Janicke U, Janicke L. Lagrangian particle modelling for regulatory purposes - a survey of recent developments in Germany. 11th International Conference on Harmonisation within Atmospheric Dispersion Modelling for Regulatory Purposes. 2004:109-113. http://www.harmo.org/conferences/proceedings/_Cambridge/publishedSections/Op109-113.pdf.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  6. [6] Cimorelli AJ, Perry SG, Venkatram A, Weil JC, Paine RJ, Wilson RB, et al. AERMOD: A dispersion model for industrial source applications. Part I: General model formulation and boundary layer characterization. J Appl Meteorol. 2005;44(5):682-693. DOI: 10.1175/JAM2227.1.10.1175/JAM2227.1
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  7. [7] Perry SG, Cimorelli AJ, Paine RJ, Brode RW, Weil JC, Venkatram A, et al. AERMOD: A dispersion model for industrial source applications. Part II: Model performance against 17 field study databases. J Appl Meteorol. 2005;44(5):694-708. DOI: 10.1175/JAM2228.1.10.1175/JAM2228.1
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  8. [8] Helge Rørdam Olesen PL, Berkowicz R. OML: Review of model formulation. NERI Technical Report No. 609; 2007. http://www.dmu.dk/Pub/FR609.pdf.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  9. [9] CERC. ADMS 5.0 Flat Terrain Validation Kincaid, Indianapolis and Prairie Grass. June 2013. http://www.cerc.co.uk/environmental-software/assets/data/doc_validation/CERC_ADMS5_Study_Validation_Kincaid_Indianapolis_PrairieGrass_5.0_vs_4.2.pdf.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  10. [10] Holmes NS, Morawska L. A review of dispersion modelling and its application to the dispersion of particles: An overview of different dispersion models available. Atmos Environ. 2006;40:5902-5928. DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.06.003.10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.06.003
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  11. [11] Scire JS, Robe FR, Fernau ME, Yamartino RJ. A user’s guide for the CALMET meteorological model (Version 5). Earth Tech, Inc. Concord, MA; 2000. http://www.src.com/calpuff/download/CALMET_UsersGuide.pdf.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  12. [12] Scire JS, Strimaitis DG, Yamartino RJ. A user’s guide for the CALPUFF dispersion model (Version 5). Earth Tech, Inc. Concord, MA; 2000. http://www.src.com/calpuff/download/CALPUFF_UsersGuide.pdf.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  13. [13] Karamchandani P, Chen S, Seigneur C. CALPUFF Chemistry Upgrade. AER Final Report CP277-07-01 prepared for API, Washington, DC. San Ramon, CA; Atmospheric & Environmental Research, Inc.; 2008. https://www3.epa.gov/ttn/scram/11thmodconf/200802-CALPUFF_Chemistry_Upgrade.pdf.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  14. [14] Karamchandani P, Chen S-Y, Balmori R. Evaluation of original and improved versions of CALPUFF using the 1995 SWWYTAF data base. AER Report CP281-09-01 prepared for API, Washington, DC. San Francisco, CA: Atmospheric and Environmental Research, Inc.; 2009. http://mycommittees.api.org/rasa/amp/CALPUFF%20Projects%20and%20Studies/CALPUFF%20Evaluation%20with%20SWWYTAF,%202009,%20Kharamchandani%20et%20al.pdf.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  15. [15] Scire JS, Strimaitis DG, Wu Z-X. New developments and evaluations of the CALPUFF model exponent. 10th EPA Conference on Air Quality Modeling. Research Triangle Park, NC; March 2012. http://mycommittees.api.org/rasa/amp/CALPUFF%20Projects%20and%20Studies/CALPUFF%20Evaluation%20with%20SWWYTAF,%202009,%20Kharamchandani%20et%20al.pdf.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  16. [16] Suppan P, Skouloudis A. Inter-comparison of two air quality modelling systems for a case study in Berlin. Int J Environ Pollut. 2003;20:75-84. DOI: 10.1504/IJEP.2003.004250.10.1504/IJEP.2003.004250
