Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Mining Landforms: An Integrated Approach for Assessing the Geotourism and Geoeducational Potential Cover

Mining Landforms: An Integrated Approach for Assessing the Geotourism and Geoeducational Potential

Open Access
|Aug 2018

References

  1. Baczyńska, E., Lorenc, M. W., & Kaźmierczak, U. (2017). The Landscape Attractiveness of Abandoned Quarries. Geoheritage, 1–15. DOI: 10.1007/s12371-017-0231-6.10.1007/s12371-017-0231-6
  2. Barba, F. J., Remondo, J., & Rivas, V. (1997). Propuesta de un procedimiento para armonizar la valoración de elementos del patrimonio geológico (Proposal of a procedure to harmonize the valuation of geological heritage elements). Zubia, 15, 11–20. DOI: 10.1007/s12371-017-0231-6.10.1007/s12371-017-0231-6
  3. Beranová, L., Balej, M., & Raška, P. (2017). Assessing the geotourism potential of abandoned quarries with multitemporal data (České Středohoří Mts., Czechia). GeoScape, 11(2), 93–111.10.1515/geosc-2017-0008
  4. Brilha, J. (2014). Mining and Geoconservation. In G. Tiess G., T. Majumder, & P. Cameron (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Mineral and Energy Policy. Berlin: Springer.
  5. Brilha, J. (2016). Inventory and Quantitative Assessment of Geosites and Geodiversity Sites: a Review. Geoheritage, 8(2), 119–134. DOI: 10.1007/s12371-014-0139-3.10.1007/s12371-014-0139-3
  6. Brilha, J. (2017). Geoheritage: Inventories and Evaluation. In E. Reynard & J. Brilha (Eds.), Geoheritage: Assessment, Protection and Management (pp. 69-85). Amsterdam/Oxford/Cambridge: Elsevier
  7. Brilha, J., Andrade, C., Azerêdo, A. C., Barriga, F. J. A. S., Cachão, M., Cunha, P. P., & Granja, M. H. (2005). Definition of the Portuguese frameworks with international relevance as an input for the European geological heritage characterisation. Episodes, 28(3), 177–186.10.18814/epiiugs/2005/v28i3/004
  8. Bruschi, V. M., Cendrero, A., & Albertos, J. A. C. (2011). A statistical approach to the validation and optimisation of geoheritage assessment procedures. Geoheritage, 3(3), 131–149. DOI: 10.1007/s12371-011-0038-9.10.1007/s12371-011-0038-9
  9. Cendrero, A., & Bruschi, V. M. (2005). Geosite Evaluation; Can we measure intangible values? Il Quaternario - Italian Journal of Quaternary Sciences, 18(1), 293-306.
  10. Cílek, V. (2002). Geodiverzita - opomíjený aspekt ochrany přírody a krajiny (Geodiversity – neglected aspect of landscape and nature conservation). Zprávy o geologických výzkumech v roce 2001, 13–15.
  11. Cleal, C. J. (2007). Geoconservation – what on Earth are we doing? In B. Hlad & U. Herlec (Eds.), Regional Conference on Geoconservation: Geological heritage in the South-European Europe (p. 25). Book of abstracts.
  12. Comanescu, L., & Dobre, R. (2009). Inventorying evaluating and tourism valuating the geomorphosites from the central sector of the Cealhau National park. GeoJournal of Tourism and Geosites, 1(3), 86–96.
  13. Copper Coast geopark. (2017). Mining heritage. Retrieved October 26, 2017, from https://coppercoastgeopark.com/mining-heritage/.
  14. Coratza, P., & Giusti, C. (2005). Methodological proposal for the assessment of the scientific quality of geomorphosites. Il Quaternario - Italian Journal of Quaternary Sciences, 18(1), 305–313.
  15. Czech Geological Survey. (2017). Database of significant geological localities of the Czech Republic. Retrieved October 26, 2017, from http://lokality.geology.cz.
  16. Dávid, L. (2008). Quarrying: an anthropogenic geomorphological approach. Acta Montanistica Slovaca, 13, 66–74.
  17. Demek, J., Havlíček, M., Kirchner, K., Nehyba, S., & Lisá, L. (2005). K rozšíření poznatků o kvartérních sedimentech na Červeném kopci v Brně (Distribution of Quaternary sediments on the Červený kopec (Red Hill) in Brno). In Geomorfologický sborník (pp. 159–163). České Budějovice: University of South Bohemia.
