Have a personal or library account? Click to login

Comparison of Competing Theories about Ideation and Creativity

Creativity. Theories – Research - Applications
Volume 2 (2015): Issue 2 (November 2015)
By:
Open Access
|Nov 2015

References

  1. Abedi, J. (2002). A latent‑variable modeling approach to assessing reliability and validity of a creativity instrument. Creativity Research Journal, 14, 267-276.10.1207/S15326934CRJ1402_12
    Search in Google Scholar
  2. Akaike, H. (1974). A new look at the statistical model identification. IEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 19, 716-23.10.1109/TAC.1974.1100705
    Search in Google Scholar
  3. Baer, J. (1991). Generality of creativity across performance domains. Creativity Research Journal, 4, 23-39.10.1080/10400419109534371
    Search in Google Scholar
  4. Bentler, P.M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238-46.10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238
    Search in Google Scholar
  5. Byrne, B. M. (1998). Structural equation modeling with LISREL, PRELIS, and SIMPLIS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
    Search in Google Scholar
  6. Chand O'Neal, I., Schulz Begle, A., Runco, M. A. (2014, August). The Effects of Arts Integrated Instruction on Ideational Behavior in 4th and 5th Grade Students. Presentation at the 122nd Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, Washington, DC.10.1037/e550952014-001
    Search in Google Scholar
  7. Chen, N., Roth, R. K. & Todhunter, J. E. (in press). I can do it! The effect of belief in stable luck on employee creativity. Business Creativity and the Creative Economy.
    Search in Google Scholar
  8. Cheung, G. W. & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 233-255.10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5
    Search in Google Scholar
  9. Cropley, D. & Cropley, A. (2012). A psychological taxonomy of organizational innovation: Resolving the paradoxes. Creativity Research Journal, 24, 29-40.10.1080/10400419.2012.649234
    Search in Google Scholar
  10. DaVia Rubenstein, L., McCoach, D. & Siegle, D. (2013). Teaching for Creativity Scales: An instrument to examine teachers’ perceptions of factors that allow for the teaching of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 25, 324‑334.10.1080/10400419.2013.813807
    Search in Google Scholar
  11. Finney, S. J. & Davis, S. L. (2003, April). Examining the invariance of the achievement goal questionnaire across gender. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.
    Search in Google Scholar
  12. Guilford, J. P. (1950). Creativity. American Psychologist, 5, 444-454.10.1037/h0063487
    Search in Google Scholar
  13. Guilford, J. P. (1968). Creativity, intelligence and their educational implications. San Diego, CA: Knapp.
    Search in Google Scholar
  14. Hocevar, D. (1979a). A comparison of statistical infrequency and subjective judgment as criteria in the measurement of originality. Journal of Personality Assessment, 43, 297-299.10.1207/s15327752jpa4303_13
    Search in Google Scholar
  15. Hocevar, D. (1979b). Ideational fluency as a confounding factor in the measurement of originality. Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 191-196.10.1037/0022-0663.71.2.191
    Search in Google Scholar
  16. Hocevar, D. (1980). Intelligence, divergent thinking, and creativity. Intelligence, 4, 25-40.10.1016/0160-2896(80)90004-5
    Search in Google Scholar
  17. Holland, J. L. (1961). Creative and academic performance among talented adolescents. Journal of Educational Psychology, 53, 132-143.10.1037/h0040758
    Search in Google Scholar
  18. Hong, E., Milgram, R. M. & Gorsky, H. (1959). Original Thinking as a Predictor of Creative Performance in Young Children. Roeper Review, 18, 147-4910.1080/02783199509553720
    Search in Google Scholar
  19. Johnson, D., Runco, M. A. & Raina, M. K. (2003). Parents and teachers’ implicit theories of children’s creativity: A cross-cultural perspective. Creativity Research Journal, 14, 427-438.
    Search in Google Scholar
  20. MacCallum, R. C., Browne, M. W. & Sugawara, H. M. (1996). Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychological Methods, 1, 130-149.10.1037/1082-989X.1.2.130
    Search in Google Scholar
  21. Milgram, R. M. & Milgram, N. A. (1976). Creative thinking and creative performance in Israeli students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 68, 255-259.10.1037/0022-0663.68.3.255
    Search in Google Scholar
  22. Miller, H. B. & Sawyers, J. K. (1989). A comparison of self and teachers ratings of creativity in fifth grade children. Creative Child and Adult Quarterly, 14, 179‑185.
    Search in Google Scholar
  23. Muthén, L. K. & Muthén, B. O. (1998-2012). Mplus user’s guide (7th ed.). Los Angeles: Muthén & Muthén.
    Search in Google Scholar
  24. Noble, E. P., Runco, M. A. & Ozkaragoz, T. Z. (1993). Creativity in alcoholic and nonalcoholic families. Alcohol, 10, 317-322.10.1016/0741-8329(93)90012-D
    Search in Google Scholar
  25. Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
    Search in Google Scholar
  26. Plucker, J. A., Runco, M. A. & Woong, L. (2006). Predicting ideational behavior from divergent thinking and discretionary time on task. Creativity Research Journal, 18, 55-63.10.1207/s15326934crj1801_7
    Search in Google Scholar
  27. Rhodes, M. (1961). An analysis of creativity. Phi Delta Kappan, 42, 305-310.
    Search in Google Scholar
  28. Richards, R. (1999). Everyday creativity. In: M. A. Runco & S. R. Pritzker (Eds.), Encyclopedia of creativity(1st ed.) (pp. 683-687). San Diego: Academic Press.
    Search in Google Scholar
  29. Runco, M. A. (1985). Reliability and convergent validity of ideational flexibility as a function of academic achievement. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 61, 1075-1081.10.2466/pms.1985.61.3f.1075
