Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Low Impact Development Practices: A Review of Current Research and Recommendations for Future Directions Cover

Low Impact Development Practices: A Review of Current Research and Recommendations for Future Directions

Ecological Chemistry and Engineering S
Volume 22 (2015): Issue 4 (December 2015)
By: Muhammad Shafique and  Reeho Kim  
Open Access
|Jan 2016

References

  1. [1] Hollis GE. Water yield chances after the urbanization of the canon's brook catchment, Harlow, England. (Changements de l'apport d'eau à la suite de l'urbanisation du bassin versant de ‘Canon's Brook’à Harlow, en Angleterre). Hydrol Sci J. 1977;22(1):61-75. DOI: 10.1080/02626667709491694.10.1080/02626667709491694
    Search in Google Scholar
  2. [2] Jennings DB, Jarnagin ST. Changes in anthropogenic impervious surfaces, precipitation and daily streamflow discharge: a historical perspective in a mid-Atlantic subwatershed. Landscape Ecol. 2002;17(5):471-489. DOI: 10.1023/A:1021211114125.10.1023/A:1021211114125
    Search in Google Scholar
  3. [3] Moore WL, Morgan CW. Effects of watershed changes on streamflow. Water Resources Symposium (No. 2 Austin [etc]). Austin: Univ. of Texas; 1969.
    Search in Google Scholar
  4. [4] Leopold LB. Hydrology for urban land planning: A guidebook on the hydrologic effects of urban land use. Pennsylvania: US Government Printing Office; 1968. http://pubs.er.usgs.gov/publication/cir554.10.3133/cir554
    Search in Google Scholar
  5. [5] Makepeace DK, Smith DW, Stanley SJ. Urban stormwater quality: summary of contaminant data. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol. 1995;25(2):93-139. DOI: 10.1080/10643389509388476.10.1080/10643389509388476
    Search in Google Scholar
  6. [6] US EPA. Results of the nationwide urban runoff program. 28 selected towns of USA: United States Environmental Protection Agency; 1983. NTIS PB84-185552. http://www.epa.gov/npdes/pubs/sw_nurp_vol_1_finalreport.pdf.
    Search in Google Scholar
  7. [7] US EPA. Low impact development (LID), a literature review. Florida and Washington DC: United States Environmental Protection Agency, 2000; EPA-841-B-00-005. http://water.epa.gov/polwaste/green/upload/lid.pdf.
    Search in Google Scholar
  8. [8] Coffman LS. Low-impact Development: An Alternative Stormwater Management Technology. Handbook of Water Sensitive Planning and Design. Maryland: France RL; 2002:97-123.10.1201/9781420032420.ch1.5
    Search in Google Scholar
  9. [9] Moglen GE, Gabriel SA, Faria JA. A framework for quantitative smart growth in land development. J Am Water Resour Assoc. 2003;39(4):947-959. https://scholar.vt.edu/access/content/group/359be9a6-39e4-43fdb090-cce1d3d2ded8/papers/JAWRA-SmartGrowth-modified.pdf.10.1111/j.1752-1688.2003.tb04418.x
    Search in Google Scholar
  10. [10] Low-impact development design strategies: an integrated design approach. Maryland: Department of Environmental Resources, Programs and Planning Division, Prince George’s County; 1999. http://water.epa.gov/polwaste/green/upload/lidnatl.pdf.
    Search in Google Scholar
  11. [11] Booth DB, Jackson CR. Urbanization of aquatic systems: degradation thresholds, stormwater detection, and the limits of mitigation. J Am Water Resour Assoc. 1997;33(5):1077-1090. http://faculty.washington.edu/dbooth/Booth_and_Jackson_1997.pdf.10.1111/j.1752-1688.1997.tb04126.x
    Search in Google Scholar
  12. [12] Hunt WF, Lord WG. Urban Waterways: Bioretention performance, design, construction, and maintenance. North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service. AGW-588-05, 2006. http://www.bae.ncsu.edu/stormwater/PublicationFiles/Bioretention2006.pdf.
