Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Evaluation of Environmental Hazard During Shale Gas Exploration Process in Poland in the Years 2012-2014 Cover

Evaluation of Environmental Hazard During Shale Gas Exploration Process in Poland in the Years 2012-2014

Open Access
|Dec 2016

References

  1. [1] Unconventional Gas, Topic Paper #29: Working Doc. of the NPC Global Oil & Gas Study, National Petroleum Council Unc. Gas Subgroup of the Technology Task Group of the NPC Committee on Global Oil and Gas. 2007; 18 July. http://www.npc.org/Study_Topic_Papers/29-TTG-Unconventional-gas.
  2. [2] Shonkoff SB, Hays J, Finkel ML. Environmental public health dimensions of shale and tight gas development. Environ Health Perspect. 2014;122:787-795. DOI: 10.1289/ehp.1307866.10.1289/ehp.1307866412303324736097
  3. [3] MIT. The Future of Natural Gas, An Interdisciplinary MIT Study. Massachusetts Institute of Technology Energy Initiative. June 2011. https://energy.mit.edu/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/MITEI-The-Future-of-Natural-Gas.pdf.
  4. [4] Jenner S, Lamadrid AJ. Shale gas vs. coal: Policy implications from environmental impact comparisons of shale gas, conventional gas, and coal on air, water, and land in the United States. Energy Policy. 2013;53: 442-453. DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2012.11.010.10.1016/j.enpol.2012.11.010
  5. [5] Modern Shale Gas Development in the United States: A Primer. U.S. Department of Energy. Oklahoma City; 2009. http://energy.gov/sites/prod/files/2013/03/f0/ShaleGasPrimer_Online_4-2009.
  6. [6] King GE. Hydraulic Fracturing 101: What Every Representative, Environmentalist, Regulator, Reporter, Investor, University Researcher, Neighbor and Engineer Should Know about Estimating Frac Risk & Improving Fracturing Performance in Unconventional Gas & Wells, SPE 152596-MS, SPE Hydraulic Fracturing Technology Conference, 6-8 February, The Woodlands, Texas, USA, 2012. DOI: 10.2118/152596-MS.10.2118/152596-MS
  7. [7] Hartmann D, Meylan B. Fracking in der Schweiz aus Sicht des Grund- und Trinkwasserschutzes. Swiss Bull Angew Geol. 2014;19(2):109-113. http://www.saseg.ch/cms/images/pdf/Publikationen/Medien/SwissBulletin_2-2014-lr.pdf.
  8. [8] Stamford L, Azapagic A. Life cycle environmental impacts of UK shale gas. Appl Energy. 2014;134:506-518. DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.08.063.10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.08.063
  9. [9] IEA. Golden Rules for a Golden Age of Gas. World Energy Outlook, Special Report on Unconventional Gas. Report IEA. 2012. http://www.worldenergyoutlook.org/media/weowebsite/2012/goldenrules/weo2012_goldenrulesreport.pdf.
  10. [10] EPA. Study of the Potential Impacts of Hydraulic Fracturing on Drinking Water Resources. Progress Report EPA 601/R-12/011, December 2012. https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/documents/hf-report20121214.pdf.
  11. [11] EPA. Assessment of the Potential Impacts of Hydraulic Fracturing for Oil and Gas on Drinking Water Resources. External Review Draft EPA/600/R-15/047a, June 2015. https://cfpub.epa.gov/ncea/hfstudy/recordisplay.cfm?deid=244651.
  12. [12] Babko R, Jaromin-Gleń K, Łagód G, Pawłowska M, Pawłowski A. Effect of drilling mud addition on activated sludge and processes in sequencing batch reactors, Desalin Water Treat. 2016;57(3):1490-1498. DOI: 10.1080/19443994.2015.1033137.10.1080/19443994.2015.1033137
  13. [13] EIA. World Shale Gas Resources: An Initial Assessment of 14 Regions Outside of the United States. Washington D.C.: U.S Department of Energy; April 2011. http://www.documentcloud.org/documents/741346-eia-2011-report.html.
