Have a personal or library account? Click to login
An Approach to Self-Configuration of M2M Services Cover

An Approach to Self-Configuration of M2M Services

Open Access
|Jun 2017

References

  1. 1. Hui, L., C. Min. Research on the Distribution System Simulation of Large Company’s Logistics under Internet of Things Based on Traveling Salesman Problem Solution. – Cybernetics and Information Technologies, Vol. 16, 2016, No 5, pp.78-97.10.1515/cait-2016-0054
  2. 2. Weyrich, M., C. Ebert. Reference Architectures for the Internet of Things. – IEEE Software, January/February 2016, pp. 112-116. https://www.computer.org/csdl/mags/so/2016/01/mso2016010112.pdf10.1109/MS.2016.20
  3. 3. Kim, J., J. Lee, J. Kim, J. Yun. M2M Service Platforms: Survey, Issues, and Enabling Technologies. – IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, Vol. 16, First Quarter 2014, No 1, pp. 61-76.10.1109/SURV.2013.100713.00203
  4. 4. Apel, S., C. Kastner, B. Garvin. Exploring Feature Interactions in the Wild: The New Feature Interaction Challenge. – In: Proc. of 5th International Workshop on Feature-Oriented Software Development, FOSD, ACM, 2013, pp.1-8.
  5. 5. Datta, S., C. Bonnet. A Lightweight Framework for Efficient M2M Device Management in OneM2M Architecture. – In: International Conference on Recent Advances in Internet of Things (RIoT’15), 2015, pp.1-6.10.1109/RIOT.2015.7104900
  6. 6. Open Mobile Alliance. Diagnostics and Monitoring Management Object. – OMA-TS-DiagMonTrapMO-V1_0-20090414-C, 2009.
  7. 7. Open Mobile Alliance. Diagnostics and Monitoring Trap Events Specifications. – OMA-TS-DiagMonTrapEvents-V1_2-20131008-A, 2013.
  8. 8. Pencheva, E., I. Atanasov. Detection of CAMEL Feature Interaction. – International Journal on Information Technology and Security, 2010, No 1, pp. 25-42.
  9. 9. Atanasov, I., E. Pencheva. CAMEL Service Interaction Detection. – International Journal on Information Technologies and Control, 2010, Issue 4, pp. 2-9.
  10. 10. Atanasov, I., E. Pencheva. A Formal Approach to Service Interaction Detection in Mobile Networks. – In: 10th WSEAS Int. Conf. on Software Engineering, Parallel and Distributed Systems (SEPADS’11), Cambridge, UK, 2011, pp. 118-123
  11. 11. Atanasov, I., E. Pencheva. Reasoning on Service Interaction in Mobile networks. – International Journal of Computers and Communications, Vol. 15, 2011, No 2, pp. 59-66.
  12. 12. 3GPP Technical Specification Group Services and System Aspects. – Policy and Charging Control Architecture, Release 13, V13.7.0, 2016.
  13. 13. Androcec, D., N. Vrcek. Ontologies for Platform as Service APIs Interoperability. – Cybernetics and Information Technologies, Vol. 16, 2026, No 4, pp. 29-44.10.1515/cait-2016-0065
  14. 14. Chen, Y., Q. Xin, S. Guan. Keynote Speech 1: Creating IoT Applications through Visual Programming and Service Orchestration. – In: 2016 IEEE Information Technology, Networking, Electronic and Automation Control Conference, Chongqing, China, 2016, pp. 1-7.
  15. 15. Im, C., C, Jeong. ISOMP: An Instant Service-Orchestration Mobile M2M Platform. – Hindawi Mobile Information System, Vol. (2016), 2016 Article ID 7263729, pp.1-16.
  16. 16. Gupta, H., S. B. Nath, S. Chakraborty, S. K. Ghosh. SDFog: A Software Defined Computing Architecture for QoS Aware Service Orchestration over Edge Devices. Cornell University Library, arXiv:1609.01190 [cs.NI].
  17. 17. Lee, N., H. Lee, W. Ryu. Considerations for Web of Object Service Architecture on IoT Environment. – International Journal of Smart Home, Vol. 9, 2015, No 1, pp. 195-202.10.14257/ijsh.2015.9.1.21
  18. 18. D’Angelo, G., S. Ferretti, V. Ghini. Simulation of the Internet of Things. Cornell University Library, arXiv:1605.04876 [cs.NI].
  19. 19. Apel, S., J. Atlee, L. Baresi, P. Zave. Feature Interactions: The next Generation. Report form Dagstuhl Seminar 14281, 2014, pp. 1-5.
  20. 20. Maternaghan, C., K. Turner. Policy Conflicts in Home Automation. – Computer Networks, Vol. 57, 2013, Issue 12, pp. 2429-2241.10.1016/j.comnet.2013.02.026
  21. 21. Dominguez, A. L. Detection of Feature Interactions in Automotive Active Safety Features. PhD Thesis, School of Computer Science, University of Waterloo, 2012.
  22. 22. Lin, Y. B., et al. EasyConnect: A Management System for IoT Devices and Its Applications for Interactive Design and Art. – IEEE Internet of Things, Vol. 2, 2015, Issue 6, pp. 551-561.10.1109/JIOT.2015.2423286
  23. 23. Pedersen, T., T. Le Guilly, A. P. Ravn, A. Skou. A Method for Model Checking Feature Interactions. – In: 10th International Joint Conference on Software Technologies (ICSOFT’15), Colmar, Alsace, France, 2015, pp. 1-10.10.5220/0005516402190228
  24. 24. Zave, P. Modularity in Distributed Feature Composition. – In: Software Requirements and Design: The Work of Michael Jackson. Good Friends Publishing, 2010, pp. 267-290.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/cait-2017-0016 | Journal eISSN: 1314-4081 | Journal ISSN: 1311-9702
Language: English
Page range: 56 - 72
Published on: Jun 26, 2017
Published by: Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Institute of Information and Communication Technologies
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2017 Evelina Pencheva, published by Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Institute of Information and Communication Technologies
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.