  18. Dingwall, P. (2005). Geological world heritage: a global framework. A Contribution to the Global Theme Study of World Heritage Natural Sites. IUCN, WCPA, UNESCO.
  19. Dixon, G. (1996). Geoconservation: An International Review and Strategy for Tasmania. Parks and Wildlife Service, Occasional Paper No. 35. Tasmania: Parks and Wildlife Service, Department of Environment and Land Management.
  20. Dowling, R. (2013). Global Geotourism – an Emerging Form of Sustainable Tourism. Czech Journal of Tourism, 2(2), 59–79. DOI: 10.2478/cjot-2013-0004.10.2478/cjot-2013-0004
  21. Dowling, R., & Newsome, D. (Eds.). (2010). Geotourism. The tourism of Geology and Landscape. Oxford: Goodfellow Publishers Ltd.
  22. Erhartič, B. (2010). Geomorphosite assessment. Acta geographica Slovenica, 50(2), 295–319. DOI: 10.3986/AGS50206.10.3986/AGS50206
  23. Evans, B. G., Cleal, C. J., & Thomas, B. A. (2017). Geotourism in an Industrial Setting: the South Wales Coalfield Geoheritage Network. Geoheritage, 10(1), 93–107. DOI: 10.1007/s12371-017-0226-3.10.1007/s12371-017-0226-3
  24. Fassoulas, C., Mouriki, D., Dimitriou-Nikolakis, P., & Iliopoulos, G. (2012). Quantitative assessment of geotopes as an effective tool for geoheritage management. Geoheritage, 4(3), 177–193. DOI: 10.1007/s12371-010-0012-y.10.1007/s12371-010-0012-y
  25. Fuertes-Gutiérrez, I., & Fernández-Martínez, E. (2010). Geosites inventory in the Leon Province (Northwestern Spain): a tool to introduce geoheritage into regional environmental management. Geoheritage, 2(1–2), 57–75.10.1007/s12371-010-0012-y
  26. Fuertes-Gutiérrez, I., & Fernández-Martínez, E. (2012). Mapping Geosites for Geoheritage Management: A Methodological Proposal for the Regional Park of Picos de Europa (León, Spain). Environmental management, 50(5), 789–806. DOI: 10.1007/s00267-012-9915-5.10.1007/s00267-012-9915-5
  27. García-Cortés, A., & Carcavilla Urquí, L. (Eds.). (2013). Documento metodológico para la elaboración del inventario español de lugares de interés geológico (IELIG), version 18-07-2013 (Document for the elaboration of the Spanish inventory of geosites). Madrid: Geological and Mining Institute of Spain.
  28. GeoLoci geopark. (2017). Hornictví a montanistika (Mining and montanistics). Retrieved October 26, 2017, from https://geoloci.webnode.cz/geotopy-a-lokality/hornictvi/.
  29. Gilíková, H. et al. (2010). Vysvětlivky k základní geologické mapě České republiky 1:25 000, 24-413 Mokrá-Horákov (Explanatory notes to the basic geological map of the Czech Republic 1:25 000, 24-413 Mokrá-Horákov). Prague: Czech geological Survey.
  30. Gray, M. (2013). Geodiversity: Valuing and Conserving Abiotic Nature. Second Edition. Chichester: Wiley Blackwell.
  31. Goudie, A. (2006). The Human Impact on the Natural Environment. Sixth Edition. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
  32. Hooke, R. L. (2000). On the history of humans as geomorphic agents. Geology, 28(9), 843–846. DOI: 10.1130/0091-7613(2000)28<;843:OTHOHA>2.0.CO;2.10.1130/0091-7613(2000)28<;843:OTHOHA>2.0.CO;2
  33. Hose, T. A. (2012). 3G’s for Modern Geotourism. Geoheritage, 4(1–2), 7–24. DOI: 10.1007/s12371-011-0052-y.10.1007/s12371-011-0052-y
  34. Hose, T. A. (2017). The English Peak District (as a potential geopark): mining geoheritage and historical geotourism. Acta Geoturistica, 8(2), 32–49.10.1515/agta-2017-0004
  35. Ilies, D. C., & Josan, N. (2007). Preliminary contribution to the investigation of the geosites from Apuseni Mountains (Romania). Revista de geomorfologie, 9, 53–59.