  14. [14] EIA. Technically Recoverable Shale Oil and Shale Gas Resources: An Assessment of 137 Shale Formations in 41 Countries Outside the United States. Washington D.C.: U.S Department of Energy; June 2013. https://www.eia.gov/analysis/studies/worldshalegas/archive/2013/pdf/fullreport_2013.pdf.
  15. [15] IEA. World Energy Outlook 2011. Report IEA 2011. https://www.iea.org/publications/freepublications/publication/WEO2011_WEB.pdf.
  16. [16] Siemek J, Nagy S, Siemek P. Challenges for sustainable development: the case of shale gas exploitation in Poland. Problemy Ekorozwoju - Problems Sust Development. 2013;8(1):91-104. http://ekorozwoj.pol.lublin.pl/no15/j.pdf.
  17. [17] Pöyry. Macroeconomic Effects of European Shale Gas Production; A report to the International Association of Oil and Gas Producers (OGP), November 2013. http://www.poyry.co.uk/sites/poyry.co.uk/files/public_report_ogp__v5_0.pdf.
  18. [18] PGI. Assessment of Shale Gas and Shale Oil Resources of the Lower Paleozoic Baltic-Podlasie-Lublin Basin in Poland. First Report. Warszawa: PGI-NRI; March 2012. https://www.pgi.gov.pl/docman-dokumenty-pig-pib/docman/aktualnosci-2012/zasoby-gazu/769-raport-en/file.html.
  19. [19] Cotton M, Rattle I, Alstine JV. Shale gas policy in the United Kingdom: An argumentative discourse analysis. Energy Policy. 2014;73:427-438. DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2014.05.031.10.1016/j.enpol.2014.05.031
  20. [20] ENVI. Impacts of shale gas and shale oil extraction on the environment and on human health. Report ENVI EP. 2011. https://europeecologie.eu/IMG/pdf/shale-gas-pe-464-425-final.pdf.
  21. [21] Rahm BG, Bates JT, Bertoia LR, Galford AE, Yoxtheimer DA, Riha SJ. Wastewater management and Marcellus Shale gas development: trends, drivers, and planning implications. J Environ Manage. 2013;120:105-113. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.02.029.10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.02.02923507249
  22. [22] Kargbo DM, Wilhelm RG, Campbell DJ. Natural gas plays in the Marcellus Shale: Challenges and potential opportunities. Environ Sci Technol. 2010;44(15):5679-5684. DOI: 10.1021/es903811p.10.1021/es903811p20518558
  23. [23] Konieczyńska M, Adamczak-Biały T, Brodecki A, Brzezińska A, Janica R, Dziekan-Kamińska E, et al. The Environment and Shale Gas Exploration. Results of Studies on the Soil-Water Environment, Ambient Air, Acoustic, Climate, Process Fluids and Wastes. Warszawa: Directorate General for Environmental Protection; 2015. http://www.gdos.gov.pl/files/artykuly/38173/The_environment_and_shale_gas_exploration_RESULTS_OF_STUDIES_ON_THE_SOIL_WATER_ENVIRONMENT_AMBIENT_AIR_ACOUSTIC_CLIMATE_PROCESS_FLUIDS_AND_WASTES.pdf.
