Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Molecular docking and dynamics simulations of bioactive terpenes from Catharanthus roseus essential oil targeting breast cancer Cover

Molecular docking and dynamics simulations of bioactive terpenes from Catharanthus roseus essential oil targeting breast cancer

Open Access
|Jun 2025

Figures & Tables

Figure 1

GC-MS chromatogram of Catharanthus roseus EO.
GC-MS chromatogram of Catharanthus roseus EO.

Figure 2

2D interaction of terpenes with surrounding amino acids of estrogen receptor: (a) ER-gamma-terpinene, (b) ER-terpinen-4-ol, (c) ER-terpinolene, (d) ER-limonene, (e) ER-2-carene, and (f) ER-incensole acetate.
2D interaction of terpenes with surrounding amino acids of estrogen receptor: (a) ER-gamma-terpinene, (b) ER-terpinen-4-ol, (c) ER-terpinolene, (d) ER-limonene, (e) ER-2-carene, and (f) ER-incensole acetate.

Figure 3

2D interaction of terpenes with surrounding amino acids of progesterone receptor: (a) PR-gamma-terpinene, (b) PR-terpinen-4-ol, (c) PR-terpinolene, (d) PR-limonene, (e) PR-2-carene, and (f) PR-incensole acetate.
2D interaction of terpenes with surrounding amino acids of progesterone receptor: (a) PR-gamma-terpinene, (b) PR-terpinen-4-ol, (c) PR-terpinolene, (d) PR-limonene, (e) PR-2-carene, and (f) PR-incensole acetate.

Figure 4

2D interaction of terpenes with surrounding amino acids of HER2 receptor: (a) HER2-gamma-terpinene, (b) HER2-terpinen-4-ol, (c) HER2-terpinolene, (d) HER2-limonene, (e) HER2-2-carene, and (f) HER2 - incensole acetate.
2D interaction of terpenes with surrounding amino acids of HER2 receptor: (a) HER2-gamma-terpinene, (b) HER2-terpinen-4-ol, (c) HER2-terpinolene, (d) HER2-limonene, (e) HER2-2-carene, and (f) HER2 - incensole acetate.

Figure 5

3D images of selected terpenes with interacting amino acid residues: (a) ER-gamma terpinene, (b) ER-terpinen-4-ol, (c) ER-terpinolene, (d) ER-limonene, (e) ER-2-carene, (f) ER-incensole acetate, (g) PR-gamma-terpinene, (h) PR-terpinen-4-ol, (i) PR-terpinolene, (j) PR-limonene, (k) ER-2-carene, (l) ER-incensole acetate, (m) HER2-gamma-terpinene, (n) HER2-terpinen-4-ol, (o) HER2-terpinolene, (p) HER2-limonene, (q) ER-2-carene, and (r) ER-incensole acetate.
3D images of selected terpenes with interacting amino acid residues: (a) ER-gamma terpinene, (b) ER-terpinen-4-ol, (c) ER-terpinolene, (d) ER-limonene, (e) ER-2-carene, (f) ER-incensole acetate, (g) PR-gamma-terpinene, (h) PR-terpinen-4-ol, (i) PR-terpinolene, (j) PR-limonene, (k) ER-2-carene, (l) ER-incensole acetate, (m) HER2-gamma-terpinene, (n) HER2-terpinen-4-ol, (o) HER2-terpinolene, (p) HER2-limonene, (q) ER-2-carene, and (r) ER-incensole acetate.

Figure 6

Two-dimensional LigPlot demonstration of top docked ligands interacting with amino acid residues of receptor protein:  Interaction of gamma terpinene with ER, interaction of limonene with ER, interaction of gamma terpinene with incensole acetate, interaction of gamma terpinen with HER2, and interaction of terpinen-4-ol with HER2. Red dotted lines specify the hydrophobic interactions while green residues denote the hydrogen bonds involved in the interaction.
Two-dimensional LigPlot demonstration of top docked ligands interacting with amino acid residues of receptor protein: Interaction of gamma terpinene with ER, interaction of limonene with ER, interaction of gamma terpinene with incensole acetate, interaction of gamma terpinen with HER2, and interaction of terpinen-4-ol with HER2. Red dotted lines specify the hydrophobic interactions while green residues denote the hydrogen bonds involved in the interaction.

Figure 7

The radar-like representation of the drug-likeness of the tested terpene compounds: (a) gamma terpinene, (b) terpinen-4-ol, (c) terpinolene, (d) limonene, (e) 2-carene, and (F) incensole acetate. LIPO (Lipophility): −0.5 < XLOGP3 <  +5.0. SIZE: 150 g/mol < MV < 500 g/mol. POLAR (Polarity): 20 Å2 < TPSA < 130 Å2.
The radar-like representation of the drug-likeness of the tested terpene compounds: (a) gamma terpinene, (b) terpinen-4-ol, (c) terpinolene, (d) limonene, (e) 2-carene, and (F) incensole acetate. LIPO (Lipophility): −0.5 < XLOGP3 <  +5.0. SIZE: 150 g/mol < MV < 500 g/mol. POLAR (Polarity): 20 Å2 < TPSA < 130 Å2.

