References
- Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context. Boulder, Co: Westview Press, Inc.
- Baer, J. (1998). The case for domain specificity of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 11, 173-177.
- Baer, J. (1999). Domains of creativity. In M. A. Runco & S. R. Pritzker (Eds.), Encyclopedia of creativity (pp. 591-596). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
- Carroll, J. B. (1993). Human cognitive abilities: A survey of factor-analytic studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Glăveanu, V. P. (2010). Paradigms in the study of creativity: Introducing the perspective of cultural psychology. New Ideas in Psychology, 28, 1, 79-93.
- Glăveanu, V. P. (2014). The psychology of creativity: A critical reading. Creativity. Theories – Research – Applications, 1, 10–32; DOI: 10.15290/ctra.2014.01.01.02.
- Guilford, J. P. (1950). Creativity. American Psychologist, 5, 444-454.
- Harrington, D. M. (1975). Effects of explicit instructions to “ be creative” on the psychological meaning of divergent thinking test scores. Journal of Personality, 43, 434-454.
- Jauk, E., Benedek, M., Dunst, B. & Neubauer, A. C. (2013). The relationship between intelligence and creativity: New support for the threshold hypothesis by means of empirical breakpoint detection. Intelligence, 41, 212-221.
- Karwowski, M. (2009). Zgłebianie kreatywnosci. Studia nad pomiarem poziomu i stylu tworczosci. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Akademii Pedagogiki Specjalnej.
- Karwowski, M. & Gralewski, J. (2013). Threshold hypothesis: Fact or artifact? Thinking Skills and Creativity, 8, 25-33.
- Kasof, J. (1995). Explaining creativity: The attributional perspective. Creativity Research Journal, 8, 311-366.
- Kim, K. H. (2005). Can only intelligent people be creative? A meta-analysis. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 16, 57–66.
- Kuhn, T. H. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
- Kuhn, T. H. (2000). The road since „ structure”. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
- Necka, E. (2001). Psychologia tworczosci. Gdansk: Gdanskie Wydawnictwo Psychologiczne.
- Nusbaum, E. C. & Silvia, P. (2011). Are intelligence and creativity really so different? Fluid intelligence, executive processes, and strategy use in divergent thinking. Intelligence, 39, 36–45.
- Plucker, J. A. (1999). Is the proof in the pudding? Reanalyzes of Torrance’s (1958 to Present) longitudinal data. Creativity Research Journal, 12, 103–114.
- Plucker, J. A. & Beghetto, R. A. (2004). Why creativity is domain general, why it looks domain specific, and why the distinction does not matter. In R. J. Sternberg, E. L. Grigorenko, & J. L. Singer (Eds.), Creativity from potential to realization (pp. 153-168). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
- Popper, K. R. (1974). The logic of scientific discovery. London: Hutchinson Publishing Group Ltd.
- Runco, M. A. (2003). Education for creative potential. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 47, 317-324.
- Runco, M. A. (2004). Everyone has creative potential. In R. J. Sternberg, E. L. Grigorenko, & J. L. Singer (Eds.), Creativity from potential to realization (pp. 21-30). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
- Sawyer, R. K. (2006). Explaining creativity. The science of human innovation. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Scott, G., Leritz, L. E. & Mumford, M. D. (2004). The effectiveness of creativity training: A quantitative review. Creativity Research Journal, 16, 361–388.
- Simonton, D. K. (1999). Genius 101. New York: Springer Publishing Company.
- Sligh, A. C., Conners, F. A., & Roskos-Ewoldsen, B. (2005). Relation of creativity to fluid and crystallized intelligence. Journal of Creative Behavior, 39, 123–136.
- Sternberg, J. R. & O`Hara, L. (1999). Creativity and intelligence. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 251-272). Cambridge, NY: Cambridge University Press.
- Weisberg, R. W. (2006). Creativity. Understanding innovation in problem solving, science, invention, and the arts. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
- Wisniewska, E. & Karwowski, M. (2007). Efektywnosc treningow tworczosci – podejscie metaanalityczne. Ruch Pedagogiczny, 3-4, 31-50.