    Search in Google Scholar
  13. [13] Davis AP. Field performance of bioretention: Hydrology impacts. J Hydrol Eng. 2008;13(2):90-95. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2008)13:2(90).10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2008)13:2(90)
    Search in Google Scholar
  14. [14] Fassman EA, Blackbourn S. J Hydrol Eng. 2010. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000238.10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000238
    Search in Google Scholar
  15. [15] Gregoire BG, Clausen JC. Effect of a modular extensive green roof on stormwater runoff and water quality. Ecol Eng. 2011;37(6):963-969. DOI:10.1016/j.ecoleng.2011.02.004.10.1016/j.ecoleng.2011.02.004
    Search in Google Scholar
  16. [16] Ahiablame LM., Engel BA, Chaubey I. Effectiveness of low impact development practices: literature review and suggestions for future research. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2012;223(7):4253-4273. DOI: 10.1007/s11270-012-1189-2.10.1007/s11270-012-1189-2
    Search in Google Scholar
  17. [17] McNett JK, Hunt WF, Davis AP. J Environ Eng. 2011;137(9):790-799. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)EE.1943-7870.0000373.10.1061/(ASCE)EE.1943-7870.0000373
    Search in Google Scholar
  18. [18] HUD (U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development). The practice of low impact development. Office of Policy Development and Research. Washington, D.C. 2003, Report prepared by NAHB Research Center, Inc. Contract No. H-21314CA.
    Search in Google Scholar
  19. [19] Davis AP. Green engineering principles promote low-impact development. Environ Sci Technol. 2005;39(16):338A-344A. DOI: 10.1021/es053327e.10.1021/es053327e
    Search in Google Scholar
  20. [20] DOD (Department of Defense). The low impact development manual, 2004: UFC-3-210-10. http://www.lowimpactdevelopment.org/lid%20articles/ufc_3_210_10.pdf.
    Search in Google Scholar
  21. [21] Hunt WF, Traver RG, Davis AP, Emerson CH, Collins KA, Stagge JH, et al. Low impact development practices: designing to infiltrate in urban environments. Effects of urbanization on groundwater: an engineering case-based approach for sustainable development, 2010:308-343. DOI: 10.1061/9780784410783.ch12.10.1061/9780784410783.ch12
    Search in Google Scholar
  22. [22] Hunt WF, Szpir LL. Urban waterways, permeable pavements, green roofs and cisterns, stormwater treatment practices for low-impact development. NC State University and NC A&T University Cooperative Extension, 2006. http://www.bae.ncsu.edu/stormwater/PublicationFiles/BMPs4LID.pdf.
    Search in Google Scholar
  23. [23] Ahiablame LM, Engel BA, Chaubey I. Effectiveness of low impact development practices: literature review and suggestions for future research. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2012;223(7):4253-4273. DOI: 10.1007/s11270-012-1189-2.10.1007/s11270-012-1189-2
    Search in Google Scholar
  24. [24] Davis AP, Hunt WF, Traver RG, Clar, M. Bioretention technology: Overview of current practice and future needs. J Environ Eng. 2009;135(3):109-117. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(2009)135:3(109).10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(2009)135:3(109)
    Search in Google Scholar
  25. [25] CEI (Comprehensive Environmental Inc.). City of Nashua, New Hampshire alternative stormwater management methods planning and guidance. Final Report, Part 1, March 2003. http://www.pennichuck.com/report/Nashua-Stormwater-Mgmt-Methods.pdf.
    Search in Google Scholar
  26. [26] Reese AJ. Volume-based hydrology. Stormwater. 2009;10(6):54-67. https://smartech.gatech.edu/bitstream/handle/1853/46236/5.6.5_Lemoine_158.pdf.