  24. [24] Bogacki M, Macuda J. The influence of shale rock fracturing equipment operation on atmospheric air quality. Archiv Mining Sci. 2014;59(4):897-912. DOI: 10.2478/amsc-2014-0062.10.2478/amsc-2014-0062
  25. [25] Vengosh A, Jackson RB, Warner N, Thomas H, Darrah TH, Kondash AA. Critical review of the risks to water resources from unconventional shale gas development and hydraulic fracturing in the United States. Environ Sci Technol. 2014;48(15):8334-8348. DOI: 10.1021/es405118y.10.1021/es405118y24606408
  26. [26] Connor JA, Molofsky LJ, Richardson SD, Bianchi-Mosquera GC. Environmental Issues and Answers Related to Shale Gas Development. SPE Latin American and Caribbean Health, Safety, Environment and Sustainability Conference, 7-8 July, 2015, Bogota, Colombia, DOI: 10.2118/174164-MS.10.2118/174164-MS
  27. [27] Nicot JP, Scanlon BR, Reedy RC, Costley RA. Source and fate of hydraulic fracturing water in the Barnett Shale: a historical perspective. Environ Sci Technol. 2014;48(4):2464-2471. DOI: 10.1021/es404050r.10.1021/es404050r24467212
  28. [28] Nicot JP, Scanlon BR. Water use for Shale-gas production in Texas, U.S. Environ Sci Technol. 2012;46(6):3580-3586. DOI: 10.1021/es204602t.10.1021/es204602t22385152
  29. [29] Olsson O, Weichgrebe D, Rosenwinkel K-H. Hydraulic fracturing wastewater in Germany: composition, treatment, concerns. Environ Earth Sci. 2013;70:3895-3906. DOI: 10.1007/s12665-013-2535-4.10.1007/s12665-013-2535-4
  30. [30] Burri P. Unconventionals in Europe: Best practice vs. worst case - the conflict between facts and public perception. Ecol Chem Eng S. 2016;23(3):377-386. DOI: 10.1515/eces-2016-0026.10.1515/eces-2016-0026
  31. [31] Vidic RD, Brantley SL, Yoxtheime DA, Abad JD. Impact of shale gas development on regional water quality. Science. 2013;340(6134). DOI: 10.1126/science.1235009.10.1126/science.123500923687049
  32. [32] Wszołek W, Macuda J, Wszołek T. The analysis of the environmental influence of drilling installation. J Acoust Soc Amer. 2000;108(5):2475-2476. DOI: 10.1121/1.4743128.10.1121/1.4743128
  33. [33] Warner NR., Christie CA, Jackson RB, Vengosh A. Impacts of shale gas wastewater disposal on water quality in western Pennsylvania. Environ Sci Technol. 2013;47(20):11849-11857. DOI: 10.1021/es402165b.10.1021/es402165b24087919
  34. [34] Reichetseder P. The concept of well integrity in gas production activities. Ecol Chem Eng S. 2016;23(2):205-213. DOI: 10.1515/eces-2016-0013.10.1515/eces-2016-0013
  35. [35] Konieczyńska M, WoŸnicka M, Antolak O, Janica R, Lichtarski G, Nidental M, et al. Environmental Aspects of Hydraulic Fracturing Treatment Performed on the Łebień LE-2H Well. Final Report. Warszawa: Polish Geological Institute-National Research Institute (PGI-NRI); 2011. http://www.pgi.gov.pl/docman-tree/kopalnia-wiedzy/gaz-lupkowy/786-the-lebien-report/file.html.
  36. [36] Howarth RW, Santoro R, Ingraffea A. Methane and the greenhouse-gas footprint of natural gas from shale formations. Clim Change. 2011;106:679-690. DOI: 10.1007/s10584-011-0061-5.10.1007/s10584-011-0061-5
  37. [37] Roy AA, Adams PJ, Robinson AL. Air pollutant emissions from the development, production and processing of Marcellus Shale natural gas. J Air Waste Manage Assoc. 2014;64(1):19-37. DOI: 10.1080/10962247.2013.826151.10.1080/10962247.2013.82615124620400
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/eces-2016-0040 | Journal eISSN: 2084-4549 | Journal ISSN: 1898-6196
Language: English
Page range: 571 - 581
Published on: Dec 30, 2016
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2016 Monika Konieczyńska, Jan Macuda, Stanisław Nagy, Jakub Siemek, published by Society of Ecological Chemistry and Engineering
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.