Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The Efficiency of Regional Innovation Systems in New Member States of the European Union: A Nonparametric DEA Approach Cover

The Efficiency of Regional Innovation Systems in New Member States of the European Union: A Nonparametric DEA Approach

Economics and Business
Volume 28 (2016): Issue 1 (April 2016)
By: ,   and    
Open Access
|Jun 2016
References

References

  1. Andersson, G. (2013). Rethinking Regional Innovation. Systemic Practice and Action Research. 26(1), 99-110. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11213-012-9265-510.1007/s11213-012-9265-5
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  2. Asheim B. T., Gertler M. S. (2005). The geography of innovation: regional innovation systems. The Oxford handbook of innovation. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 291-317.
    Search in Google Scholar
  3. Autant-Bernard C., LeSage J. P. (2011). Quantifying knowledge spillovers using spatial econometric models. Journal of Regional Science, 5(3), 471-496. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9787.2010.00705.x10.1111/j.1467-9787.2010.00705.x
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  4. Bai, J. (2013). On Regional Innovation Efficiency: Evidence from Panel Data of China’s Different Provinces, Regional Studies, 47(5), 773-788. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2011.59178410.1080/00343404.2011.591784
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  5. Bosco, M., G., Brugnoli, A. (2010). Regional Efficiency, Innovation and Productivity. RSA Conference proceedings, Pecs.
    Search in Google Scholar
  6. Broekel, T. (2012). Collaboration Intensity and Regional Innovation Efficiency in Germany - A Conditional Efficiency Approach. Industry and Innovation, 19(2), 155-179. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2012.65088410.1080/13662716.2012.650884
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  7. Broekel, T., Buerger, M., Brenner, T. (2010). An investigation of the relation between cooperationand the innovative success of German regions. Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography.10.11, Utrecht University.
    Search in Google Scholar
  8. Burda, M. C., Severgnini, B. (2009). TFP Growth in Old and New Europe. Comparative Economic Studies, 51(4), 447-466. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/ces.2009.1910.1057/ces.2009.19
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  9. Cai, Y., Hanley, A. (2014). Innovation rankings: good, bad or revealing? Applied Economics Letters. 21(5), 325-328. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13504851.2013.85936610.1080/13504851.2013.859366
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  10. Chen, K., Guan, J. (2012). Measuring the Efficiency of China’s Regional Innovation Systems: Application of Network Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA), Regional Studies, 46(3), 355-377. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2010.49747910.1080/00343404.2010.497479
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  11. Cooke, P. (1992). Regional innovation systems: competitive regulation in the new Europe. Geoforum, 23(3), 365-382. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0016-7185(92)90048-910.1016/0016-7185(92)90048-9
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  12. Cooke, P. (2004). The regional innovation system in Wales: evolution or eclipse. In Cooke P, Heidenreich M, Braczyk H. (Eds) Regional innovation systems, 2nd Edition. Routledge, London and New York, pp. 214-233.
    Search in Google Scholar
  13. D’Agostino, L. M., Laursen, K., Santangelo, G. D. (2013). The impact of R&D offshoring on the home knowledge production of OECD investing regions. Economic Geography, 13(1), 145-175. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbs01210.1093/jeg/lbs012
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  14. Daraio, A., Simar, L. (2007). Nonparametric efficiency analysis: a multivariate conditional quantile approach. Journal of Econometrics, 140(2), 375-400. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2006.07.00210.1016/j.jeconom.2006.07.002
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  15. De Bruijn, P., Lagendijk, A. (2005). Regional innovation systems in the Lisbon strategy. European Planning Studies, 13(8), 1153-1172. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0965431050033651910.1080/09654310500336519
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  16. Doloreux, D. (2003) Regional innovation systems in the periphery: the case of the Beauce in Quebec (Canada). International Journal of Innovation Management. 7(1), 67-94. http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/S136391960300073810.1142/S1363919603000738
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  17. Drăgan, N., Dzemyda, I., Karčiauskas, A. (2011). An approach to evaluate influence of European Union innovation policy to increase the economic equality between member states. Intellectual economics: scientific research journal, 1(9), 23-36.
    Search in Google Scholar
  18. Dzemyda, I., Karčiauskas, A. (2012a). Inovacijų sistemos ir universitetai: teoriniai aspektai. Social sciences studies: research papers, 4(3), 991-1007.
    Search in Google Scholar
  19. Dzemyda, I., Karčiauskas, A. (2012b). Inovacijų sistemos ir aukštojo mokslo sąveikos analizė. Applied economics: systematic research. 6(1), 41-59.
