Uniquely Creative: Developing a New Outline for Positive Outcomes

Kaufman, James C.

doi:10.1515/ctra-2018-0018

Abstract

There were four broad takeaways from the commentaries by the distinguished contributors. First, there was a caution on focusing too much on the positive outcomes. Second, there were several important considerations noted that can enrich the discussion. Third, people made a strong case for revisiting old outcomes with new methods and theories. Finally, there were suggestions for “new” positive outcomes that creativity may predict. I build on these and my own thoughts to offer an outline to cover a (hopefully expandable) list of potential outcomes. I end with a call for open commentaries to be considered for a future special section in this journal.

References

Bacon, S. F. (2005). Positive psychology's two cultures. Review of General Psychology, 9, 181-192.10.1037/1089-2680.9.2.181
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Barbot, B. (2018). “Generic” creativity as a predictor or outcome of identity development? Creativity: Theories-Research-Applications, 5, 159-164.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Beghetto, R. A. (2014). Creative mortification: An initial exploration. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 8, 266-276.10.1037/a0036618
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Beghetto, R. A., & Karwowski, M (2018). Educational consequences of creativity: A creative learning perspective. Creativity: Theories-Research-Applications, 5, 146-154.10.1515/ctra-2018-0011
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Beghetto, R. A., Kaufman, J. C., & Baer, J. (2014). Teaching for creativity in the common core classroom. New York: Teachers College Press
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Cropley, D. H., Kaufman, J. C., & Cropley, A. J. (2008). Malevolent creativity: A functional model of creativity in terrorism and crime. Creativity Research Journal, 20, 105-115.10.1080/10400410802059424
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
De Petrillo, L., & Winner, E. (2005). Does art improve mood? A test of a key assumption underlying art therapy. Art Therapy: Journal of the American Art Therapy Association, 22, 205-212.10.1080/07421656.2005.10129521
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Duckworth, A. (2016). Grit: The power of passion and perseverance. New York: Scribner.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Forgeard, M. (2018). Creativity for mental health: Seeking new answers to an old question. Creativity: Theories-Research-Applications, 5, 165-169.10.1515/ctra-2018-0014
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Forgeard, M. J. C. (2013). Perceiving benefits after adversity: The relationship between self-reported posttraumatic growth and creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 7, 245–264.10.1037/a0031223
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Forgeard, M. J. C., & Kaufman, J. C. (2016). Who cares about imagination, creativity, and innovation, and why? A review. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 10, 250-269.10.1037/aca0000042
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Glăveanu, V. P. (2018). Creativity in and for society. Creativity: Theories-Research-Applications, 5, 155-158.10.1515/ctra-2018-0012
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Groyecka, A. (2018). Will becoming more creative make us more tolerant? Creativity: Theories-Research-Applications, 5, 170-176.10.1515/ctra-2018-0015
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Ivcevic, Z., & Kaufman, J. C. (2013). The can and cannot do attitude: How self estimates of ability vary across ethnic and socioeconomic groups. Learning and Individual Differences, 27, 144-148.10.1016/j.lindif.2013.07.011
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Jauk, E., & Sordia, N. (2018). On risks and side effects: Does creative accomplishment make us narcissistic? Creativity: Theories-Research-Applications, 5, 182-187.10.1515/ctra-2018-0017
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kaufman, J. C. (2001). The Sylvia Plath effect: Mental illness in eminent creative writers. Journal of Creative Behavior, 35, 37-50.10.1002/j.2162-6057.2001.tb01220.x
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kaufman, J. C. (2005). Non-biased assessment: A supplemental approach. In C. L. Frisby & C. R. Reynolds (Eds.), Children’s handbook of multicultural school psychology (pp. 824-840). New York: Wiley.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kaufman, J. C. (2006). Self-reported differences in creativity by gender and ethnicity. Journal of Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20, 1065-1082.10.1002/acp.1255
