References
- [1] Kříž J, Hyšplerová L, Trnková L, Lyčka A, Vybíral B, Hlúbik J, et al. Innovation in study of physical and technical measurements. Czech-polish cooperation of universities. Chem Didact Ecol Metrol. 2014;19(1-2):37-45. DOI: 10.1515/cdem-2014-0003.
- [2] Igliński B, Piechota G, Buczkowski R. Development of biomass in polish energy sector: an overview. Clean Techn Environ Policy. 2015;17(2):317-329. DOI: 10.1007/s10098-014-0820-x.
- [3] The agricultural biogas plants in Poland. Oil and Gas Institute - National Research Institute Poland. 2014. https://www.globalmethane.org/documents/Poland-Ag-Biogas-Plants-April-2014.pdf.
- [4] Lebuhn M, Munk B, Effenberger M. Agricultural biogas production in Germany - from practice to microbiology basics. Energy, Sustainability Society. 2014;4:10. DOI: 10.1186/2192-0567-4-10.
- [5] Weiland P. Biogas production: Current state and perspectives. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2009;85(4):849-860. DOI: 10.1007/s00253-009-2246-7.
- [6] Bond T, Templeton MR. History and future of domestic biogas plants in the developing world. Energy Sust Develop. 2011;15(4):347-354. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0973082611000780.
- [7] El Monayeri DS, Atta NN, El Mokadem SM, Aboulfotoh AM. Improvement of anaerobic digesters using pre-selected micro-organisms. Inter Water Technol J. 2013;3(1):45-59. http://iwtj.info/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/V3-N1-P5.pdf.
- [8] Chen YR, Hashimoto AG. Substrate utilization kinetic model for biological treatment process. Biotechnol Bioeng. 1980;22(10):2081-95. DOI: 10.1002/bit.260221008.
- [9] Ghatak MD, Mahanta P. Comparison of kinetic models for biogas production rate from saw dust. Int J Res Eng Technol. 2014;3(7):248-254. http://esatjournals.net/ijret/2014v03/i07/IJRET20140307042.pdf.
- [10] Echiegu EA. Kinetic models for anaerobic fermentation processes - A review. Amer. J. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2015;11(3):132-148. DOI: 10.3844/ajbbsp.2015.132.148.
- [11] Yu L, Wensel PC, Ma J, Chen S. Mathematical modeling in anaerobic digestion. J Bioremed Biodeg. 2013;S4(003):1-12. DOI: 10.4172/2155-6199.S4-003.
- [12] Kříž J, Hyšplerová L, Smolík M, Eminger S, Vargová A, Keder J, et al. Modelling of emissions from large biogas plants. Chem Didact Ecol Metrol. 2015;20(1-2):49-58. DOI: 10.1515/cdem-2015-0005.
- [13] Mirkouei A, Bhinge R, McCoy C, Haapala KR, Dornfeld DA. A pedagogical module framework to improve scaffolded active learning in Manufact Eng Educ. Procedia Manufacturing. 2016;5:1128-1142. DOI: 10.1016/j.promfg.2016.08.088.
- [14] Nielsen TB, Holmegaard HT. From university student to employee. Int J Innovation Sci Math Educ. 2016;24(3):14-30. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/308889074.
- [15] Smigiel E, Sonntag M. A paradox in physics education in France. Phys Educ. 2013;48(4):497. DOI: 10.1088/0031-9120/48/4/497. http://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/0031-9120/48/4/497/meta.
- [16] Korpela A, Tarhasaari T, Kettunen L, Mikkonen R, Kinnari-Korpela H. Towards deeper comprehension in higher engineering education: rethinking “in theory yes, but not in practice”. Europ J Sci Math Educ. 2015;3(4):390-407. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/282661587.