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  17. [17] Juda-Rezler K. New challenges in air quality and climate modeling. Archiv Environ Protect. 2010;36(1):3-28. www.ipis.zabrze.pl/dokumenty/archives/roczniki/2010/AOS10-1.pdf.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  18. [18] Karamchandani P, Vijayaraghavan K, Yarwood G. Sub-grid scale plume modeling. Atmosphere. 2011;2(3):389-406. DOI: 10.3390/atmos2030389.10.3390/atmos2030389
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  19. [19] Leelőssy Á, Molnár F, Izsák F, Havasi Á, Lagzi I, Mészáros R. Dispersion modeling of air pollutants in the atmosphere: a review. Open Geosciences. 2014;6(3):257-278. DOI: 10.2478/s13533-012-0188-6.10.2478/s13533-012-0188-6
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  20. [20] US EPA. Guideline on Air Quality Models: Revision to the Guideline on Air Quality Models: Adoption of a Preferred General Purpose (Flat and Complex Terrain) Dispersion Model and Other Revisions; Final Rule. Federal Register, 40 CFR Part 51. 2005;70(216):68218-68261. https://www3.epa.gov/scram001/guidance/guide/appw_05.pdf.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  21. [21] US EPA. Clarification of regulatory status of CALPUFF for near-field applications. Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, Air Quality Assessment Division, Research Triangle Park, NC; 2008. https://www3.epa.gov/scram001/guidance/clarification/clarification%20of%20regulatory%20status%20of%20calpuff.pdf.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  22. [22] Levy JI, Spengler JD, Hlinka D, Sullivan D, Moon D. Using CALPUFF to evaluate the impacts of power plant emissions in Illinois: model sensitivity and implications. Atmos Environ. 2002;36:1063-1075. DOI: 10.1016/S1352-2310(01)00493-9.10.1016/S1352-2310(01)00493-9
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  23. [23] Levy JI, Wilson AM, Evans JS, Spengler JD. Estimation of primary and secondary particulate matter intake fractions for power plants in Georgia. Environ Sci Technol. 2003;37(24):5528-36. DOI: 10.1021/es034484l.10.1021/es034484l14717160
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  24. [24] Yim SHL, Fung JCH, Lau AKH. Use of high-resolution MM5/CALMET/CALPUFF system: SO2 apportionment to air quality in Hong Kong. Atmos Environ. 2010;44:4850-4858. DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.08.037.10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.08.037
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  25. [25] Cui H, Yao R, Xu X, Xin C, Yang J. A tracer experiment study to evaluate the CALPUFF real time application in a near-field complex terrain setting. Atmos Environ. 2011;45(39):7525-7532. DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.08.041.10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.08.041
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  26. [26] Hernández-Garces A, Souto Ja, Rodríguez Á, Saavedra S, Casares JJ. Validation of CALMET/CALPUFF models simulations around a large power plant stack. Física de la Tierra. 2015;27:35-55. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5209/rev_FITE.2015.v27.51192.10.5209/rev_FITE.2015.v27.51192
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  27. [27] Dresser AL, Huizer RD. CALPUFF and AERMOD model validation study in the near field: Martins Creek revisited. J Air Waste Manage Assoc. 2011;61(6):647-659. DOI: 10.3155/1047-3289.61.6.647.10.3155/1047-3289.61.6.647
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  28. [28] Gulia S, Kumar A, Khare M. Performance evaluation of CALPUFF and AERMOD dispersion models for air quality assessment of an industrial complex. J Sci Ind Res. 2015;74:302-307. http://nopr.niscair.res.in/handle/123456789/31451.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  29. [29] Jittra N, Pinthong N, Thepanondh S. Performance evaluation of AERMOD and CALPUFF air dispersion models in industrial complex area. Air Soil Water Res. 2015;8:87-95. DOI:10.4137/ASWR.S32781.10.4137/ASWR.S32781