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kaufman, J. C. (2010). Using creativity to reduce ethnic bias in college admissions. Review of General Psychology, 14, 189-203.10.1037/a0020133
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kaufman, J. C. (Ed.) (2014). Creativity and mental illness. New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139128902
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kaufman, J. C. (2018a). Creativity’s need for relevance in research and real life: Let’s set a new agenda for positive outcomes. Creativity: Theories-Research-Applications, 5, 124-137.10.1515/ctra-2018-0008
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kaufman, J. C. (2018b). Finding meaning with creativity in the past, present, and future. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 13, 734-749.10.1177/1745691618771981
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kaufman, J. C. (2018c). What creativity can be, and what creativity can do. In R. J. Sternberg & J. C. Kaufman (Eds.), Nature of human creativity (pp. 125-133). New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781108185936.011
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kaufman, J. C., Baer, J., & Gentile, C. A. (2004). Differences in gender and ethnicity as measured by ratings of three writing tasks, Journal of Creative Behavior, 38, 56-69.10.1002/j.2162-6057.2004.tb01231.x
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kaufman, J. C., & Beghetto, R. A. (2009). Beyond big and little: The Four C Model of Creativity. Review of General Psychology, 13, 1-12.10.1037/a0013688
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kaufman, J. C., & Beghetto, R. A. (2013). In praise of Clark Kent: Creative metacognition and the importance of teaching kids when (not) to be creative. Roeper Review, 35, 155-165.10.1080/02783193.2013.799413
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kaufman, J. C., Glăveanu, V., & Baer, J. (Eds.) (2017). Cambridge handbook of creativity across domains. New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781316274385
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Luria, S. R., O’Brien, R. L., & Kaufman, J. C. (2016). Creativity in gifted identification: Increasing accuracy and diversity. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1377, 44-52.10.1111/nyas.13136
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Martela, F., & Steger, M. F. (2016). The three meanings of meaning in life: Distinguishing coherence, purpose, and significance. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 1-15.10.1080/17439760.2015.1137623
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Pennebaker, J. W. (1997). Writing about emotional experiences as a therapeutic process. Psychological Science, 8, 162–166.10.1111/j.1467-9280.1997.tb00403.x
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Reiter-Palmon, R. (2018). Are the outcomes of creativity always positive? Creativity: Theories-Research-Applications, 5, 177-181.10.1515/ctra-2018-0016
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Simonton, D. K. (2018). Creative genius as inherently relevant and beneficial: The view from Mount Olympus. Creativity: Theories-Research-Applications, 5, 138-141.10.1515/ctra-2018-0009
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Simonton, D. K. (2009). Genius 101. New York: Springer.10.1891/9780826106285
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Sternberg, R. J. (2018). Yes, creativity can predict academic success. Creativity: Theories-Research-Applications, 5, 142-145.10.1515/ctra-2018-0010
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Sternberg, R. J. (2010). College admissions for the 21st century. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.10.4159/9780674058590
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Sternberg, R. J., Bonney, C. R., Gabora, L., & Merrifield, M. (2012). WICS: A model for college and university admissions. Educational Psychologist, 47, 30-41.10.1080/00461520.2011.638882
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Sternberg, R. J., Kaufman, J. C., & Pretz, J. E. (2001). The propulsion model of creative contributions applied to the arts and letters. Journal of Creative Behavior, 35, 75-101.10.1002/j.2162-6057.2001.tb01223.x
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Sternberg, R. J., Kaufman, J. C., & Roberts, A. M. (in press). The relation of creativity to intelligence and wisdom. In J.C. Kaufman & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of creativity (2^nd Ed). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Waterman, A. S. (2013). The humanistic psychology–positive psychology divide: Contrasts in philosophical foundations. American Psychologist, 68, 124-133.10.1037/a0032168
Search in Google Scholar Back to article

Uniquely Creative: Developing a New Outline for Positive Outcomes

Abstract

Paradigm

My account