    Search in Google Scholar
  20. Dzemydaitė, G., Galinienė, B. (2013). Evaluation of regional efficiency disparities using efficient frontier analysis. Ekonomika, 92(4).10.15388/Ekon.2013.0.2348
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  21. Dzemydaite, G., Dzemyda, I., Galinienė, B. (2015). The Evaluation of Regional Innovation Systems’ Efficiency in New Member States of European Union. Journal of Applied Sciences, Vol. X, Issue 3(33), p. 317-328.
    Search in Google Scholar
  22. Kaihua C., Mingting, K. (2014). Staged efficiency and its determinants of regional innovation systems: a two-step analytical procedure. The Annals of Regional Science. 52(2), 627-657, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00168-014-0604-610.1007/s00168-014-0604-6
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  23. Lafarga, C. V., Baderrama. J. (2015). Efficiency of Mexico’s regional innovation systems: an evaluation applying data envelopment analysis (DEA). African Journal of Science, Technology, Innovation and Development. 7(1). http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20421338.2014.97965210.1080/20421338.2014.979652
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  24. Makkonen, T. & T. Inkinen (2014). Spatial scaling of regional strategic programmes in Finland: A qualitative study of clusters and innovation systems. Norsk Geografisk Tidsskrift-Norwegian Journal of Geography, 68(4), 216-227. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00291951.2014.92455110.1080/00291951.2014.924551
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  25. Moodysson, J., Zukauskaite, E. (2014). Institutional Conditions and Innovation Systems: On the Impact of Regional Policy on Firms in Different Sectors. Regional Studies, 48(1), 127-138. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2011.64900410.1080/00343404.2011.649004
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  26. ESPON (2012). Factsheet Latvia - Lithuania. ESPON Project TERREVI.
    Search in Google Scholar
  27. European Commission (2004). Commission Communacation. Third report on economic and social cohesion. COM(2004) 107 final. Brussels, 18.2.2004.
    Search in Google Scholar
  28. European Commission (2014). Innovation Union Scoreboard 2014. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/policies/innovation/files/ius/ius-2014_en.pdf accesed on 10 10 2014.
    Search in Google Scholar
  29. European Commission (2013). EU Cohesion Policy 2014-2020: legislative proposals. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/what/future/proposals_2014_2020_en.cfm accessed on 10 09 2015.
    Search in Google Scholar
  30. Eurostat (2015). Database by themes - General and regional statistics. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/what/future/proposals_2014_2020_en.cfm accesed on 15 09 2014.
    Search in Google Scholar
  31. Fritsch, M., Slavtchev, V. (2011). Determinants of the Efficiency of Regional Innovation Systems. Regional Studies, 45(7), 905-918, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0034340080225149410.1080/00343400802251494
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  32. Howells, J. (2012). The geography of knowledge: never so close but never so far apart. Journal of Economic Geography, 12(5), 1003-1020, http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbs02710.1093/jeg/lbs027
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  33. Svetikas, K. Ž., Dzemyda, I. (2009). An approach to the evaluation of regional inequalities: a case study of Lithuanian counties. Intellectual economics. 2(6), 96-107.
    Search in Google Scholar
  34. Tharakan J. (2015). Indigenous knowledge systems - a rich appropriate technology resource. African Journal of Science, Technology, Innovation and Development, 7(1), 52-57, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20421338.2014.98798710.1080/20421338.2014.987987
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  35. Yi, S., Fengyan, C. (2015). Regional Innovation Systems Based on Stochastic Frontier Analysis: A Study on Thirty-One Provinces in China. Science, Technology & Society, 20(2), 204-224. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/097172181557980810.1177/0971721815579808
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  36. Zhong, W., Yuan, W., Li, X. S., Huang, Z. (2011). The performance evaluation of regional R&D investments in China: An application of DEA based on the first official China economic census data. Omega, 39(4), 447-455. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2010.09.004 10.1016/j.omega.2010.09.004
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/eb-2016-0012 | Journal eISSN: 2256-0394 | Journal ISSN: 1407-7337
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 83 - 89
Published online: Jun 10, 2016
Published in print: Apr 1, 2016
Published by: Riga Technical University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year
Keywords:
Data envelopment analysis,
innovation systems,
regional efficiency
Related subjects:
Business and economics,
Political economics,
Political economics, other,
Business management,
Business management, other,
Mathematics and statistics for economists,
Statistics,
Econometrics

© 2016 Giedrė Dzemydaitė, Ignas Dzemyda, Birutė Galinienė, published by Riga Technical University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Volume 28 (2016): Issue 1 (April 2016)
Previous article
Next article