    Search in Google Scholar
  30. Runco, M. A. (1987). Interrater agreement on a socially valid measure of students’ creativity. Psychological Reports, 61, 1009-1010. 10.2466/pr0.1987.61.3.1009
    Search in Google Scholar
  31. Runco, M. A. (1999). Divergent and creative thinking. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
    Search in Google Scholar
  32. Runco, M. A. (2007). Creativity. Theories and themes: Research, development, and practice. Burlington, MA: Elsevier Academic Press.
    Search in Google Scholar
  33. Runco, M. A. (2008). Commentary: Divergent thinking is not synonymous with creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 2, 93-96.10.1037/1931-3896.2.2.93
    Search in Google Scholar
  34. Runco, M. A. (2013, October). The real creativity crisis. Keynote address to the Mississippi Association for Gifted Children, Hattiesburg, MS.10.1037/e574802013-336
    Search in Google Scholar
  35. Runco, M. A. & Albert, R. S. (1985). The originality and convergent validity of ideational originality in academically gifted and nongifted children. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 45, 483-501.10.1177/001316448504500306
    Search in Google Scholar
  36. Runco, M. A. & Albert, R. S. (2005). Parents' personality and the creative potential of exceptionally gifted boys. Creativity Research Journal, 17, 355-368.10.1207/s15326934crj1704_7
    Search in Google Scholar
  37. Runco, M. A. & Charles, R. (1993). Judgments of originality and appropriateness as predictors of creativity. Personality and Individual Differences, 15, 537-546.10.1016/0191-8869(93)90337-3
    Search in Google Scholar
  38. Runco, M. A. & Jaeger, G. J. (2012). The standard definition of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 24, 92-9610.1080/10400419.2012.650092
    Search in Google Scholar
  39. Runco, M. A. & Plucker, J. A. & Lim, W. (2000-2001). Development and psychometric integrity of a measure of ideational behavior. Creativity Research Journal, 13, 393-400.10.1207/S15326934CRJ1334_16
    Search in Google Scholar
  40. Runco, M. A., Johnson, D. & Bear, P. (1993). Parents' and teachers' implicit theories of children's creativity. Child Study Journal, 23, 91-113.
    Search in Google Scholar
  41. Runco, M. A., Okuda, S. M. & Thurston, B. J. (1991). Environmental cues and divergent thinking. In M. A. Runco (Ed.), Divergent thinking (pp. 79-85). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
    Search in Google Scholar
  42. Runco, M. A., Walczyk, J. J., Acar, S., Cowger, E. L., Simundson, M. & Tripp, S. (2013). The incremental validity of a Short Form of the Ideational Behavior Scale and usefulness of distractor, contraindicative, and lie scales. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 48, 185-197.10.1002/jocb.47
    Search in Google Scholar
  43. Runco, M. & Richards, R. (1998). Eminent creativity, everyday creativity, and health. Stamford, CT: Ablex.
    Search in Google Scholar
  44. Schwartz, G. (1978). Estimating the dimension of a model. Annals of Statistics, 6, 461-464.10.1214/aos/1176344136
    Search in Google Scholar
  45. Shapiro, A. K. (1960). A contribution to a history of the placebo effect. Behavioral Science, 5, 109-135.10.1002/bs.3830050202
    Search in Google Scholar
  46. Steenkamp, J. E. M. & Baumgartner, H. (1998). Assessing measurement invariance in crossnational consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 25, 78-90.10.1086/209528
    Search in Google Scholar
  47. Torrance, E. P. (1974). The Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking: Norms - Technical manual. Bensenville, IL: Scholastic Testing Service.
    Search in Google Scholar
  48. Torrance, E. P. (1995). Why fly? Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
    Search in Google Scholar
  49. Vandenberg, R. J. & Lance, C. E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3, 4-70.10.1177/109442810031002
    Search in Google Scholar
  50. Vartanian, O., Bouak, F., Caldwell, J. L., Cheung, B., Cupchik, G., Jobidon, M. E., Lam, Q., Nakashima, A., Paul, M., Peng, H., Silvia, P. J. & Smith, I. (2014). The effects of a single night of sleep deprivation on fluency and prefrontal cortex function during divergent thinking. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 1-12.10.3389/fnhum.2014.00214
    Search in Google Scholar
  51. Wallach, M. A. (1970). Creativity. In P. H. Mussen (ed.), Manual of child psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 1211-1272). New York: Wiley.
    Search in Google Scholar
  52. Wallach, M. A. & Kogan, N. (1965). Modes of thinking in young children: A study of the creativity-intelligence distinction. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
    Search in Google Scholar
  53. Wallach, M. A. & Wing, C. (1969). The talented student. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
    Search in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ctra-2015-0018 | Journal eISSN: 2354-0036
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 145 - 164
Submitted on: Feb 16, 2015
Accepted on: Aug 11, 2015
Published on: Nov 26, 2015
Published by: University of Białystok
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year
Keywords:
Ideas,
Ideation,
Creativity,
Creativity Testing,
Creative Process,
Creative Product,
Originality,
Fluency,
Flexibility
Related subjects:
Arts,
Arts, general,
Social sciences,
Psychology,
Development psychology,
Applied psychology,
Education,
Education, other

© 2015 Ivonne Chand O’Neal, Sue Hyeon Paek, Mark A. Runco, published by University of Białystok
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 2 (2015): Issue 2 (November 2015)Next article