    Search in Google Scholar
  27. [27] Debo TN, Reese A. Municipal Stormwater Management. CRC Press; 2002. https://www.crcpress.com/Municipal-Stormwater-Management-Second-Edition/Debo-Reese/9781566705844.10.1201/9781420032260
    Search in Google Scholar
  28. [28] Zimmer CA, Heathcote IW, Whiteley HR, Schroter H. Low-impact-development practices for stormwater: implications for urban hydrology. Canadian Water Res J. 2007;32(3):193-212. DOI: 10.4296/cwrj3203193.10.4296/cwrj3203193
    Search in Google Scholar
  29. [29] Lloyd S. Water sensitive urban design in the Australian context, 2001. http://www.lsln.net.au/jspui/handle/1/11522.
    Search in Google Scholar
  30. [30] Scholz, M, Grabowiecki P. Review of permeable pavement systems. Build Environ. 2007;42(11):3830-3836. DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2006.11.016.10.1016/j.buildenv.2006.11.016
    Search in Google Scholar
  31. [31] Pezzaniti D, Beecham S, Kandasamy J. Influence of clogging on the effective life of permeable pavements. Proc ICE-Water Manage. 2009;162(3):211-220. DOI: 10.168/WAMA.2009.00034.10.1680/wama.2009.00034
    Search in Google Scholar
  32. [32] USEPA (US Environmental Protection Agency). Stormwater technology fact sheet. Bioretention. Washington, DC: Office of Water; 1999. EPA 832-F-99-012.
    Search in Google Scholar
  33. [33] Bioretention manual. Maryland: Department of Environmental Resources, Prince George’s County; 2007. http://www.aacounty.org/DPW/Highways/Resources/Raingarden/RG_Bioretention_PG%20CO.pdf.
    Search in Google Scholar
  34. [34] Design manual for use of bioretention in stormwater management. County PGC; 1993. http://water.epa.gov/polwaste/npdes/swbmp/Bioretention-Rain-Gardens.cfm.
    Search in Google Scholar
  35. [35] Dietz ME. Low impact development practices: A review of current research and recommendations for future directions. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2007;186(1-4):351-363. DOI: 10.1007/s11270-007-9484-z.10.1007/s11270-007-9484-z
    Search in Google Scholar
  36. [36] Line DE, Hunt WF. Performance of a bioretention area and a level spreader-grass filter strip at two highway sites in North Carolina. J Irrig Drain Eng Div Am Soc Civ Eng. 2009;135(2):217-224. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(2009)135:2(217).10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(2009)135:2(217)
    Search in Google Scholar
  37. [37] Roy-Poirier A, Champagne P, Filion Y. Review of bioretention system research and design: Past, present, and future. J Environ Eng. 2010;136(9):878-889. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)EE.1943-7870.0000227.10.1061/(ASCE)EE.1943-7870.0000227
    Search in Google Scholar
  38. [38] Chapman C, Horner RR. Performance assessment of a street-drainage bioretention system. Water Environ Res. 2010;82(2):109-119. DOI: 10.2175/106143009X426112.10.2175/106143009X426112
    Search in Google Scholar
  39. [39] DeBusk KM, Wynn TM. Storm-water bioretention for runoff quality and quantity mitigation. J Environ Eng. 2011;137(9):800-808. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)EE.1943-7870.0000388.10.1061/(ASCE)EE.1943-7870.0000388
    Search in Google Scholar
  40. [40] Ahiablame LM, Engel BA, Chaubey I. Effectiveness of low impact development practices: literature review and suggestions for future research. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2012;223(7):4253-4273. DOI:10.1007/s11270-012-1189-2.10.1007/s11270-012-1189-2
    Search in Google Scholar
  41. [41] Hunt WF, Smith JT, Jadlocki SJ, Hathaway JM, Eubanks PR. Pollutant removal and peak flow mitigation by a bioretention cell in urban Charlotte, NC. J Environ Eng. 2008. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(2008)134:5(403).10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(2008)134:5(403)
    Search in Google Scholar
  42. [42] Davis AP, Shokouhian M, Sharma H, Minami C. Water quality improvement through bioretention media: Nitrogen and phosphorus removal. Water Environ Res. 2006:284-293. DOI: 10.2175/106143005X94376.10.2175/106143005X94376
    Search in Google Scholar
  43. [42] Hunt WF, Jarrett AR, Smith JT, Sharkey LJ. Evaluating bioretention hydrology and nutrient removal at three field sites in North Carolina. J Irrig Drain Eng. 2006. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(2006)132:6(600).10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(2006)132:6(600)
