Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Primary Science Teaching – Is it Integral and Deep Experience For Students? Cover

Primary Science Teaching – Is it Integral and Deep Experience For Students?

Open Access
|Jun 2016

References

  1. Abell, S. K. (2008). Twenty years later: does pedagogical content knowledge remain a useful idea?,(10), 1405–1416.
  2. Álvarez-García, O., Sureda-Negre, J., & Comas-Forgas, R. (2015). Environmental Education in Pre-Service Teacher Training: A Literature Review of Existing Evidence.,(1), 72–85.
  3. Anderson, D., & Clark, M. (2012). Development of syntactic subject matter knowledge and pedagogical content knowledge for science by a generalist elementary teacher.(3), 315–330.
  4. Appelton, K., & Kindt, I. (1999). Why teach primary science? Influences on beginning teachers’ practices.(2), 155–168.
  5. Avraamidou, L., & Zembal-Saul, C. (2010). In search of well-started beginning science teachers: insights from two first-year elementary teachers.,(6), 661–686.
  6. Basit, T.N. (2003). Manual or electronic? The role of coding in qualitative data analysis.,(2), 143–154.
  7. Bentham, H. (2013). Clearing the path that has been laid: A conceptualisation of education for sustainable development.,(2), 25–41.
  8. Boyd, D.J., Grossman, P.L., Lankford, H., Loeb, S., & Wyckoff, J. (2009). Teacher preparation and student achievement.,(4), 416–440.
  9. Biggers, M., & Forbes, C. T. (2012). Balancing teacher and student roles in elementary classrooms: pre-service elementary teachers’ learning about the inquiry continuum.,(14), 2205–2229.
  10. Brown, T. (2006). Negotiating psychological disturbances in pre-service teacher education.,675–689.
  11. Bryan, L. A. (2003). Nestedness of beliefs: examining a prospective elementary teacher’s belief system about science teaching and learning.,(9), 835–868.
  12. Bryan, L. A. (2012). Research on science teacher beliefs. In B.J. Fraser, K.G. Tobin & C. J. McRobbie (Eds.),(pp. 477–495). Springer Netherlands.
  13. Carter, L. (2012). Globalization and science education: global information culture, post-colonialism and sustainability. In B.J. Fraser, K.G. Tobin & C. J. McRobbie (Eds.),(pp. 899–912). Springer Netherlands.
  14. Chang, M. (2009). An appraisal perspective of teacher burnout: Examining the emotional work of teachers.,(3), 193–218.
  15. Chi, M. T. H. (1997). Quantifying qualitative analysis of verbal data: a practical guide.,(3), 271–315.
  16. Cochran-Smith, M., McQuillan, P., Mitchell, K., Terrell, D. G., Barnatt, J., D’Souza, L., et al. (2012). A longitudinal study of teaching practice and early career decisions. A cautionary tale.(5), 844–880.
  17. Cousin, G., & Deepwell, F. (2005). Designs for network learning: a communities of practice perspective.(1), 57–66.
  18. Creswell, J. W. (2008).New Jersey: Pearson Education.
  19. Davis, E.A., & Smithey, J. (2009). Beginning teachers moving toward effective elementary science teaching.,(4), 745–770.
  20. Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2000).367–378. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  21. Duit, R., & Treagust, D.F. (2012). How can conceptual change contribute to theory and practice in science education? In B. J. Fraser, K. Tobin & C. J. McRobbie (Eds.),(pp. 107–118). Springer Netherlands.
  22. Fisher, H. E., Borowski, A. & Tepner, O. (2012). Professional knowledge of science teachers. In B. J. Fraser, K. Tobin and C. J. McRobbie (Eds.),(pp. 435–448). Springer Netherlands.
  23. Flores, M.A., & Day, C. (2006). Contexts witch shape and reshape new teachers’ identities: a multi–perspective study.219–232.
