Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Response Of Actinomycetes, Phosphatases And Urease To Soil Contamination With Herbicides Cover

Response Of Actinomycetes, Phosphatases And Urease To Soil Contamination With Herbicides

Ecological Chemistry and Engineering S
Volume 22 (2015): Issue 2 (June 2015)
By: ,  ,  ,   and    
Open Access
|Sep 2015
References

References

  1. [1] Tao L, Yang H. Fluroxypyr biodegradation in soils by multiple factors. Environ Monit Assess. 2011;175:227-238. DOI: 10.1007/s10661-010-1508-2.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  2. [2] Zhang HB, Luo YM, Zhao QG, Wong MH, Zhang GL. Residues of organochlorine pesticides in Hong Kong soils. Chemosphere. 2006;63:633-641. DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2005.08.006.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  3. [3] Emmerling C, Liebner C, Haubold-Rosar M, Katzur J, Schvoder D. Impact of application of organic west materials of microbial and enzyme activities of nine soil in the lusetion coal mining region. Plant Soil. 2000;220:129-138. DOI: 10.1023/A:1004784525209.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  4. [4] Frączek K, Kozdrój J. Assessment of airborne actinomycetes in subterranean and earth sanatoriums. Ecol Chem Eng S. 2013;20(1):151-161. DOI: 10.2478/eces-2013-0012.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  5. [5] Slavίk R, Julinová M, Labudίková M. Screening of the spatial distribution of risk metals in topsoil from an industrial complex. Ecol Chem Eng S. 2012;19(2):259-272. DOI: 10.2478/v10216-011-0020-0.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  6. [6] Baćmaga M, Boros E, Kucharski J, Wyszkowska J. Enzymatic activity in soil contaminated with the Aurora 40 WG herbicide. Environ Protec Eng. 2012;38(1):91-102.
    Search in Google Scholar
  7. [7] Rahmansyah M, Antonius S, Sulistinah N. Phosphatase and urease instability caused by pesticides present in soil improved by grounded rice straw. J Agric Biol Sci. 2009;4(2):56-62.
    Search in Google Scholar
  8. [8] Singh DK, Kumar S. Nitrate reductase, arginine deaminase, urease and dehydrogenase activities in natural soil (ridges with forest) and in cotton soil after acetamiprid treatments. Chemosphere. 2008;71:412-418. DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2007.11.005.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  9. [9] Carter MR. Soil Sampling and Methods of Analysis. London: Canadian Soc Soil Sci, Lewis Publishers; 1993.
    Search in Google Scholar
  10. [10] Nelson DW, Sommers LE. Total carbon, organic carbon, and organic matter. In: Method of Soil Analysis: Chemical Methods. Sparks DL, editor. Madison, WI: Amer Soc Agronomy; 1996; 1201-1229.
    Search in Google Scholar
  11. [11] Parkinson D, Gray FRG, Williams ST. Methods of Studying Ecology of Soil Microorganism. IBP Handbook. Oxford and Edinburgh: Blackwell Scientific Publications; 1997; 19.
    Search in Google Scholar
  12. [12] De Leij FAAM, Whipps JM, Lynch JM. The use of colony development for the characterization of bacterial communities in soil and on roots. Microb Ecol. 1993;27:81-97.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  13. [13] Sarathchandra SU, Burch G, Cox NR. Growth patterns of bacterial communites in the rhizoplane and rhizosphere of with clover (Trifolium repens L.) and perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.) in long-term pasture. Appl Soil Ecol. 1997;6:293-299.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  14. [14] Alef K, Nannipieri P, Trazar-Capeda C. Phosphatase activity. In: Methods in Applied Soil Microbiology and Biochemistry. Alef K, Nannipieri P, editors. London: Academic Press Harcourt Brace & Company, Publishers; 1998; 335-344.
    Search in Google Scholar
  15. [15] Alef K, Nannipieri P. Urease activity. In: Methods in Applied Soil Microbiology and Biochemistry. Alef K, Nannipieri P, editors. London: Academic Press. Harcourt Brace & Company, Publishers, 1998; 316-320.
    Search in Google Scholar
  16. [16] Orwin KH, Wardle DA. New indices for quantifying the resistance and resilience of soil biota to exogenous disturbances. Soil Biol Biochem. 2004;36:1907-1912. DOI: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2004.04.036.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  17. [17] Statsoft, Inc, Statistica. Data Analysis Software System, version 9.1., 2010 <.>.
    Search in Google Scholar