    Search in Google Scholar
  44. [44] Luell SK, Hunt WF, Winston RJ. Evaluation of undersized bioretention stormwater control measures for treatment of highway bridge deck runoff. Water Sci Technol. 2011;64(4):974-979. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22097087.10.2166/wst.2011.73622097087
    Search in Google Scholar
  45. [45] Kim H, Seagren EA, Davis AP. Engineered bioretention for removal of nitrate from stormwater runoff. Water Environ Res. 2003:355-367. http://www.jstor.org/stable/25045707.10.2175/106143003X141169
    Search in Google Scholar
  46. [46] Dietz ME, Clausen JC. Saturation to improve pollutant retention in a rain garden. Environ Sci Technol. 2006;40(4):1335-1340. DOI: 10.1021/es051644f.10.1021/es051644f
    Search in Google Scholar
  47. [47] Ergas SJ, Sengupta S, Siegel R, Pandit A, Yao Y, Yuan X, et al. Performance of nitrogen-removing bioretention systems for control of agricultural runoff. J Environ Eng. 2010;136(10):1105-1112. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)EE.1943-7870.0000243.10.1061/(ASCE)EE.1943-7870.0000243
    Search in Google Scholar
  48. [48] Davis AP, Shokouhian M, Sharma H, Minami C, Winogradoff D. Water quality improvement through bioretention: Lead, copper, and zinc removal. Water Environ Res. 2003:73-82. http://www.jstor.org/stable/25045664.10.2175/106143003X140854
    Search in Google Scholar
  49. [49] Sun X, Davis AP. Heavy metal fates in laboratory bioretention systems. Chemosphere. 2007;66(9):1601-1609. DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2006.08.013.10.1016/j.chemosphere.2006.08.013
    Search in Google Scholar
  50. [50] Zhang W, Brown GO, Storm DE. Enhancement of heavy metals retention in sandy soil by amendment with fly ash. Trans ASABE. 2008;51(4):1247-1254. http://cat.inist.fr/?aModele=afficheN&cpsidt=20763846.10.13031/2013.25241
    Search in Google Scholar
  51. [51] Zhang L Seagren EA, Davis AP, Karns JS. The capture and destruction of Escherichia coli from simulated urban runoff using conventional bioretention media and iron oxide-coated sand. Water Environ Res. 2010;82(8):701-714. DOI: 10.2175/106143010X12609736966441.10.2175/106143010X12609736966441
    Search in Google Scholar
  52. [52] Zhang L, Seagren EA, Davis AP, Karns JS. Long-term sustainability of Escherichia coli removal in conventional bioretention media. J Environ Eng. 2011;137(8):669-677. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)EE.1943-7870.0000365.10.1061/(ASCE)EE.1943-7870.0000365
    Search in Google Scholar
  53. [53] Hathaway AM, Hunt WF, Wright JD, Jadlocki SJ. Field evaluation of indicator bacteria removal by stormwater BMPs in North Carolina. In World Environmental and Water Resources Congress 2009@sGreat Rivers, ASCE, 2009. 1123-1132. DOI: 10.1061/41036(342)112.10.1061/41036(342)112
    Search in Google Scholar
  54. [54] Brown RA, William III FH. Impacts of construction activity on bioretention performance. J Hydr Eng. 2009;15(6):386-394. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000165.10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000165
    Search in Google Scholar
  55. [55] Trowsdale SA, Simcock R. Urban stormwater treatment using bioretention. J Hydr. 2011;397(3):167-174. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.11.023.10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.11.023
    Search in Google Scholar
  56. [56] Brown RA, Hunt WF. Water Sci Technol. 2012;65(2):361-367. DOI: 10.2166/wst.2012.860.10.2166/wst.2012.860
    Search in Google Scholar
  57. [57] Davis AP, Shokouhian M, Sharma H, Minami C. Water Environ Res. 2001:5-14. http://www.jstor.org/stable/25045454.10.2175/106143001X138624
    Search in Google Scholar
  58. [58] Hsieh CH, Davis AP. Evaluation and optimization of bioretention media for treatment of urban storm water runoff. J Environ Eng. 2005;131(11):1521-1531. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(2005)131:11(1521).10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(2005)131:11(1521)
    Search in Google Scholar
  59. [59] Glass C, Bissouma S. Evaluation of a parking lot bioretention cell for removal of stormwater pollutants. Trans Ecol Environ. 2005:699-708. http://cat.inist.fr/?aModele=afficheN&cpsidt=17626010.