  24. Forbes, C. T., & Davis, E. A. (2008). Curriculum design for inquiry: pre-service elementary teachers’ mobilization and adaptation of science curriculum materials.(7), 820–839.
  25. Fortus, D. & Krajcik, J. (2012). Curriculum coherence and learning progressions. In B. J. Fraser, K. Tobin & C. J. McRobbie (Eds.),. (pp. 783–798). Springer Netherlands.
  26. Feiman-Nemser, S. (2008). Teacher learning: How do teachers learn to teach? In M. Cochran-Smith, S. Feiman-Nemser, D. J. McIntyre, & K. Demers (Eds.),(pp. 697–705). New York: Routledge.
  27. Friedrichsen, P., van Driel, J. H., & Abell, S. K. (2011). Taking a closer look at science teaching orientations.,(2), 358–376.
  28. Gerretson, H., Iliško, Dz. & Fortino, C. (2010). Sustaining self-regulated learning through inquiry-driven mathematics and science instruction.,(1), 3–17.
  29. Gray, T. H., Bastian, K.C. & Fortner, K.C. (2011). Early-career teacher effectiveness and attrition.(6), 271–280.
  30. Heckhausen, H. (1991).. New York: Springer.
  31. Heller, J.I., Kristen, R.D., Wong, N., Shinohara, M., & Miratrix, L.W., (2012). Differential effects on three professional development models on teacher knowledge and student achievement in elementary science.,(3), 333–362.
  32. Hollins, E. R. (2011). Teacher preparation for quality teaching.,(4), 395–407.
  33. Kang, N.-H. (2007). Elementary teachers’ teaching for conceptual understanding: Learning from action research.,(4), 469–495.
  34. Korthagen, F. (2004). In search of the essence of a good teacher: towards a more holistic approach in teacher education.77–97.
  35. Korthagen, F., & Vasalos, A. (2005). Levels in reflection: core reflection as a means to enhance professional growth. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 11(1), 47–71.
  36. Kleickmann, T., Richter, D., Kunter, M., Elsner, J., Besser, M., Krauss, S., & Baumert, J. (2013). Teachersëcontent knowledge and pedagogical content knowledge: The role of structural differences in teacher education.,(1), 90–106.
  37. Lloyd, J. K., Smith, R. G., Fay, C. L., Khang, G. N., Wah, L. L. K., & Sai, C. L. (1998). Subject knowledge for science teaching at primary level: a comparison of preservice teachers in England and Singapore.(5), 521–532.
  38. Loughran, J., Mulhall, P., & Berry, A. (2008). Exploring pedagogical content knowledge in science teacher education.,(13), 1301–1320.
  39. Loughran, J., Milroy, P., Berry, A., Gunstone, R., & Mulhall, P. (2001). Documenting science teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge through PaP-eRs. Research in Science Education, 31, 289–307.
  40. Lederman, N. G., Lederman, J. S., & Bell, R. L. (2004).New York: Pearson Education.
  41. Malderez, A., Hobson, A. Tracey, L., & Kerr, K. (2007). Becoming a student teacher: core features of the experience.,(3), 225–248.
  42. Meijer, P., Korthagen, F., & Vasalos, A. (2009). Supporting presence in teacher education: The connection between the personal and professional in teaching.297–308.
  43. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994).Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  44. Moore, F. M. (2008). Professional identity and science teacher professional development.(6), 684–710.
  45. Munck, M. (2007). Science pedagogy, teacher attitudes, and student success.(2), 13–24.
  46. Newton, L. D., & Newton, D. P. (2001).London: Routledge Falmer.
  47. Nilsson, P., & Loughran, J. (2012). Exploring the development of pre-service science elementary teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge.,(7), 699–721.
  48. Nilsson, P., & van Driel, J. (2010). Teaching together and learning together—Primary science student teachers’ and their mentors’ joint teaching and learning in the primary classroom.,(6), 1309–1318.
  49. Otero, V. K., & Nathan, M. J. (2008). Preservice elementary teachers’ views of their students’ prior knowledge of science.,(4), 497–523.