  18. [18] Mukherjee P, Alam S, Sardar D, Pahari A, Roy S, Chowdhury A. Persistence and dissipation of linuron (Afalon-50 WP) in pea cropped soil and its effect on soil microorganisms. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol. 2006;76(3):407-414. DOI: 10.1007/s00128-006-0936-8.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  19. [19] Araújo ASF, Monteiro RTR, Abarkeli RB. Effect of glyphosate on the microbial activity of two Brazilian soil. Chemosphere. 2003;52:799-804. DOI: 10.1016/S0045-6535(03)00266-2.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  20. [20] Crouzet O, Batisson I, Besse-Hoggan P, Bonnemoy F, Bardot C, Poly F, et al. Response of soil microbial communities to the herbicide mesotrione: A dose-effect microcosm approach. Soil Biol Biochem. 2010;42:193-202. DOI: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2009.10.016.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  21. [21] Kucharski J, Wyszkowska J. Biological properties of soil contaminated with the herbicyde Apyros 75 WG. J Elem. 2008;13(3):357-371.
    Search in Google Scholar
  22. [22] Ratcliff AW, Busse MD, Shestak CJ. Changes in microbial community structure following herbicide (glyphosate) addition to forest soils. Appl Soil Ecol. 2006;34:114-124. DOI: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2006.03.002.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  23. [23] Cycoń M, Piotrowska-Seget Z. Changes in bacterial diversity and community structure following pesticides addition to soil estimated by cultivation technique. Ecotoxicology. 2009;18(5):632-642. DOI: 10.1007/s10646-009-0321-6.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  24. [24] Cycoń M, Piotrowska-Seget Z, Kozdrój J. Linuron effects on microbiological characteristics of sandy soils as determined in a pot study. Ann Microbiol. 2010;60(3):439-449. DOI: 10.1007/s13213-010-0061-0.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  25. [25] Ros M, Goberna M, Moreno JL, Hernandez T, Garcı′a C, Insam H, et al. Molecular and physiological bacterial diversity of a semi-arid soil contaminated with different levels of formulated atrazine. Appl Soil Ecol. 2006;34:93-102. DOI: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2006.03.010.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  26. [26] Megharaj M, Kantachote D, Singleton I, Naidu R. Effect of long-term contamination of DDT on soil microflora with special reference to soil algae and algae transformation DDT. Environ Pollut. 2000;109:35-42. DOI: 10.1016/S0269-749(99)00231-6.
    Search in Google Scholar
  27. [27] Cai X, Sheng G, Liu W. Degradation and detoxication of acetochlor in soils treated by organic and thiosulfate amendments. Chemosphere. 2007;66:286-292. DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2006.05.011.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  28. [28] Nweke CO, Ntinugwa C, Obah IF, Ike SC, Eme GE, Opara EC, et al. In vitro effects of metals and pesticides on dehydrogenase activity in microbial community of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) rhizoplane. Afr J Biotechnol. 2007;6(3):290-295.
    Search in Google Scholar
  29. [29] Yang-Fang Y, Hang M, Xiang-Chi Z. Effects of mefenacet on microbial respiration and enzyme activities in paddy soil. Acta Pedol Sin. 2004;41:93-96.
    Search in Google Scholar
  30. [30] Sukul P. Enzymatic activities and microbial biomass in soil as influenced by metaxyl residues. Soil Biol Biochem. 2006;38:320-326. DOI: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2005.05.009.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  31. [31] Yao X, Min H, Lii Z, Yuan H. Influence of acetamipirid on soil enzymatic activities and respiration. Eur J Soil Biol. 2006;42:120-126. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejsobi.2005.12.001.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  32. [32] Wyszkowska J. Effect of soil contamination with Treflan 480 EC on biochemical properties of soil. Pol J Environ Stud. 2002;11(1):71-77.
    Search in Google Scholar
  33. [33] Wyszkowska J, Kucharski J. Biochemical and physicochemical properties of soil contaminated with herbicide Triflurotox 250 EC. Pol J Environ Stud. 2004;13(2):223-231.
    Search in Google Scholar
  34. [34] Bécaert V, Samson R, Deschênes L. Effect of 2,4-D contamination on soil functional stability evaluated using the relative soil stability index (RSSI). Chemosphere. 2006;64:1713-1721. DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2006.01.008.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/eces-2015-0015 | Journal eISSN: 2084-4549 (formerly 1898-6196) | Journal ISSN: 1898-6196
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English, Polish
Page range: 255 - 267
Published on: Sep 19, 2015
Published by: Society of Ecological Chemistry and Engineering
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Keywords:
herbicides,
soil contamination,
numbers of actinomycetes,
activity of enzymes,
soil resistance to herbicides
Related subjects:
Chemistry,
Sustainable and green chemistry,
Life sciences,
Ecology

© 2015 Małgorzata Baćmaga, Jan Kucharski, Jadwiga Wyszkowska, Monika Tomkiel, Agata Borowik, published by Society of Ecological Chemistry and Engineering
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Volume 22 (2015): Issue 2 (June 2015)
Previous article
Next article