    Search in Google Scholar
  60. [60] Hong E, Seagren EA, Davis AP. Sustainable oil and grease removal from synthetic stormwater runoff using bench-scale bioretention studies. Water Environ Res. 2006:141-155. DOI: 10.2175/106143005X89607.10.2175/106143005X89607
    Search in Google Scholar
  61. [61] Roseen R, Ballestero T, Houle J, Avelleneda P, Wildey R, Briggs J, et al. Storm water low-impact development, conventional structural, and manufactured treatment strategies for parking lot runoff: Performance evaluations under varied mass loading conditions. Transp Res Rec. 2006:135-147. DOI: 10.3141/1984-15.10.1177/0361198106198400113
    Search in Google Scholar
  62. [62] Davis AP. Field performance of bioretention. Water quality. Environ Eng Sci. 2007;24(8):1048-1064. DOI: 10.1089/ees.2006.0190.10.1089/ees.2006.0190
    Search in Google Scholar
  63. [63] Rusciano GM, Obropta CC. Bioretention column study: Fecal coliform and total suspended solids reductions. Trans ASABE. 2007;50(4):1261-1269. http://www.water.rutgers.edu/Rain_Gardens/RGWebsite/misc/ColumnStudy.pdf.10.13031/2013.23636
    Search in Google Scholar
  64. [64] USEPA (US Environmental Protection Agency). Stormwater technology fact sheet. Vegetated swales. Washington, DC: Office of Water; 1999. EPA 832-F-99-006. http://www.in.gov/idem/files/apph-ref.pdf.
    Search in Google Scholar
  65. [65] Kirby JT, Durrans SR, Pitt R, Johnson PD. Hydraulic resistance in grass swales designed for small flow conveyance. J Hydraul Eng. 2005;131(1):65-68. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(2005)131:1(65).10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(2005)131:1(65)
    Search in Google Scholar
  66. [66] Barrett ME, Walsh PM, Joseph F. Malina Jr, Charbeneau RJ. Performance of vegetative controls for treating highway runoff. J Environ Eng. 1998;124(11):1121-1128. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(1998)124:11(1121).10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(1998)124:11(1121)
    Search in Google Scholar
  67. [67] Fach S, Engelhard C, Wittke N, Rauch W. Performance of infiltration swales with regard to operation in winter times in an Alpine region. Water Sci Technol. 2011;63(1):2658. DOI: 10.2166/wst.2011.153.10.2166/wst.2011.15322049762
    Search in Google Scholar
  68. [68] Backstrom M. Sediment transport in grassed swales during simulated runoff events. Water Sci Technol. 2002;45(7):41-49. www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11989891.10.2166/wst.2002.0115
    Search in Google Scholar
  69. [69] Backstrom M. Grassed swales for stormwater pollution control during rain and snowmelt. Water Sci Technol. 2003;48(9):123-134. http://wst.iwaponline.com/content/48/9/123.10.2166/wst.2003.0508
    Search in Google Scholar
  70. [70] Miller C. Vegetated Roof Covers, A New Method for Controlling Runoff in Urbanized Areas. Proceedings from the 1998 Pennsylvania Stormwater Management Symposium. Villanova University; 1998.
    Search in Google Scholar
  71. [71] GRRP (Green Roof Research Program). The Green roof research program at Michigan State University, 2010 [online]. http://www.hrt.msu.edu/greenroof/#Green%20Roof%20.
