Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The Social “Cost” of Working in Groups and Impact on Values and Creativity Cover

The Social “Cost” of Working in Groups and Impact on Values and Creativity

Open Access
|Dec 2016

References

  1. Albert, R. S. (1975). Toward a behavioral definition of genius. American Psychologist, 30, 140-151.10.1037/h0076861
  2. Anderson, N. H. (1980). Information integration theory in developmental psychology. In F. Wilkening, J. Beden, & T. Trabasso (Eds.), Information integration by children (pp. 1-45). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
  3. Bruner, J. (1962). The conditions of creativity. In J. Bruner (Ed.), On knowing: Essays for the left hand, (pp. 17-30). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  4. Cohen, J., & Cohen, P. (1975). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  5. Costa, P. T. Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Four ways five factors are basic. Personality and Individual Differences, 13, 653-665.10.1016/0191-8869(92)90236-I
  6. Dennis, A., & Gallupe, R. B (1993). A history of group support system empirical research: Lessons learned and future directions. In L. M. Jessup & J. S Valacich (Eds.), Group support systems: New perspectives (pp. 59-77). New York: MacMillan.
  7. Diehl, M., & Stroebe, W. (1987). Productivity loss in brainstorming groups. Toward the solution of a riddle. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 497-509.10.1037/0022-3514.53.3.497
  8. Dollinger, S., Burke, P A., & Gump, N. W. (2007). Creativity and values. Creativity Research Journal, 19, 91-103.10.1080/10400410701395028
  9. Goncalo, J. A., & Duguid, M. M. (2012). Follow the crowd in a new direction: When conformity pressure facilitates group creativity (and when it does not). Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 118, 14-23.10.1016/j.obhdp.2011.12.004
  10. Guilford, J. P. (1967). The nature of human intelligence. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  11. Guilford, J. P. (1968). Creativity, intelligence and their educational implications. San Diego, CA: EDITS/Knapp.
  12. Hocevar, D. (1979). Ideational fluency as a confounding factor in the measurement of originality. Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 191-196.10.1037/0022-0663.71.2.191
  13. Karau, S. J., & Williams, K. D. (1993). Social loafing: A meta-analytic review and theoretical integration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 681-706.10.1037/0022-3514.65.4.681
  14. Kasof, J., Chen, C., Himsel, A., & Greenberger, E. (2007). Values and creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 19, 105-122.10.1080/10400410701397164
  15. Larey, T. S., & Paulus, P. B. (1999). Group preference and convergent tendencies in small groups: A content analysis of group brainstorming performance. Creativity Research Journal, 12, 175-184.10.1207/s15326934crj1203_2
  16. McGrath, J. E. (1984). Groups: Interaction and performance. New York, NY: Prentice Hall.
  17. Mueller, J. S., Melwani, S., & Goncalo, J. A. (2012). The bias against creativity: People people desire yet reject creative ideas. Psychological Science, 23, 13-17.10.1177/0956797611421018
  18. Nemiro, J. (2002). The creative process in virtual teams. Creativity Research Journal, 14, 69-83.10.1207/S15326934CRJ1401_6
  19. Osborn, A. F. (1957). Applied imagination: Principles and procedures of creative problem-solving. New York, NY: Charles Scribner’s Sons.
  20. Parnes, S. J., & Meadow, A. (1959). Effects of “brainstorming” instructions on creative problem solving by trained and untrained subjects. Journal of Educational Psychology, 50, 171-176.10.1037/h0047223
  21. Paulus, P. B., & Dzindolet, M. T. (1993). Social influence processes in group brainstorming. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 575-586.10.1037/0022-3514.64.4.575
  22. Plucker, J. A., Runco, M. A. & Lim, W. (2006). Predicting ideational behavior from divergent thinking and discretionary time on task. Creativity Research Journal, 18, 55-63.10.1207/s15326934crj1801_7
  23. Rickards, T., & DeCock, C. (2012). Understanding organizational creativity: Toward a multiparadigmatic approach. In M. A. Runco (Ed.), Creativity Research Handbook (Vol. 2, pp. 1-32). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
  24. Rothenberg, A., & Hausman, C. (1976). The creativity question. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
  25. Rubenson, D. L., & Runco, M. A. (1992). The psychoeconomic approach to creativity. New Ideas in Psychology, 10, 131-147.10.1016/0732-118X(92)90021-Q
  26. Runco, M. A. (1985). Reliability and convergent validity of ideational flexibility as a function of academic achievement. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 61, 1075-1081.10.2466/pms.1985.61.3f.1075
  27. Runco, M. A. (1986a). Flexibility and originality in children’s divergent thinking. Journal of Psychology, 120, 345-352.10.1080/00223980.1986.9712632
  28. Runco, M. A. (1986b). Maximal performance on divergent thinking tests by gifted, talented, and nongifted children. Psychology in the Schools, 23, 308-315.10.1002/1520-6807(198607)23:3<;308::AID-PITS2310230313>3.0.CO;2-V
  29. Runco, M. A. (1988). Creativity research: Originality, utility, and integration. Creativity Research Journal, 1, 1-7.10.1080/10400418809534283
  30. Runco, M. A. (1991). Divergent thinking. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
  31. Runco, M. A. (1996). Personal creativity: Definition and developmental issues. New Directions for Child Development, 72, 3-30.10.1002/cd.23219967203
  32. Runco, M. A. (1999). Divergent thinking. In M. A. Runco & S. Pritzker (Eds.), Encyclopedia of creativity (pp. 577-582). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
  33. Runco, M. A. (Ed.) (2013). Divergent thinking and creative potential. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
  34. Runco, M. A., & Albert, R. S. (1985). The reliability and validity of ideational originality in the divergent thinking of academically gifted and nongifted children. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 45, 483-501.10.1177/001316448504500306
  35. Runco, M. A., & Charles, R. E. (1993). Judgments of originality and appropriateness as predictors of creativity. Personality and Individual Differences, 15, 537-546.10.1016/0191-8869(93)90337-3
  36. Runco, M. A., & Jaeger, G. (2012). The standard definition of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 24, 92-96.10.1080/10400419.2012.650092
  37. Runco, M. A., & Mraz, W. (1992). Scoring divergent thinking tests using total ideational output and a creativity index. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 52, 213-221.10.1177/001316449205200126
  38. Rushton, P., Murray, H. G., & Paunonen, S. V. (1983). Personality, research creativity, and teaching effectiveness. In R. S. Albert (Ed.), Genius and eminence (pp. 281-301). Oxford: Pergamon Press.
  39. Simonton, D. K. (2012). Taking the U.S. Patent Office criteria seriously: A quantitative three-criterion creativity definition and its implications. Creativity Research Journal, 24, 97-106.10.1080/10400419.2012.676974
  40. Sosik, J. J., Kahai, S. S., & Avolio, B. J. (1998). Transformational leadership and dimensions of creativity: Motivating idea generation in computer-mediated groups. Creativity Research Journal, 11, 111-121.10.1207/s15326934crj1102_3
  41. Sternberg, R. J. (1995). Defying the crowd: Cultivating creativity in a culture of conformity. New York: Free Press.
  42. Wallach, M. A., & Kogan, N. (1965). Modes of thinking in young children: A study of the creativity-intelligence distinction. New York: Holt, Reinhart, & Winston.
Language: English
Page range: 229 - 243
Submitted on: Mar 8, 2016
|
Accepted on: Oct 8, 2016
|
Published on: Dec 30, 2016
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2016 Mark A. Runco, Ning Hao, Selcuk Acar, Jing Yang, Mengying Tang, published by University of Białystok
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.