Duplicate Literature Detection for Cross-Library Search

Liu, Wei; Zeng, Jianxun

doi:10.1515/cait-2016-0028

Abstract

The proliferation of online digital libraries offers users a great opportunity to search their desired literatures on Web. Cross-library search applications can help users search more literature information from multiple digital libraries. Duplicate literatures detection is always a necessary step when merging the search results from multiple digital libraries due to heterogeneity and autonomy of digital libraries. To this end, this paper proposes a holistic solution which includes achieving automatic training set, holistic attribute mapping, and weight of attribute training. The experiments on real digital libraries show that the proposed solution is highly effective.

References

1. http://www.brightplanet.com/completeplanet/
Search in Google Scholar
2. Su, W., H. Wu, Y. Li et al. Understanding Query Interfaces by Statistical Parsing. - ACM Transactions on the Web (TWEB), Vol. 7, 2013, No 2, p. 8.10.1145/2460383.2460387
Search in Google Scholar
3. Dragut, E. C., W. Meng, C. T. Yu. Deep Web Query Interface Understanding and Integration. - Synthesis Lectures on Data Management, Vol. 7, 2012, No 1, pp. 1-168.10.2200/S00419ED1V01Y201205DTM026
Search in Google Scholar
4. Lu, Y, H. He, H. Zhao et al. Annotating Search Results from Web Databases. - Knowledge and Data Engineering, IEEE Transactions on, Vol. 25, 2013, No 3, pp. 514-527.10.1109/TKDE.2011.175
Search in Google Scholar
5. Palekar, V. R., M. S. Ali, R. Meghe. Deep Web Data Extraction Using Web Programming-Language Independent Approach. - Journal of Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, Vol. 3, 2012, No 2, p. 69.
Search in Google Scholar
6. Wang, Z., G. Xu, H. Li et al. A Probabilistic Approach to String Transformation. - Knowledge and Data Engineering, IEEE Transactions on, Vol. 26, 2014, No 5, pp. 1063-1075.10.1109/TKDE.2013.11
Search in Google Scholar
7. Sood, S., D. Loguinov. Probabilistic Near-Duplicate Detection Using Simhash. - In Proc of 20th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, ACM, 2011, pp. 1117-1126.10.1145/2063576.2063737
Search in Google Scholar
8. Zhao, W. L., C. W. Ngo, H. K. Tan et al. Near-Duplicate Keyframe Identification with Interest Point Matching And Pattern Learning. - Multimedia, IEEE Transactions on, Vol. 9, 2007, No 5, pp. 1037-1048.10.1109/TMM.2007.898928
Search in Google Scholar
9. Hajishirzi, H., W. Yih, A. Kolcz. Adaptive Near-Duplicate Detection via Similarity Learning. - In: Proc. of 33rd International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. ACM, 2010, pp. 419-426.10.1145/1835449.1835520
Search in Google Scholar
10. Zhao, P., J. Xin, X. Xian et al. Active Learning for Duplicate Record Identification in Deep Web. Foundations of Intelligent Systems. Berlin, Heidelberg, Springer, 2014, pp. 125-134.10.1007/978-3-642-54924-3_12
Search in Google Scholar
11. Xiao, C., W. Wang, X. Lin et al. Efficient Similarity Joins for Near-Duplicate Detection. - ACM Transactions on Database Systems (TODS), Vol. 36, 2011, No 3, p. 15.10.1145/2000824.2000825
Search in Google Scholar
12. He, B., K. C.-C. Chang. Making Holistic Schema Matching Robust: An Ensemble Approach. - KDD, 2005, pp. 429-43810.1145/1081870.1081920
Search in Google Scholar
13. Fellegi, I. P., A. B. Sunter. A Theory for Record Linkage. - Journal of the American Statistical Association, Vol. 64, December 1969, No 328, pp. 1183-1210.10.1080/01621459.1969.10501049
Search in Google Scholar
14. Newcombe, H. B., J. M. Kennedy, S. J. Axford, A. P. James. Automatic Linkage of Vital Records. - Science, Vol. 130, October 1959, No 3381, pp. 954-959.10.1126/science.130.3381.954