    Search in Google Scholar
  72. [72] Bianchini F, Hewage K. How “green” are the green roofs? Lifecycle analysis of green roof materials. Build Environ 2012;48:57-65. DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2011.08.019.10.1016/j.buildenv.2011.08.019
    Search in Google Scholar
  73. [73] Ahiablame LM, Engel BA, Chaubey I. Effectiveness of low impact development practices: literature review and suggestions for future research. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2012;223(7):4253-4273. DOI: 10.1007/s11270-012-1189-2.10.1007/s11270-012-1189-2
    Search in Google Scholar
  74. [74] Rowe DB. Green roofs as a means of pollution abatement. Environ Pollut. 2011;159(8):2100-2110. DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2010.10.029.10.1016/j.envpol.2010.10.02921074914
    Search in Google Scholar
  75. [75] Alsup S, Ebbs S, Retzlaff W. The exchangeability and leachability of metals from select green roof growth substrates. Urban Ecosystems. 2010;13(1):91-111. DOI: 10.1007/s11252-009-0106-y.10.1007/s11252-009-0106-y
    Search in Google Scholar
  76. [76] Berndtsson JC, Emilsson T, Bengtsson L. The influence of extensive vegetated roofs on runoff water quality. Sci Total Environ. 2006;355(1):48-63. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2005.02.035.10.1016/j.scitotenv.2005.02.03516442432
    Search in Google Scholar
  77. [77] Hathaway AM, Hunt WF, Jennings GD. A field study of green roof hydrologic and water quality performance. Trans ASABE5. 2008;1(1):37-44. http://www.bae.ncsu.edu/people/faculty/jennings/Publications/ASABE%20Hathaway%20Hunt%20Jennings.pdf.10.13031/2013.24225
    Search in Google Scholar
  78. [78] Vijayaraghavan K., Joshi UM, Balasubramanian R. A field study to evaluate runoff quality from green roofs. Water Res. 2012;46(4):1337-1345. DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2011.12.050.10.1016/j.watres.2011.12.05022244273
    Search in Google Scholar
  79. [79] Zobrist J, Müller SR, Ammann A, Bucheli TD, Mottier V, Ochs M, et al. Quality of roof runoff for groundwater infiltration. Water Res. 2000;34(5):1455-1462. DOI: 10.1016/S0043-1354(99)00290-0.10.1016/S0043-1354(99)00290-0
    Search in Google Scholar
  80. [80] USEPA S. Stormwater Technology Fact Sheet: Porous Pavement, 1999.
    Search in Google Scholar
  81. [81] Collins KA, Hunt WF, Hathaway JM. Hydrologic comparison of four types of permeable pavement and standard asphalt in eastern North Carolina. J Hydrol Eng. 2008. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2008)13:12(1146).10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2008)13:12(1146)
    Search in Google Scholar
  82. [82] Collins KA, Hunt WF, Hathaway JM. Side-by-side comparison of nitrogen species removal for four types of permeable pavement and standard asphalt in eastern North Carolina. J Hydrol Eng. 2009;15(6):512-521. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000139.10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000139
    Search in Google Scholar
  83. [83] Hunt WF, Stephens S, Mayes D. Permeable pavement effectiveness in eastern North Carolina. Proceedings of 9th International Conference on Urban Drainage. Portland: ASCE; 2002.
