Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Evaluation of the surface structure of composite restorations in light of own pilot research Cover

Evaluation of the surface structure of composite restorations in light of own pilot research

Open Access
|Sep 2016

References

  1. 1. Batko K. et al.: Characteristics of the surface layer of selected glass-ionomer cements by inverse gas chromatography in increased humidity conditions. Polimery, 51, 280, 2006.10.14314/polimery.2006.280
  2. 2. Chałas R. et al.: Assessment of dentin reaction after Biodentine application. Curr. Iss. Pharm. Med. Sci., 26, 435, 2013.10.12923/j.2084-980X/26.4/a.19
  3. 3. Chałas R. et al.: Long-term clinical performance of experimental glass-ionomer cement with the bi-functional fluid. J. Pre-Clin. Clin. Res., 9, 109, 2015.10.5604/18982395.1186489
  4. 4. Jamróz-Wilkońska L., Wilkoński W., Krupiński J.: Evaluation of surface roughness of composite materials using an Atomic Force Microscope (AFM) after polishing with different polishing systems. Mag. Stomat., 26, 144, 2014.
  5. 5. Jamróz-Wilkońska L., Wilkoński W., Krupiński J.: The spectrophotometric evaluation of surface discolourations of composite materials after polishing with different polishing systems. e-Dentico, 35, 70, 2012.
  6. 6. Li Y. et al.: Effect of filler content and size on properties of composites. J. Dent. Res., 64, 1396, 1985.10.1177/002203458506401215013001160
  7. 7. Łagan S.: Estimation of possibility of application of CIMM technique for direct composite fillings in the 1st and 2nd class cavities according to Black. Akt. Probl. Biomech., 3, 131, 2009.
  8. 8. Mystowska J., Dąbrowski J.R.: Tribological characteristics of kinematics couple: tooth-composite material for permanent dental fillings. Ekspl. i Niezawod. – Maint. and Reliabil., 12, 4, 2010.
  9. 9. Nagarajan V.S., Jahanmir S., Thompson V.P.: In vitro contact wear of dental composites. Dent. Mater., 20, 63, 2004.
  10. 10. Olek A., Klimek L., Bołtacz-Rzepkowska E.: Research methods of material engineering used in dental experimental studies. Mag. Stomat., 17, 66, 2015.
  11. 11. Ono M. et al.: Surface properties of resin composite materials relative to biofilm formation. Dent. Mater. J., 26, 613, 2007.10.4012/dmj.26.61318203458
  12. 12. Orłowski M., Tarczydło B., Chałas R.: Evaluation of marginal integrity of four bulk-fill dental composite materials: in vitro study. Sci. World J., 2015; 2015:701262. doi: 10.1155/2015/701262. Epub 2015 Mar 22.10.1155/2015/701262438568525874254
  13. 13. Turssi C.P., Rodrigues A.L. Jr., Serra M.C.: Textural characterization of finished and polished composites over time of intraoral exposure. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. B Appl. Biomater., 76, 381, 2006.
  14. 14. Watanabe T. et al. Influence of polishing duration on surface roughness of resin composites. J. Oral Sci., 47, 21, 2005.10.2334/josnusd.47.2115881225
  15. 15. Yazici A.R., Muftu A., Kugel G.: Three-dimensional surface profile analysis of different types of flowable restorative resins following different finishing protocols. J Contemp. Dent. Pract., 5, 9, 2007.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/cipms-2016-0022 | Journal eISSN: 2300-6676 | Journal ISSN: 2084-980X
Language: English
Page range: 111 - 113
Submitted on: May 10, 2016
|
Accepted on: Jun 16, 2016
|
Published on: Sep 24, 2016
Published by: Sciendo
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2016 Renata Chalas, Miroslaw Orlowski, Bozena Tarczydlo, Joanna Zubrzycka-Wrobel, Karol Maj, Ilona Wojcik-Checinska, published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.