Figure 8

Boiled-egg model of selected terpenes for brain penetration and absorption in the GI tract. The BBB is thought to be passively crossed by molecules in the yolk of boiled eggs.
Boiled-egg model of selected terpenes for brain penetration and absorption in the GI tract. The BBB is thought to be passively crossed by molecules in the yolk of boiled eggs.

Figure 9

RMSD plot vs time (ns): (a) RMSD of estrogen with gamma terpinene (7,461) and estrogen with limonene (22,311) and (b) RMSD of HER2 with gamma terpinene (7,461) and HER2 with terpinen-4-ol (5,325,830).
RMSD plot vs time (ns): (a) RMSD of estrogen with gamma terpinene (7,461) and estrogen with limonene (22,311) and (b) RMSD of HER2 with gamma terpinene (7,461) and HER2 with terpinen-4-ol (5,325,830).

Figure 10

(a) RMSF of ER with gamma terpinene (7,461) and ER with limonene (22,311) and (b) RMSF values of HER2 with gamma terpinene (7,461) and HER2 with terpinen-4-ol (5,325,830).
(a) RMSF of ER with gamma terpinene (7,461) and ER with limonene (22,311) and (b) RMSF values of HER2 with gamma terpinene (7,461) and HER2 with terpinen-4-ol (5,325,830).

Figure 11

Rg vs time (ns) plot: (a) ER with gamma terpinen (7,461), ER with limonene (22,311). (b) HER2 with gamma terpinen (7,461) and HER2 with terpinen-4-ol (5,325,830).
Rg vs time (ns) plot: (a) ER with gamma terpinen (7,461), ER with limonene (22,311). (b) HER2 with gamma terpinen (7,461) and HER2 with terpinen-4-ol (5,325,830).

Figure 12

PCA analysis of ER docked trajectories with gamma terpinene (a) and limonene (b). The corresponding eigen value’s total % of mean square displacements is used to calculate the logged deviations in the residue location for each direction. The steady color transition from blue to white to red indicates periodic jumps between the structural conformations derived from simulated trajectories.
PCA analysis of ER docked trajectories with gamma terpinene (a) and limonene (b). The corresponding eigen value’s total % of mean square displacements is used to calculate the logged deviations in the residue location for each direction. The steady color transition from blue to white to red indicates periodic jumps between the structural conformations derived from simulated trajectories.

Figure 13

PCA analysis of HER2 receptor docked simulated MD trajectories with gamma terpinene (a) and terpinen-4-ol (b). The corresponding value of mean square displacements is used to calculate the logged deviations in the residue location for each direction.
PCA analysis of HER2 receptor docked simulated MD trajectories with gamma terpinene (a) and terpinen-4-ol (b). The corresponding value of mean square displacements is used to calculate the logged deviations in the residue location for each direction.

Figure 14

Dynamic cross correlation for ER complexed with (a) gamma terpinene and (b) limonene. HER2 receptor complex with (c) gamma terpinene and (d) terpinen-4-ol. (Residues are numbered from 1 to 200 as in crystal structure). During 100 ns simulation interval, the crusade of residues displays dynamic positive correlation in cyan blue color and a negative correlation in cyan pink color.
Dynamic cross correlation for ER complexed with (a) gamma terpinene and (b) limonene. HER2 receptor complex with (c) gamma terpinene and (d) terpinen-4-ol. (Residues are numbered from 1 to 200 as in crystal structure). During 100 ns simulation interval, the crusade of residues displays dynamic positive correlation in cyan blue color and a negative correlation in cyan pink color.

Figure 15

(a) MTT test for cytotoxicity and (b) IC50 concentration of selected terpene compounds. P values indicated as *(0.05), **(0.001), and ***(0.0001).
(a) MTT test for cytotoxicity and (b) IC50 concentration of selected terpene compounds. P values indicated as *(0.05), **(0.001), and ***(0.0001).