  36. Jacková, K., & Romportl, D. (2008). The relationship between geodiversity and habitat richness in Šumava National Park and Krivoklástsko PLA (Czech Republic): a quantitative analysis approach. Journal of Landscape Ecology, 1(1), 24–38.10.2478/v10285-012-0003-6
  37. JNCC (Joint Nature Conservation Committee). (1977). Guidelines for selection of Earth Science SSSIs. Retrieved October 26, 2017, from http://jncc.defra.gov.uk/page-2317.
  38. Kirchner, K. et al. (2017). Local geoheritage: its importance and potential for geotourist and recreational activities (a case study from Lomnicko area). In J. Fialová & D. Pernicová (Eds.), Public recreation and landscape protection – with nature hand in hand? (pp. 202–211). Brno: Mendel University in Brno.
  39. Kirchner, K., & Smolová, I. (2010). Základy antropogenní geomorfologie (Fundamentals of anthropogenic geomorphology). Olomouc: Palacký University.
  40. Kubalíková, L. (2013). Geomorphosite assessment for geotourism purposes. Czech Journal of Tourism, 2(2), 80-104. DOI: 10.2478/cjot-2013-0005.10.2478/cjot-2013-0005
  41. Kubalíková, L., & Kirchner, K. (2016). Geosite and Geomorphosite Assesment as a Tool for Geoconservation and Geotourism Purposes: a Case study from Vizovická vrchovina Highland (Eastern Part of the Czech Republic). Geoheritage, 8(8), 5–14. DOI: 10.1007/s12371-015-0143-2.10.1007/s12371-015-0143-2
  42. Kubalíková, L., Kirchner, K., & Bajer, A. (2017). Secondary geodiversity and its potential for urban geotourism: a case study from Brno city, Czech Republic. Quaestions Geographicae, 36(3), 63-73.10.1515/quageo-2017-0024
  43. Kubalíková, L., & Bajer, A. (2018). Geotourism within urban areas: new ways of promotion of natural and cultural heritage (case study from Brno city) In L. Lněnička (Ed.), Conference proceedings from Central-European geographical conference (in prep.). Brno: Masaryk University.
  44. Lóczy, D. (2010). Anthropogenic Geomorphology in Environmental Management. In J. Szabó, L. Dávid, & D. Loszy (Eds.), Anthropogenic Geomorphology. A Guide to Man-Made Landforms (pp 25–38). Dordrecht/Heidelberg/London/New York: Springer.
  45. London Geodiversity Partnership. (2014). London Geodiversity Action Plan 2014-2018. London: Capita Symonds with assistance from the London Geodiversity Partnership and Natural England. Retrieved November 17, 2017, from http://www.londongeopartnership.org.uk/downloads/LGAP%202014-2018.pdf.
  46. López-García, J. A., Oyarzun, R., Andrés, S. L., & Martínez, J. I. M. (2011). Scientific, Educational, and Environmental Considerations Regarding Mine Sites and Geoheritage: A Perspective from SE Spain. Geoheritage, 3(4), 267-275.10.1007/s12371-011-0040-2
  47. Mata-Perelló, J., Carrión, P., Molina, J., & Villas-Boas, R. (2017). Geomining Heritage as a Tool to Promote the Social Development of Rural Communities. In E. Reynard & J. Brilha (Eds.), Geoheritage: Assessment, Protection and Management (pp. 167–177). Amsterdam/Oxford/Cambridge: Elsevier
  48. Migoń, P. (2012). Geomorfologia (Geomorphology). Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, 461 p.
  49. Müller, P., & Novák, Z. (2000). Geologie Brna a okolí (Geology of Brno and its surroundings). Prague: Czech geological institute.
  50. Osborne, R. A. L. (2000). Presidential Address for 1999-2000. Geodiversity: „green“ geology in action. Proc. Linn. Soc. NSW, 122, 149–173.
