Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Spatial and chemical patterns of PM2.5 - differences between a maritime and an inland country Cover

Spatial and chemical patterns of PM2.5 - differences between a maritime and an inland country

Ecological Chemistry and Engineering S
Volume 23 (2016): Issue 1 (March 2016)
By: Małgorzata Werner,  Maciej Kryza and  Anthony J. Dore  
Open Access
|Apr 2016

References

  1. [1] Aldabe J, Elustondo D, Santamaría C, Lasheras E, Pandolfi M, Alastuey A, et al. Chemical characterisation and source apportionment of PM2.5 and PM10 at rural, urban and traffic sites in Navarra (North of Spain). Atmos Res. 2011;102(1-2):191-205. DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosres.2011.07.003.10.1016/j.atmosres.2011.07.003
    Search in Google Scholar
  2. [2] Hueglin C, Gehrig R, Baltensperger U, Gysel M, Monn C, Vonmont H. Chemical characterisation of PM2.5, PM10 and coarse particles at urban, near-city and rural sites in Switzerland. Atmos Environ. 2005;39:637-651. DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2004.10.027.10.1016/j.atmosenv.2004.10.027
    Search in Google Scholar
  3. [3] Kampa M, Castanas E. Human health effects of air pollution. Environ Pollut. 2008;151(2):362-367. DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2007.06.012.10.1016/j.envpol.2007.06.012
    Search in Google Scholar
  4. [4] Perez L, Tobias A, Querol X, Künzli N, Pey J, Alastuey A, et al. Coarse particles from Saharan dust and daily mortality. Epidemiology. 2008;19(6):800-807. DOI: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e31818131cf.10.1097/EDE.0b013e31818131cf
    Search in Google Scholar
  5. [5] Viana M, Querol X, Alastuey A, Alastuey A, Ballester F, Llop S, et al. Characterising exposure to PM aerosols for an epidemiological study. Atmos Environ. 2008;42(7):1552-1568. DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.10.087.10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.10.087
    Search in Google Scholar
  6. [6] Bravo MA, Bell ML. Spatial heterogeneity of PM10 and O3 in São Paulo, Brazil, and implications for human health studies. J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2011;61(1):69-77. DOI: 10.3155/1047-3289.61.1.69.10.3155/1047-3289.61.1.69
    Search in Google Scholar
  7. [7] Menon S, Unger N, Koch D, Francis J, Garrett T, Sednev I, et al. Aerosol climate effects and air quality impacts from 1980 to 2030. Environ Res Lett. 2008;3(2):024004. DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/3/2/024004.10.1088/1748-9326/3/2/024004
    Search in Google Scholar
  8. [8] Bytnerowicz A, Omasa K, Paoletti E. Integrated effects of air pollution and climate change on forests: a northern hemisphere perspective. Environ Pollut. 2007;147(3):438-445. DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2006.08.028.10.1016/j.envpol.2006.08.028
    Search in Google Scholar
  9. [9] Brunekreef B, Holgate ST. Air pollution and health. Lancet. 2002;360(9341):1233-1242. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)11274-8.10.1016/S0140-6736(02)11274-8
    Search in Google Scholar
  10. [10] Basart S, Pay MT, Jorba O, Pérez C, Jiménez-Guerrero P, Schulz M, et al. Aerosols in the CALIOPE air quality modelling system: evaluation and analysis of PM levels, optical depths and chemical composition over Europe. Atmos Chem Phys. 2012;12(7):3363-3392. DOI: 10.5194/acp-12-3363-2012.10.5194/acp-12-3363-2012
    Search in Google Scholar
  11. [11] Nelson PF. Trace metal emissions in fine particles from coal combustion. Energy Fuels. 2007;21(2):477-484. DOI: 10.1021/ef060405q.10.1021/ef060405q
    Search in Google Scholar
  12. [12] Juda-Rezler K, Reizer M, Oudinet J-P. Determination and analysis of PM10 source apportionment during episodes of air pollution in Central Eastern European urban areas: The case of wintertime 2006. Atmos Environ. 2011;45(36):6557-6566. DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.08.020.10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.08.020
    Search in Google Scholar
  13. [13] Mathur R, Yu S, Kang D, Schere KL. Assessment of the wintertime performance of developmental particulate matter forecasts with the Eta-Community Multiscale Air Quality modeling system. J Geophys Res D Atmos. 2008;113. DOI: 10.1029/2007JD008580.10.1029/2007JD008580
    Search in Google Scholar
  14. [14] Turnbull AB, Harrison RM. Major component contributions to PM10 composition in the UK atmosphere. Atmos Environ. 2000;34(19):3129-3137. DOI: 10.1016/S1352-2310(99)00441-0.10.1016/S1352-2310(99)00441-0
    Search in Google Scholar
  15. [15] Harrison RM, Yin J. Chemical speciation of PM2.5 particles at urban background and rural sites in the UK atmosphere. J Environ Monit. 2010;12(7):1404-1414. DOI: 10.1039/c000329h.10.1039/c000329h20401363