Search in Google Scholar
15. Jaro, M. A. Advances in Record-Linkage Methodology as Applied to Matching the 1985 Census of Tampa, Florida. - Journal of the American Statistical Association, Vol. 84, June 1989, No 406, pp. 414-420.10.1080/01621459.1989.10478785
Search in Google Scholar
16. Dempster, A., N. Laird, D. Rubin. Maximum Likelihood from Incomplete Data via the EM Algorithm. - Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Vol. B, 1977, No 39, pp. 1-38.10.1111/j.2517-6161.1977.tb01600.x
Search in Google Scholar
17. Winkler, W. E. Improved Decision Rules in the Felligi-Sunter Model of Record Linkage. Technical Report Statistical Research Report Series RR93/12, U.S. Bureau of the Census, Washington, D.C., 1993.
Search in Google Scholar
18. Cochinwala, M., V. Kurien et al. Improving Generalization with Active Learning. - Information Sciences, Vol. 137, September 2001, No 1-4, pp. 1-15.10.1016/S0020-0255(00)00070-0
Search in Google Scholar
19. Breiman, L., J. Friedman et al. Classification and Regression Trees. CRC Press, July 1984.
Search in Google Scholar
20. Hastie, T., R. Tibshirani, J. Friedman. The Elements of Statistical Learning. - Springer Verlag, August 2001.10.1007/978-0-387-21606-5
Search in Google Scholar
21. Bilenko, M., R. Mooney et al. Adaptive Name Matching in Information Integration. - IEEE Intelligent Systems, Vol. 18, 2003, No 5, pp. 16-23.10.1109/MIS.2003.1234765
Search in Google Scholar
22. Chang, K. C., B. He, C. Li, M. Patel, Z. Zhang. Structured Databases on the Web: Observations and Implications. - SIGMOD Record, Vol. 33, 2004, No 3, pp. 61-70.10.1145/1031570.1031584
Search in Google Scholar
23. Cohen, W., J. Richman. Learning to Match and Cluster Large High-Dimensional Data Sets for Data Integration. - In Proc. of 8th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 2002.10.1145/775047.775116
Search in Google Scholar
24. Mc Callum, A., B. Wellner. Conditional Models of Identity Uncertainty with Application to Noun Coreference. - In: Proc. of Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS’2004), 2004.
Search in Google Scholar
25. Xiao, C., W. Wang, X. Lin et al. Efficient Similarity Joins for Near-Duplicate Detection. - ACM Transactions on Database Systems (TODS), Vol. 36, 2011, No 3, p. 15.10.1145/2000824.2000825
Search in Google Scholar
26. Tejada, S., C. Knoblock, S. Minton. Learning Domain-Independent String Transformation Weights for High Accuracy Object Identification. - In: Proc. of 8th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 2002.10.1145/775047.775099
Search in Google Scholar
27. Rohit, A., S. Chaudhuri, V. Ganti. Eliminating Fuzzy Duplicates in Data Warehouses. - In: Proc. of 28th International Conference on Very Large Databases, 2002.
Search in Google Scholar
28. Guha, S., N. Koudas et al. Merging the Results of Approximate Match Operations. - In: Proc. of 30th International Conference on Very Large Databases, 2004, pp. 636-647.10.1016/B978-012088469-8.50057-7
Search in Google Scholar
29. Chaudhuri, S., V. Ganti, R. Motwani. Robust Identification of Fuzzy Duplicates. - In: Proc. of 21st IEEE International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE’2005), 2005, pp. 865-876.
Search in Google Scholar
30. Christen, P. A Survey of Indexing Techniques for Scalable Record Linkage and Deduplication. - IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, Vol. 24, 2012, No 9, pp. 1537-1555. 10.1109/TKDE.2011.127
Search in Google Scholar

Duplicate Literature Detection for Cross-Library Search

Abstract

Paradigm

My account