  51. Palacio-Prieto, J. L. (2015). Geoheritage Within Cities: Urban Geosites in Mexico City. Geoheritage, 7(4), 365–373. DOI: 10.1007/s12371-014-0136-6.10.1007/s12371-014-0136-6
  52. Panizza, M. (2001). Geomorphosites: concepts, methods and example of geomorphological survey. Chinese Science Bulletin, 46, 4–6. DOI: 10.1007/BF03187227.10.1007/BF03187227
  53. Panizza, M., & Piacente, S. (1993). Geomorphological assets evaluation. Zeitschrift fur geomorfologie, Supp. Band, 87, 13–18.
  54. Panizza, M., & Piacente, S. (2005). Geomorphosites: a bridge betwenn scientific research, cultural integration and artistic suggestion. Il Quaternario – Italian Journal of Quaternary Sciences, 18(1), 3–10.
  55. Panizza, M., & Piacente, S. (2008). Geomorphosites and geotourism. Rev. Geogr. Acadêmica, 2(1), 5–9.
  56. Panizza, M., & Reynard, E. (2005). Géomorphosites: définition, évaluation et cartographie (Geomorphosites: definition, assessment and cartography). Géomorphologie: relief, processus, environnement, 1(3), 177–180.
  57. Pereira, P., Pereira, D. I., & Alves, M. I. (2007). Geomorphosite assessment in Montesinho Natural Park (Portugal). Geographica Helvetica, 62(3), 159–168.10.5194/gh-62-159-2007
  58. Pereira, P., & Pereira, D. (2010). Methodological guidelines for geomorphosite assessment. Géomorphologie: relief, processus, environnement, 1(3), 215–222.10.4000/geomorphologie.7942
  59. Petersen, J. (2002). The role of roadcuts, quarries, and other artificial exposures in geomorphology education. Geomorphology, 47, 289–301. DOI: 10.1016/S0169-555X(02)00095-8.10.1016/S0169-555X(02)00095-8
  60. Pica, A., Fredi, P., & Del Monte, M. (2014). The Ernici Mountains Geoheritage (Central Apennines, Italy): Assessment of the Geosites for Geotourism Development. GeoJournal of Tourism and Geosites, 7/14(2), 193-206.
  61. Pica, A., Vergari, F., Fredi, P., & Del Monte, M. (2016). The Aeterna Urbs geomorphological heritage (Rome, Italy). Geoheritage, 8, 31-42.10.1007/s12371-015-0150-3
  62. Pica, A., Luberti, G. M., Vergari, F., Fredi, P., & Del Monte, M. (2017). Contribution for an urban geomorphoheritage assessment method: proposal from three geomorphosites in Rome (Italy). Quaestiones Geographicae, 36(3), 21–36. DOI: 10.1515/quageo-2017-0030.10.1515/quageo-2017-0030
  63. Pralong, J. P. (2005). A method for assessing tourist potential and use of geomorphological sites. Géomorphologie: relief, processus, environnement, 1(3), 189–196.10.4000/geomorphologie.350
  64. Pralong, J. P., & Reynard, E. (2005). A proposal for a classification of geomorphological sites depending on their tourist value. Il Quaternario - Italian Journal of Quaternary Sciences, 18(1), 315–321.
  65. Prosser, C. (2016). Geoconservation, Quarrying and Mining: Opportunities and Challenges Illustrated Through Working in Partnership with the Mineral Extraction Industry in England. Geoheritage, 1–12. DOI: 10.1007/s12371-016-0206-z10.1007/s12371-016-0206-z
  66. Reynard, E., Fontana, G., Kozlik, L., & Scapozza, C. (2007). A method for assessing „scientific“ and „additional values“ of geomorphosites. Geographica Helvetica, 62(3), 148–158.10.5194/gh-62-148-2007
  67. Reynard, E., Perret, A., Bussard, J., Grangier, L., & Martin, S. (2016). Integrated approach for the Inventory and Management of geomorphological Heritage at the Regional Scale. Geoheritage, 8, 43–60.10.1007/s12371-015-0153-0
  68. Reynard, E., Pica, A., & Coratza, P. (2017). Urban geomorphological heritage. An overview. Quaestiones Geographicae, 36(3), 7–20. DOI: 10.1515/quageo-2017-0022.10.1515/quageo-2017-0022
  69. Reynolds, J. (2001). Notes to accompany RIGS recording, assessment and designation and notification sheets. In Notes on the UKRIGS Conference 2001. Penirth: UKRIGS Conference. Retrieved November 17, 2017, from http://wiki.geoconservationuk.org.uk/images/8/8d/Assessinfo.pdf.