    Search in Google Scholar
  16. [16] Renner E, Wolke R. Modelling the formation and atmospheric transport of secondary inorganic aerosols with special attention to regions with high ammonia emissions. Atmos Environ. 2010;44(15):1904-1912. DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.02.018.10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.02.018
    Search in Google Scholar
  17. [17] European Comission. Commission Staff Working Paper Establishing Guidelines for Demonstration and Subtraction of Exceedances Attributable to Natural Sources under the Directive 2008/50/EC on Ambient Air Quality and Cleaner Air for Europe SEC(2011) 208 Final. Brussels 15.02.201; 2011. http://ec.europa.eu/environment/air/quality/legislation/pdf/sec_2011_0208.pdf.
    Search in Google Scholar
  18. [18] Fournier N, Dore AJ, Vieno M, Weston KJ, Dragosits U, Sutton MA. Modelling the deposition of atmospheric oxidised nitrogen and sulphur to the United Kingdom using a multi-layer long-range transport model. Atmos Environ. 2004;38(5):683-694. DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2003.10.028.10.1016/j.atmosenv.2003.10.028
    Search in Google Scholar
  19. [19] Kryza M, Werner M, Błaś M, Dore AJ, Sobik M. The effect of emission from coal combustion in nonindustrial sources on deposition of sulfur and oxidized nitrogen in Poland. J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2010;60(7):856-866. DOI: 10.3155/1047-3289.60.7.856.10.3155/1047-3289.60.7.85620681433
    Search in Google Scholar
  20. [20] Stedman JR, Kent AJ, Grice S, Bush TJ, Derwent RG. A consistent method for modelling PM10 and PM2.5 concentrations across the United Kingdom in 2004 for air quality assessment. Atmos Environ. 2007;41(1):161-172. DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.07.048.10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.07.048
    Search in Google Scholar
  21. [21] Simpson D, Benedictow A, Berge H, Bergström R, Emberson LD, Fagerli H, et al. The EMEP MSC-W chemical transport model - technical description. Atmos Chem Phys. 2012;12(16):7825-7865. DOI: 10.5194/acp-12-7825-2012.10.5194/acp-12-7825-2012
    Search in Google Scholar
  22. [22] Bergström R, Denier van der Gon HAC, Prévôt ASH, Yttri KE, Simpson D. Modelling of organic aerosols over Europe (2002-2007) using a volatility basis set (VBS) framework: application of different assumptions regarding the formation of secondary organic aerosol. Atmos Chem Phys. 2012;12(18):8499-8527. DOI: 10.5194/acp-12-8499-2012.10.5194/acp-12-8499-2012
    Search in Google Scholar
  23. [23] Dragosits U, Sutton MA, Place CJ, Bayley AA. Modelling the spatial distribution of agricultural ammonia emissions in the UK. Environ Pollut. 1998;102(1):195-203. DOI: 10.1016/S0269-7491(98)80033-X.10.1016/S0269-7491(98)80033-X
    Search in Google Scholar
  24. [24] Dębski B, Olendrzyński K, Cieślińska J, Kargulewicz I, Skośkiewicz J, Olecka A, Kania K. Inwentaryzacja emisji do powietrza SO2, NO2, CO, NH3, pyłów, metali ciężkich NMLZO i TZO w Polsce za rok 2007 (Inventarisation of emission to the air of SO2, NO2, CO, NH4, particulate matters, heavy metals, NMLZO and TZO in Poland for the year 2007). Warszawa: Instytut Ochrony Środowiska, Krajowe Centrum Inwentaryzacji Emisji. 2009.
    Search in Google Scholar
  25. [25] Korcz M, Fudała J, Kliś C. Estimation of wind blown dust emissions in Europe and its vicinity. Atmos Environ. 2009;43(7):1410-1420. DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.05.027.10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.05.027
    Search in Google Scholar
  26. [26] Tsyro SG. To what extent can aerosol water explain the discrepancy between model calculated and gravimetric PM10 and PM 2.5? Atmos Chem Phys. 2005;5:515-532. DOI: 10.5194/acp-5-515-2005.10.5194/acp-5-515-2005
    Search in Google Scholar
  27. [27] Werner M, Kryza M, Dore AJ. Differences in the spatial distribution and chemical composition of PM10 between the UK and Poland. Environ Model Assess. 2014;19(3):179-192. DOI: 10.1007/s10666-013-9384-0.10.1007/s10666-013-9384-0
    Search in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/eces-2016-0004 | Journal eISSN: 2084-4549 | Journal ISSN: 1898-6196
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 61 - 69
Published on: Apr 9, 2016
Published by: Society of Ecological Chemistry and Engineering
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year
Keywords:
PM2.5,
concentrations,
FRAME,
United Kingdom,
Poland
Related subjects:
Chemistry,
Sustainable and green chemistry,
Engineering,
Electrical engineering,
Energy engineering,
Life sciences,
Ecology

© 2016 Małgorzata Werner, Maciej Kryza, Anthony J. Dore, published by Society of Ecological Chemistry and Engineering
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 23 (2016): Issue 1 (March 2016)Next article