ADMET properties of terpenes phytocompounds reported in C_ roseus EO

ADMET parametersGamma terpineneTerpinen-4-olTerpinoleneLimonene2-CareneIncensole acetate
Aq. solubility (mg/mol)4.332.543.413.314.514.65
BBB penetrationYesYesYesYesYesYes
Bioavailability0.550.550.550.550.550.55
VDssModerateLowModerateHighHighLow
Lipinski violation000011
Gastrointestinal (GI) absorptionLowHighLowLowLowLow
CYP3A4 inhibitorNoNoNoNoNoNo
Log S (ESOL)mg/mol4.33−2.78−3.5−3.5−2.48−3.26
Bioavailability0.550.520.550.550.550.56
CNS permeability (log PS)−2.762−2.9883−3.542−2.994−3.775−3.551
CYP1A2 inhibitorNoNoNoNoNoNo
CYP2C19 inhibitorNoNoNoNoNoNo
Total clearance (log mL/min/kg)1.3431.2471.2250.4330.5520.732
Renal OCT2 substrateNoNoNoNoNoNo

Assessment of the toxicity properties of terpenes phytocompounds reported in C_ roseus EO

Toxicity parametersGamma terpineneTerpinen-4-olTerpinoleneLimonene2-careneIncensole acetate
AMES toxicityNontoxicNontoxicNontoxicNontoxicNontoxicNontoxic
HepatotoxicityNoNoNoNoNoYes
CarcinogenNoncarcinogenNoncarcinogenNoncarcinogenNoncarcinogenNoncarcinogenNoncarcinogen
BiodegradationNot readily biodegradableNot readily biodegradableNot readily biodegradableNot readily biodegradableNot readily biodegradableNot readily biodegradable
hERG-1 inhibitorWeak inhibitorWeak inhibitorWeak inhibitorWeak inhibitorWeak inhibitorWeak inhibitor
HIAHIA+HIA+HIA+HIA+HIA+HIA+

Molecular interaction profile of breast cancer receptors with terpene hit phytocompounds identified from C_ roseus EO

ReceptorCompound Vander Waals interactionNo. of H bondsH-bond length (Å)Hydrogen bond residuesPi–Pi interactionDocking score (kcal/mol)
EstrogenGamma-terpineneTHR227, GLY 25941.722LYS 197, GLY 259, TYR 193, LEU 173PHE 229, TRP 53−6.9
1.451
2.311
1.321
Terpinen-4-olLYS 197, ARG 130, GLY 259, PHY 22911.97TYR 193TRP 53−6.3
TerpinoleneLEU 428, GLY 32122.711MET 38, LEU 391, ALA 35, GLY 390LEU 428, MET 388−6.1
2.177
LimoneneLUE 349, ARG394, ALA 35012.19ALA350, LEU391, GLY390, ARG 394MET 388, LEU 387, LEU 391−6.5
2-CareneTRP 383, ARG 394, LEU 34911.069ALA 351, TRP 383, GLU 353ALA 350, LEU 387−6.3
Incensole -acetateLEU384, MET388, PHE 404, GLY 52132.196ALA 354, MET 388, LEU 375−8.0
2.160
2.178
ProgesteroneGamma-terpineneLEU 797, TYR890, CYS 891, PHE 90521.875ASN719, PHE 895PHE 794, LEU715, MET 801−6.2
1.421
Terpinen-4-olGLU723, LEU726, ASN719, GLU 72141.919LEU726, GLY 722MET 759−6.3
TerpinoleneASN719, PHE 794, LEU 71511.8997CYS 891TYR890, LEU887, PHE 905, MET 801−6.3
LimonenePHE 778, LEU 718, ASN719, MET 80152.54ASN719, MET801, CYS891, THR894, PHE 905LEU715, PHE 905, TYR890, VAL 903−6.2
2-CareneLEU 718, THR 894LEU 715, ASN 719, TAR 894VAL 903−6.3
Incensole -acetateMET 759, LEU 887, TYR 89031.91GLY 722, GLY 724, CYS 891−4.6
2.46
2.08
HER2Gamma terpineneLEU 866, ARG 86841.849ALA730, LYS 853, GLY804, ASP 863LEU852, VAL734, LYS 753−6.8
1.613
2.088
Terpinen-4-ol41.770SER 783, MET774, LYS 753, THR 798VAL734 LYS 753−7.1
2.652
TerpinoleneTHR862, MET774, ASP 863, GLU770, SER 78331.797ALA730, LYS 753, THR798, ASP 863VAL734, LEU796, PHE 864, ALA 751−6.6
2.058
LimoneneTHR798, ASP 863, THR 86231.794ALA730, LYS 753, ASP 863ALA 751, VAL 734−6.6
1.849
2-CareneSER 783, THR798, ASP 863, LYS 75341.613LYS 753, SER 783, MET 774, ASP 613PHE 864, MET 774, LEU 785−6.6
1.770
2.435
1.7842
Incensole -acetate41.797ALA 730, LYS 753, LEU 806−3.4
1.746
2.058
Language: English
Submitted on: Nov 19, 2024
Accepted on: May 21, 2025
Published on: Jun 20, 2025
Published by: Sciendo
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2025 Iffat Nayila, Sumaira Sharif, Riaz Ullah, Amal Alotaibi, Syed Ali Raza Shah, Maira Bibi, Saima Hameed, Aasma Iqbal, published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.