Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Slovenian Complementary Health Insurance Reform – Dichotomy between the Internal Market and the Social Dimension Cover

Slovenian Complementary Health Insurance Reform – Dichotomy between the Internal Market and the Social Dimension

DANUBE
Volume 6 (2015): Issue 4 (December 2015)
By:   
Open Access
|Jan 2016
References

References

  1. De Vries, S. A. (2011). BUPA; Healthy Case, in the Light of a Changing Constitutional Setting in Europe?, in de Gronden, J. W., Neergaard, U., Szyszczak, E. and Krajewski, M. (eds.).. The Hague: T.M.C. Asser Press.
    Search in Google Scholar
  2. Gracar, I. (2014).(Working Paper). Ljubljana.
    Search in Google Scholar
  3. Graells, S. A. (2011).. Oxford: Hart Publishing.
    Search in Google Scholar
  4. Health Insurance Institute of Slovenia. (2013).. Ljubljana: Health Insurance Institute of Slovenia.
    Search in Google Scholar
  5. Health Insurance Institute of Slovenia. (2015).. Ljubljana: Health Insurance Institute of Slovenia.
    Search in Google Scholar
  6. Ivanjko, Š. (2013). Zavarovalnice v krizi dobro poslujejo, ker strah zaradi negotovosti povečuje potrebo po zavarovanju..
    Search in Google Scholar
  7. Lianos, I. (2013).(CLES Working Paper Series 3/2013). London: Centre for Law, Economics and Society CLES, Faculty of Laws, UCL.
    Search in Google Scholar
  8. Mikeln, A. (2014).. Ljubljana.
    Search in Google Scholar
  9. Nikolić, B. (2015a). Definition of Slovenian Complementary Health Insurance as a Service of General Economic Interest., 13(1): 29–47.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  10. Nikolić, B. (2015b).(Working Paper). Ljubljana.
    Search in Google Scholar
  11. Nikolić, B. (2015c).(Doctoral dissertation). Ljubljana: Faculty of Law.
    Search in Google Scholar
  12. Nikolić, B. (2015d). Why the Complementary Health Insurance Providers Are Exempted from Paying the Tax on Insurance Premium Transactions., 34(35):14–16.
    Search in Google Scholar
  13. Organisatation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2013).. Paris: OECD Publishing.
    Search in Google Scholar
  14. Schieber, G. and Gottret, P. (2006).. Washington: The World Bank.
    Search in Google Scholar
  15. Semmelmann, C. (2010). The European Union’s Economic Constitution under the Lisbon Treaty: Soul-Searching Shifts the Focus to Procedure., 35(4), 516–542.
    Search in Google Scholar
  16. Tajnikar, M., Došenovič Bonča, P. et al. (2015).. Retrieved 14.7.2015 from University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Economics Web site:.
    Search in Google Scholar
  17. Wagstaff, A. (2001).(Policy Research Working Paper). Washington: World Bank.
    Search in Google Scholar
  18. World Health Organization (WHO). (2000).. Geneva: WHO.
    Search in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/danb-2015-0013 | Journal eISSN: 1804-8285 | Journal ISSN: 1804-6746 (formerly 1804-8285)
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 205 - 216
Published on: Jan 6, 2016
Published by: European Research University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Keywords:
Complementary Health Insurance,
Internal Market,
Social Dimension,
Earmarked Taxation
Related subjects:
Business and economics,
Political economics,
Macroeconomics,
Economic policy,
Law,
European law,
European law, other,
Law, other

© 2016 Bruno Nikolić, published by European Research University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Volume 6 (2015): Issue 4 (December 2015)
Next article