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  30. [30] Rood AS. Performance evaluation of AERMOD, CALPUFF, and legacy air dispersion models using the Winter Validation Tracer Study dataset. Atmos Environ. 2014;89:707-720. DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.02.054.10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.02.054
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  31. [31] Tartakovsky D, Broday DM, Stern E. Evaluation of AERMOD and CALPUFF for predicting ambient concentrations of total suspended particulate matter (TSP) emissions from a quarry in complex terrain. Environ Pollut. 2013;179:138-145. DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2013.04.023.10.1016/j.envpol.2013.04.023
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  32. [32] Thepanondh S, Outapa P, Saikomol S. Evaluation of dispersion model performance in predicting SO2 concentrations from petroleum refinery complex. Int J GEOMATE. 2016;11(23):2129-2135. http://www.geomatejournal.com/sites/default/files/articles/2129-2135-1118-Thepanondh-July-2016-c1.pdf.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  33. [33] Holnicki P, Kałuszko A, Trapp W. An urban scale application and validation of the CALPUFF model. Atmos Pollut Res. 2015;7(3):393-402. DOI: 10.1016/j.apr.2015.10.016.10.1016/j.apr.2015.10.016
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  34. [34] Zhou Y, Levy JI, Hammitt JK, Evans JS. Estimating population exposure to power plant emissions using CALPUFF: a case study in Beijing, China. Atmos Environ. 2003;37(6):815-826. DOI: 10.1016/S1352-2310(02)00937-8.10.1016/S1352-2310(02)00937-8
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  35. [35] López MT, Zuk M, Garibay V, Tzintzun G, Iniestra R, Fernández A. Health impacts from power plant emissions in Mexico. Atmos Environ. 2005;39(7):1199-1209. DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2004.10.035.10.1016/j.atmosenv.2004.10.035
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  36. [36] Hao J, Wang L, Shen M, Li L, Hu J. Air quality impacts of power plant emissions in Beijing. Environ Pollut. 2007;147:401-408. DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2006.06.013.10.1016/j.envpol.2006.06.01316899328
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  37. [37] ENVIRON International Corporation. Evaluation of Chemical Dispersion Models using Atmospheric Plume Measurements from Field Experiments. Final Report UNC-EMAQ 4-06.018.v4 prepared for Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards U.S. EPA. EPA Contract No: EP-D-07-102, Novato, CA; September 2012. https://www3.epa.gov/scram001/reports/Plume_Eval_Final_Sep_2012v5.pdf.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  38. [38] Apostoł M, Bąkowski A, Chronowska-Przywara K, Kot M, Monieta J, Oleniacz R, et al. Wybrane zagadnienia inżynierii mechanicznej, materiałowej i środowiskowej (Selected issues of mechanical, material and environmental engineering). Kraków: Wyd. Katedra Automatyzacji Procesów, AGH w Krakowie; 2015. DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.1.2907.1440.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  39. [39] EEA. Reported data on large combustion plants covered by Directive 2001/80/EC. August 2016. http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/data/lcp-1.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  40. [40] US EPA. AP42 Fifth Ed. Vol. 1, 1.1, 1993. http://www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/ap42/ch01/bgdocs/b01s01.pdf.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  41. [41] Chief Inspectorate for Environmental Protection (Poland). Air Quality Portal. http://powietrze.gios.gov.pl (accessed in 31.01.2016).
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  42. [42] EEA. AirBase - The European air quality database. http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/data/airbase-the-european-air-quality-database-8/ (accessed in 30.09.2015).