    Search in Google Scholar
  84. [84] Bean EZ, Hunt WF, Bidelspach DA. Field survey of permeable pavement surface infiltration rates. J Irrig Drain Eng. 2007. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(2007)133:3(249).10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(2007)133:3(249)
    Search in Google Scholar
  85. [85] Brattebo BO, Booth DB. Water Res. 2003;37(18):4369-4376. DOI: 10.1016/S0043-1354(03)00410-X.10.1016/S0043-1354(03)00410-X
    Search in Google Scholar
  86. [86] Dreelin EA, Fowler L, Carroll CR. A test of porous pavement effectiveness on clay soils during natural storm events. Water Res. 2006;40(4):799-805. DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2005.12.002.10.1016/j.watres.2005.12.002
    Search in Google Scholar
  87. [87] James W, Shahin R. A laboratory examination of pollutants leached from four different pavements by acid rain. Advances in Modeling the Management of Stormwater Impacts. 1998;6(17):321.10.14796/JWMM.R200-17
    Search in Google Scholar
  88. [88] Fach S, Geiger WF. Effective pollutant retention capacity of permeable pavements for infiltrated road runoffs determined by laboratory tests. Water Sci Technol. 2005;51(2):37-45. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.365.9249&rep=rep1&type=pdf.10.2166/wst.2005.0030
    Search in Google Scholar
  89. [89] Myers B, Beecham S, van Leeuwen JA. Water quality with storage in permeable pavement basecourse. Proceedings of the ICE-Water Management. 2011;164(7):361-372. DOI: 10.1680/wama.2011.164.7.361.10.1680/wama.2011.164.7.361
    Search in Google Scholar
  90. [90] Dierkes C, Kuhlmann L, Kandasamy J, Angelis G. Pollution retention capability and maintenance of permeable pavements. Proc. 9th International Conference on Urban Drainage, Global Solutions for Urban Drainage, 2002. DOI: 10.1061/40644(2002)40.10.1061/40644(2002)40
    Search in Google Scholar
  91. [91] Dierkes C, Holte A, Geiger WF. Heavy metal retention within a porous pavement structure. Proc. the Eighth International Conference on Urban Storm Drainage. 1999. http://extension.oregonstate.edu/stormwater/sites/default/files/heavy_metal_retention_with_pervious_pavement.pdf.
    Search in Google Scholar
  92. [92] Newman AP, Pratt CJ, Coupe SJ, Cresswell N. Oil bio-degradation in permeable pavements by microbial communities. Innovative Technologies in Urban Drainage. 2002;45(2):51-56. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.365.8488&rep=rep1&type=pdf.10.2166/wst.2002.0116
    Search in Google Scholar
  93. [93] Legret M, Colandini V. Effects of a porous pavement with reservoir structure on runoff water: water quality and fate of heavy metals. Water Sci Technol. 1999;39(2):111-117. DOI: 10.1016/S0273-1223(99)00014-1.10.1016/S0273-1223(99)00014-1
    Search in Google Scholar
  94. [94] Pagotto C, Legret M, Le Cloirec P. Comparison of the hydraulic behaviour and the quality of highway runoff water according to the type of pavement. Water Res. 2000;34(18):4446-4454. DOI: 10.1016/S0043-1354(00)00221-9.10.1016/S0043-1354(00)00221-9
    Search in Google Scholar
  95. [95] Rushton BT. Low-impact parking lot design reduces runoff and pollutant loads. J Water Res Planning and Management. 2001;127(3):172-179. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(2001)127:3(172).10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(2001)127:3(172)
    Search in Google Scholar
  96. [96] Tota-Maharaj K, Scholz M. Efficiency of permeable pavement systems for the removal of urban runoff pollutants under varying environmental conditions. Environ Progress Sustainable Energy. 2010;29(3):358-369. DOI: 10.1002/ep.10418.10.1002/ep.10418
    Search in Google Scholar
  97. [97] Booth DB, Leavitt J. Field evaluation of permeable pavement systems for improved stormwater management. J Am Planning Assoc. 1999;65(3):314-325. DOI: 10.1080/01944369908976060.10.1080/01944369908976060
    Search in Google Scholar
  98. [98] Fitts G. The new and improved open graded friction course mixes. Asphalt. 2002;17(2). http://worldcat.org/oclc/1514484.