  50. Patton, M. Q. 2002.&Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
  51. Pekrun, R., Frenzel, A. C., Goetz, W., & Perry, R. P. (2007). The control-value theory of achievement emotions: An integrative approach to emotions in education. In P. A. Schutz, & R. Pekrun, (Eds.).. (pp. 13–36). San Diego: Elsevier.
  52. Pipere, A., Reunamo, J., & Jones, M. (2010). Perceptions of research in education for sustainable development: An international perspective.,(2), 5–24.
  53. Pipere, A., Veisson, M., & Salīte, I. (2015). Developing research in teacher education for sustainability: UN DESC via the Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability,(2), 5–44.
  54. Poulou, M. (2007). Student–teachers’ concerns about teaching practice. European,(1), 91–110.
  55. Rodgers, C. R., & Scott, K. H. (2008). The development of the personal self and professional identity in learning to teach. In M. Cochran-Smith, S. Nemser-Freiman, (Eds.).(pp. 732–755). New York: Routledge.
  56. Schneider, R. M., & Plasman, K. (2011). Science teacher learning progressions. A review of science teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge development.(4), 530–565.
  57. Schram, A.B. (2014). A mixed method content analysis of the research literature in science education.(15), 2619–2638.
  58. Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching., 4–14.
  59. Sikka, H., & Timoštšuk, I. (2008). The role of reflection in understanding teaching practice., 7, 147–152.
  60. Zembal-Saul, C. (2008). Learning to teach elementary school science as argument.,(4), 687–719.
  61. Zembylas, M. (2007). Emotional ecology: the intersection of emotional knowledge and pedagogical content knowledge in teaching.355–367.
  62. Timoštšuk, I., & Sikka, H. (2008). Identity statements of student teachers in the initial stage of teacher training as indicators of environmental, cognitive and relationship mechanisms. In J. Mikk, M. Veisson, P. Luik (Eds.),(pp. 95–107). Peter Lang Publishers House.
  63. Timoštšuk, I. 2009. Coping of trainee-teachers in influencing pupils’ study environment. In J. Hytönen (Ed.),(pp. 75–85). Helsinki: University of Helsinki.
  64. Timoštšuk, I., & Ugaste. A. (2010). Student teachers’ professional identity.26, 1563–1570.
  65. Timoštšuk, I., & Ugaste. A. (2012). The role of emotions in student teachers’ professional identity.”(4), 421–433.
  66. Trent, J., & Gao, X. (2009). “At least I’m the type of teacher I want to be”: second-career English language teachers’ identity formation in Hong Kong secondary schools.253–270.
  67. Yoon, H.-G., Joung, Y.J., & Kim, M. (2012). The challenges of science inquiry teaching for pre-service teachers in elementary classrooms: difficulties on and under the scene.,, 589–608.
  68. Van Driel, J.H., & Berry, A. (2012). Teacher professional development focusing on pedagogical content knowledge.(1), 26–28.
  69. Van Huizen, P., Van Oers, B., & Wubbels, T. (2005). A Vygotskian perspective on teacher education.,(3), 269–290.
  70. Wallace, J., & Loughran, J. (2012). Science teacher learning. In B. J. Fraser, K. Tobin and C. J. McRobbie (Eds.),. (pp. 295–306). Springer Netherlands.
  71. Wenger, E. 1998.New York: Cambridge University Press.
  72. Science Education in Europe: National Policies, Practices and Research (2011). Eurydice. European Commission. Retrieved on April 18, 2016, from
  73. Teaching and Learning International Survey (2009). Organization for economic cooperation and Development. Retrieved on April 18, 2016, from.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/dcse-2016-0006 | Journal eISSN: 2255-7547 | Journal ISSN: 1691-6301 (formerly 2255-7547)
Language: English
Page range: 82 - 99
Published on: Jun 8, 2016
Published by: Daugavpils University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2016 Inge Timoštšuk, published by Daugavpils University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.