  70. Serrano-Cañadas, E., & González-Trueba, J. J. (2005). Assessment of geomorphosites in natural protected areas; the Picos de Europa National Park (Spain). Géomorphologie: relief, processus, environnement, 1(3), 197–208.10.4000/geomorphologie.364
  71. Sharples, C. (2002). Concepts and principles of geoconservation. Tasmanian Parks & Wildlife Service website, September 2002. Retrieved November 17, 2017, from http://dpipwe.tas.gov.au/Documents/geoconservation.pdf.
  72. Stefano, M., & Paolo, S. (2017). Abandoned Quarries and Geotourism: an Opportunity for the Salento Quarry District (Apulia, Southern Italy). Geoheritage, 9(4), 463–477. DOI: 10.1007/s12371-016-0201-4.10.1007/s12371-016-0201-4
  73. Suzuki, D., & Takagi, H. (2017) Evaluation of geosites for sustainable planning and management in geotourism. Geoheritage, 1–13. DOI: 10.1007/s1237-017-0225-4.10.1007/s1237-017-0225-4
  74. Szabó, J., Dávid, L., & Loczy, D. (Eds.). (2010). Anthropogenic Geomorphology. A Guide to Man-Made Landforms. Dordrecht/Heidelberg/London/New York: Springer.10.1007/978-90-481-3058-0
  75. Tůma, A. et al. (2011). Plán péče o Národní přírodní památku Červený kopec na období 2012–2021. (Care plan of National Natural Monument Červený kopec for the years 2012–2021). Nature Conservation Agency of the Czech Republic. Retrieved October 21, 2017, from http://drusop.nature.cz/ost/archiv/plany_pece/index.php?frame&ID=24299.
  76. Tuscan Mining Geopark. (2017). Tuscan Mining Geopark. Retrieved February 26, 2017, from https://www.coopcollinemetallifere.it/en/parco-colline-metallifere.
  77. UNESCO. (1972). Convention concerning the protection of the world cultural and natural heritage. Retrieved October 22, 2017, from: http://whc.unesco.org/archive/convention-en.pdf.
  78. Ústřední seznam ochrany přírody (Central database of nature conservation). (2017). Retrieved October 26, 2017, from http://drusop.nature.cz/portal.
  79. Wimbledon, W. A. (2011). Geosites—a mechanism for protection, integrating national and international valuation of heritage sites. Geologia dell’Ambiente, 2, 13-25.
  80. Zelenka, J. et al. (2014). Metodiky národních geoparků (Methods for national geoparks). Chrudim/Prague: Vodní zdroje Chrudim a Ministerstvo životního prostředí (Ministry of Environment, Czech Republic).
  81. Zeman, A. (1992). New data on the Quaternary at Červený kopec hill in Brno. Scripta Geology, 22, 123–131.
  82. Zouros, N. (2007). Geomorphosite assessment and management in protected areas of Greece. Case study of the Lesvos Island - coastal geomorphosites. Geographica Helvetica, 62(3), 169–180. DOI: 10.5194/gh-62-169-2007.10.5194/gh-62-169-2007
  83. Zwoliński, Z., Hildebrandt-Radke, I., Mazurek, M., & Makohonienko, M. (2017a). Existing and proposed urban geosites values resulting from geodiversity of Poznań City. Quaestiones Geographicae, 36(3), 125–149. DOI: 10.1515/quageo-2017-0031.10.1515/quageo-2017-0031
  84. Zwoliński, Z., Najwer, A., & Giardino, M. (2017b). Methods for Assessing Geodiversity. In E. Reynard & J. Brilha (Eds.), Geoheritage: Assessment, Protection and Management (pp. 27–52). Amsterdam/Oxford/Cambridge: Elsevier10.1016/B978-0-12-809531-7.00002-2
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/cjot-2017-0007 | Journal eISSN: 1805-9767 | Journal ISSN: 1805-3580
Language: English
Page range: 131 - 154
Published on: Aug 29, 2018
Published by: Masaryk University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2018 Lucie Kubalíková, published by Masaryk University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.