    Search in Google Scholar
  99. [99] Ferguson BK. Porous Pavements. Florida: CRC Press; 2005. https://www.crcpress.com/Porous-Pavements/Ferguson/9780849326707.10.1201/9781420038439.ch4
    Search in Google Scholar
  100. [100] Stenmark C. An alternative road construction for stormwater management in cold climates. Water Sci Technol. 1995;32(1):79-84. DOI: 10.1016/0273-1223(95)00541-T.10.1016/0273-1223(95)00541-T
    Search in Google Scholar
  101. [101] Toronto and Region Conservation. Performance evaluation of permeable pavement and a bioretention swale. Seneca College, King City, Ontario. Toronto and Region Conservation Authority, 2006: Interim Report #2. https://wiki.umn.edu/pub/AARCapstone/BestManagementPractices/StormwaterManagement2.pdf.
    Search in Google Scholar
  102. [102] Traver RG, Welker AL, Horst M, Vanacore M, Braga A, Kob L, et al. Lessons in porous concrete. Stormwater. 20005; July/August: 30-45.
    Search in Google Scholar
  103. [103] Kwiatkowski M, Welker AL, Traver RG, Vanacore M, Ladd T. Evaluation of an infiltration best management practice utilizing pervious concrete. J Am Water Resour Assoc. 2007:1208-1222. DOI: 10.1111/j.1752-1688.2007.00104.x.10.1111/j.1752-1688.2007.00104.x
    Search in Google Scholar
  104. [104] Balades JD, Legret M, Madiec H. Permeable pavements: Pollution management tools. Water Sci Technol. 1995;32(1):49-56. DOI: 10.1016/0273-1223(95)00537-W.10.1016/0273-1223(95)00537-W
    Search in Google Scholar
  105. [105] Bioretention manual. Landover, MD: Prince George’s County (MD) Government, Department of Environmental Protection. Watershed Protection Branch; 2002.
    Search in Google Scholar
  106. [106] Widomski MK, Sobczuk H, Olszta W. Sand-filled drainage ditches for erosion control: Effects on infiltration efficiency. Soil Sci Soc Am J. 2010;74(1):213-220. DOI: 10.2136/sssaj2009.0003.10.2136/sssaj2009.0003
    Search in Google Scholar
  107. [107] Abu-Zreig M, Tamimi A. Field evaluation of sand-ditch water harvesting technique in Jordan. Agricult Water Manage. 2011;98(8):1291-1296. DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2011.03.008.10.1016/j.agwat.2011.03.008
    Search in Google Scholar
  108. [108] Makepeace DK, Smith DW, Stanley SJ. Urban stormwater quality: summary of contaminant data. Crit Rev in Environ Sci Technol. 1995; 25(2):93-139. DOI: 10.1080/10643389509388476.10.1080/10643389509388476
    Search in Google Scholar
  109. [109] Pitt R, Clark S, Field R. Groundwater contamination potential from stormwater infiltration practices. Urban Water. 1999;1(3):217-236. DOI: 10.1016/S1462-0758(99)00014-X.10.1016/S1462-0758(99)00014-X
    Search in Google Scholar
  110. [110] Rusciano GM, Obropta CC. Efficiency of bioretention systems to reduce fecal coliform counts in stormwater. North American Surface Water Quality Conference and Exposition, Orlando, FL. July. 2005. http://water.usgs.gov/wrri/AnnualReports/2004/FY2004_NJ_Annual_Report.pdf
    Search in Google Scholar
  111. [111] Kaushal SS, Groffman PM, Likens GE, Belt KT, Stack WP, Kelly VR, et al. Increased salinization of fresh water in the northeastern United States. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005;102(38):13517-13520. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0506414102.10.1073/pnas.0506414102122465416157871
    Search in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/eces-2015-0032 | Journal eISSN: 2084-4549 | Journal ISSN: 1898-6196
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 543 - 563
Published on: Jan 22, 2016
Published by: Society of Ecological Chemistry and Engineering
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year
Keywords:
low impact development,
green roof,
bioretention,
pervious pavement
Related subjects:
Chemistry,
Sustainable and green chemistry,
Engineering,
Electrical engineering,
Energy engineering,
Life sciences,
Ecology

© 2016 Muhammad Shafique, Reeho Kim, published by Society of Ecological Chemistry and Engineering
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 22 (2015): Issue 4 (December 2015)Next article