References
- Albert, R. S. (1995). Madison Avenue Comes to Academe. Creativity Research Journal, 8, 427-429.
- Amabile, T. M. (1995). Attributions of Creativity: What Are the Consequences? Creativity Research Journal 8, 423-426.
- Amabile, T. M. (1985). Motivation and creativity: Effects of motivational orientation on creative writers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 393-399.
- Amabile, T. M., & Kramer, S. (2010). What really motivates workers. Harvard Business Review, 88, 1, 44-45.
- Barron, F. (1995). No rootless flower: An ecology of creativity. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
- Eisenberger, R., & Shanock, L. (2003). Reward, intrinsic motivation, and creativity: A case study of conceptual and methodological isolation. Creativity Research Journal, 15, 121-130.
- Glăveanu, V. P. (2014). The psychology of creativity: A critical reading. Creativity. Theories – Research – Applications, 1, 10-32; DOI: 10.15290/ctra.2014.01.01.02.
- Gruber, H. E. (1988). The evolving systems approach to creative work. Creativity Research Journal, 1, 27-51.
- Kasof, J. (1995). Explaining creativity: The attributional perspective. Creativity Research Journal, 8, 311-366.
- Kharkhurin, A. (2014). Creativity four-in-one: Four Criterion Construct of Creativity Creativity Research Journal, 26, 338–352.
- Koestler, A. (1964). The act of creation. New York: Macmillan.
- Richards, R. (1991). A new aesthetic for environmental awareness: Chaos theory, the beauty of nature, and our broader humanistic identity. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 41, 59–95.
- Richards, R. (2007). Everyday creativity and new views of human nature. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
- Rogers, C. R. (1959). Toward a theory of creativity. In H. H. Anderson (Ed.), Creativity and its cultivation (pp. 69-82). New York: Harper & Row.
- Rothenberg, A. (1999). Janusian processes. In M. A. Runco & S. Pritzker (Eds.), Encyclopedia of creativity (pp. 103-108). San Diego, CA: Academic.
- Runco, M. A. (1989). The creativity of children’s art. Child Study Journal, 19, 177-189.
- Runco, M. A. (1995). Insight for creativity, expression for impact. Creativity Research Journal, 8, 377-390.
- Runco, M. A. (1999). Misjudgment of creativity. In M. A. Runco & S. Pritzker (Eds.), Encyclopedia of creativity (pp. 235-240). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
- Runco, M. A. (2005). Self-actualization. In N. J. Salkind (Ed.). Encyclopedia of human development (pp. 1132-1133). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
- Runco, M. A. (2010). Creative thinking may be simultaneous as well as blind [Comment on Creative thought as blind-variation and selective retention: Combinatorial models of exceptional creativity by Dean Keith Simonton] Physics of Life Reviews, 7, 184-185.
- Runco, M. A. (2010). Products depend on creative potential: A comment on the productivist industrial model of knowledge production. Gifted and Talented International, 25, 81-87.
- Runco, M. A., & Jaeger, G. (2012). The standard definition of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 24, 92-96.
- Runco, M. A., McCarthy, K. A., & Svensen, E. (1994). Judgments of the creativity of artwork from students and professional artists. Journal of Psychology, 128, 23-31.
- Runco, M. A., & Smith, W. R. (1992). Interpersonal and intrapersonal evaluations of creative ideas. Personality and Individual Differences, 13, 295-302.
- Sternberg, R. J. (1995). If You Change Your Name to Mark Twain, Will You Be Judged As Creative? Creativity Research Journal, 8, 367-370.
- Simonton, D. K. (2012). Taking the U.S. Patent Office Criteria Seriously: A Quantitative Three-Criterion Creativity Definition and Its Implications. Creativity Research Journal, 24, 97-106.
- Wallach, M. A., & Wing, C. W. Jr. (1969). The Talent Student: A Validation of the Creativity Intelligence Distinction. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.