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  43. [43] EEA. Air Quality e-Reporting (AQ e-Reporting). May 2016. http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/data/aqereporting-1.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  44. [44] Oleniacz R, Rzeszutek M. Determination of optimal spatial databases for the area of Poland to the calculation of air pollutant dispersion using the CALMET/CALPUFF model. Geomat Environ Eng. 2014;8(2):57-69. DOI: 10.7494/geom.2014.8.2.57.10.7494/geom.2014.8.2.57
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  45. [45] Oleniacz R, Rzeszutek M. Assessment of the impact of spatial data on the results of air pollution dispersion modeling. Geoinformatica Polonica. 2014;13:57-68. DOI: 10.2478/gein-2014-0006.10.2478/gein-2014-0006
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  46. [46] Stelson AW, Seinfeld JH. Relative humidity and temperature dependence of the ammonium nitrate dissociation constant. Atmospheric Environ. 1982;16:983-992. DOI: 10.1016/0004-6981(82)90184-6.10.1016/0004-6981(82)90184-6
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  47. [47] Atkinson R, Lloyd AC, Winges L. An updated chemical mechanism for hydrocarbon/NOx/SOx photo oxidation suitable for inclusion in atmospheric simulation models. Atmos Environ. 1982,16:1341-1355. DOI: 10.1016/0004-6981(82)90055-5.10.1016/0004-6981(82)90055-5
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  48. [48] Scire JS, Lurmann FW, Bass A, Hanna SR. Development of the MESOPUFF II Dispersion Model. Concord, MA: Environmental Research and Technology, Inc.; Contract No. 68-02-3733; Environmental Sciences Research Lab., Office of Research and Development, U.S. EPA, Research Triangle Park, NC; 1984. https://nepis.epa.gov/Exe/ZyPDF.cgi/9101QF22.PDF?Dockey=9101QF22.PDF.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  49. [49] Morris RE, Kessler RC, Douglas SG, Styles KR, Moore GE. Rocky Mountain Acid Deposition Model Assessment: Acid Rain Mountain Mesoscale Model (ARM3). San Rafael, CA.: Systems Applications, Inc., US EPA, Research Triangle Park, NC, Atmospheric Sciences Research Laboratory; 1988. https://ntrl.ntis.gov/NTRL/dashboard/searchResults/titleDetail/PB89124408.xhtml.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  50. [50] Nenes A, Pandis SN, Pilinis C. ISORROPIA: A new thermodynamic equilibrium model for multiphase multicomponent inorganic aerosols. Aquat Geochem. 1998;4(1):123-152. DOI: 10.1023/A:1009604003981.10.1023/A:1009604003981
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  51. [51] Fountoukis C, Nenes A. ISORROPIA II: a computationally efficient thermodynamic equilibrium model for K+-Ca2+-Mg2+-NH4+-Na+-SO42−-NO3−-Cl−-H2O aerosols. Atmos Chem Phys. 2007;7(17):4639-4659. DOI: 10.5194/acp-7-4639-2007.10.5194/acp-7-4639-2007
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  52. [52] Wexler AS, Seinfeld JH. Second-generation inorganic aerosol model. Atmos Environ. 1991;25A:2731-2748. DOI: 10.1016/0960-1686(91)90203-J.10.1016/0960-1686(91)90203-J
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  53. [53] TRC Environmental Corporation. CALPUFF Chemistry Updates: User’s Instructions for API Chemistry Options. Prepared for WEST Associates, Lowell, MA; 2010. http://www.src.com/calpuff/download/Mod64_Files/UsersInstructions_UpdatedChemistry.pdf.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/eces-2016-0043 | Journal eISSN: 2084-4549 | Journal ISSN: 1898-6196
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 605 - 620
Published on: Dec 30, 2016
Published by: Society of Ecological Chemistry and Engineering
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year
Keywords:
air pollution modelling,
CALPUFF,
atmospheric chemical transformations,
secondary inorganic aerosols,
large combustion plants
Related subjects:
Chemistry,
Sustainable and green chemistry,
Engineering,
Electrical engineering,
Energy engineering,
Life sciences,
Ecology

© 2016 Robert Oleniacz, Mateusz Rzeszutek, Marek Bogacki, published by Society of Ecological Chemistry and Engineering
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 23 (2016): Issue 4 (December 2016)Next article